中文摘要
本研究旨在探討運動道德解離和社會認同與利社會及反社會行為之關係。本研究對象台灣地區大專院校102學年度籃球、足球、手球校隊選手為主要研究對象，共20隊，每隊人數約為7至21人。施測問卷共276份，剔除無效問卷11份，有效問卷為265份（籃球88份、足球105份、手球72份），有效問卷率為96%。測量工具為運動道德解離量表、利社會行為與反社會行為量表及團隊認同量表。資料收集後，採描述性統計（descriptive analyses）、皮爾森積差相關（Pearson correlation）及階層迴歸分析（regression analyses）等統計方式分析。研究結果如下：一、運動道德解離對隊友的利社會行為呈負向預測效果，運動道德解離對隊友、對對手的反社會行為皆呈正向預測效果。二、運動道德解離對對手反社會行為的影響關係，會因為不同的團隊認同而有所不同，呈現交互作用的效果。對於運動道德解離與對對手的反社會行為會隨著團隊認同的提升而降低。因此教練可以使用團隊認同來降低對對手的反社會行為。

Abstract
The main purpose of this study was to examine moderating effects of social identity on his relationship between sport moral disengagement, prosocial and antisocial behavior. There were 265 male participants in this study. Moral disengagement in sport scale, the prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport scale and social identity questionnaire were used in this study. Hierarchical Regression analyses revealed that: a）sport moral disengagement significantly negative predicted prosocial behaviors toward teammates, but sport moral disengagement significantly positive predicted antisocial behaviors toward teammates and opponents. b）team identity was the moderator between sport moral disengagement, prosocial and antisocial behavior. The findings support that high team identity and high sport moral disengagement would be the low antisocial behaviors toward opponents. Coaches could use team identity to decrease player’s antisocial behaviors toward opponents.

口試委員與系主任簽字之論文通過簽名表………………………………………I
論文授權書………………………………………………………………………………………………II
中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………………………………III
英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………………………………IV
謝誌……………………………………………………………………………………………………………V
目次……………………………………………………………………………………………………………VI
表次……………………………………………………………………………………………………………IX
圖次………………………………………………………………………………………………………………X
第壹章　緒論………………………………………………………………………………………………1
第一節 問題背景……………………………………………………………………………………1
第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………………………………………3
第三節 研究問題……………………………………………………………………………………3
第四節 研究假設……………………………………………………………………………………4
第五節 研究範圍與限制………………………………………………………………………4
第六節 名詞操作性定義………………………………………………………………………5
第貳章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………………………………7
第一節 運動道德解離……………………………………………………………………………7
第二節 利社會及反社會行為………………………………………………………………10
第三節 運動道德解離與利社會及反社會行為的關係……………………12
第四節 團隊認同……………………………………………………………………………………14
第五節 運動道德解離、團隊認同與利社會及反社會行為的關係…………15
第參章 研究方法………………………………………………………………………………………………18
第一節 研究架構……………………………………………………………………………………18
第二節 研究對象……………………………………………………………………………………19
第三節 研究工具……………………………………………………………………………………19
第四節 施測程序……………………………………………………………………………………20
第五節 資料處理……………………………………………………………………………………20
第肆章 結果與討論………………………………………………………………………………22
第一節 研究結果……………………………………………………………………………………22
第二節 綜合討論……………………………………………………………………………………29
第伍章 結論與建議…………………………………………………………………………………31
第一節 結論……………………………………………………………………………………………31
第二節 建議……………………………………………………………………………………………31
參考文獻………………………………………………………………………………………………………32

詹世偉（2012）。運動員目標取向和利社會行為的關係研究：檢驗家長式領導的調節效應（未出版碩士論文）。國立體育大學，桃園縣。
蔡俊傑、羅鴻仁、管世弘（2012）。運動道德解離量表之編製。大專體育學刊，14，40-53頁。
Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 27-46.
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development : Vol. 1 Theory (pp. 45-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193-209.
Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 101-119.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364-374.
Boardley, I.D., & Kavussanu, M. (2007). Development and validation of the moral disengagement in sport scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29, 608-628.
Boardley, I. D., & Kavussanu, M. (2009). The influence of social variables and moral disengagement on prosocial and antisocial behaviours in field hockey and netball. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27, 843-854.
Boardley, I.D., & Kavussanu, M. (2010). Effects of goal orientation and perceived value of toughness on antisocial behavior in soccer: The mediating role of moral disengagement. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32, 176-192.
Boardley, I.D., & Kavussanu, M. (2011). Moral disengagement in sport. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 93-108.
Brown, R. (2000). Social Identity Theory: past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745-778.
Bruner, M. W., Boardley, I. D. & Côté J. (2014). Social identity and prosocial and antisocial behavior in youth sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise,15, 56-64.
Cameron, J. E. (2004). A three factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3, 239-262.
Corrion, K., Long, T., Smith, A. L., & d'Arripe-Longueville, F. (2009). "It's not my fault; it's not serious": Athlete accounts of moral disengagement in competitive sport. The Sport Psychologist, 23, 388-404.
Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 374-391.
Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R.A. (1998). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 701–778). NY: Wiley.
Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575-604.
Hornstein, H.A. (1976). Cruelty and kindness: A new look at aggression and altruism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Kavussanu, M., Seal, A., & Phillips, D. (2006). Observed prosocial and antisocial behaviors in male soccer teams: Age differences across adolescence and the role of motivational variables. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 18, 326–344.
Kavussanu, M., & Boardley, I. D. (2009). The prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 31, 97-117.
Kavussanu, M. (2006). Motivational predictors of prosocial and antisocial behaviour in football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 575-588.
Kelman, H. C. (1961). Process of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly 25, 57-78.
Long, T., Pantaléon, N., Bruant, G., & d’Arripe-Longueville, F. (2006). A qualitative study of moral reasoning of young elite athletes. The Sport Psychologist, 20, 330-347.
Miles Hewstone, Mark Rubin, Hazel Willis (2002) Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575-604.
Nezlek, J. B., & Smith, C. V. (2005). Social identity in daily social interaction. Self and Identity, 4, 243-261.
Sage, L., Kavussanu, M., & Duda, J. L. (2006). Goal orientations and moral identity as predictors of prosocial and antisocial functioning in male association football players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 455-466.
Stornes, T. & Ommundsen, Y. (2004). Achievement goals, motivational climate and sportspersonship: A study of young handball players. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48, 205-221.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp: 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology,33, 1-39.
Traclet, A., Romand, P., Moret, O., & Kavussanu, M. (2011). Antisocial behaviour in soccer: A qualitative study of moral disengagement. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 9, 143-155.
White-Ajmani, M. L., & Bursik, K. (2014). Situational context moderates the relationship between moral disengagement and aggression. Psychology of Violence, 4, 90-100.
Winterich K. P. , Mittal V., Ross Jr W. T. (2009). Donation behavior toward in‐groups and out‐groups: The role of gender and moral identity. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 199-214.