帳號:guest(3.15.206.133)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):沈哲穎
作者(外文):Shen, Zhe Ying
論文名稱(中文):台灣所得與財富分配之分析
論文名稱(外文):Distribution of Income and Wealth in Taiwan
指導教授(中文):吳世英
指導教授(外文):Wu, Shih Ying
口試委員(中文):黃朝熙
王惠貞
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:經濟學系
學號:103072521
出版年(民國):105
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:80
中文關鍵詞:所得不均財富不均結構性分析
外文關鍵詞:income inequalitywealth inequalityCross-sectional analysis
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:353
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:40
  • 收藏收藏:0
本研究以2005 年綜合所得稅統計資料與財富統計資料,分析台灣高所得者之所得與財產份額,並進行橫斷面之結構性分析。本文發現2005年台灣最高1%所得家戶所得集中程度高且來源為資本所得,另外台灣最高1%所得家戶所擁有之投資財富份額非常高,不均程度非常嚴重。台灣財產份額分配呈現U型,最低5% 所得家戶所擁有之財產份額較中低所得家戶還要多。另外在所得與財富結構上,薪資所得較高之納稅家戶容易選擇置產在報酬優渥的資本所得中,而資本利得較高之納稅家戶卻約有一半比例之家戶擁有得薪資收入較低。平均財富之年齡分布上,65歲以上老年人口擁有之平均財富相較於其他年齡分布較高。本研究之著墨點在於利用綜合所得稅統計資料與財富資料,描繪有別於以往所得不均表像之研究,目的在探討所得與財富之結構性議題。
This study analyzes the income and wealth distributions in Taiwan based on Individual Tax Returns for 2005. The contribution of this study is to document Taiwan’s income distribution, wealth distribution and the relationship between income and wealth. The results reveal that both wealth and income are highly concentrated in the top 1% of income households. For the top 1% of income households, wages and capital income were the two major sources of income, and stock investment was the major type of assets. However, for the top 0.1%, capital income becomes the single most important source of income. The research results also show that the distribution of wealth in Taiwan is U-shaped in 2005, in which the wealth share for the bottom 5% of income households, is larger than the 5% of middle income households. Households with the head aged 65 or more own more wealth than other age groups. Households with more wage income also tend to also have more capital income. On the other hand, households with more capital income do not necessarily have more wage income.|
目錄
壹、緒論 3
一、 研究動機與目的 3
二、 研究資料與方法: 8
三、 研究架構 11
貳、所得不均之相關研究 12
一、 歐洲、美國之高所得者份額變化 12
二、 歐洲、美國之所得相關研究 14
三、 台灣之高所得者份額變化 15
四、 高財富者份額變化 17
參、家庭收支調查與綜合所得稅資料比較 21
一、 家庭收支調查 21
二、 個人綜合所得稅 23
三、 兩者之優缺 25
肆、台灣所得現況與貧富不均 29
一、 主計處之家庭收支調查統計資料 29
二、 財政部之個人所得稅統計資料 33
三、 綜合所得稅資料與家庭收支所得資料之異同 37
伍、台灣財富分配現況 44
一、 台灣財富現況 44
二、 財富等分位統計分析 51
三、 等分位組間納稅人特性分析 53
六、台灣所得與財富之結構現況 60
一、 最高1%、5%、10%、20% 之所得者結構 61
二、 年齡之橫截面分析 66
三、 所得與財富之勞倫斯曲線 67
七、結論 73
八、參考文獻 77
行政院主計處. 2011. 《94年家庭收支調查報告》. 財政部財稅資料中心
行政院主計處. 2012. 《103年國富統計報告》. 行政院主計總處.
取自:https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/lp.asp?CtNode=3104&CtUnit=394&Base
DSD=7&mp=1
行政院主計處. 2013. 《94年度綜合所得稅申報初步開徵核定統計專冊》.
財政部財稅資料中心。
取自:http://www.fia.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=1299&ctNode=236&mp=1
全國法規資料庫. 2016. 《所得稅法》.
取自:http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=G0340003
洪明皇. 2013. “台灣高所得者所得份額之變化:1977–2010”, Survey
Research—Methods and Applications 30: 47-95.
洪明皇、鄭文輝. 2009a. “台灣中層階級流失的成因與對策”,《靜宜人文
社會學報》3(2): 107–126。
財政部統計處. 2015. 《中華民國104年財政統計年報》.
衛生福利部. 2016.《105年度低收入戶、中低收入戶資格審核標準及歷年 最低生活費》.
取自:http://www.mohw.gov.tw/CHT/DOSAASW/DM1_P.aspx?f_list_
no=114&fod_list_no=1552&doc_no=52560
Atkinson. A. B. 2004. “Income Tax and Top Incomes over the Twentieth
Century”. Hacienda Pública Española/Revista de Economía Pública
168(1): 123–141.

Aaberge. R. , A. B. Atkinson, S. Königs and C. Lakner. 2013. ”From
Classes to Copulas: Wages, capital, and top incomes” , Working paper,
University of Oxford.
Atkinson, A. B. and T. Piketty. 2007. Top Incomes over the Twentieth
Century: A Contrast between Continental European and English-speaking
Countries. New York: Oxford University Press.
Atkinson, A. B. and T. Piketty. 2010. Top Incomes: A Global Perspective,
New York: Oxford University Press.
Atkinson, A. B. , T. Piketty, and E. Saez. 2011. “Top Incomes in the Long
Run of History”, Journal of Economic Literature 49(1): 3–71.
Boserup S. H. , W. Kopczuk and T. K. Claus. 2016. “The Role of Bequests
in Shaping Wealth Inequality:Evidence from Danish Wealth Records”,
NBER Working Paper No. 21896
Chu, Cyrus C. Y. , Kamhon Kan, Teyu Chou and Sheng-Cheng Hun. 2015.
“Top Income Shares in Taiwan”, WTID Working Paper 2015/2
Galor. O. and O. Moav. 2004. “From physical to human capital
accumulation: inequality and the process of development”, Review of Economic Studies 71, 1001–1026
Hung. R. 1996. “The Great U-Turn in Taiwan: Economic Restructuring and
a Surge in Inequality”. Journal of Contemporary Asia 26(2): 151–163.
Kaplan S. N. and J. Rauh. 2013. ”Family, Education, and Sources of
Wealth among the Richest Americans: 1982–2012”, American Economic
Review Papers and Proceedings. 103 (3), 158–62

Kopczuk. W. 2014. “What Do We Know About Evolution of Top Wealth
Shares in the United States?”, NBER Working Paper No. 20734
Kopczuk. W. 2013. ”Family, Education, and Sources of Wealth among the
Richest Americans: 1982–2012”, American Economic Review Papers and
Proceedings. 2013, 103 (3), 158–62
Kopczuk. W. and E. Saez. 2004. “Top Wealth Shares in the United States,
1916–2000: Evidence from Estate Tax Returns”, National Tax Journal 57(2): 445–487.
Persson, T. and G. Tabellini. 1994. “Is inequality harmful for growth?”,
American Economic Review 84, 600–621
Perotti. R. 1996. “Growth, income distribution, and democracy: what the
data say”, Journal of Economic Growth 1149–187
Piketty. T. 2003. “Income Inequality in France, 1901–1998”, Journal of
Political Economy 111(5): 1004–1042.
Piketty. T. 2015. “About Capital in the Twenty-First Century”, American
Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 2015, 105(5): 48–53
Piketty. T. and E. Saez. 2006. “The Evolution of Top Incomes: A Historical
and International Perspective”, NBER Working Paper No. 11955.
Piketty. T. and E. Saez. 2007. “Income and Wage Inequality in the United
States, 1913–2002”, pp. 141–225 in Atkinson & Piketty (eds.), Top Incomes
over the Twentieth Century: A Contrast between Continental European and
English-speaking Countries. New York: Oxford University Press.
Piketty. T. and E. Saez. 2014. “Inequality in the Long-Run”, Science 344,
2014, 838-843
Piketty. T. and G. Zucman. 2013a. “Capital is Back: Wealth-Income Ratios
in Rich Countries, 1700–2010”, PSE Working Paper
Piketty. T. and G. Zucman. 2013b. “Wealth and Inheritance in the Long
Run.” In Handbook of Income Distribution, Vol. 2, edited by A. Atkinson
Ravallion. M. 2014. “Income inequality in the developing world” , Science
344, 851
Ravallion. M. 2013. “Inequality convergence”, World Bank, Development
Research Group, MSN MC 3-306, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA
Saez. E. 2013 “Striking It Richer: The Evolution of Top Incomes in The
United States”, (Update Using 2012 Preliminary Estimates). Berkeley, CA:
University of California Department of Economics
Saez. E. 2005. “Top Incomes in the United States and Canada over the
Twentieth Century”, Journal of the European Economic Association 3(2–3): 402–411.
Saez. E. and G. Zucman. 2014. “Wealth Inequality in the United States
since 1913: Evidence from Capitalized Income Tax Data”, NBER Working
Paper No. 20625
WTID. 2016. 《Pareto-Lorenz coefficients》
取自:http://www.wid.world/#Database
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *