|
中文部份 王文科、王智弘(2010)。教育研究法。臺北市:五南。 方廷榕(2011)。國中學生的解題策略與推理歷程研究-以一個非例行性問題為例。未出版碩士論文。中原大學教育研究所。 李惠如(2010)。在以臆測活動為中心的教學情境下八年級學生臆測思維歷程的展現與其數學解題歷程之研究。未出版碩士論文。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所。 林志能(2011)。國小學童在不同學習情境中論證能力表現之研究。未出版碩士論文。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所。 林福來(2007)。青少年數學論證「學習與教學」理論之研究:總計畫(4/4)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫期末報告。(計畫編號:NSC94-2521-S-003-001),未出版。 林碧珍(2013)。師資培育者幫助教師協助學生學習數學的教師專業發展研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫期末報告。(計畫編號:NSC99-2511-S134-005-MY3),未出版。 林碧珍、周欣怡(2013年12月)。國小學生臆測未知結果之論證結構:以四邊形沿一對角線剪開為例。「第29屆科學教育國際研討會」發表之論文,國立彰化師範大學。 林碧珍、馮博凱(2013年12月)。國小學生反駁錯誤命題的論證結構-以速率單元為例。「第29屆科學教育國際研討會」發表之論文,國立彰化師範大學。 林碧珍、鍾雅芳(2013)。六年級學生解決數字規律性問題的數學臆測思維歷程。2013年第五屆科技與數學教育國際學術研討會暨數學教學工作坊論文集(pp.100-110),6月8-9日。國立台中教育大學數學教育學系。 吳俊德(2007)。不同推理能力學生猜測與檢驗歷程之探討。未出版碩士論文,國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所。 岳彥汝(2013)。探討高中二年級學生幾何論證的能力—以「圓形的判別」為例。未出版碩士論文。國立彰化師範大學數學研究所。 教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要數學學習領域。臺北:作者。 徐利治、王前(1989)。數學與思維。湖南:湖南教育出版社。 陳玉玫(2010)。國三學生幾何論證能力之探討。未出版碩士論文。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所。 陳佩卿(2008)。推理方式、形式、正確性對代數論證效力評估的影響:六年級、八年級及成人的比較。未出版碩士論文。國立臺北教育大學心理與諮商研究所。 陳英娥、林福來(1998)。數學臆測的思維模式。科學教育學刊,6(2),191-218。 陳英娥(2002)。教室中的數學論證之研究。教育研究資訊,10(6),111-132。 張少偉(2010)。實施以臆測為中心的教學對七年級個案學生數學論證能力影響之研究。未出版碩士論文。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所。 黃秋齡(2005)。國二生在論證表現之研究-以商高定理為例。未出版碩士論文。國立高雄師範大學數學研究所。 黃翎斐、張文華、林陳涌(2008)。不同佈題模式對學生論證表現的影響。科學教育學刊,16(4),375-393。 黃瑞琴(1991)。質的教育研究方法。臺北市:心理。彭淑芬(2013)。探索國小六年級數學學習高成就學童之臆測思維--以比與比值問題為例。未出版碩士論文。國立新竹教育大學數理教育研究所。 廖曉澐(2008)。探討8年級學生在規律問題中形成與檢驗猜想的表現與歷程。未出版碩士論文,國立彰化師範大學數學系所。 蔡忠翰(2011)。高一數理資優班與普通班學生在數列級數單元的解題歷程中所展現的臆測思維與數學素養之比較研究。未出版碩士論文。國立彰化師範大學資賦優異研究所。 蔡俊彥、黃台朱、楊錦潭(2008)。國小學童網路論證能力及科學概念學習之研究。科學教育學刊,16(2),171-192。 鍾雅芳(2012)。規律性問題下六年級學生臆測思維歷程的探討。未出版碩士論文。國立新竹教育大學數理教育研究所。 蕭淑惠(2010)。實施以臆測為中心的教學探討四年級學生臆測思維歷程與主動思考能力展現之行動研究。未出版碩士論文。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所。
西文部份 Balacheff, N. (1988). Aspects of proof in pupils’ practice of school mathematics. In D. Pimm (Ed), Mathematics, teachers and children, (pp.216-235). Stoughton: Hodder education. Boero, P. (1999). Argumentation and mathematical proof: A complex, productive, unavoidable relationship in mathematics and mathematics education. International Newsletter on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Proof, 7(8). Cañadas, M. C., Deulofeu, J., Figueiras, L., Reid, D., & Yevdokimov, A. (2007). The conjecturing process: Perspectives in theory and implications in practice. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 55–72. Cantlon, D. (1998). Kid+conjecture=mathematics power. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(2), 108-112. Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 401-429. Davis, P. J., Hersh, R., & Marchisotto, E. A.(2011). The mathematical experience. New York: Springer. Douek, N. (1999). Argumentative aspects of proving: Analysis of some undergraduate mathematics students’ performances. In O. Zaslavsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23nd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 273-288). Haifa, Israel: PME. Douek, N., & Scali, E., (2000). About argumentation and conceptualisation, Proceedings of the 24th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 249-256). Hiroshima, Japan: PME. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classroom. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. Durand-Guerrier, V., Boero, P., Douek, N., Epp,S., & Tanguay, D. (2012). Argumentation and Proof in the Mathematics Classroom, in G. Hannah and M. De Villiers (eds) Proof and proving in mathematics education, New ICMI study series, Springer, Chapter 15. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPing into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933. Forman, E. A., Larreamendy-Joerns, J., Stein, M. K., & Brown, C. A. (1998). “You’re going to want to find out which and prove it”: Collective argumentation in a mathematics classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6, 527–548. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Gold, R. L. (1958). Roles in sociological field observations. Social Forces, 36(3), 217-223. Hanna, G. (1989). More than formal proof. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(1), 20-25. Knipping, C. (2003). Argumentation structures in classroom proving situations. In M. A. Mariotti (Ed.), Proceedings of the third conference of the European society in mathematics education (unpaginated). Retrieved from http://ermeweb.free.fr/CERME3/Groups/TG4/TG4_Knipping_cerme3.pdf Knipping, C. (2004). Argumentations in proving discourses in mathematics classrooms. In G. Törner, et al. (Eds.), Developments in mathematics education in German-speaking countries. Selected papers from the annual conference on didactics of mathematics, Ludwigsburg, March 5–9, 2001 (pp. 73–84). Hildesheim: Franzbecker Verlag. Knipping, C. (2008). A method for revealing structures of argumentations in classroom proving processes. ZDM The international journal on mathematics education, 40(3), 427-447. doi: 10.1007/s11858-008-0095-y Knipping, C., & Reid, D. A., (2013). Revealing structures of argumentations in classroom proving processes. In A. Andrew & I. J. Dove (Eds.), The argument of mathematics (pp.119-146). Dordrecht: Springer. Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 229-269). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Krummheuer, G. (2007). Argumentation and participation in the primary mathematics classroom: Two episodes and related theoretical abductions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(1), 60-82. Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. New York: Cambridge University Press. Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1985). Thinking mathematically (Rev. ed.). New York: Addison Wesley. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM, 2000. National Research Council (1989). Everybody counts. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. OECD. (2013). Pisa 2015 draft collaborative problem solving framework. Retrieved Apr 28, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Collaborative%20Problem%20Solving%20Framework%20.pdf Polya, G. (1954). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Reid, D.A. (2002). Conjectures and refutations in grade 5 mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(1), 5–29. Reid, D. A., & Knipping, C. (2010). Argumentation structures. In D. A. Reid & C. Knipping (Eds.), Proof in mathematics education: Research, learning and teaching (pp. 179-192). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Simon, M. A., & Blume, G. W. (1996). Justification in the mathematics classroom: A study of prospective elementary teachers. Journal of mathematical behavior, 15(1), 3-31. Stylianides, A. J. (2007). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for research in mathematics education, 38(3), 289–321. Stylianides, A. J., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Understanding and describing mathematical knowledge for teaching: knowledge about proof for engaging students in the activity of proving. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 11:307-332. Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. U. K. Department for Education. (2013). Mathematics programmes of study: key stages 1 and 2. Retrieved May 1, 2014, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/239129/PRIMARY_national_curriculum_-_Mathematics.pdf Yackel, E. (2001). Explanation, justification, and argumentation in mathematics classrooms. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th conference for the international group of psychology of mathematics education, 1, 9–24, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Yackel, E. (2002). What we can learn from analyzing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 423-440. Yevdokimov, O. (2005). About a constructivist approach for stimulating students’ thinking to produce conjectures and their proving in active learning of geometry. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the CERME 4 international conference (469-480). Sant Feliu de Guíxols, Spain. Published online at http://ermeweb.free.fr/CERME4/ Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study as a serious research strategy. Science communication, 3(1), 97-114. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods(3rd Edition). California: Sage Publications.
|