本研究從策略實踐的觀點，觀察與分析會議規劃者及參與者如何做好議題設定的工作。議題設定是策略會議或是工作坊能否順利舉行的核心關鍵，也是近年來開放策略活動日趨蓬勃發展中的一個重要研究問題。我們的研究對象是台灣於2012年所舉行的第九次全國科學技術會議，因為牽涉領域廣泛，相關利害關係人多元，如何做好議題設定進而凝聚發展共識，是一件重要、但也深具挑戰性的工作。在方法上，我們紮根於質性的行動研究，歸納出三種議題設定的策略實踐手法，包括：問題化、未來化，以及連結化，同時也指出道德化所扮演的重要調節功能。我們的研究成果除了對於議題設定提供更豐富的解讀以外，對於策略實踐、策略會議，以及開放策略等領域也能提供理論與實務上的意涵。

This paper draws on a strategy-as-practice perspective to examine the articulation of agenda-setting, a key activity important for both strategy meetings and open strategy. Our research target is the 9th National Science and Technology Conference held by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan in 2012. The conference is nationwide, regularly organized, and has an open design, highlighting the importance of setting agendas skillfully to build consensus and guide action. Using qualitative-based action research procedures, we develop three strategy tools for the design and delivery of agenda-setting. These include problematizing, futurizing, and corresponding. We also point out moralizing as a moderator for such a strategic and creative process. We conclude by discussing the implications of our research for strategy workshops, strategy practices, and open strategy.

摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
謝 誌 III
目錄 X
圖目錄 XIII
表目錄 XIV
第壹章 導論 1
第一節 研究動機與問題 1
第二節 論文架構 4
第貳章 文獻與理論 5
第一節 策略實踐 5
第二節 會議在策略實踐過程的重要性 6
第三節 議題設定 8
第參章 研究方法 13
第一節 行動研究 13
第二節 研究對象 14
第三節 資料來源 15
第四節 資料分析 18
第肆章 第九次全科會 21
第一節 第九次全科會 21
第伍章 如何做好議題設定 24
第一節 三種議題設定的實踐方式 24
一 問題化 24
二 未來化 30
三 連結化 36
第二節 道德化的調節角色 43
第陸章 討論與結論 48
第一節 理論與實務意涵 48
第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議 52
參考文獻 72
一 中文部分 72
二 英文部分 74

一 中文部分
王佑曾，2012，第九次全國科技會議－議題四：「如何銜接上游學研與下游產業」，台北市，國科會。
朱敬一，2012，第九次全國科技會議－議題二 「如何做好臺灣的智財佈局」，台北市，國科會。
洪世章，2013，第九次全國科學技術會議議題先期研究計畫－子計畫二：新興科技產業相關議題研究，台北市，國科會。
胡志明，2012，第九次全國科技會議－議題六 「如何提升臺灣科技(資通訊)產業創新動能」，台北市，國科會。
柯承恩、陳忠仁，2013，第九次全國科技會議議題先期研究計畫－子計畫三：科技前瞻、人力資源與永續發展相關議題研究，台北市，國科會。
孫秀惠，1992，問題出在經濟，笨蛋！遠見雜誌，第78期。取自http://www.gvm.com.tw/Boardcontent_2719.html（最後瀏覽日期：2015年3月12日）
翁啟惠，2012，第九次全國科技會議－議題一：「如何提升台灣的學研地位？」，台北市，國科會。
陳建仁，2012，第九次全國科技會議－議題五 「如何推動由上而下的科技計畫」，台北市，國科會。
管中閔，2012，第九次全國科技會議－議題七 「如何面對臺灣的科技人才危機」，台北市，國科會。
劉兆漢，2012，第九次全國科技會議－議題三 「如何推動臺灣永續發展」，台北市，國科會。 
二 英文部分
Adams, B. 2004. Public meetings and the democratic process. Public Administration Review, 64(1): 43-54.
Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. 2006. Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: positioning data to contribute to theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(8): 819-841.
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. 2011. Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2): 247-271.
Amsden, A. H., & Chu, W. W. 2003. Beyond late development: Taiwan's upgrading policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Antonakis, J., Fenley, M., & Liechti, S. 2012. Learning charisma. Harvard Business Review, 90(6): 127-130.
Aristotle. 1991. The art of rhetoric. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Arrow, K. J. 1963. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. American Economic Review, 53(5): 941-973.
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1): 611-639.
Benton, M., & Frazier, P. J. 1976. The Agenda Setting Function of the Mass Media At Three Levels of Information Holding. Communication Research, 3(3): 261-274.
Bhaskar, R. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophic Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Brighton, UK: Harvester.
Boden, D. 1994. The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Breznitz, D. 2005. Development, flexibility and R & D performance in the Taiwanese IT industry: capability creation and the effects of state–industry coevolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(1): 153-187.
Brown, A. D., Ainsworth, S., & Grant, D. 2012. The rhetoric of institutional change. Organization Studies, 33(3): 297-321.
Burgelman, R. A. 1996. A process model of strategic business exit: Implications for an evolutionary perspective on strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Summer Special Issue): 193-214.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. 1979. Sociological Paradigm and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann.
Chen, M. J., Su, K-H, & Tsai, W. 2007. Competitive tension: The awareness-motivation-capability perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 101-118.
Cohen, B. C. 1963. The Public and Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cohen, D. 1975. A Report on A Non-election Agenda Setting Study. Association for Education in Journalism. Ottawa, Canada.
Cornelissen, J. P. 2005. Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 30(4): 751-764.
Cornelissen, J. P., Durand, R., Fiss, P. C., Lammers, J. C., & Vaara, E. 2015. Putting Communication Front and Center in Institutional Theory and Analysis. Academy of Management Review, 40(1): 10-27.
Cornelissen, J. P., Holt, R., & Zundel, M. 2011. The role of analogy and metaphor in the framing and legitimization of strategic change. Organization Studies, 32(12): 1701-1716.
Cornelissen, J. P., & Werner, M. D. 2014. Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1): 181-235.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. 1994. Introduction: Entering the field of qualitativeresearch. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Durkheim, E. 1951. Suicide. New York: The Free Press.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532-550.
Ezzamel, M. 1994. From problem solving to problematization: relevance revisited. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 5(3): 269-280.
Fligstein, M. 2001. Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2): 105-125.
Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York, NY: Random House LLC.
Freire, P. 1972. The pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.
Galer, G. 2004. Scenarios of change in South Africa. The Round Table, 93(375): 369-383.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Green Jr, S., & Li, Y. 2011. Rhetorical institutionalism: Language, agency, and structure in institutional theory since Alvesson 1993. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7): 1662-1697.
Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. 2010. Discourse, field-configuring events, and change in organizations and institutional fields: Narratives of DDT and the Stockholm Convention. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6): 1365-1392.
Hargadon, A. B., & Douglas, Y. 2001. When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3): 476-501.
Hendry, J., & Seidl, D. 2003. The structure and significance of strategic episodes: Social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1): 175-196.
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, R. 1995. Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hung, S.-C., & Whittington, R. 2011. Agency in National Innovation Systems: Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Professionalization of Taiwanese IT. Research Policy, 40(4): 526-538.
Iyengar, S. 1979. Television News and Issue Salience A Reexamination of the Agenda-Setting Hypothesis. American Politics Research, 7(4): 395-416.
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. 1985. Psychological accounts of agenda-setting. Mass Media and Political Thought, 117-140.
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. 1987. New that Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. 1993. News coverage of the gulf crisis and public opinion a study of agenda-setting, priming, and framing. Communication Research, 20(3): 365-383.
Jarzabkowski, P., & Seidl, D. 2008. The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy. Organization Studies, 29(11): 1391-1426.
Jick, T. D. 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4): 602-611.
Johnson, C., Dowd, T. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. 2006. Legitimacy as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 32: 53-78.
Johnson, G., Langely, A., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. 2007. Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, G., Prashantham, S., Floyd, S. W., & Bourque, N. 2010. The ritualization of strategy workshops. Organization Studies, 31(12): 1589-1618.
Kahane, A. 1992. The Mont Fleur Scenarios. Deeper News, 7(1): 1-22.
Kappel, T. A. 2001. Perspectives on roadmaps: How organizations talk about the future. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(1): 39-50.
Kingdon, J. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
Korkman, O., Storbacka, K., & Harald, B. 2010. Practices as markets: Value co-creation in e-invoicing. Australasian Marketing Journal, 18(4): 236-247.
Langley, A. 1999. Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4): 691-710.
Lewin, K. 1946. Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4): 34-46.
Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. 2001. Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7): 545-564.
Lounsbury, M., Ventresca, M., & Hirsch, P. M. 2003. Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: a cultural–political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Economic Review, 1(1): 71-104.
Luhmann, N. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Maguire, S. 2004. The co-evolution of technology and discourse: A study of substitution processes for the insecticide DDT. Organization Studies, 25(1): 113-134.
Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. 2009. Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1): 148-178.
Martin, B. R., & Johnston, R. 1999. Technology foresight for wiring up the national innovation system: experiences in Britain, Australia, and New Zealand. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 60(1): 37-54.
Mazarr, M. J. 2007. The Iraq War and Agenda Setting. Foreign Policy Analysis, 3(1): 1-23.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. 1972. The Agenda-setting function of the media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(summer): 176-187.
McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. 1993. The evolution of agenda-setting research：Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43 (2): 58-67.
Miettinen, R., Samra-Fredericks, D., & Yanow, D. 2009. Re-turn to practice: an introductory essay. Organization Studies, 30(12): 1309-1327.
Mintzberg, H. 1978. Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9): 934-948.
Mulgan, G. 2009. The Art of Public Strategy: Mobilizing Power and Knowledge for the Common Good. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1): 145-179.
Orlikowski, W. J. 2007. Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9): 1435-1448.
Parker, I. 1992. Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.
Parsons, T. 1960. Structure and Process in Modern Society. New York, NY: Free Press.
Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Peck, E., Gulliver, P., & Towell, D. 2004. Why do we keep on meeting like this? The board as a ritual in health and social care. Health Services Management Research, 17(2): 100-109.
Petrick, I. J., & Echols, A. E. 2004. Technology roadmapping in review: A tool for making sustainable new product development decisions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1): 81-100.
Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W., & Cameron, K. S. 2001. Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4): 697-713.
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. 2004. Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4): 635-652.
Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analysing Industries and Firms. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.
Portz, J. 1996. Problem definitions and policy agendas: Shaping the educational agenda in Boston. Policy Studies Journal, 24(3): 371-385.
Postma, T. J., & Liebl, F. 2005. How to improve scenario analysis as a strategic management tool?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(2): 161-173.
Ragin, C. C. 1987. The Comparative Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Rasche, A., & Chia, R. 2009. Researching strategy practices: a genealogical social theory perspective. Organization Studies, 30(7): 713-734.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). 2001. Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage Publications.
Reckwitz, A. 2002. Toward a Theory of Social Practices A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2): 243-263.
Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. 2011. Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization?. Organization, 18(1): 23-44.
Schaller, R. R. 1997. Moore’s law: Past, present, and future. IEEE Spectrum, 34(6): 52-59.
Scheufele, D. A. 2000. Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3(2-3): 297-316.
Schoemaker, P. J. 1995. Scenario planning: a tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36: 25-25.
Schwartzman, H. B. 1989. The meeting: Gatherings in organizations and communities. New York: Plenum.
Siggelkow, N. 2007. Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 20-24.
Simon, H. A. 1982. Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason (Vol. 3). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Simon, H. A. 1991. Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2 (1): 125-134.
Spee, A. P., & Jarzabkowski, P. 2011. Strategic planning as communicative process. Organization Studies, 32(9): 1217-1245.
Stringer, E. T. 2007. Action Research (Third Edition). London: Sage Publications.
Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571-610.
Suddaby, R. & Greenwood, R. 2005. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1): 35-67.
Susman, G. I., & Evered, R. D. 1978. An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(4): 582-603.
Sutherland, M., & Galloway, J. 1981. Role of advertising: Persuasion or agenda setting. Journal of Advertising Research, 21(5): 25-29.
Swinburne, R. 2002. Revelation: From metaphor to analogy. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Takeshita, T. 2006. Current critical problems in agenda-setting research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(3): 275-296.
Tengblad, S. (Ed.) 2012. The Work of Managers: Towards a Practice Theory of Management. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Tepper, S. 2004. Setting agendas and designing alternatives: Policymaking and the strategic role of meetings. Review of Policy Research, 21(4): 523-542.
Van de Ven, A. H. 1992. Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5): 169-188.
Vaara, E., & Whittington, R. 2012. Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1): 285-336.
Wade, R. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Whittington, R. 2007. Strategy practice and strategy process: family differences and the sociological eye. Organization studies, 28(10): 1575-1586.
Whittington, R., Cailluet, L., & Yakis‐Douglas, B. 2011. Opening strategy: Evolution of a precarious profession. British Journal of Management, 22(3): 531-544.
Whittington, R. & Yakis-Douglas, B. 2011. Strategic disclosure: the communication of strategy. In M. Barnett & T. Pollock (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation (pp. 402-419). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Yin, R. K. 1984. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Zaltman, G., & Zaltman, L. H. 2007. Marketing metaphoria: What deep metaphors reveal about the minds of consumers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Zilber, T. B. 2011. Institutional multiplicity in practice: A tale of two high-tech conferences in Israel. Organization Science, 22(6): 1539-1559.