帳號:guest(3.144.242.40)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):楊芷穎
作者(外文):Yang Chih Ying
論文名稱(中文):自然體驗活動對兒童自然連結、親環境行為與生活品質之研究
論文名稱(外文):The research to Influence of Children’s Participation in Nature Activities on Nature Connection, Pro-environmental Behavior and Quality of Life
指導教授(中文):曾慈慧
指導教授(外文):Tseng, Tzu.Hui
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立新竹教育大學
系所名稱:環境與文化資源學系碩士班
學號:10124308
出版年(民國):105
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:132
中文關鍵詞:自然體驗自然連結親環境行為生活品質
外文關鍵詞:Nature activitiesNature ConnectionPro-environmental BehaviorQuality of Life
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:768
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
中文摘要
過去許多研究探討兒童的自然連結會影響他們參加以自然為本的活動,對於環境的態度也會不同,然國內很少探討自然體驗活動對兒童自然連結、親環境行為與生活品質影響之研究,是引發本研究探討之動機。本研究以「準實驗法」進行實證研究,研究對象分為實驗組與對照組,實驗組為參加自然體驗營和鄉土營9~12歲之學童,對照組則為參加國小校內暑期安親班三~六年級之學童,共260人。有效取樣人數共193人;以「自然連結(NR)」、「兒童新生態典範(NEP-C)」及「生活品質(PedsQLTM)」量表進行測量。
本研究結果如下:
1.自然組與鄉土組參與自然體驗活動後,其自然連結、親環境行為與生活品質,整體而言比參加前顯著提高。
2.整體而言,自然組、鄉土組參與自然體驗活動後的自然連結、親環境行為與生活品質,比對照組顯著提高。
3.就親環境行為而言,鄉土組學生其生態的自我與重視自然對親環境行為具顯著預測力;在生活品質方面,自然組學童的生態的自我、環境覺知與敏感度與環境概念知識對於生活品質具顯著預測力。`
最後,根據研究發現及結果提出建議,提供學校、教育相關單位、環境教育工作者、家長以及後續研究者參考。
Abstract
According to the past literature, about the about the influence of children’s participation in nature activities will be different for the environment attitude. But in Taiwan, few studies investigate the impact of Nature Connection, Pro-environmental Behavior and Quality of Life with nature activities. Thus, it becomes our motivation of the research.
This study employed quasi-experimental method of nonequivalent pre and post-tests control group design, and participants were divided into the experimental group (nature camp and rural camp) and the comparison group. One class, as the experimental group, had a natural experience activities were 9 to 12 yrs child, while the other, Participants were 3 to 6 rd graders in elementary school the control group, experienced summer daycare. There were 260 official questionnaires distributed. After taking away the invalid questionnaires, there were 193 valid questionnaires used. Pre-tests and post-tests of "Nature Relatedness Scale", "New Ecological Paradigm Scale for Children" and "The PedsQL TM4.0 Generic Core Scales" were given to the experimental group. The collected data was analyzed through statistical methods including descriptive statistics, the paired-samples t-test, and multi factor line regression method, was further illustrated by qualitative data. The main results of the study are as follows:
1. After the nature activities, the nature camp and rural camp performed significant better than the pre-tests of "Nature Connection", "Pro-environmental Behavior" and " Quality of Life ".
2. In whole, both the nature camp and rural camp performed significant better than the control group in the post-tests of "Nature Connection", "Pro-environmental Behavior" and"Quality of Life ".
3. In "Pro-environmental Behavior ", the rural group "ecological self" and "appreciate nature" positively affect the pro-environmental behavior. In " Quality of Life ", the natural group "ecological self"、"environmental awareness and sensitivity" and "knowledge of environmental concepts" positively affect the Quality of Life.
Finally, some suggestions have been offered accordingly to schools, educational administration, environmental educators, parents and future research direction, as well as natural activities teaching lesson plan development.
目 錄
謝誌 i
中文摘要 ii
英文摘要 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究流程 2
第四節 名詞釋義 5
第五節 研究範圍與限制 6
第二章 文獻回顧 7
第一節 自然體驗與相關研究 7
第二節 自然連結與相關研究 17
第三節 親環境行為與相關研究 24
第四節 生活品質之探討 39
第五節 自然連結、親環境行為與生活品質之關係 44
第三章 研究方法 49
第一節 研究架構與設計 49
第二節 研究對象 56
第三節 實驗場域範圍 58
第四節 研究工具 61
第五節 實證研究資料處理分析 65
第四章 研究結果與分析 66
第一節 樣本與問卷描述性分析 66
第二節 信度與因素分析 76
第三節 參與自然體驗活動前後之差異性檢定 80
第四節 參與不同自然體驗活動之改變量差異性分析 84
第五節 研究變項間之相關分析 90
第六節 參與自然體驗活動後自然連結、親環境行為與生活品質之多元迴歸分析 91
第五章 結論與建議 95
第一節 結論 95
第二節 建議 100
參考文獻 104
附錄 116
附錄一 研究問卷 116
附錄二 原文量表 123
附錄三 量表使用同意書 127
附錄四 荒野自然體驗營活動時間表 131
附錄五 塭內鄉土體驗營活動時間表 132
參考文獻
壹、中文部分
王文科(1999)。教育研究法(五版)。台北:五南。
王碧君(2007)。幼兒教師實施自然體驗課程之行動研究。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系碩士論文。
方麗雲(2012)。幼兒生命教育之行動研究--以校園自然體驗活動為例。國立臺北教育大學生命教育與健康促進研究所碩士論文。
朱作仁(1994)。自然教育—教育百科辭典。台北市:五南。
江慧玲(2003)。社區老年婦女的健康狀況、家庭功能、與生活品質之相關性探討。長庚大學護理學研究所碩士論文。
沈振中(1999)。老鷹觀想錄。基隆市:基隆市野鳥學會。
李錫津(1998)。新世紀學校本位之課程實施。載於中華民國課程與教學學會主編:學校本位課程與教學創新。台北:揚智文化。
李思屏(2001)。遊客對生態旅遊之環境態度與行為關係之研究--以關渡自然公園為例。國立臺灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文。
李美珠(2008)。自然體驗方案對國中生正向情緒之影響。國立台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系在職進修碩士班論文。
李淑幸(2005)。利用自然體驗活動提升國小三年級學生欣賞自然之美的研究。國立台北師範學院自然科學教育所碩士論文。
吳岸芳(2007)。自然體驗融入幼兒生命教育之教學行動研究-以復興鄉泰雅族幼兒為例。國立臺北教育大學幼兒教育學系碩士論文。
沈麗瑛(2014)。自然體驗萌發兒童美感經驗之探究。台灣首府大學幼兒教育學研究所碩士論文。
林寶山、康春枝(譯)(1990)。學校與社會.兒童與課程(原作者:J. Dewey)。臺北市:五南出版。
林辰峰(2009)。校園自然體驗方案教學對國小四年級學童環境覺知影響之行動研究。國立臺北教育大學自然科學教育學系碩士論文。
林新沛、鄭時宜 (2002) 。環境倫理與環境政策態度相關之研究—以樹德科技大學為例。 樹德科技大學學報,4(1):51-62。
林生傳(2005)。教育社會學。台北:巨流。
林綺秋(2013)。親師生一起進行自然體驗之行動研究。國立東華大學幼兒教育學系碩士論文。
林立(2012)。冒險治療與自然體驗團體對社會退縮青少年介入影響之研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系所碩士論文。
周瑞雲(1997)。鄉土教育之實施與檢討─以台北市為例。新教育實踐─開放教育、鄉土教育、田園教學之分析,73-92。台北市:師大書苑。
周孟慈(2005)。自然旅遊環境之遊憩體驗與生心理效益之研究。國立中興大學園藝學系碩士論文。
姚開屏(2002)。健康相關生活品質概念與測量原理之簡介。台灣醫學會期刊,6(2),183-192。
胡月芬(2014)。兒童旅遊經驗對環境態度和環境行為影響之研究。國立新竹教育大學環境與文化資源學系碩士論文。
翁珮怡(2003)。環境景觀生態結構對物種、使用者自然度感受及其生心理反應影響之研究。國立中興大學園藝學系碩士論文。
徐邦寧(2007)。牽起自然體驗與特教孩子之手-特教孩子在自然體驗活動中之學習反應初探。國立台灣師範大學環境教育研究所碩士論文。
徐瑞梅(2007)。自然體驗班級活動提升國小中年級學童自尊效果之研究。國立新竹教育大學人資處輔導教學所碩士論文。
唐宜君(2014)。個人自然連結對自然景觀知覺之影響。國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學系博士論文。
陳健一(1995)。自然教育發展機制。教師天地,75,38-41。
陳俊甫(2001)。自然體驗的理念與思維─返照初心見自然。國立東華大學自然資源管理研究所碩士論文。
陳敬中(2003)。花蓮縣政府人員之環境知識、環境典範及環境行為研究。國立東華大學自然資源管理研究所碩士論文。
陳鈺雯(2011)。自然體驗融入國小視覺藝術教育:「親自然‧玩藝術」暑期輔導活動之個案研究。國立彰化師範大學藝術教育研究所碩士論文。
陳惠雅(2012)。羅東自然教育中心課程對國小高年級學生在環境教育課程目標及生態價值模式之影響。國立中興大學森林學系所碩士論文。
張子超(1995)。 環保教師對新環境典範態度分析。環境教育季刊,26,37-45。
張子超(2003)。永續發展研究融入九年一貫課程之新環境典範的內涵概念。全球變遷通訊雜誌,38:11-16。
張維國(2002)。一顆自然體驗教育的種子─從「自然寫作」與「自然教學」的對話中萌芽。國立新竹師範學院國民教育所碩士論文。
張立莉(2007)。環境藝術融入自然體驗對國小學童環境覺知的影響。臺北市立教育大學自然科學系碩士論文。
張碧凰(2009)。探討自然體驗活動對慢性精神分裂病患精神病症狀、認知功能與社區生活功能之影響。國立台北護理學院護理研究所碩士論文。
教育部(2001)。國民小學九年一貫課程第一學習階段暫行綱要。台北:教育部。
教育部國語推行委員會(2007)。教育部國語辭典簡編本(網路版)。教育部,取自http://dict.concised.moe.edu.tw/jdict/main/cover/main.htm檢索日期:2012.04
黃鳳瑛(1997)。田園課程的教學策略。新教育實踐─開放教育、鄉土教育、田園教學之分析,175-197。台北市:師大書苑。
黃玉琳(1998)。國家公園學童環境教育活動設計之研究-以陽明山國家公園為例。國立中興大學園藝研究所碩士論文。
黃文雄、黃芳銘、游森期、田玉芬、吳忠宏(2009)。新環境典範量表之驗證與應用。環境教育研究,6(2),49-76。
黃淑敏(2011)。生命教育融入幼兒自然體驗教學之行動研究。朝陽科技大學幼兒保育系碩士論文。
曾鈺琪(2014)。自然連結、美感體驗與環境敏感性發展:十位都市青少年的自然經驗之紮根理論研究。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所碩士論文。
項退結(譯)(2004)。西洋哲學辭典(原作者:Brugger,1978)。台北市:華香園。
靳知勤(1994)。從環境知識、態度與行為間的關係論環境教育目標之達成。環境教育,23,31-39。
楊冠政(1998)。環境教育。台北:明文書局。
蔡巧玲(2004)。你準備好去冒險了嗎。大專體育,71,134-139。
蔡幸紋(2012)。尋找那片綠草如茵~以學生為本的高關懷青少年自然體驗課程初探。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所碩士論文。
劉彥俊(1994)。童軍教育。台北市:水牛。
劉春媛(2000)。親環境行為習慣化的現實性分析。四川大學公共管理學院管理與社會心理學系博士論文。
劉輝(2005)。環境友好行為。黑河學刊,4,123-125.
劉賢偉、吳建平(2010)。環境關心與親環境行為及其關係的研究進展。中國環境科學學會學術年會論文集,2,187-191。
鄭世彬(2005)。自然體驗教學引導兒童自然書寫之成效探討。臺北市立教育大學環境教育所碩士論文。
盧俊宏(2002)。規律運動、心理健康和生活品質。國民體育季刊,31(1),60-73。
謝智謀、王怡婷(譯)(2003)。體驗教育:帶領內省指導手冊(原作者:Clifford E. Knapp)。臺北市:幼獅。
謝金青(2011)。社會科學研究法:論文寫作之理論與實務。新北市:威仕曼文化。

貳、外文部分
Anja, K., & Julian, A. (2002). Mind the Gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behaviour. In J. Kuhl, & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behaviour. Heidelberg: Springer, 11-39.
Ajzen, I. (1991). Theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes. 50, 179-211.
山崎英則、片上宗二 (2003)。教育用語辭典。京都:ミネルヴァ。
Burgess, J., Harrison, C. M., & Filius, P. (1998). Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environment and Planning A, 30(8), 1445-1460.
Bragg, E. A. (1996). Towards ecological self: Deep ecology meets constructionist self-theory. Journal o f Environmental Psychology, 16, 93-108.
Bogeholzy, S. (2006). Nature experience and its importance for environmental knowledge, values and action: Recent German empirical contributions.
Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L. M., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2010). A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health, 10, 456-465.
Chipeniuk, R. (1995). Childhood Foraging as a Means of Acquiring Competent Human Cognition about Biodiversity. Environment and Behavior, 27(4), 490-512.
Conn, S. (1998). Living in the earth: Ecopsychology, health and psychotherapy. The Humanistic Psychologist, 26, 179-198.
Cornell, J. (1998). Sharing the Joy of Nature: Nature Activities for All Ages. Published by Dawn Pubns.
Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature, 45-65. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cottrell, S. P. (2003). Monitoring environmental behavior among recreational boaters. The Environment Paper Series, 6(2), 32-39. Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland.
Chawla, L. (1999). Life Paths Into Effective Environmental Action, The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 15-26.
Chawla, L., & Cushing, D. F. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behavior. Environmental Education Research, 13, 437-452.
Carlson, S., & Maxa, S. (1998). Pedagogy applied to nonformal education. The Center. St. Paul: Center for Youth Development, University of Minnesota Extension Service.
Carlson, S. (2008). Environmental Field Days: Recommendations for Best Practices. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 7, 94-105.
Collado, S., & Corraliza, J. A. (2011). Children’s perceived restoration and pro¬environmental beliefs. Journal of Asian Behavioural Studies, 1, 1-12.
Cheng, C. H., & Monrone, M. C. (2012). Connection to Nature: Children's Affective Attitude Toward Nature, Environment and Behavior, 44, 31-49.
Collado, S., Staats, H., & Corraliza, J. A. (2013). Experiencing nature in children’s summer camps: Affective, cognitive and behavioural consequences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 37-44.
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm” : a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442.
De Vries, S., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2003). Natural environments e healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the rela-ionship between greenspace and health. Environment and Planning A, 35, 1717-1731.
Dutcher, D. D., Finley, J. C., Luloff, A. E., & Buttolph Johnson, J. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior, 39, 474-493.
DeVellis R. F. (1998). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. CA: Sage.
Ewert, A., G. Place & J. Sibthorp (2005). Early-Life Outdoor Experiences and an Individual’s Environmental Attitudes. Leisure Sciences, 27, 225-239.
Fietkau, H. J., & Kessel, H. (1981) Umweltlernen. Veränderungsmöglichkeiten des umweltbewusstseins: Modelle, erfahrungen. Königstein: Hain-Verlag.
Feral, C. H. (1998). The connectedness model and optimal development: Is ecopsychology the answer to emotional well-being? The Humanistic Psychologist, 26, 243-274.
Faber Taylor, A., Wiley, A., Kuo, F.E., & Sullivan, W.C. (1998). Growing up in the inner city: Green spaces as places to grow. Environment and Behavior, 30(1), 3-27.
Faber Taylor, A., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W.C. (2001). Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to green play settings. Environment and Behavior, 33(1), 54-77.
Faber Taylor, A., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W.C. (2002). Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner-city children. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 49-63.
Gigliotti, L. M. (1994). Environmental issues: Cornell students' willingness to take action. Journal of Environmental Education, 26(1), 34-42.
Hungerford, H. R., & Peyton, R. B. (1976). Teaching Environmental Education. Portland, ME: J. Weston Walch.
Hungerford, H. R., Peyton, R. B., & Wilke, R. J. (1980). Goals for Curriculum development for Environmental Education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 11(3), 42-47.
Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1989). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21.
Hartig, T., Mang, M. & Evans, G. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23, 3-26.
Hinds, J. & Sparks, P. (2008). Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 109-120.
Herzog, T. R., Black, A. M., Fountaine, K. A. & Knotts, D. J. (1997). Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 165-170.
Iozzi, L. (1984). A summary of research in environmental education, 1971-1982. Monographs in environmental education and environmental studies, 2(11). Columbus, OH: ERIC/SMEAC.
José, A. C., Silvia, C., & Lisbeth, B. (2013). Spanish Version of the New Ecological Paradigm Scale for Children. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16(27), 1-8.
Kaplan, R. (1973). Some psychological benefits of gardening. Environment and Behavior, 5(2), 145-162.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychology perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kellert, S. R. (1997). Kinship to mastery: Biophilia in human evolution and development. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Kahn, P. H. Jr. (1997). Developmental psychology and the biophilia hypothesis: Children’s affiliation with nature. Developmental Review, 17, 1-61.
Kals, E., Schumacher, D. & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity towards nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178-202.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.
Kellert, S. R. (2002). Experiencing nature: affective, cognitive and evaluative development in children. Children and Nature. The MIT Press, 117-151.
Kaltenborn, B. P. & Bjerke T., (2002). Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59, 1-11.
Kals, E., & Maes, J. (2004). Sustainable development and emotions. In P. Schmuck & W. P. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology o f sustainable development, 97-122. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Kals, E., & Müller, M. M. (2012). Emotions and environment. In D. S. Clayton (Ed.), The oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology, 128-147. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Korpela, K., Borodulin K., Neuvonen, M., Paronen, O., & Tyrväinen, L. (2013). Analyzing the mediators between nature-based outdoor recreation and emotional well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 1-7.
Lang, L. L. (1986). An Interdisciplinary Curriculum Model for Outdoor Education. Doctoral Dissertation of the North Dakota university.
Leeming, F. C., Dwyer, W. O., Porter, B. E. & Cobern, M. K. (1993). Outcome research in environmental education: a critical review. Journal of Environmental Education, 24(4), 8-21.
Leeming, F. C., Dwyer, W. O., & Bracken, B. A. (1995). Children's environmental attitude and knowledge scale: Construction and validation. Journal of Environmental Education, 26(3), 22-31.
London, P. (2003). Drawing closer to nature. Boston: Shambhala Publications.
Lohr, V. I., & Pearson-Mims, C. H. (2005). Children's active and passive interactions with plants influence their attitude and actions. Hort Technology, 15, 472-476.
Louv, R. (2005). Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder. Algonquin Books.
Leyla E., Kate E., Suril S. & James R. (2010). Using Nature and Outdoor Activity to lmprove Children’s Health. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care, 40(5), 102-117.
Larson L. R., Green G. T., & Castleberry S. B. (2011).Construction and validation of an instrument to measure environmental orientations in a diverse group of children. Environment and Behavior, 43, 72-89.
Lin, C. Y, Luh, W. M, Yang, A. L, Su, C. T, Wang, J. D, Ma, H. I. (2012). Psychometric properties and gender invariance of the Chinese version of the self-report pediatric quality of life inventory version 4.0: short form is acceptable. Qual Life Res, 21,177–182.
Maslow, A. (1959). Cognition of Being in the Peak Experiences. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 94(1), 43-66.
Moore, E. O. (1981). A Prison environment’s effect on health care service demands Journal of Environmental System, 11(1), 17-34.
Meeberg, G.A. (1993). Quality of life: Aconcept analysis. Joural of Advanced Nursing, 18, 32-38.
Millar, M.G., & Tesser, A. (1986). Effects of affective and cognitive focus on the attitude-behavior relation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 270-276.
Mayer, S. F., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503-515.
Manoli, C., Johnson, B., & Dunlap, R. E. (2007), Assessing children's environmental worldviews: Modifying and validating the new ecological paradigm scale for use with children. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(4), 3-13.
Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., De Vries, S., Spreeuwenberg, P., Schellevis, F. G., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2009). Morbidity is related to a green living environment. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 63, 967-973.
Martin, P. (2012). Why Direct Personal Contact with Nature is Naturally Beneficial[Online forum comment]. Retrieved from http://activeeducation.com.au/2012/12/12/why-direct-personal-contact-with-nature-is-naturally-beneficial/
Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep ecology movements. Inquiry, 16, 95-100.
Nebbe, L. L. (1995). Nature as a guide: nature in counseling, therapy, and education (2nd edition ed.): Educational Media Corporation.
Nisbet, E. K. L., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715-740.
Oskamp, S. (2000). Psychological Contribution to Achieving an Ecologically Sustainable Future for Humanity. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 373-390.
Poudel, D. D., Vincent, L. M., Anzalone, C., Huner, J., Wollard, D., Clement, T., DeRamus, A., & Blakewood, G. (2005). Hands-on activities and challenge tests in agricultural and environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 36(4), 10-22.
Rutherford, K. M. (1995). Mobiziling the healing emotions: Nature experience in theory and practice. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 33(4), 146-156.
Simmons, D. A., & Young, C. (1993). Perceived resource needs for providing nature experience. Environmental Education and Information, 12(2), 95-105.
Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 65-84.
Schmitt, B. (1999). Experiential Marketing. N Y: The Free Press.
Schultz, P. W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for envi- ronmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 391-406.
Starke, L. (2005). State of the World 2005. A Worldwatch Institute Report. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Schultz, P. W., & Tabanico, J. (2007). Self, identity, and the natural environment: Exploring implicit connections with nature1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(6), 1219-1247. Doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00210.x
Tanner, T. (1980). Significant Life Experiences: A New Research Area in Environmental Education. Journal of Environmental Education, 11(4), 20-24.
Talbot, J. F. & Kaplan, S. (1986). Perspectives on wilderness: Re-examining the value of extended wilderness experiences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6, 177-188.
Tarrant, M. A., Manfredo, M. J. & Driver, B. L. (1994). Recollections of outdoor recreation experiences: a psychophysiological perspective. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(4), 357-371.
Tennessen, C., & Cimprich, B. (1995). Views to nature: effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1), 77-85.
The Taiwan WHOQOL Group (2000). Introduction to the development of the WHOQOL-Taiwan version. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 19:315-24.
Tang, I. C., Sullivan, W. C., Chang, C. Y. (2014). Perceptual evaluation of naturallandscapes: the role of the individual connection to nature. Environment and Behavior, doi: 10.1177/0013916513520604.
Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus Urban Scenes Some Psychophysiological Effects. Environment and Behavior, 13: 523-556.
Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View Through a Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery. Science, 224: 420-421.
Ulrich, R.S. (1993). Biophilia, Biophobia and Natural Landscapes. In Kellert, S.R., & Wilson, E. O. (Eds.), The Biophilia Hypothesis Island Press, 73 -143.
Varni, J. W., Seid, M., Rode, C. A. (1999). The PedsQL: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Med Care, 37(2), 126-39.
Varni, J. W. (2012). Scalingandscoringof the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ PedsQLTM. MAPI Research Trust, 1-105.
Van Herzele, A., & De Vries, S. (2012). Linking green space to health: A comparative study of two urban neighbourhoods in Ghent, Belgium. Population & Environment, 34, 171-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11111-011-0153-1.
Vining, J., & Merrick, M. S. (2012). Environmental epiphanies: Theoretical foundations and practical applications. In D. S. Clayton (Ed.), The oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp.485-508). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Wells, N. (2000). At Home with Nature: The Effects of Nearby Nature on Children’s Cognitive Functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32(6): 775-795.
Wells, N., & Evans, G. (2003). Nearby Nature: A Buffer of Life Stress Among Rural Children. Environment and Behavior, 35(3), 311-330.
Wiseman, M. & F. X. Bogner. (2003). A higher-order model of ecological values and its relationship to personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 783-94.
Wells, N., & Lekies, K. (2006). Nature and the Life Course: Pathways from Childhood Nature Experiences to Adult Environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1-24.
White, P. R. (2012). Enhancing the experience of connection with nature: Participants' responses to the MAPIN Strategy. Ecopsychology, 4(4), 345-354. Doi: 10.1089/eco.2012.0054
Palmer, H. E. (1933). Second Interim Report on English Collocation. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *