帳號:guest(13.59.106.251)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):魏毓芬
作者(外文):Wei,Yuh Fen
論文名稱(中文):醫院貴重醫療儀器之管理及採購決策
論文名稱(外文):Purchase Decision Making and Management of Precious Medical Equipments
指導教授(中文):簡禎富
指導教授(外文):Chien,Chen Fu
口試委員(中文):洪冠予
彭金堂
口試委員(外文):Hung,Kuan-Yu
Peng,Jin Tang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:工業工程與工程管理學系
學號:103034609
出版年(民國):105
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:55
中文關鍵詞:全面資源管理PDCA循環紫式決策分析架構簡易多屬性評等技術
外文關鍵詞:Total Resource ManagementPCDA cycleUNISON Decision Analysis FrameworkSimple Multi-Attribute Ranking Technique
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:204
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
隨著國人對疾病的預防保健意識抬頭與社會保險制度的普及,民眾對就醫品質的要求越來越高,選擇性也越來越多。因此,醫院面對競爭壓力,在精進人員服務品質與醫療技術的同時,因應市場需求,也紛紛投資引進新穎而貴重的儀器設備。依據中央健康保險署(簡稱健保署)所公布的資料顯示,高資本支出的醫療儀器如電腦斷層攝影機(Computerized Tomography, CT)與磁振造影掃描儀(Magnetic Resonance Imaging, MRI)的使用佔健保給付醫療費用中的最大宗,且逐年遞增,盡管健保署的總額支付制度提高了給付門檻,醫院仍不惜成本大舉投注資金採購並定期汰換貴重醫療儀器,以因應治療需求並提高疾病的診斷率,爭取民眾就醫信心,主要還能快速累進醫院營收,平衡支出維持營運。
醫院的醫療設備資源種類繁多,屬於貴重醫療儀器價格昂貴且不在少數,無論是在新機採購或是汰舊換新、及後續維護與保養合約的選購方案上,每年都將耗費醫院許多的成本預算。目前,甚少有相關論著是以醫療設備資源管理的角度進一步探討儀器設備採購的需求與決策。
本研究目的係導入「全面資源管理」的概念,建立貴重醫療儀器資源管理架構,探討醫院對醫療設備資源的投資決策,透過PDCA循環改善架構持續監控貴重醫療儀器於臨床的使用效益,讓醫療單位能及時調整資源使用策略或改善服務流程,甚至用以評定貴重醫療儀器採購的時機。本文以某區域醫院磁振造影機之綜合效率評估(OEE),及後續結合紫式決策分析架構以簡易多屬性評等技術(SMART)作為新機採購之系統性分析,證實對貴重醫療儀器的管理及使用效能具有不錯的監督效果,有助醫院提升醫療照護品質,強化競爭力。
With the raising awareness of disease prevention and healthcare as well as the popularization of social security, people in Taiwan tend to seek for higher quality of medication. For these reasons, more selections of medical treatments appeared to fulfill the mass. Due to the competitive pressure, hospitals have not only improved their service and medical technology, but also many new and valuable equipment were invested and introduced to medical treatments. According to the statistics of National Health Insurance Administration (NHI) for high capital expenditure equipments including CT (Computerized Tomography) and MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) stands for the largest proportion of our health insurance expense and is increasing annually. Despite that NHI has establish the policy of global budget system to raise the payment condition, hospitals still regularly eliminate and purchase valuable equipment at no cost in order to meet the needs of medical treatment and to improve the accuracy of medical detective rate. For this way, hospitals can not only gain the trust of people but also mainly to increase their revenue in a more rapid way and balance between expenditure.
There are great varieties of medical equipment in a hospital and many of them are valuable equipment. Every year, great amount of budget will be spent on the purchase of new equipment and signing maintenance contracts. Up to now, few thesis focus on the management or the decision making of purchasing medical equipment.
This study aims to apply the concept of Total Resource Management (TRM) to build up the structure of resource managing and the decision making of investing medical equipment in hospitals. By PCDA cycle, we can continuously control the efficiency of valuable equipment upon its clinical usage. Medical departments can promptly adjust their strategies of resource using and improve their services and furthermore, to evaluate the right timing for purchasing valuable equipment. Then, we will focus on the overall benefit evaluation for MRI machines in a specific regional hospital. By applying Simple Multi-Attribute Ranking Technique (SMART) in UNISON Decision Analysis Framework, we are able to analyze the purchase of new machines in a more systematic way. Form this study, we will find out positive effects for valuable equipment management as well as improving the quality of medical treatments in the hospitals to increase competitiveness.
目錄 i
表目錄 v
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景、動機與重要性 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 論文結構 3
第二章 文獻回顧 5
2.1 全面資源管理之醫院資源管理 5
2.2 總體擁有成本(Total Cost of Ownership, TCO) 9
2.3 設備綜合效率(Overall Equipment Efficiency, OEE) 10
2.4 簡易多屬性評等技術(Simple Multi-Attribute Ranking Technique, SMART) 11
第三章 醫院貴重醫療儀器資源管理架構 14
3.1 資源目標規劃 15
3.1.1 審視資源應用活動建立根本目標 17
3.1.2 建構資源績效指標 18
3.1.3 設定目標績效值 19
3.2 資源管控執行 19
3.2.1 制定工具目標 19
3.2.2 產生執行方案 19
3.2.3 實施作業與方案 20
3.3 資源績效評估 20
3.4 資源績效檢討與改善 21
3.4.1 標準作業程序 22
3.4.2 標竿評估比較 22
3.4.3 分析討論與學習 23
第四章 實證研究 24
4.1 資源目標規劃 24
4.1.1. 審視資源應用活動建立根本目標 24
4.1.2. 建構貴重醫療設備資源的績效指標 25
4.1.3. 設定目標績效值 25
4.2 資源管控執行 26
4.2.1. 制定工具目標 28
4.2.2. 產生執行的方案 28
4.3 資源績效評估 35
4.4 資源績效檢討與改善建議 36
4.4.1醫院關鍵資源的採購規劃 37
4.5 結果與討論 46
第五章 結論 47
5.1 研究貢獻和限制 47
5.2 未來研究方向 48
參考文獻 49
附錄一:醫院評鑑基準(資料修改自:廖學志,2008) 51
附錄二:案例醫院組織架構(委員會) 55
中文
大衛.諾頓David P. Norton、羅伯.柯普朗Robert S. Kaplan(2013),策略校準:應用平衡計分卡創造組織最佳綜效,臉譜出版社。
王乃弘(1999),民眾就醫選擇之研究-分析層級程序法之應用,中華公共衛生雜誌,Vol.18,No.2,頁138-151。
申斯靜(2005),以病人安全為中心之醫療設備管理,慈濟醫學雜誌 , 17卷4_S期,頁35 – 39。
林繼勇、簡禎富、胡志翰,「紫式決策分析以建構液晶原料廠製程確效評估模式」,品質學報,第十五卷第五期,民國97年,385-398頁。
李隆生(1999),影響醫院購置昂貴醫療儀器決策之因素-以台南高雄兩地醫院為例,中華公共衛生雜誌,Vol.18,No.5,頁327-33。
吳清山、林天祐(2005),教育新詞書(New Dictionary of Education),高等教育文化事業有限公司
胡志翰(2010),晶圓廠全面資源管理架構及績效指標,國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系博士論文。
財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會,104年醫院評鑑基準及評量項目。網址:http://www.tjcha.org.tw,民國104年。
楊明璧、吳信宏(2002),臺灣貴重儀器投資及更新之決策模式,醫務管理期刊,Vol.3,No.3,頁81-103。
郭美利(2012),醫院全面資源管理之研究,國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系碩士論文。
張晴翔(2007),醫院採購重大儀器決策分析---以南部某醫學中心放射科部門為例,Proceeding of International Medical Informatics Symposium in Taiwan 2007,Nov. 16-17 2007
廖學志(2008),Journal of Healthcare Quality VOL.2 NO.2 43
簡禎富(2005),決策分析與管理,雙葉書廊,台北。
簡禎富、許嘉裕(2014),資料挖礦與大數據分析,前程文化,台北。
簡禎富、游智閔、徐紹鐘(2009),紫式決策分析以建構半導體晶圓廠人力規劃決策模型,管理與系統,16卷2期,頁157-180。
簡禎富、胡志翰(2011),「全面資源管理架構:以晶圓廠為實證」,品質學報,第十八卷第六期,民國100年,581-607頁。
魏慶國、王舜睦(2006),醫院資材與物流管理,華杏出版社,台北。
財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會,104年醫院評鑑基準及評量項目。網址:http://www.tjcha.org.tw,民國104年。
英文
Antonio, M. C., Adreiana, R.R., and Gregory, L. H.( 2014), “ Outsouring versus in-house matitenance of Medical device: a longitudinal empirical study. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2014; 35(3): pp.193-199.
Grossman, Sanford J., and Oliver D. Hart. 1986. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy 94(4): 691-719.R.S. Kaplan and D.P. Norton, "The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance," Harvard Business Review (January-February 1992): 71-79.
Lakhal, S., Martel, A., Kettani, O., and Oral, M. (2001),Theory and Methodology On the Optimization of Supply Chain Networking Decisions, European Journal of Operational Research 129, 2001, pp259-270
Prahaled, C. K. and Hamel, G. (1990), The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp71-91
Wu, J.-Z. and Chien, C.-F. (2008), “Modeling strategic semiconductor assembly outsourcing decisions based on empirical settings,” OR Spectrum, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 401-430.
Chien, C.-F. and Hsu, C.-Y. (2011), “UNISON Analysis to Model and Reduce Step-and-Scan Overlay Errors for Semiconductor Manufacturing,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 22, No.3, pp. 399-412.
Chien, C.-F., Hu, C.-H. and Lin, C.-Y. (2008), "Analysing inspection frequency for wafer bumping process and an empirical study of UNISON decision framework," Int. J. Manufacturing Technology and Management, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 130-144.
Chien, C.-F. and Lin, K.-Y. (2012), "Manufacturing intelligence for Hsinchu Science Park semiconductor sales prediction," Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 98–110.
Chien, C. -F., Wang, H. -J., & Wang, M. (2007), "A UNISON framework for analyzing alternative strategies of IC final testing for enhancing overall operational effectiveness," International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 107, No. 1, pp.20-30.
(此全文未開放授權)
電子全文
摘要
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *