在現今社會，是個重視人民聲音與自主的時代，因此政策行銷是一個非常重要的政治工具。其中「議題設定」（Agenda-Setting）在媒體的佈局上對於政策有莫大的影響。政治家和領導人可以經由公開設定某些特別的議題，來告訴人們該想什麼，進而得到動員群眾的力量，借此推廣其想要執行的政策。大眾媒體中的報章雜誌，是議題設定的重要媒介。政府官員通常有許多面對媒體或群眾的機會，在公開場合、網路社群、媒體雜誌採訪等等來強調、型塑議題的方向。透過媒體持續不斷的報導某些重大議題，並引發一連串議題討論，會讓議題變得更具爭議性，可以對聽眾或讀者產生類似「催眠式」或是「洗腦式」的動員與改變效果。（洪世章、曾詠青, 2013）
1972年，Maxwell McCombs與Donald L. Shaw為議題設定一詞開啟了迄今超過三十餘年（1972-現今）的研究途徑。然而議題設定一詞並非McCombs與Shaw所獨創，非這兩人最早提出，也非這兩人所獨有，只是因為這三十餘年來的文獻積累與既定論述，使得議題設定成為McCombs與Shaw的代稱。
經由不斷地尋找資料與參考文獻，學生期望能整理出整體完善議題設定的理論。因此本研究論文希望規劃出：
1.構框下完整的議題設定
2.議題誘因、事件如何引導議題設定
3.政策（行銷）議題設定過程
4.現今研究的趨勢
5.現今議題設定研究的障礙

關鍵字：議題設定、構框、議題誘因、事件、設定障礙、政策行銷、說服

In today's society, it is a great importance to the people's voice and autonomy era, so the marketing policy is a very important political tool. While "Agenda-Setting" in the layout of the media, has a great influence on the policy. Politicians and leaders can set some particular through public agenda, telling people what to think, and then get the strong power to mobilize the masses, thereby promoting policies they want to perform. Mass media in newspapers and magazines, the media agenda setting is important. Government officials often have many opportunities to face the media or the masses, in public, online communities, media magazine interview, etc. to emphasize issues shaping the direction. Continuing coverage of certain major issues through the media and sparked a series of topics for discussion, will become more controversial topics, listeners or readers can have a similar "Hypnotic" or alter the effect of mobilization and "brainwashing" in.（Hung & Tseng, 2013）
In 1972, Maxwell McCombs and Donald L. Shaw term Agenda-Setting for the order to open far more than three dozen years（1972-Current）research avenues. However, the term Agenda-Setting that McCombs and Shaw are not original, first proposed that the two non- nor unique to these two people, just because of more than thirty years with the established literature plot cumulative discourse, making agenda setting becomes McCombs and Shaw 's in lieu of that.
By constantly looking for information and references, I hope to sort out the issues set theory as a whole to improve. So I will be planned out that this essay：
1.A complete set of issues under the framing.
2.Agenda incentive, how to guide agenda by events.
3.Policy（Marketing）agenda-setting process.
4.Trends of the current study.
5.The current research topics of obstacles.

Keywords: Agenda-Setting, Framing, Agenda incentive, Events, Setting barriers, Policy marketing, Persuasion

目錄
致謝詞 I
摘要 II
Abstract III
圖目錄 VII
表目錄 VIII
第一章 導論 1
第一節 研究目的 1
第二節 研究問題 2
第三節 研究方法 2
第二章 構框理論 7
第一節 何謂構框理論？ 7
2.1.1 構框（Framing） 7
2.1.2 構框的策略性應用 7
第二節 構框層級 8
2.2.1構框（Framing）與框架（Frame） 8
2.2.2 微觀層級 12
2.2.3 中間層級 13
2.2.4 總體層級 14
第三節 策略會議 15
2.3.1 會議（Meeting） 16
2.3.2 情節（Episode） 17
2.3.3 第一部分：策略會議的特色 19
2.3.4 第二部份：會議結構的分類 23
第三章 文獻探討 25
第一節 何謂議題設定？ 25
3.1.1 議題設定之源起、理論 25
3.1.2 議題設定之研究範圍、領域 26
3.1.3 議題設定之內涵、步驟、模式 36
第二節 整合性研究 37
3.2.1 議題誘因 37
3.2.2 事件 39
3.2.3 設定障礙 42
第三節 觀念性架構 44
第四章 個案分析 48
第一節 首長訪談 Interview PDF for research 48
4.1.1 前農委會林享能主委 48
4.1.2 時任經濟部長次長黃重球 50
4.1.3 時任李鴻源政務員 52
4.1.4 時任科顧組陳炳煇執秘 54
4.1.5 時任中研院陳建仁副院長 56
第二節 會議記錄節錄 59
第五章 結論與建議 71
參考文獻 74


圖目錄
圖 1、Summary of meeting data set 18
圖 2、Meeting Initiation Practices and Their Implications 19
圖 3、Meeting Conduct Practices and Their Implications 21
圖 4、Meeting Termination Practices and Their Implications 22
圖 5、The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy. 24
圖 6、國際社會化與研究議題設定之分析 32
圖 7、Role of Advertising: Persuasion or Agenda-Setting? 35
圖 8、The Emergence of American Political Issues: The Agenda-Setting Function of the Press 41
圖 9、Typology of campaign audiences and likely media effects on each type 43
圖 10、議題設定構框觀念性架構 47


表目錄
表 1 1 以質化方法進行研究之議題設定相關論文整理 3
表 1 2 研究策略與問題類型 4
表 2 1 Putting Framing in Perspective：A Review of Framing and Frame Analysis across the Management and Organizational Literature 9

王啟明，2012，「 國際社會化與研究議題設定之分析」，全球政治評論，(40)， 67-88。
洪世章、曾詠青，2014，「師出有名：如何做好政策行銷」，產業與管理論壇，16（2）：26-42。
張耀仁，2006，「跨媒體議題設定之探析：整合次領域研究的觀點」，傳播與管理研究。
郭陽道，1979，「新聞媒介議題設定理論的理論及其研究趨勢」，新聞學研究。
葉至誠，2000，「社會科學概論」，揚智文化事業有限公司。
Adams, B. 2004 „Public meetings and the democratic process‟. Public Administration Review 64: 43-54.
Ansari, S. M., Fiss, P., & Zajac, E. J. 2010. Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 67–92.
Balogun, J., P. Jarzabkowski and D. Seidl (eds). 2007. Special Issue „Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective‟. Human Relations 60(1).
Bateson, G. 1955/1972. Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine (original work published 1955).
Benford, R. D. 1997. An insider’s critique of the social movement framing perspective. Sociological Inquiry, 67, 409–443.
Benford, R.D. & Snow, D.A. 2000. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview andAssessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 611-639.
Benford, R.D., Snow, D.A., 2000. Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26, 611–639.
Benner, M. J., & Tripsas, M. 2012. The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 277–302.
Benton, M., & Frazier, P. J. 1976. The Agenda Setting Function of the Mass Media At Three Levels of" Information Holding". Communication Research, 3(3), 261-274.
Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. 1954. Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Boden, D. 1994 The business of talk: organizations in action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Burke, K. 1937. Attitudes towards history. New York: New Republic
Campbell, J.L., 2005. Where do we stand? Common mechanisms in organizations and social movements research. In: Davis, G.F., McAdam, D., Scott, W.R., Zald, M.N. (Eds.), Social Movements and Organization Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 41–68.
Cohen, B. C. 1963. The Public and Foreign Policy. Princeton：Princeton University Press.
Cohen, D. 1975. A report on a non-election agenda setting study. Association for Education in Journalism. Ottawa, Canada.
Cornelissen, J. P., & Werner, M. D. 2014. Putting Framing in Perspective: A Review of Framing and Frame Analysis across the Management and Organizational Literature. The Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 8, No. 1, 181–235
Creed, W. E. D., Langstraat, J. A., & Scully, M. A. 2002. A picture of the frame: Frame analysis as technique and as politics.Organizational Research Methods,5(1), 34–35.
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. 1999. Just going along: Nonconscious priming and conformity to social pressure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 578–589.
Ghanem, S. 1997. Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda-setting. In M. McCombs, D. L. Shaw, & D. Weaver , Communication and democracy (pp. 3–14). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gillham, B. 2000. Case study research methods. Continuum.
Hanggi, H. 2006. Interregionalism as a Multifaceted Phenomenon: In Search of a Typology, in Heiner Hanggi et al. eds., Interregionalism and International Relations . London: Routledge. pp.31-42.
Hendry, J. 2000 „Strategic decision making, discourse, and strategy as social practice‟. Journal of Management Studies 37: 955-977.
Hendry, J., and D. Seidl 2003 „The structure and significance of strategic episodes: social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change‟. Journal of Management Studies 40: 175-196.
Hung, S. C., & Whittington, R. 2011. Agency in national innovation systems: Institutional entrepreneurship and the professionalization of Taiwanese IT.Research Policy, 40 (4), 526-538.
Hymes, D. 1974. Foundations of sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Iyengar, S. 1990. The accessibility bias in politics: Television news and public opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2, 1–15.
Iyengar, S. 1991. Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, S.,＆Kinder D. R. 1987. New that matters. Chicago＆London: The University of Chicago Press.
Janis, I. 1982. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Jarzabkowski, P., & Seidl, D. 2008. The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy. Organization Studies, 29(11), 1391-1426.
Johnson, G., L. Melin and R. Whittington 2003 „Micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view‟. Journal of Management Studies 40/1: 3-22
Kingdon, J. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: HarperCollins.
Kingdon, J. W., & Thurber, J. A. 1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (Vol. 45). Boston: Little, Brown.
Klapper, J. T. 1960. The effects of mass communication. Glencoe, Illinois :Free Press
Lang, G. E., ＆ Lang, K. 1981. Watergate. An exploration of the agenda-building process. In C. G. Wilhoit ＆ H. D. Bock (Ed.), Mass communication review yearbook, Volume2 (pp. 447-468). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Lazarsfeld, P. F. 1940. Radio and the printed page: An introduction to the study of radio and its role in the communication of ideas. Duell, Sloan and Pearce.
Levy, J. 1994. Learning and Foreign Policy. International Organization, Vol.48, No.2, pp.283-284.
Lounsbury, M., Ventresca, M., & Hirsch, P. M. 2003. Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: a cultural–political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Economic Review.
Luhmann, N. 1990. Anfang und Ende: Probleme einer Unterscheidung. in Zwischen anfang und ende: fragen an die pädagogik. N. Luhmann and K. E. Schorr (eds), 11-23. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, N. 1995 Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Maher, T. M. 2001. Framing: An emerging paradigm or a phase of agenda setting. Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, 83-94.
Martin, S.A. 1975. Youth unrest on the national agenda：studying a decade of public opinion. Newhouse Communications Research Center.
Mazarr, M. J. 2007. The Iraq War and Agenda Setting. Foreign Policy Analysis,3(1), 1-23.
McCombs, M & Shaw, D.L.1993.The evolution of agenda-setting research：Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication，43，58-67.
McCombs, M. E. & Shaw, D. L. 1972. The Agenda-setting function of the media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36(summer)176-187.
McCombs, M. E. & Shaw, D. L.1973. Political Issues and Voter Need for Orientation in McCombs, M. E and Shaw, D. L1997(eds) The Emergence of American Political Issues：The Agenda-Setting Function of the Press. West Publishing Co.
McCombs, M. E., & Schulte, H. F. 1975. Expanding the domain of the agenda-setting function of mass communication. World Assoc. Public Opin. Res. Congr., Montreaux, Switzerland.
McLeod, J. M., Becker, L. B., Byrnes, J. E. 1974. “Another look at the Agenda-setting function of the press”. Communication Research 1(April)131-166.
McManus, J. H. 1994. Market-driven journalism: Let the citizen beware?. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. 2000. News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science
O‟Leary, J.(ed) 1997 The Times good university guide: 1997. London: Times Books.
Peck, E., P. 6, P. Gulliver and D. Towell 2004 „Why do we keep on meeting like this? the board as a ritual in health and social care‟. Health Services Management Research 17: 100-109.
Ragin, C. C. 1987. The comparative methods. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Reese, S. D.,＆Danielian, L. H. 1989. Intermedia influence and the drug issue: Converging on Cocaine. In P. J. Shoemaker (Ed.), Communication campaigns about drugs: Government, media and the public (pp. 29-45). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Regelsberger, E.1990. The Dialogue of the EC/Twelve with Other Regional Group: A NewEuropean Identity in the International System? in Geoffrey Edwards and Elfriede Regelsberger eds., Europe’s Global Links: The European Community and Inter-Regional Cooperation . London: Pinter Publishers. pp.9-15.
Scheufele, D. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103–122.
Schwartzman, H. B. 1989 The meeting: gatherings in organizations and communities. NewYork: Plenum.
Simon, H. 1997 Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press.
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International social movement research, 1(1), 197-217.
Snow, D. A., Burke Rochford, E., Jr., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 54, 464–481.
Starbuck, W. H. (1983). Organizations as action generators. American Sociological Review, 48, 91–102.
Sutherland, M., & Galloway, J. 1981. Role of advertising: persuasion or agenda setting?. Journal of Advertising Research.
Takeshita, T. 1998. Media no gidai-settei kino : The agenda-setting function of the media. Tokyo: Gakubunsha
Takeshita, T. 2006. Current critical problems in agenda-setting research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 275–296.
Tepper, S. 2004 „Setting agendas and designing alternatives: policymaking and the strategic role of meetings‟. Review of Policy Research 21: 523-542.
Terry L. I. (2001) Thrips and weevils as dual, specialist pollinators of the Australian cycad Macrozamia communis(Zamiaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 162: 1293 –1305
Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6(3), 280–321.
Weber, K., Heinze, K. L., & DeSoucey, M. (2008). Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 529–567.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Young, M. L. 1992. Dictionary of polling: The languages of contemporary opinion research. Westport, CT: Greenwood.