帳號:guest(18.119.167.33)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):詹淳惠
作者(外文):Chan, Chun Hui
論文名稱(中文):利用電子自旋共振方法研究熱與化學變性作用對於 Bax 蛋白質之穩定性情形
論文名稱(外文):An Assessment of Bax Protein Stability by Thermal and Chemical Denaturation Using Cw-ESR
指導教授(中文):江昀緯
指導教授(外文):Chiang, Yun-Wei
口試委員(中文):王聖凱
陳佩燁
江昀緯
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:化學系
學號:101023517
出版年(民國):104
畢業學年度:103
語文別:英文中文
論文頁數:85
中文關鍵詞:蛋白質蛋白結構電子自旋共振
外文關鍵詞:BaxProtein structureElectron spin resonance
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:51
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
Bax是一種參與細胞凋亡過程的蛋白質,其中作用機制已經有完整的研究,但是Bax本身的穩定性和變性性質卻很少人探討,因此這篇論文會著重在探討Bax蛋白的穩定性和變性性質。本篇論文會以電子自旋共振光譜儀、旋光光譜儀和Thermofluor來探討Bax在熱和化學作用下的性質,期盼能從根本上了解Bax蛋白質 。

經由電子自旋共振光譜儀的分析,Bax可以分成兩區域:N-terminal和C-terminal。N-terminal是第1到88號氨基酸,此區域在化學作用下會完全失去結構,而剩下的C-terminal卻仍然保有部份結構。從序列的特性來看,百分之九十的含苯環氨基酸都分布在C-terminal,而這些含苯環氨基酸在距離夠近的情況下會產生交互作用,進而穩定蛋白質結構,這就是Bax在化學變性作用下還能保有部份結構的原因。

旋光光譜儀在熱變性作用下顯示Bax仍然存在二級結構和三級結構,這呼應了前面電子自旋共振光譜儀的論點。再者,Thermofluor利用螢光也量化不同突變點的熱穩定性,發現把含苯環氨基酸取代掉的位點(或是空間上靠近含苯環氨基酸的位點)會使蛋白質的熱穩定性下降特別顯著,因此可以證明含苯環氨基酸之間的交互作用是穩定蛋白質結構很重要的因素。

綜合以上, Bax因為有含苯環氨基酸之間的作用力,使得不管是在高溫或是高濃度化學變性劑的環境下都能保有部份結構。
Bcl2 associated X (Bax) protein is an apoptotic member in the Bcl-2 protein family and playing a key role in regulating the apoptotic signaling. However, it remains unclear about the stability and unfolding of Bax protein. This study has reported a comprehensive investigation on the stability of Bax and many Bax variants in 0 and 6 M GdnHCl using ESR, CD, and Thermofluor spectroscopy methods. Nitroxide-based spin label (designated as R1 side chain) was used to probe the changes in local environment of protein with the applied chemical and thermal denaturation. ESR spectra were collected from various sites spanning over the nine α-helices of Bax at temperatures −23, 2, and 25 oC, providing information about how local environment of the respective nine helices is changed with the presence of GdnHCl at varying temperatures. Based on the observed site-specific ESR spectral changes, we found that Bax can be divided into two structural regions, of which respond differently to the presence of GdnHCl. In a solution containing 6 M GdnHCl, the N-terminal region (i.e., the first 88 residues from the N terminus, namely the helices from α1 to α3) was found to unfold largely because the corresponding spectra became similar and exhibited a highly mobile state, whereas the C-terminal region (covering from α4 to α9) of Bax was found to retain to some extent its local structures and remain unfolded. Some of the spectra from the C-terminal region even showed an enhanced immobilization of the R1 side chain either in 6 M GdnHCl or at high temperatures, supporting a view that the C-terminal region retains a well-defined tertiary structure against chemical and thermal denaturation. This finding was evidently supported by the results of CD spectroscopy. The far-UV CD spectra confirmed an appreciable amount of α-helical content of Bax in 0 M GdnHCl at high temperatures (90 oC). Most importantly, CD signal in the near-UV region was observed to be significant in magnitude at 2 oC and continuously increase with increasing temperature, suggesting that aromatic interactions are present within Bax structure and playing an important role in stabilizing Bax against the denaturing effect of increasing temperature. The importance of aromatic interactions within Bax structure was further confirmed by structural calculations to show that a total of 12 aromatic pairs were involved in aromatic interactions in the C-terminal region. Moreover, our Thermofluor assay showed that a point mutation in the interior surrounded by α4, α5, and α6 (particularly in the sequence from 99 to 117) in the C-terminal region would largely disrupt the stability of the whole Bax protein because the interior was spatially crowded with residues involved in aromatic-aromatic and cation-pi interactions in the C-terminal region. As such, we conclude that a molten globule state of Bax protein, which is composed of a coil-like denatured segment in the N-terminal region and a dry core in the C-terminal region, can exist as a stable monomer in 6 M GdnHCl at room temperatures or in 0 M GdnHCl at temperatures up to 90 oC (provided that the core sequence from 99 to 117 is not mutated). Because the aromatic interactions contribute significantly to the stabilization of the C-terminal region, Bax was found to largely unfold only at high temperatures in 6 M GdnHCl. Moreover, our results have evidently ruled out the “indirect interaction mechanism” that protein denaturation occurs because denaturants preferentially solvate hydrophobic residues, which in turn destabilize the native structure of a protein. The C-terminal region of Bax is a highly stable molten globule intermediate and is resistant to the denaturation by either heat or 6 M GdnHCl. Only by combining the effects of thermal and chemical denaturation could we unfold the molten globule intermediate of Bax and distinguish its stabilities.
Ⅰ. Outline

1. Introduction 1
1.1. Study Background and Motivation 1
1.2. Protein Unfolding by Urea and Guanidine Hydrochloride 3
1.2.1. The Difference between Urea and Guanidine Hydrochloride 4
1.2.2. Protein is Partially Unfolded by High Concentration of Denaturant 6
2. Theory 7
2.1. Electron Spin Resonance 7
2.1.1. Historical Perspective 7
2.1.2. Paramagnetic Substances 8
2.1.3. Zeeman Effect and Resonance 9
2.1.4. Hyperfine Interaction 12
2.1.5. ESR Spectra 14
2.1.5.1. Site-Directed Spin Labeling 15
2.1.5.2. The Orientation of Nitroxide Spin Label 16
2.1.5.3. The Motion of Nitroxide Spin Label 17
2.1.5.4. Fast Motion 18
2.1.5.5. Slow Motion 18
2.1.5.6. Very Slow Motion 19
2.2. Circular Dichroism 21
2.2.1. Introduction 21
2.2.2. Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) Analysis. 22
2.3. Thermofluor Essay 23
2.3.1. Introduction 23
3. Material and Methods 27
3.1. Preparation of Bax Cysteine Mutants 27
3.2. Mutant Bax Expression and Purification 27
3.3. EPR Sample Preparation 28
3.4. Cw-ESR Spectroscopy 29
3.4.1. Denaturant Experiment 29
3.4.2. Heating Experiment 29
3.5. Thermofluor Sample Preparation 30
3.5.1. Heating Experiment 30
3.5.2. Denaturant Experiment 30
3.6. Monitoring Protein Thermal Stability by QPCR Machine 31
3.7. Circular Dichroism Sample Preparation and Experiments 31
3.7.1. Heating Experiment 32
3.7.2. Titration Experiment 32
4. Results 33
4.1. Bax Unfolding Study from Macroscopic Views 33
4.1.1. Circular Dichroism Analysis 33
4.1.1.1. Thermal Unfolding by CD spectroscopy 33
4.1.1.2. Chemical Unfolding by CD spectroscopy 39
4.1.2. Thermofluor Analysis 40
4.1.2.1. Thermal Unfolding Experiments with Thermofluor Assay 40
4.1.2.2. Thermofluor Assay in the presence of GdnHCl 44
4.2. Bax Unfolding Study in Local Perspective 47
4.2.1. Electron Spin Resonance 47
4.2.1.1. Bax α1 helix 47
4.2.1.2. Bax α2 helix 49
4.2.1.3. Bax α3 and α4 helices 51
4.2.1.4. Bax α5 helix 54
4.2.1.5. Bax α6 helix 57
4.2.1.6. Bax α7 and α8 helices 59
4.2.1.7. Bax α9 helix 61
4.2.1.8. Low Temperature Line Shape in ESR Spectra 63
4.2.2. The Story from ESR CW Experiments 64
4.2.2.1. Hubbell Plots 64
5. Discussion 72
5.1. Equilibrium Issue 72
5.2. Bax remains in a monomeric state after unfolding 74
5.3. Bax have second hydrophobic core 75
5.4 Bax Unfolded Pathway 77
6. Conclusion 79
7. References 81


Ⅱ. Figures
Figure 1.1. Bax activation mechanism proposed by Youle et al. Bax N-terminal was engaged in translocation and oligomerization while α5, α6 and α9 were insert into membrane.1 2
Figure 1.2. Model demonstrating Bax dimerization structure and possible activation mechanism. 2
Figure 2.1 Energy level of free electron in magnetic field B. 10
Figure 2.2. Commonly used nitroxide spin label. 12
Figure 2.3 Energy levels of electron spin in magnetic field B considering interaction with nearby nuclei. 14
Figure 2.4. MTSSL spin label interacts with protein cysteine side chain to form covalent bond. 15
Figure 2.5 Powder spectra of ESR spectroscopy in different orientation. 16
Figure 2.6. The spectra are made by EasySpin simulation. 20
Figure 2.7. Circular dichroism spectra of proteins secondary structure. 22
Figure 2.8. The structure of Sypro Orange, which is not disclosed by manufacturer. 24
Figure 2.9. Thermofluor transition in protein unfolding by heat. Black dot represents Sypro Orange in quenched status. Star means Sypro Orange binding to hydrophobic residues with fluorescence emission. 25
Figure 2.10. 26
Figure 3.1. ESR experiment sample preparation. 29
Figure 3.2. Sample preparation for thermofluor experiment. 31
Figure 4.1. Bax denatured by heating from 2 oC to 90 oC in the step of 2 oC. (Only show the results by 10 oC increment) 34
Figure 4.2. Bax unfolding at 222 nm CD signal. 35
Figure 4.3. Bax melting temperature extrat by SVD. V represents the row vector in VT, which contain crucial information from CD spectra. 35
Figure 4.4. Bax heating experiment near-UV CD spectra. 36
Figure 4.5. Aromatic residues (color red) distribute mainly on Bax C-terminal domain (color blue). 37
Figure 4.6. Mechanisms of breaking disulfied bond. 38
Figure 4.7. Bax heating experiment with TCEP. The strong near-UV signals still exsist. 38
Figure 4.8. Bax was titrating from 0 M to 8 M monitoring 222 nm. 39
Figure 4.9. Bax mutants at 76, 99, 113, 114, 117, 137, and 144 are colored red. They form an important region to stabilize Bax structure. 42
Figure 4.10. Bax WT thermal unfolding transitions in triplicate experiments. 43
Figure 4.11. Bax WT in first derivative. 44
Figure 4.12. The Tm differences between mutants and Bax wild type. 44
Figure 4.13. Bax WT thermofluor data in different concentration of GdnHCl. 45
Figure 4.14. Bax first derivative data. Black arrows point out ambiguous slope changing point. 46
Figure 4.15. Bax α1 helix in 0 M (Blue) and 6 M (Red) GdnHCl. 48
Figure 4.16. Bax α1 helix mutants (Red). 49
Figure 4.17. Bax α2 helix in 0 M (Blue) and 6 M (Red) GdnHCl. 50
Figure 4.18. Bax α2 helix mutants (Red). 51
Figure 4.19. Bax α3 and α4 helices in 0 M (Blue) and 6 M (Red) GdnHCl. 53
Figure 4.20. Bax α3 and α4 helix mutants (Red). 54
Figure 4.21. π-π aromatic interaction between α4 (Blue) and α6 (Red). 54
Figure 4.22. Bax α5 helix in 0 M (Blue) and 6 M (Red) GdnHCl. 55
Figure 4.23. Bax α5 helix mutants (Red). 56
Figure 4.24. π-π stacking among α5 (Blue), (from up-right to left) α7, α8 and α9 (Red). 56
Figure 4.25. Bax α6 helix in 0 M (Blue) and 6 M (Red) GdnHCl. 58
Figure 4.26. Bax α6 helix mutants (Red). 58
Figure 4.27. α6 helix (Blue) π-π interaction with α4 (Red, up) and α5 (Red, down) 59
Figure 4.28. Bax α7 and α8 helix in 0 M (Blue) and 6 M (Red) GdnHCl. 60
Figure 4.29. Bax α7 and α8 helix mutants (Red). 60
Figure 4.30. Bax α9 helix in 0 M (Blue) and 6 M (Red) GdnHCl. 62
Figure 4.31. Bax α9 helix mutants (Red). 62
Figure 4.32. π-π interaction between M188 and F116 resulted to M191R1 slow motion comparing to S4R1 motion. 63
Figure 4.33. Bax mutants in 0M GdnHCl Hubbell plot at 25oC. 65
Figure 4.34. Bax mutants in 6 M GdnHCl Hubbell plot. The plot is separated into three regions. 66
Figure 4.35. Central linewidth (ΔH0-1) with Bax mutants. 67
Figure 4.36. Subtraction central line width by using each residue’s unfolded value as standard. 68
Figure 4.37. Second moments (2)-1 with Bax mutants. 69
Figure 4.38. Subtraction second moment by using each residue’s unfolded value as standard. 69
Figure 5.1. G150R1 unfolded spectra within one day (Blue) and after one week in 25 oC. (Red) 73
Figure 5.2. R94R1 unfolded spectra within one day (Blue) and after two weeks in 25 oC. (Red) 73
Figure 5.3. Carbonic Anhydrase (Blue) was bigger than Bax (Red) in unfolded state. 74
Figure 5.4. F114R1 in 0M GdnHCl heating from 30 oC (Red) to 80oC (Black). 76
Figure 5.5. F114R1 in 6M GdnHCl heating from 30 oC (Red) to 80 oC (Black). 76
Figure 5.6. The most left peak of F114R1 intensity changes from ESR heating-denaturant experiment. 77
Figure 6.1 Bax native structure. 80
Figure 6.2 Bax unfolded structure, in molten globular state. 80




Ⅲ. Tables
Table 4.1. Tm points for all Bax mutants by Thermofluor experiment. Wild type is denoted as WT and Cysteine Free is abbreviated by CF. ΔTm were generated by subtracting Bax wild type as standard. 41
Figure 4.39. Hubbell plot of Bax. The region refers to prior research and experiment spectra. (Blue: 0 M, Red: 6 M GdnHCl ) 70
Table 4.2. Hubbell plot parameters. 70
Table 4.3. Hubbell plot parameters. 71

1. Youle, R. J.; Strasser, A., The BCL-2 Protein Family: Opposing Activities that Mediate Cell Death. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio 2008, 9 (1), 47-59.
2. Czabotar, P. E.; Westphal, D.; Dewson, G.; Ma, S.; Hockings, C.; Fairlie, W. D.; Lee, E. F.; Yao, S.; Robin, A. Y.; Smith, B. J.; Huang, D. C. S.; Kluc, R. M.; Adams, J. M.; Colman, P. M., Bax Crystal Structures Reveal How BH3 Domains Activate Bax and Nucleate Its Oligomerization to Induce Apoptosis. Cell 2013, 152, 519-531.
3. Vanzi, F.; Madan, B.; Sharp, K., Effect of the Protein Denaturants Urea and Guanidinium on Water Structure: A Structural and Thermodynamic Study. J Am Chem Soc 1998, 120, 10748-10753.
4. O’Brien, E. P.; Dima, R. I.; Brooks, B.; Thirumalai, D., Interactions Between Hydrophobic and Ionic Solutes in Aqueous Guanidinium Chloride and Urea Solutions: Lessons for Protein Denaturation Mechanism. J Am Chem Soc 2007, 129, 7346-7353.
5. Camilloni, C.; Rocco, A. G.; Eberini, I.; Gianazza, E.; Broglia, R. A.; Tiana, G., Urea and Guanidinium Chloride Denature Protein L in Different Ways in Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Biophys J 2008, 94 (12), 4654-4661.
6. Fersht, A. R.; Petrovich, M., Reply to Campos and Munoz: Why Phosphate is a Bad Buffer for Guanidinium Chloride Titrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013, 110 (14), 1244-1245.
7. Del Vecchio, P.; Graziano, G.; Granata, V.; Barone, G.; Mandrich, L.; Rossi, M.; Manco, G., Denaturing Action of Urea and Guanidine Hydrochloride Towards Two Thermophilic Esterases. Biochem J 2002, 367, 857-863.
8. Pitari, G.; D'Archivio, A. A.; Leandro, L. D.; Antonini, G.; Panatta, A.; Tettamanti, E.; Dupre, S.; Malatesta, F., Conformational Changes at the Active Site of Pantetheine Hydrolase During Denaturation by Guanidine Hydrochloride. J Protein Chem 1999, 18 (7), 785-789.
9. Klug, C. S.; Feix, J. B., Guanidine Hydrochloride Unfolding of a Transmembrane β-strand in FepA Using Site-directed Spin Labeling. Prot Sci 1998, 7, 1469-176.
10. Hubbell, W. L.; Lopez, C. J.; Altenbach, C.; Yang, Z. Y., Technological Advances in Site-directed Spin Labeling of Proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2013, 23 (5), 725-733.
11. Hubbell, W. L., Watching Proteins Move Using Site-directed Spin Labeling. Structure 1996, 4 (7), 779-783.
12. Poole,C. P.; Farach, H. A., Theory of Magnetic Resonance, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York, NY, U.S.A 1987.
13. Fajer, P. G., Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy Labeling in Peptide and Protein Analysis. Wiley, New York, U.S.A. 2000, 5725-5761.
14. Feher, G., Method of Polarizing Nuclei in Paramagnetic Substances. Phys Rev 1956, 103 (2), 500-501.
15. Hyde, J. S.; Chien, J. C. W.; Freed, J. H., Electron–Electron Double Resonance of Free Radicals in Solution. J Chem Phys 1968, 48 (9), 4211-4226.
16. Mims, W. B.; Nassau, K.; McGee, J. D., Spectral Diffusion in Electron Resonance Lines. Phys Rev 1961, 123 (6), 2059-2069.
17. Eliav, U.; Freed, J. H., The Oscillatory Nature of Polarization Evolution in CIDEP. J Phys Chem 1984, 88 (7), 1277-1280.
18. Lynch, W. B.; Earle, K. A.; Freed, J. H., 1‐mm Wave ESR Spectrometer. Rev Sci Instrum 1988, 59 (8), 1345-1351.
19. Altenbach, C.; Flitsch, S. L.; Khorana, H. G.; Hubbell, W. L., Structural Studies on Transmembrane Proteins: Spin labeling of bacteriorhodopsin mutants at unique cysteines. Biochemistry 1989, 28 (19), 7806-7812.
20. Hubbell, W. L.; Cafiso, D. S.; Altenbach, C., Identifying Conformational Changes with Site-directed Spin Labeling. Nat Struct Biol 2000, 7 (9), 735-739.
21. Columbus, L.; Hubbell, W. L., Mapping Backbone Dynamics in Solution with Site-directed Spin Labeling: GCN4-58 bZip free and bound to DNA. Biochemistry 2004, 43 (23), 7273-7287.
22. Budil, D. E.; Lee, S.; Saxena, S.; Freed, J. H., Nonlinear-least-squares Analysis of Slow-motion EPR Spectra in One and Two Dimensions Using a Modified Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm. J Magn Reson Ser A 1996, 120 (2), 155-189.
23. Greenfield, N. J., Analysis of the Kinetics of Folding of Proteins and Peptides Using Circular Dichroism. Nat Protoc 2006, 1 (6), 2891-9.
24. Kelly, S. M.; Jess, T. J.; Price, N. C., How to Study Proteins by Circular Dichroism. Bba-Proteins Proteom 2005, 1751 (2), 119-139.
25. Niesen, F. H.; Berglund, H.; Vedadi, M., The Use of Differential Scanning Fluorimetry to Detect Ligand Interactions that Promote Protein Stability. Nat Protoc 2007, 2 (9), 2212-2221.
26. Lavinder, J. J.; Magliery, T. J., High-Throughput Thermal Scanning- A General, Rapid Dye-Binding Thermal Shift Screen for Protein Engineering. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131, 3794-3795.
27. Layton, C. J.; Hellinga, H. W., Thermodynamic Analysis of Ligand-Induced Changes in Protein Thermal Unfolding Applied to High-Throughput Determination of Ligand Affinities with Extrinsic Fluorescent Dyes. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 10831-10841.
28. Boivin, S.; Kozak, S.; Meijers, R., Optimization of Protein Purification and Characterization Using Thermofluor Screens. Protein Expres Purif 2013, 91 (2), 192-206.
29. Bhasin, N.; Carl, P.; Harper, S.; Feng, G.; Lu, H.; Speicher, D. W.; Discher, D. E., Chemistry on a Single Protein, Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1, During Forced Unfolding. J Bio Chem 2004, 279 (44), 45865-45874.
30. Yethon, J. A.; Epand, R. F.; Leber, B.; Epand, R. M.; Andrews, D. W., Interaction with a Membrane Surface Triggers a Reversible Conformational Change in Bax Normally Associated with Induction of Apoptosis. J Bio Chem 2003, 278 (49), 48935-48941.
31. Zhao, G. P.; Zhu, Y. L.; Eno, C. O.; Liu, Y. L.; DeLeeuw, L.; Burlison, J. A.; Chaires, J. B.; Trent, J. O.; Li, C., Activation of the Proapoptotic Bcl-2 Protein Bax by a Small Molecule Induces Tumor Cell Apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol 2014, 34 (7), 1198-1207.
32. Suzuki, M.; Youle, R. J.; Tjandra, N., Structure of Bax: Coregulation of Dimer Formation and Intracellular Localization. Cell 2000, 103 (4), 645-654.
33. Burley, S. K.; Petsko, G. A., Aromatic-Aromatic Interaction: a Mechanism of Protein Structure Stabilization. Science 1985, 229, 23-28.
34. Hong, H.; Park, S.; Jime´nez, R. H. F.; Rinehart, D.; Tamm, L. K., Role of Aromatic Side Chains in the Folding and Thermodynamic Stability of Intergal Membrane Proteins. J Am Chem Soc 2007, 129, 8320-8327.
35. Hubbell, W. L.; Altenbach, C., Investigation of Structure and Dynamics in Membrane Proteins Using Site-directed Spin Labeling. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1994, 4, 566-573.
36. Hubbell, W. L.; Mchaourab, H.; Altenbach, C.; Lietzow, M. A., Watching Proteins Move Using Site-directed Spin Labeling. Structure 1996, 4, 779-783.
37. Altenbach, C.; Cai, K.; Khorana, H. G.; Hubbell, W. L., Structural Features and Light-Dependent Changes in the Sequence 306-322 Extending from Helix VII to the Palmitoylation Sites in Rhodopsin: A Site-Directed Spin-Labeling Study. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 7931-7837.
38. Isas, J. M.; Langen, R.; Haigler, H. T.; Hubbell, W. L., Structure and Dynamics of a Helical Hairpin and Loop Region in Annexin 12: A Site-Directed Spin Labeling Study. Biochemistry 2001, 41, 1464-1473.
(此全文未開放授權)
電子全文
摘要
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *