|
1. 宋欣穎. (2012). 專利授權暨拍賣平台 2012年首度秋拍即將登場. DIGITIMES中文網. 新竹市 2. 吳亞君. (2000). 航太科技教育產學聯盟策略之研究. 臺灣師範大學. Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database. (2000年) 3. 李聖賢. (2009). 產學關係持續性之研究. 暨南大學國際企業學系學位論文(2009 年), 1-113. 4. 孟繼洛. (2003). 產學合作教育的新思維: 技術及職業教育雙月刊. 5. 洪友芳, 何. (2013). 交大成員不當使用IP 台積電提告. 6. 洪鉛財, & 張文龍. (2002). 創新育成中心進駐戶類型與培育服務需求關系探討—進駐戶觀點. [A Study on the Nurturing Services Demand Among the Type of Incubator Tenants — The Tenants' Point of View]. 中華管理學報, 3(2), 17-29. 7. 徐作聖. (1999). 全球化科技政策與企業經營, 華泰出版社, 台灣台北. 8. 馬自明. (2011). 新交大幫「吃軟不吃硬」. 財訊雙週刊. 9. 國立交通大學. (2009). 97年度學校自訂績效及目標值達成情形. 國立交通大學. 10. 國立交通大學. (2012). 交通大學十年發展藍圖. 新竹市. 11. 國立清華大學. (2013). 國立清華大學2012校務年報. 新竹市,台灣. 12. 國立清華大學產學合作辦公室. (2012). 創業清華. 國立清華大學出版社. 新竹市,台灣 13. 國立清華大學教師借調兼職兼課處理要點 (2014). 14. 張元杰, 朱詣尹, 洪世章, & 林博文. (2003). Stimulating technology transfer through effective policy mechanisms (Vol. Final Report). Taipei: APEC-STPRC. 15. 張元杰, 周雅燕, 高建, 蔡林彤飛, & 范舜雯. (2013). 創業型大學之發展-對大學評鑑的省思. 評鑑雙月刊, (43), 37-42. 16. 張翼. (2014). 教授們~您辛苦的智慧財產/研究結晶,請不要再輕忽了! [Press release] 17. 教育部. (2009). 97年度大專校院產學合作績效評量結果公布!. 教育部電子報. 18. 教育部高教司. (2012). 100年度大專校院產學合作績效評量結果. 高教技職簡訊, 70(教育部). 19. 許秩維. (2013). 交大研發電晶體 速度世界第一, 中央社. 20. 陳姿伶. (2004). 個案研究法 (Case Study). 21. 陳達仁, & 耿筠. (2007). 95 年度大專校院產學合作績效評量結果. 評鑑雙月刊, (10) 22. 陳達仁, & 耿筠. (2008). 96 年度大專校院產學合作績效評量結果. 評鑑雙月刊, (15), 38-42. 23. 陳達仁, & 耿筠. (2010). 98 年度大專校院產學合作績效評量結果. 評鑑雙月刊, (28) 24. 陳達仁. (2011). 99年度大專校院產學合作績效評量結果. 評鑑雙月刊, 34(財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會). 25. 耿筠, & 張明華. (2010). 從產學合作績效評量看技專校院如何做好智財管理制度的精進. 評鑑雙月刊, (28), 37-41. 26. 彭明輝. (2011). 清大彭明輝的部落格. 27. 黃彥瑜. (2013). 邁向華人首學─清華全面品質管理的創新與實踐. 台北市: 遠見天下文化. 28. 黃琬婷. (2009). 台灣公私立大學經營為創業型大學之研究. (博士(Doctor)), 國立臺灣師範大學, 台北市. 29. 葉重新. (2001). 教育研究法. 台北: 心理. 30. 葛孟堯, 劉江彬, & 耿筠. (2010). 影響我國大學技術移轉績效因素之研究. [The Research of the Factors of Technology Transfers Performance of Universities in Taiwan]. 科技管理學刊, 15(2), 55-82. 31. Chang, Y.-C., Chen, M.-H., Hua, M., & Yang, P. Y. (2006). Managing academic innovation in Taiwan: Towards a ‘scientific–economic’framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(2), 199-213. 32. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Issues in Higher Education: ERIC. 33. Clark, B. R. (2000). Collegical Entrepreneurialism In Proactive Universities: Lessons From Europe. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 32(1), 10-19. 34. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Mustar, P., & Knockaert, M. (2007). Academic spin-offs, formal technology transfer and capital raising. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4). 35. Corman, J., Perles, B., & Vancini, P. (1988). Motivational factors influencing high-technology entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 26(1), 36-42. 36. D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research policy, 36(9), 1295-1313. 37. D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316-339. 38. Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research policy, 34(3), 349-367. 39. Duke, C. R. (1995). Organizational conflicts affecting technology commercialization from nonprofit laboratories. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 4(5), 5-13. 40. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550. 41. Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research policy, 27(8), 823-833. 42. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research policy, 32(1), 109-121. 43. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple Helix: university-industry-government. Innovation in action. 44. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123. 45. Franklin, S. J., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2001). Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 127-141. 46. Ghosh, B., & Kwan, W. (1996). An analysis of key success factors of SMEs: a comparative study of Singapore/Malaysia and Australia/New Zealand. Paper presented at the The 41st ICSB World Conference Proceedings I. 47. Goldfarb, B., & Henrekson, M. (2003). Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research policy, 32(4), 639-658. 48. Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research policy, 40(8), 1045-1057. 49. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 119-127. 50. Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research policy, 38(6), 922-935. 51. Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001). Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review, 240-259. 52. Landry, R., Amara, N., & Rherrad, I. (2006). Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities. Research policy, 35(10), 1599-1615. 53. Landry, R., Saïhi, M., Amara, N., & Ouimet, M. (2010). Evidence on how academics manage their portfolio of knowledge transfer activities. Research policy, 39(10), 1387-1403. 54. Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations. Science and public policy, 23(5), 279-286. 55. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56-63. 56. Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields. Research policy, 27(8), 835-851. 57. Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980. Research policy, 30(1), 99-119. 58. Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2002). Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayhā€“Dole act in the United States. Research policy, 31(3), 399-418. 59. Murray, F., & Stern, S. (2007). Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge?: An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(4), 648-687. 60. Nelson, R. R. (2004). The market economy, and the scientific commons. Research policy, 33(3), 455-471. 61. O'Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities. Research policy, 34(7), 994-1009. 62. O'Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Morse, K. P., O'Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Management, 37(1), 1-16. 63. Ounjian, M., Carne, EB. (1987). .A study factors witch affect technology transfer in a multiplication multibusiness unit corporation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 34(3), 194-201. 64. Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research policy, 23(5), 487-521. 65. Peters, L., & Fusfeld, H. (1982). University-industry research relationships. National Science Foundation, USA. 66. Philpott, K., Dooley, L., O'Reilly, C., & Lupton, G. (2011). The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31(4), 161-170. 67. Renault, C. S. (2006). Academic capitalism and university incentives for faculty entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2), 227-239. 68. Rothaermel, F. T., & Thursby, M. (2005). Incubator firm failure or graduation?: The role of university linkages. Research policy, 34(7), 1076-1090. 69. Shane, S. (2004a). Academic entrepreneurship: Edward Elgar Publishing. 70. Shane, S. (2004b). Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 127-151. 71. Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640-660. 72. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111-133. 73. Stankiewicz, R. (1986). Academics and entrepreneurs: developing university-industry relations: Pinter London. 74. Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation: Brookings Institution Press. 75. Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2002). Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science, 48(1), 90-104. 76. Upstill, G., & Symington, D. (2002). Technology transfer and the creation of companies: the CSIRO experience. R&D Management, 32(3), 233-239. 77. Wallmark, J. T. (1997). Inventions and patents at universities: The case of Chalmers University of Technology. Technovation, 17(3), 127-139. 78. Wong, P.-K., Ho, Y.-P., & Singh, A. (2007). Towards an “entrepreneurial university” model to support knowledge-based economic development: The case of the National University of Singapore. World Development, 35(6), 941-958. 79. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods. |