本論文將家庭生產引入新凱因斯模型，探討貨幣政策的總體效果。本文發現，因為有家庭生產，家計單位可將時間轉為家庭勞動，增加家庭消費，維持原來的效用水準，亦即家庭生產提供了另一個時間和資源分配的管道，讓家計單位更能因應外生衝擊，當貨幣政策緊縮時，市場生產會減少，而多餘時間會轉為家庭生產。
此外，由於期內調整成本的出現，將市場資本轉作家庭資本時，需要付出調整成本，因此，家計單位將會試圖將市場資本投資與家庭耐久財投資同步增減，以減少調整成本的支出，所以本文可藉此達成市場投資和家庭投資之同步性。
最後，為了解決Barsky et al.（2003，2007）所提出，傳統新凱因斯模型下耐久財與非耐久財的同步性問題，本文假設耐久財具有僵固性，且應相同於或高於非耐久財的價格僵固性。家庭生產的設定不僅使模型更貼近真實情況，也有助於改善此一同步性問題。

This paper aims to investigate the macroeconomic effects of monetary policy in a new Keynesian model with home production. This paper shows that, because of home production, households can maintain their utility by spending more time in home production and consuming more home goods when a contractionary monetary policy shock happens. The presence of the intratemporal adjustment costs of turning home investment into business investment (or the other way around) can help the model account for the comovement between business and home investments. To solve the comovement puzzle in the traditional new Keynesian model raised by Barsky et al. (2003, 2007), i.e. the comovement between nondurable and durable goods, we assume that the prices of durable goods are equally or more rigid as compared to the prices of nondurable goods. Our numerical results suggest that introducing home production into the model is not only realistic but also helpful for solving the comovement puzzle.

摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝辭 iii
內文目錄 iv
附圖目錄 vi
附表目錄 vii
壹、 緒論 1
一、 研究背景與動機 1
（一） 家庭生產與景氣循環 1
（二） 新凱因斯模型與貨幣政策 3
二、 研究目的與方法 4
貳、 基本模型 7
一、 家計單位（Households） 7
二、 批發商（Wholesale firms） 10
三、 零售商（Retailers） 11
四、 政府 12
五、 市場均衡與結清 13
參、 數值模擬分析 14
一、 參數設定 14
二、 基本模型分析結果 16
（一） 衝擊反應分析 16
（二） 二階動差結果 18
三、 耐久財之價格僵固性的影響 20
四、 家庭生產的影響 21
五、 調整成本的影響 22
肆、 穩健性檢驗 23
一、 耐久財價格僵固性與同步性問題 23
二、 家庭生產與同步性問題 24
伍、 結語 26
參考文獻 28
附錄 31
A. 模型變數推導 31
B. 均衡條件 34
C. 參數校準推導 37

[1] Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2007). Measuring Trends in Leisure: The Allocation of Time over Five Decades. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 969-1006.
[2] Aguiar, M., Hurst, E., & Karabarbounis, L. (2013). Time use during the great recession. The American Economic Review, 103(5), 1664-1696.
[3] Barsky, R., House, C. L., & Kimball, M. (2003). Do Flexible Durable Goods Prices Undermine Sticky Price Models? (No. w9832). National Bureau of Economic Research.
[4] Barsky, R. B., House, C. L., & Kimball, M. S. (2007). Sticky-price models and durable goods. The American Economic Review, 97(3), 984-998.
[5] Barsky, R. B., Boehm, C. E., House, C. L., & Kimball, M. S. (2015). Monetary Policy and Durable Goods. Working paper.
[6] Benhabib, J., Rogerson, R., & Wright, R. (1991). Homework in Macroeconomics: Household Production and Aggregate Fluctuations. Journal of Political Economy, 99(6), 1166-1187.
[7] Bils, M., & Klenow, P. (2004). Some Evidence on the Importance of Sticky Prices. Journal of Political Economy, 112(5), 947-985.
[8] Bridgman, B. (2013). Home Productivity. Manuscript, Buerau of Economic Analysis.
[9] Calvo, G. A. (1983). Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12(3), 383-398.
[10] Cantelmo, A., & Melina, G. (2015). Monetary Policy and the Relative Price of Durable Goods. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 5328.
[11] Carlstrom, C. T., & Fuerst, T. S. (2010). Nominal rigidities, residential investment, and adjustment costs. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 14(01), 136-148.
[12] Chang, Y. (2000). Comovement, excess volatility, and home production. Journal of Monetary Economics, 46(2), 385-396.
[13] Chen, B. L., & Liao, S. Y. (2014). Capital, credit constraints and the comovement between consumer durables and nondurables. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 39, 127-139.
[14] Clarida, R., Galí, J., & Gertler, M. (1999). The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1661-1707.
[15] Erceg, C., & Levin, A. (2006). Optimal monetary policy with durable consumption goods. Journal of Monetary Economics, 53(7), 1341-1359.
[16] Fisher, J. D. (2007). Why does household investment lead business investment over the business cycle?. Journal of Political Economy, 115(1), 141-168.
[17] Gaumont, D., Wright, R., & Zhu, Y. (2016). House Price Rigidity. Working paper.
[18] Gomme, P., Kydland, F. E., & Rupert, P. (2001). Home production meets time to build. Journal of Political Economy, 109(5), 1115-1131.
[19] Greenwood, J., & Hercowitz, Z. (1991). The Allocation of Capital and Time over the Business Cycle. Journal of Political Economy, 99(6), 1188-1214.
[20] Gwin, C., & VanHoose, D. D. (2012). Durable goods and sticky prices: Industry-level evidence. Economics Letters, 116(3), 460-464.
[21] Huffman, G. W., & Wynne, M. A. (1999). The role of intratemporal adjustment costs in a multisector economy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 43(2), 317-350.
[22] Klenow, P. J., & Malin, B. A. (2010). Microeconomic evidence on price-setting. Handbook of Monetary Economics 3A, B. Friedman and M. Woodford ed.: Elsevier, 2011, 231-284.
[23] Lester, R. (2014). Home production and sticky price models: Implications for monetary policy. Journal of Macroeconomics, 41, 107-121.
[24] Monacelli, T. (2009). New Keynesian models, durable goods, and collateral constraints. Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(2), 242-254.
[25] Nakamura, E., & Steinsson, J. (2008). Five Facts about Prices: A Reevaluation of Menu Cost Models. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4), 1415-1464.
[26] Taylor, J. B. (1993, December). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. In Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy (Vol. 39, pp. 195-214). North-Holland.
[27] Tsai, Y. C. (2016). What Do Working Capital And Habit Tell Us About The Co-movement Problem?. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 20(1), 342-361.