現今在講究民意的現代社會中，無論是政治家或企業領導人，要說服民眾或員工接受領導，是個重要的議題，因此做好政策行銷，贏得跟隨者的認可，是一個重要的工具。
「構框」的觀念強調：領導人將感知到的事實的特定面向，作一些挑選，在一些溝通內容做強調或推廣，引導群眾聚焦在特定的觀察角度上，激勵跟從者去達成設定的目標。其中透過「情境規劃」的方式，建立未來各種的可能情境，將參考架構擴大，不只從單一角度審視狀況，而是採取多面向的方式，來發掘問題或釐清討論議題，並且更寬廣且自由的思考問題與建立共識。
將「情境規劃」作為「構框」工具，可以藉由設計未來可能的情境發展，產生共同的組織語言，達成組織內部的共識。亦即將各種未來的可能狀況做一些設計，降低群眾的疑慮，讓群眾對宣導的政策或策略方向產生信心，進而達到領導的效果。
本文亦針對幾個案例，進行情境規劃作為構框工具的探討：殼牌公司利用所發展的情境，成功的度過了能源危機；南非在民主化過程中，利用「鳥人情境」領導眾人支持謹慎的經濟政策；學生佔領立法院的情境分析、政府打房政策的情境分析；以及第九次全科會會議紀錄的分析。

In today's democratic society, whether politicians or business leaders need an effective policy marketing strategy powerful tool to persuade their followers to do.
The concept of framing is that the leader motivates followers to achieve the set goal through making emphasize some communication or promotional content, and guide the people to focus on a particular viewing angle.
The approach of scenario planning provides a variety of possible future scenarios to expand the frames of reference, and take more broad and liberal thinking way to have consensus-building.
The process of scenario planning approach as the framing tool is to design some possible future scenarios, develop common language, and therefore reaching a consensus within the organization.
This article also serves several cases ,which is related to scenario planning as the framing tool. Including Shell coping with the oil crisis successfully with using scenarios; the role of Icarus scenario in the democratization in South Africa; the scenarios about students occupied Legislative Yuan, the scenarios related to government's housing policy; and analyzing records of the 9th national science and technology conference.

摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
第一章 導論 1
第一節 研究目的 1
第二節 研究問題 1
第三節 研究方法 1
第二章 構框理論 3
第一節 構框理論 3
第二節 對話 10
第三章 情境規劃 13
第一節 情境規劃的由來 13
第二節 情境規劃與傳統預測的異同 14
第三節 情境規劃的定義 16
第四節 情境規劃的應用 17
第五節 情境的分類 22
第四章 情境規劃 24
第一節 情境規劃的案例 24
第二節 小結 31
第五章 結論 34
第一節 研究結論 34
第二節 研究貢獻 36
參考文獻 37

洪世章、曾詠青，2013。師出有名：如何做好政策行銷。首屆海峽兩岸科技管理學術年會，中國科學院大學（北京），2013年11月30日，兩岸研討會。
張寶誠，2009-11-16。「情境規劃 成功奠基」，經濟日報，A17版。
財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心，第九次核心討論會會議紀錄，2011，台北：財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心。
陳萬淇，1995。個案研究法，華泰書局。
葉至誠，2000。社會科學概論，揚智文化事業有限公司，102。
廖珮君，2014-05-14。「房價壓力測試 國銀全過關」，蘋果日報，財金新聞版。
劉倩華，2011，部會首長訪談紀錄。
蔡勝男，2004-11-10。「組織因應變革的決策制定途徑 ～情境規劃方法（下篇）」，T&D 飛訊，27，11-13，取自http://www.nacs.gov.tw/NcsiWebFileDocuments/c7678ba898b462c81e7ac95845714acc.pdf，最後一次拜訪日期：2013年10月26日。
ALTPS (Africa’s Long Term Perspective Study). 2003. Africa 2025. What Possible Futures for Sub-Saharan Africa?. Pretoria:University of South Africa Press.
Andrews, K. R. 1951. Executive training by the case method. Harvard Business Review, 29(5): 58-70.
Ansari, S. M., Fiss, P., & Zajac, E. J. (2010). Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Academy of Management Review, 35(1): 67-92.
Ashby, W. R. 1969. Self-regulation and requisite variety. Systems thinking: 105-124.
Barsalou, L. W. 1992. Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields. In E. Kittay & A. Lehrer(Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization: 21-74. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Barsalou, L. W., & Hale, C. R. 1993. Components of conceptual representation: From feature lists to recursive frames. In I. Van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R. Michalski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and concepts: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis: 97-144. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Becker, H. S. 1983. Scenarios: A tool of growing importance to policy analysts in government and industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 23(2): 95-120.
Beckert, J. 2010. How do fields change? The interrelations of institutions, networks,and Cognition in the dynamics of markets. Organization Studies, 31: 605-627.
Benford, R. D. 1993. Frame disputes within the nuclear disarmament movement. Social Forces, 71: 677-701.
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639.
Benner, M. J., & Tripsas, M. 2012. The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 277-302.
Bohm, D. 1996. On dialogue. New York, NY: Routledge.
Brauers, J., & Weber, M. 1988. A new method of scenario analysis for strategic planning. Journal of forecasting, 7(1): 31-47.
Bunn, D. W., & Salo, A. A. 1993. Forecasting with scenarios. European Journal of Operational Research, 68(3): 291-303.
Bunn, D. W., &Wright, G. 1991. Interaction of judgemental and statistical forecasting methods: Issues & analysis. Management Science, 37/5: 501-518.
Campbell, J. L. 2005. Where do we stand?. Social movements and organization theory: 41-48.
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. 2007. Framing theory. Annual Review of American Political Science, 10: 103-126.
Clark, H. H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Creed, D., DeJordy, R., & Lok, J. 2010. Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6): 1335-1364.
Creed, W. E. D., Langstraat, J. A., & Scully, M. A. 2002. A picture of the frame: Frame analysis as technique and as politics. Organizational Research Methods, 5(1): 34-35.
Davis, G. 2002. Scenarios as a Tool for the 21st Century. Probing the Future Conference, Strathclyde University, Glasgow, Scotland: 1-7.
Dewulf, A., Gray, B., Putnam, L., Lewicki, R., Aarts, N., Bouwen, R., & Van Woerkum,C. 2009. Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations, 62: 155-193.
Diehl, D., & McFarland, D. A. 2010. Towards a historical sociology of situations.American Journal of Sociology, 115(6), 1713-1752.
Druckman, J. N. 2001. The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3): 225-256.
Ducot, C., & Lubben, G.J. 1980. A typology for scenarios. Futures, 12/1: 51-57.
Edmundson, R. H. 1990. Decomposition: A strategy for judgemental forecasting. Journal of Forecasting, 9(4): 305- 314.
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. 1982. Prediction, diagnosis, and causal thinking in forecasting. Journal of Forecasting, 1(1): 23-36.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4): 532-550.
Entman, R. M. 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of communication, 43(4): 51-58.
Fay N., Garrod, S., & Roberts, L. 2008. The fitness and functionality of culturally evolved communication systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences, 363, 3553-3561.
Fischhoff, B. 1988. Judgmental aspects of forecasting: Needs and possible trends. International Journal of Forecasting, 4(3): 331-339.
Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. 2006. The symbolic management of strategic change:Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal,49(6): 1173-1193.
Galer, G. 2004. Scenarios of change in South Africa. The Round Table, 93(375): 369-383.
Garvin, D., & Roberto, M. 2005. Change through persuasion. Harvard Business Review, 83(2): 105-112.
Gergen, K., Gergen, M., & Barrett, F. 2004. Dialogue: Life and death of the organization. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 39-59.) London. Sage Publications.
Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. 1991. Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 433-448.
Godet, M. 2000. The art of scenarios and strategic planning: tools and pitfalls.Technological forecasting and social change, 65(1): 3-22.
Goffman, E. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston,MA: North Eastern University Press.
Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hendry, J., & Seidl, D. 2003. The structure and significance of strategic episodes: Social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1): 175-196.
Hodgkinson, G., Whittington, R., Johnson, G., & Schwarz, M. (2006). The role of strategy workshops in strategy development processes. Long Range Planning, 39, 479-496.
Huss, W. R. 1988. A move toward scenario analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 4(3): 377-388.
Isaacs, W. 1993. Taking flight: Dialogue, collective thinking, and organizational learning. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2): 24-39.
Isaacs, W. 1999. Dialogue and the art of thinking together. New York, NY: Random House.
Isaacs, W. 2001. Toward an action theory of dialogue. International Journal of Public Administration, 24(7/8): 709-748.
Jennings, R. 2014. Three Scenarios That End Occupation of Taiwan Parliament. Forbes. 取自www.forbes.com/sites/ralphjennings/2014/04/01/three-scenarios-to-end-taiwan-protests-against-china-trade-pact/，最後一次拜訪日期：2014年4月20日。
Jungermann, H. 1985. Inferential processes in the construction of scenarios. Journal of Forecasting, 4(4): 321-327.
Kahane, A. 1992. The Mont Fleur scenarios. Deeper News.
Kahn, H., & Wiener, A. J. 1967. The year 2000: a framework for speculation on the next thirty-three years. Macmillan publishing company, New York.
Kaplan, S. 2008. Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organization Science, 19(5): 729-752.
Keepin, B., & Wynne B. 1984. Technical analysis of IIASA energy scenarios. Nature. 312: 691-695.
Kellogg, K. C. 2009. Operating room: Relational spaces and micro-institutional change in surgery. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 657-711.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Levinthal, D., & Rerup, C. 2006. Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science, 17(4): 502-513.
Linneman, R. E., &Kennell, J. D. 1977. Shirt-sleeve approach to long-range plans. Harvard Business Review, 55/2: 141-150.
MacNulty, R.1977. Scenario development for corporate planning. Futures, 9(2): 128-138.
Maitlis, S., & Lawrence, T. 2007. Triggers and enablers of sensegiving in organizations.Academy of Management Journal, 50: 57-84.
Maitlis, S., & Sonenshein, S. 2010. Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick 1988. Journal of Management Studies, 47: 551-580.
March, J. C., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
Miilett, S.M. 1988. How scenarios trigger strategic thinking. Long Range Planning, 21/5: 61-68.
Miller, D. 1993. The architecture of simplicity. Academy of Management review, 18(1): 116-138.
Ney, S., & Thompson. M. 2000. Cultural discourses in the global climate change debate. Society, behaviour, and climate change mitigation: 65-92.
Oliver, P., & Johnston, H. 2000. What a good idea! Frames and ideologies in social movement research. Mobilization, 5: 1-18.
Peterson, G. D., Cumming, G. S., & Carpenter, S. R. 2003. Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation biology, 17(2): 358-366.
Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. M. 2001. Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1): 283-305.
Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. 1997. Switching Trains of Thought The Impact of News Frames on Readers' Cognitive Responses. Communication research, 24(5): 481-506.
Schnaars, S. P. 1987. How to develop and use scenarios. Long Range Planning, 20/1: 105-114.
Schoemaker, P. J. H. 1995. Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36: 25-40.
Schwartz, P. 1998. Scenario Planning: Managing for the Future. Wiley&Sons: 35-37
Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Scott, W. R. 2003. Institutional carriers: Reviewing modes of transporting ideas overtime and space and considering their consequences. Industrial and CorporateChange, 12: 879-894.
Senge, P. 1990. The fifth discipline: The art and science of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.
Senge, P. 2006. The fifth discipline. London: Random House.
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. 1988. Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization.International. Social Movement Research, 1, 197-217.
Sonenshein, S. 2006. Crafting social issues at work. Academy of Management Journal,49: 1158-1172.
Starbuck, W., & Milliken, F. 1988. Executive perceptual filters: What they notice and how they make sense. In D. Hambrick (Ed.), The executive effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers (pp. 35-65). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Tannen, D. 1985. Frames and schemas in interaction. Quaderni di Semantica, 6(2): 326-335.
Terreblanche, S. 2002. A history of inequality in South Africa, 1652-2002.Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press.
Thompson, I. 1999. Women and feminism in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 13(2): 154-179.
Van der Heijden, K. 1996. Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation. John Wiley & Sons. New Jersey.
Wack, P. 1985. Scenarios: Uncharted Waters Ahead. Harvard Business Review. Vol 2, 2: 73-80.
Walters, C. J. l986. Adaptive management of renewable resources. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, NY, 374.
Weber, K., Heinze, K. L., & DeSoucey, M. 2008. Forage for thought: Mobilizing codesin the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Administrative ScienceQuarterly, 53: 529-567.
Weick, K. E. 1993. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 628-652.
Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Weick, K.E. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing, Addison Wesley, MA
Zakay, D. 1983. The relationship between the probability assessor and the outcomes of an event as a determiner of subjective probability. Acta psychologica, 53(3): 271-280.