驗收抽樣計畫為品質管理領域中一項實用之工具，其可作為買賣雙方間判定貨批是否允收之決策準則。文獻上已有許多學者應用各種不同抽樣檢驗策略發展出驗收抽樣計畫，其中快速轉換抽樣系統（Quick Switching Sampling System, QSS system）為一個由兩種不同檢驗水準之抽樣計畫的系統，當品質狀況良好時，可採用正常檢驗（Normal Inspection）；當品質狀況不佳時，則採用加嚴檢驗（Tightened Inspection），而這種快速轉換的機制，經證實可以在保障買賣雙方的品質水準和風險要求下，有效地節省抽樣成本。
傳統型驗收抽樣計畫針對製程產品品質的評估，常以良率為基礎，乃是追求產品品質能夠「符合規格」，然而根據現代化的品質觀念，符合規格已不再是最終追求之目標，而是應追求「符合目標值」，此概念可由田口博士所提出的損失函數做為評估的準則。
本研究利用製程損失指標Le發展出計量型快速轉換抽樣系統，並設計出三種不同參數類型之抽樣系統。其次，建立最佳化模型以最小化平均抽樣樣本數來求解出各類型抽樣系統在不同「品質水準」與「風險」要求組合之系統參數值。接著，除了針對所發展出之三種不同類型的QSS system進行評估與分析外，並與存在的計量型驗收抽樣計畫進行分析與比較。最後，以一實例分析作為說明，以供使用者未來應用的參考。

Acceptance sampling plan is a practical tool in quality management field. It can provide the vendor and the buyer a decision rule for lot sentencing to meet their requirements of product quality. Several acceptance sampling plans have been developed by using different strategies, one of them is quick switching sampling system (QSS system). QSS system is one of two-plan sampling systems, which involves only normal and tightened inspections and has a rule for switching between these two types of inspection. The normal inspection can be used when the quality is found to be good and tightened inspection is used when the quality of a product deteriorated.
Traditional acceptance sampling plan always focus on conforming to specification limits, but according to modern quality improvement theories or Taguchi’s quality philosophy, reduction of deviation from the target value should serve as the guiding principle rather than conforming to specification limits. And this concept can reduce the loss caused by the deviation.
For this reason, this paper develops a variables QSS system based on process loss index Le. Because QSS system has three different types, we will study each of them. Moreover, the behavior of the proposed plan under various parameters is studied and the plan parameters are determined by an optimization problem. The advantages of the proposed plan are discussed compared with the existing plans using the process loss function. Finally, an application example is presented for illustration and discussion.

摘要 I
Abstract II
致謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 VII
表目錄 IX
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的 4
1.3研究架構 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
2.1驗收抽樣計畫 5
2.2驗收抽樣計畫之分類 7
2.2.1依檢驗方式分類 7
2.2.2依數據性質分類 13
2.3驗收抽樣計畫之衡量方法 16
2.3.1操作特性曲線 17
2.3.2平均抽樣樣本數 19
2.4製程損失分析 20
2.5製程損失指標 25
2.5.1製程損失指標 與 之關係 26
2.5.2製程損失指標 之估計式 27
2.5.3製程損失指標 估計式之抽樣分配 27
2.5.4製程損失指標 之區間估計與假設檢定 28
第三章 基於製程損失指標之計量型快速轉換抽樣系統 29
3.1第一型計量型快速轉換抽樣系統 29
3.1.1系統設計概念及執行步驟 30
3.1.2系統之允收機率函數 32
3.1.3系統參數數學模型 33
3.1.4求解結果分析與應用 34
3.2第二型計量型快速轉換抽樣系統 36
3.2.1系統設計概念及執行步驟 37
3.2.2系統之允收機率函數 39
3.2.3系統參數數學模型 39
3.2.4求解結果分析與應用 40
3.3第三型計量型快速轉換抽樣系統 45
3.3.1系統設計概念及執行步驟 45
3.3.2系統之允收機率函數 47
3.3.3系統參數數學模型 47
3.3.4求解結果分析與應用 48
第四章 比較與分析 56
4.1 第一型計量型快速轉換抽樣系統與已被提出的驗收抽樣計畫之比較 56
4.1.1 操作特性曲線 56
4.1.2 平均抽樣樣本數 58
4.2 第二型計量型快速轉換抽樣系統與已被提出的驗收抽樣計畫之比較 60
4.2.1 操作特性曲線 60
4.2.2 平均抽樣樣本數 62
4.3 第三型計量型快速轉換抽樣系統與已被提出的驗收抽樣計畫之比較 66
4.3.1 操作特性曲線 66
4.3.2 平均抽樣樣本數 67
4.4 結論 73
第五章 實際案例 75
5.1觸控面板簡介 75
5.2電容式觸控面板 76
5.2.1表面電容式觸控面板 76
5.2.2投射電容式觸控面板 78
5.3觸控面板製程介紹 79
5.4個案分析 80
第六章 結論與未來研究方向 83
6.1結論 83
6.2未來研究方向 85
參考文獻 86

鄭春生 (2010)，「品質管理：現代化觀念與實務應用」，全華圖書股份有限公司。

Aslam, M., Yen, C.H. and Jun, C.H. (2011). Variable repetitive group sampling plans with process loss consideration. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 81(11), 1417-1432.

Aslam, M., Yen, C.H., Chang, C.H. and Jun, C.H. (2014). Multiple dependent state variable sampling plans with process loss consideration. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 71(5-8), 1337-1343.

Balamurali, S. and Jun, C.H. (2006). Repetitive group sampling procedure for variables inspection. Journal of Applied Statistics, 33(3), 327-338.

Balamurali, S. and Jun, C.H. (2007). Multiple dependent state sampling plans for lot acceptance based on measurement data. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(3), 1221-1230.

Balamurali, S., Park, H., Jun, C.H., Kim, K.J. and Lee, J. (2005). Designing of variables repetitive group sampling plan involving minimum average sample number. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 34(3), 799-809.

Balamurali, S. and Usha, M. (2011). Optimal designing of a variables quick switching system by minimzing the average sample number. Journal of Applied Statistics, 19(3), 295-310.

Balamurali, S. and Usha, M. (2012). Variables quick switching system with double specification limits. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 19(2), 1250008-1250024.

Balamurali, S. and Usha, M. (2014). Optimal designing of variables quick switching system based on the process capability index . Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 31(2), 85-94.

Boyles, R.A. (1991). The Taguchi capability index. Journal of Quality Technology, 23(1), 17-26.

Chan, L.K., Cheng, S.W. and Spiring, F.A. (1988). A new measure of process capability: . Journal of Quality Technology, 20(3), 162-175.

Dodge, H.F. (1967). A new dual system of acceptance sampling (Vol. 16): Rutgers-The State University New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Dodge, H.F. and Romig, H. (1929). A method of sampling inspection. Bell System Technical Journal, 8(4), 613-631.

Garvin, D.A. (1987). Competing on the 8 dimensions of quality. Harvard business review, 65(6), 101-109.

Govindaraju, K. and Balamurali, S. (1998). Chain sampling plan for variables inspection. Journal of Applied Statistics, 25(1), 103-109.

Govindaraju, K. and Ganesalingam, S. (1997). Sampling inspection for resubmitted lots. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 26(3), 1163-1176.

Govindaraju, K. and Kuralmani, V. (1992). Modified tables for the selection of QSS–1 quick switching system for a given (AQL, LQL). Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 21(4), 1103-1123.

Hamaker, H. (1950). The theory of sampling inspection plans: publisher not identified.

Johnson, T. (1992). The relationship of to squared error loss. Journal of Quality Technology, 24(4), 211-215.

Juran, J.M. (1974). Quality Control Handbook, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, NY.

Kane, V.E. (1986). Process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology, 18(1), 41-52.

Myers, R.H., Montgomery, D.C. and Anderson-Cook, C.M. (2009). Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments (Vol. 705): John Wiley & Sons.

Owen, D. (1967). Variables sampling plans based on the normal distribution. Technometrics, 9(3), 417-423.

Pearn, W.L., Chang, Y.C. and Wu, C.W. (2004). Distributional and inferential properties of the process loss indices. Journal of Applied Statistics, 31(9), 1115-1135.

Pearn, W.L. and Wu, C.W. (2006). Critical acceptance values and sample sizes of a variables sampling plan for very low fraction of defectives. Omega, 34(1), 90-101.

Pearn, W.L. and Wu, C.W. (2007). An effective decision making method for product acceptance. Omega, 35(1), 12-21.

Romboski, L. (1969). An investigation of quick switching acceptance sampling system. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers State University.

Schilling, E.G. and Neubauer, D.V. (2008). Acceptance Sampling in Quality Control (2nd Edition). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.

Seidel, W. (1997). Is sampling by variables worse than sampling by attributes? A decision theoretic analysis and a new mixed strategy for inspecting individual lots. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B, 96-107.

Sherman, R.E. (1965). Design and evaluation of a repetitive group sampling plan. Technometrics, 7(1), 11-21.

Soundararajan, V. and Arumainayagam, S.D. (1990). Construction and selection of modified quick switching systems. Journal of Applied Statistics, 17(1), 83-114.

Soundararajan, V. and Palanivel, M. (1997). Quick switching variables single sampling (QSVSS) system indexed by AQL and LQL: Acceptance Criterion Tightening. Journal of Applied Statistics, 6(1), 45-57.

Taylor, W.A. (1996). A Program for Selecting Quick Switching Systems. Journal of Quality Technology, 28(4), 473-479.

Tsui, K.L. (1997). Interpretation of process capability indices and some alternatives. Quality engineering, 9(4), 587-596.

Wu, C.W., Aslam, M. and Jun, C.H. (2012). Variables sampling inspection scheme for resubmitted lots based on the process capability index . European Journal of Operational Research, 217(3), 560-566.

Yen, C.H. and Chang, C.H. (2009). Designing variables sampling plans with process loss consideration. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 38(8), 1579-1591.