帳號:guest(18.226.150.95)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):潘子維
作者(外文):Pan, Zhi Wei
論文名稱(中文):社群媒體上資訊分享行為之影響因素
論文名稱(外文):Determining Factors Influencing Word-of-Mouth Behaviors on Social Media
指導教授(中文):丘宏昌
指導教授(外文):Chiu, Hung Chang
口試委員(中文):翁晶晶
謝依靜
口試委員(外文):Weng, Jingjing
Hsieh ,Yi Ching
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:科技管理研究所
學號:103073506
出版年(民國):105
畢業學年度:104
語文別:英文
論文頁數:49
中文關鍵詞:口碑式行銷移動互聯網電腦網路社群媒體病毒式行銷接收者特性
外文關鍵詞:Word of mouthMobile InternetDesktop InternetSocial MediaViral MarketingReceiver Characteristic
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:92
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
口碑在行銷的研究領域上一直是一項重要的議題,透過顧客的正向的口碑來影響其他顧客的購買,已被認為是一種相當有效果的行銷方式。隨著越來越多行銷專家把社群媒體作為更進一步接觸消費者的策略核心,行動化的趨勢也影響到網路口碑行銷的進化。這種多種管道來達到創造流量與增加關注的行銷手法,能有效地為行銷者帶來偌大的成功。然而這類行銷方式能夠成功的關鍵,而在過去中的文獻較少去探討。
因此,本研究將參考過去的相關理論與模型,包括了溝通說服理論、使用與滿足理論、社會資本理論、價值理論,針對資訊分享者為何願意在網路上進行資訊分享行為進行探討,並使用實驗設計的方式進行,發展出2 (關係強度:強 vs. 弱) × 2 (快樂性利益內容:高 vs. 低) × 2 (功利性內容:高 vs. 低) × 2 (接收者特性;主動vs. 被動) × 2 (訊息管道;手機 vs. 電腦)共32種情境。研究結果發現,關係強度為強關係時,訊息內容包含了快樂以及功利性價值的利益時,訊息閱讀者對於產品有較高的涉入性時,以及訊息分享是透過手機的管道及具有高主動性時,將會有較大的資訊分享意願。而此結果則提供企業在設計整合行銷傳播時,能作為參考的方向,以提升顧客願意為其進行口碑行銷的意願與行為。
Word-of-mouth communication (WOM) is considered as an important issue for marketing researchers. Through the positive WOM to influence other potential customers has been considered as an effective marketing mode. As more and more marketers incorporate social media as an integral part to align engagement strategy in consumers' electronic WOM (e-WOM), the mobile marketing has emerged. The omni-channel tactics lead to the success in gaining traffic and raising awareness to achieve effective and efficient marketing benefits. However, it is not clear how they works and only limited research has been published regarding e-WOM communication in social media context.
Accordingly, this study intends to combine related research—including communication theory, uses and gratifications theory, social capital and value theory—to investigate the determinants of consumers' intention to share marketing information on the social media. We use experiment design to test our hypothesis. 32 scenarios: 2 (tie strength: strong vs. weak) × 2 (utilitarian value: high vs. low) × 2 (hedonic value: high vs. low) × 2 (receiver characteristic: active vs. passive) × 2 (transmission channel: mobile vs. desktop) were developed for the experiment. The results suggest that tie strength, contents with utilitarian value and hedonic value, characteristic of the audiences and transmission channel affects the willing to share information significantly. We intend to produce findings that deserve considerable attention from marketers seeking to implement e-WOM campaigns on social media and the implications and limitation are discussed for researchers and practitioners.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction 5
2. Literature review and hypothesis development 8
2.1 Message source 9
2.2 Message contents 11
2.3 Message audience 13
2.3.1 The effectiveness of message source on information sharing intention across message audience 15
2.4 Message transmission channel 16
2.4.1 The effectiveness of message source on information sharing intention across message channel 17
2.4.2 The effectiveness of message contents on information sharing intention across message channel 18
3. Methodology 20
3.1 Research framework 20
3.2 Pretest 20
3.3 Design and procedure 22
3.4 Measures 24
4. Data analysis 25
4.1 Manipulation check 25
4.2 Hypothesis testing 26
4.3 Main effect 27
4.4 Interaction effect 27
5. Conclusions 29
5.1 Discussions and implications 29
5.2 Limitations and future research directions 32
References 34
Appendix A. Designed materials 42
A1. High utilitarian; low hedonic content via desktop 42
A2. High hedonic; low utilitarian content via desktop 43
A3. High utilitarian; low hedonic content via mobile phone 44
A4. High hedonic; low utilitarian content via mobile phone 45
Appendix B. Designed questionnaires 46
B1. Questionnaire with consumer value 46
B2-1. Questionnaire with strong tie and activeness 46
B2-2. Questionnaire with weak tie and activeness 47
B2-3. Questionnaire with strong tie and passiveness 47
B2-4. Questionnaire with weak tie and passiveness 48
Melumad, S., Inman, J. J., Pham, M. T., Stephen, A. T., Grewal, L., Zubcsek, P. P., . . . Sciandra, M. R. (2015). Advances in Mobile Consumer Behavior: Effects on Content Generation, Social Persuasion, Mobile Targeting and Shopping Behavior. Advances in Consumer Research, 43.

Vollmer, C., & Precourt, G. (2008). Always on: Advertising, marketing, and media in an era of consumer control: McGraw Hill Professional.

Neter, J., Kutner, M.H., Nachtsheim, C.J. and Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied Linear Statistical Models, 4th ed. Boston, MA.: McGraw-Hill.

Stoel, L., Wickliffe, V., & Lee, K. H. (2004). Attribute beliefs and spending as antecedents to shopping value. Journal of Business Research, 57(10), 1067-1073.

Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. (2000). A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 65-81.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.

Hair, J., et al. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, USA.

Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.

Ruder Finn. New Study Shows 'Intent' Behind Mobile Internet Use. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-study-shows-intent-behind-mobile-internet-use-84016487.html

Q4 2014 Consumer Sharing Trends Report. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/sharethis/q4-2014-consumer-sharing-trends-report

Meeker, M. (2015). 2015 Internet Trends Report. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/kleinerperkins/internet-trends-v1

Facebook. (2014). The Ice Bucket Challenge on Facebook. Retrieved from http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2014/08/the-ice-bucket-challenge-on-facebook/

The ALS Association (August 29, 2014). The ALS Association Expresses Sincere Gratitude to Over Three Million Donors. Retrieved from http://www.alsa.org/news/media/press-releases/ice-bucket-challenge-082914.html

Steinfield, C., DiMicco, J. M., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2009). Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies.

Pigg, K. E., & Crank, L. D. (2004). Building community social capital: The potential and promise of information and communications technologies. The Journal of Community Informatics, 1(1).

Benevenuto, F., Rodrigues, T., Cha, M., & Almeida, V. (2009). Characterizing user behavior in online social networks. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference.

Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion; psychological studies of opinion change.

Mazzarol, T., Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2007). Conceptualizing word-of-mouth activity, triggers and conditions: an exploratory study. European Journal of Marketing, 41(11/12), 1475-1494.

Schiffman, L. G., Kanuk, L.L. and Wisenblit, J. (2010). Consumer Behavior, 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ.: Prentice Hall.

Pescher, C., Reichhart, P., & Spann, M. (2014). Consumer decision-making processes in mobile viral marketing campaigns. Journal of interactive marketing, 28(1), 43-54.

Hausmann, A. (2012). Creating ‘buzz’: opportunities and limitations of social media for arts institutions and their viral marketing. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 17(3), 173-182.

Golan, G. J., & Zaidner, L. (2008). Creative Strategies in Viral Advertising: An Application of Taylor’s Six‐Segment Message Strategy Wheel. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(4), 959-972.

Bashein, B. J., & Markus, M. L. (1997). A credibility equation for IT specialists. MIT Sloan Management Review, 38(4), 35.

Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5): sage.

Mittal, V., Huppertz, J. W., & Khare, A. (2008). Customer complaining: The role of tie strength and information control. Journal of retailing, 84(2), 195-204.

Okazaki, S. (2008). Determinant factors of mobile‐based word‐of‐mouth campaign referral among Japanese adolescents. Psychology & Marketing, 25(8), 714-731.

Chu, S.-C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47-75.

Chiu, H.-C., Hsieh, Y.-C., Kao, Y.-H., & Lee, M. (2007). The determinants of email receivers' disseminating behaviors on the Internet. Journal of advertising research, 47(4), 524-534.

Mason, P. R., & Davis, B. H. (2007). More than the words: using stance-shift analysis to identify crucial opinions and attitudes in online focus groups. Journal of advertising research, 47(4), 496-506.

José-Cabezudo, R. S., & Camarero-Izquierdo, C. (2012). Determinants of opening-forwarding e-mail messages. Journal of Advertising, 41(2), 97-112.

Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., & Schkade, L. L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision Sciences, 35(2), 259-288.

Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American journal of sociology, 558-588.

Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations: Simon and Schuster.

Dellarocas, C. (2003). The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 49(10), 1407-1424.

Sridhar Balasubramanian, V. M. (2001). The economic leverage of the virtual community. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(3), 103-138.

Feldman, S. P., & Spencer, M. C. (1965). The Effect of Personal Influence on the Selection of Consumer Services: Center for regional studies.

Hausman, A. V., & Siekpe, J. S. (2009). The effect of web interface features on consumer online purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 5-13.

Overby, J. W., & Lee, E.-J. (2006). The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 59(10), 1160-1166.

Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of consumer research, 17(4), 454-462.

Lee, M., & Youn, S. (2009). Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) How eWOM platforms influence consumer product judgement. International Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 473-499.

Hennig‐Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word‐of‐mouth via consumer‐opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of interactive marketing, 18(1), 38-52.

Gabbott, M., & Hogg, G. (2000). An empirical investigation of the impact of non-verbal communication on service evaluation. European Journal of Marketing, 34(3/4), 384-398.

Bristor, J. M. (1990). Enhanced explanations of word of mouth communications: The power of relationships. Research in consumer behavior, 4(1), 51-83.

Morrison, D., McLoughlin, I., Hogan, A., & Hayes, C. (2012). Evolutionary Clustering and Analysis of User Behaviour in Online Forums. Paper presented at the ICWSM.

Gruen, T. W., Osmonbekov, T., & Czaplewski, A. J. (2006). eWOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 449-456.

Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of consumer research, 132-140.
Balasubramanian, S., Peterson, R. A., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2002). Exploring the implications of m-commerce for markets and marketing. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 348-361.

Carrasco, J. A., & Miller, E. J. (2006). Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: a social network approach. Transportation, 33(5), 463-480.

Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Mazzarol, T. (2008). Factors influencing word of mouth effectiveness: receiver perspectives. European Journal of Marketing, 42(3/4), 344-364.

Garbarino, E., & Strahilevitz, M. (2004). Gender differences in the perceived risk of buying online and the effects of receiving a site recommendation. Journal of Business Research, 57(7), 768-775.

Barwise, T. P., Ehrenberg, A. S., & Goodhardt, G. J. (1982). Glued to the box?: Patterns of TV repeat‐viewing. Journal of Communication, 32(4), 22-29.

Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. The Journal of Marketing, 92-101.

Ghose, A., Goldfarb, A., & Han, S. P. (2012). How is the mobile Internet different? Search costs and local activities. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 613-631.

Dichter, E. (1966). {How word-of-mouth advertising works}. Harvard business review, 44(6), 147-160.

Cheung, C. M., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461-470.

Alreck, P. L., & Settle, R. B. (1995). The importance of word-of-mouth communications to service buyers. Paper presented at the Proceedings of American Marketing Association.

Minahan, S., Ferraro, C., & Sands, S. (2011). The inscrutable shopper consumer resistance in retail Consumer behavior collection. (pp. 153 p.). Retrieved from http://portal.igpublish.com/iglibrary/search/BEPB0000076.html

Sui, L., & Ke, X. (2015). Intension Analysis of User News Sharing in Social Media LISS 2014 (pp. 681-687): Springer.

Mahajan, V., Muller, E., & Kerin, R. A. (1984). Introduction strategy for new products with positive and negative word-of-mouth. Management Science, 30(12), 1389-1404.

West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2007). Introduction to Communication Theory. Analysis and Application.

Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (1994). An introduction to mass media research. California: Wadsworth.

Lariscy, R. W., Tinkham, S. F., & Sweetser, K. D. (2011). Kids these days: Examining differences in political uses and gratifications, Internet political participation, political information efficacy, and cynicism on the basis of age. American Behavioral Scientist, 0002764211398091.

McQuail, D. (1994). Mass communication: Wiley Online Library.

Harrison-Walker, L. J. (2001). The measurement of word-of-mouth communication and an investigation of service quality and customer commitment as potential antecedents. Journal of service research, 4(1), 60-75.

Butler, B. S. (2001). Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Information Systems Research, 12(4), 346-362.

Pan, B., & Wang, D. Mobile Internet Access Patterns for Travel: Comparison of Desktops, Tablets, and Phones.

Palka, W., Pousttchi, K., & Wiedemann, D. G. (2009). Mobile word-of-mouth–A grounded theory of mobile viral marketing. Journal of Information Technology, 24(2), 172-185.

Angeletou, S., Rowe, M., & Alani, H. (2011). Modelling and analysis of user behaviour in online communities The Semantic Web–ISWC 2011 (pp. 35-50): Springer.

De Bruyn, A., & Lilien, G. L. (2008). A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence through viral marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(3), 151-163.

Katz, J. E., & Aspden, P. (1997). A nation of strangers? Communications of the ACM, 40(12), 81-86.

Burt, R. S. (1984). Network items and the general social survey. Social networks, 6(4), 293-339.

Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2002). Online and in the know: Uses and gratifications of the web for political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 54-71.

Chen, Y., & Xie, J. (2008). Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Science, 54(3), 477-491.

Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1985). The origins of individual media-system dependency a sociological framework. Communication Research, 12(4), 485-510.

Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal Influence, The part played by people in the flow of mass communications: Transaction Publishers.

Ajzen, I. (1992). Persuasive communication theory in social psychology: a historical perspective. Influencing human behavior, 1-27.

Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175-196.

Cantril, H. (1941). Professor quiz: A gratifications study. Radio research, 34-45.

Ailawadi, K. L., Neslin, S. A., & Gedenk, K. (2001). Pursuing the value-conscious consumer: store brands versus national brand promotions. Journal of Marketing, 65(1), 71-89.

Arndt, J. (1967). Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of marketing Research, 291-295.

Blumler, J. G. (1979). The role of theory in uses and gratifications studies. Communication Research, 6(1), 9-36.

Stone, G., & Stone, D. (1990). Lurking in the literature: Another look at media use habits. Mass Communications Review, 17(1), 25-33.

Church, K., and N. Oliver. (2011) "Understanding mobile web and mobile search use in today's dynamic mobile landscape." In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 67-76. ACM.

Chua, A. YK, R. S. Balkunje, and D. HL Goh (2011). "Fulfilling mobile information needs: a study on the use of mobile phones." In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, p. 92. ACM.

Hinz, O., Skiera, B., Barrot, C., & Becker, J. U. (2011). Seeding strategies for viral marketing: An empirical comparison. Journal of Marketing, 75(6), 55-71.

Rosenberg, M., Schooler, C., & Schoenbach, C. (1989). Self-esteem and adolescent problems: Modeling reciprocal effects. American sociological review, 1004-1018.

Chiu, H.-C., Pant, A., Hsieh, Y.-C., Lee, M., Hsioa, Y.-T., & Roan, J. (2014). Snowball to avalanche: Understanding the different predictors of the intention to propagate online marketing messages. European Journal of Marketing, 48(7/8), 1255-1273.

Okazaki, S. (2009). Social influence model and electronic word of mouth: PC versus mobile internet. International Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 439-472.

Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business horizons, 52(4), 357-365.

Li, P. P. (2007). Social tie, social capital, and social behavior: Toward an integrative model of informal exchange. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(2), 227-246.

Brown, J. J., & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of consumer research, 350-362.

Ebster, C., & Garaus, M. (2011). Store design and visual merchandising : creating store space that encourages buying (1st ed.). New York, NY: Business Expert Press.

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 1360-1380.

Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490.

Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. The communication of ideas, 37, 215-228.

Earley, P. C., & Gibson, C. B. (1998). Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of management, 24(3), 265-304.

McQuail, D., Blumler, J. G., & Brown, J. R. (1972). The television audience: A revised perspective. Media studies: A reader, 271, 284.

Kubey, R. W. (1986). Television use in everyday life: Coping with unstructured time. Journal of Communication, 36(3), 108-123.

Watson, R. T., Pitt, L. F., Berthon, P., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2002). U-commerce: expanding the universe of marketing. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 333-347.

Ma, L., Sian Lee, C., & Hoe-Lian Goh, D. (2014). Understanding news sharing in social media: An explanation from the diffusion of innovations theory. Online Information Review, 38(5), 598-615.

Jin, L., Chen, Y., Wang, T., Hui, P., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2013). Understanding user behavior in online social networks: A survey. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 51(9), 144-150.

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68.

Rubin, A. M., & Windahl, S. (1986). The uses and dependency model of mass communication. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 3(2), 184-199.

Palmgreen, P., & Rayburn, J. D. (1979). Uses and gratifications and exposure to public television a discrepancy approach. Communication Research, 6(2), 155-179.

Charney, T., & Greenberg, B. S. (2002). Uses and gratifications of the Internet. Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses, 379-407.

Ebersole, S. (2000). Uses and gratifications of the web among students. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 6(1), 0-0.

Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass communication & society, 3(1), 3-37.

Van der Lans, R., Van Bruggen, G., Eliashberg, J., & Wierenga, B. (2010). A viral branching model for predicting the spread of electronic word of mouth. Marketing Science, 29(2), 348-365.

Phelps, J. E., Lewis, R., Mobilio, L., Perry, D., & Raman, N. (2004). Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: Examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along email. Journal of advertising research, 44(04), 333-348.

Ho, J. Y., & Dempsey, M. (2010). Viral marketing: Motivations to forward online content. Journal of Business Research, 63(9), 1000-1006.

Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2004). A Web for all reasons: uses and gratifications of Internet components for political information. Telematics and Informatics, 21(3), 197-223.

Burtch, G., & Hong, Y. (2014). What Happens When Word of Mouth Goes Mobile?

Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon. com. MIS quarterly, 34(1), 185-200.

Walsh, G., Gwinner, K. P., & Swanson, S. R. (2004). What makes mavens tick? Exploring the motives of market mavens' initiation of information diffusion. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(2), 109-122.

Ballard, C. L. (2011). “WHAT’S HAPPENING”@ TWITTER: A USES AND GRATIFICATIONS APPROACH.

Dobele, A., Lindgreen, A., Beverland, M., Vanhamme, J., & van Wijk, R. (2007). Why pass on viral messages? Because they connect emotionally. Business horizons, 50(4), 291-304.

Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362-369.

Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Mazzarol, T. (2012). Word of mouth: measuring the power of individual messages. European Journal of Marketing, 46(1/2), 237-257.

Gremler, D. D. (1994). Word-of-mouth about service providers: an illustration of theory development in marketing. Paper presented at the AMA winter educators' conference proceedings.

Engel, J. F., Kegerreis, R. J., & Blackwell, R. D. (1969). Word-of-mouth communication by the innovator. The Journal of Marketing, 15-19.

Bansal, H. S., & Voyer, P. A. (2000). Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context. Journal of service research, 3(2), 166-177.

Allsop, D. T., Bassett, B. R., & Hoskins, J. A. (2007). Word-of-mouth research: principles and applications. Journal of advertising research, 47(4), 398-411.

Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of consumer research, 644-656.

Ferguson, D. A., & Perse, E. M. (2000). The World Wide Web as a functional alternative to television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 155-174.

Sterling, G. (2015). Study: Mobile Apps For Engagement, Mobile Web For Research & Comparisons. Retrieved from http://marketingland.com/study-mobile-apps-for-engagement-mobile-web-for-research-comparisons-146192
(此全文限內部瀏覽)
電子全文
摘要
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *