鑒於美國於1980年代與台灣相繼通過智慧財產權下放到研究機構或企業的法案，近年來，創業型大學不管在美國或是台灣都快速的增加，加上政府經費補助的減少，迫使學校尋找另外的資金來支持研究，透過學校的發明去授權為最直接且穩定的資金來源，產學合作、技術授權成了邁向創業型大學的必經之路，本文透過對於創業型大學理論的瞭解，研究兩個不同的個案，了解其理論是否與學校從研究型大學轉型為創業型大學的過程中一致，也了解不同學校的作法，希望未來能夠更加增進台灣的大學現有不足。本研究採用比較個案研究，著重在探討史丹佛大學以及麻省理工學院成為創業型大學的作法，本文最後探討研究結論、討論研究理論與意涵、最後為研究限制與未來建議。

In the 1980s as U.S. and Taiwan governments passed intellectual property rights to put through research institutions or enterprises bill. In recent years, regardless of United States or Taiwan entrepreneurial universities are increasing rapidly. With reduced government funding, forcing schools to find another funds to support research. Through school technology licensing is the most direct and stable source of funding. Industry-university cooperation, technology licensing are the ways towards becoming an entrepreneurial university. This paper go through the understanding of the theory of entrepreneurial university, and research two different cases to understand whether the theory is consistent with the process from research university to entrepreneurial university. In order to improve Taiwans’ Universities current inadequate I tried to understand the different practice of different schools. In this study, I focus on comparative case studies between Stanford University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology to understand their process of becoming an entrepreneurial university. This paper concludes by research findings, discussing applications for theory and practice, limitations and future research.

目錄
摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝詞 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 VI
圖目錄 VII
第一章 緒論 1
1.1. 研究背景 1
1.2. 研究動機 2
1.3. 研究問題與目的 3
1.4. 章節架構 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
2.1. 創業型大學（Entrepreneurial University） 4
第三章 研究方法 7
3.1. 個案研究法 7
3.2. 個案選擇的方式與原則 8
3.3. 資料收集方法 9
第四章 個案研究 10
4.1. 史丹佛創新創業精神 10
4.1.1. 歷史 10
4.1.2. 研究與教育 12
4.1.3. 技術轉移 16
4.1.4. 創業與衍生公司 20
4.2. 麻省理工學院創新創業精神 24
4.2.1. 歷史 24
4.2.2. 研究與教育 26
4.2.3. 技術轉移 30
4.2.4. 創業與衍生公司 33
4.3. 小結 36
第五章 結論與建議 38
5.1. 研究結論 38
5.2. 研究貢獻 38
5.3. 實務意涵 39
5.4. 研究限制與未來研究建議 39
參考文獻 41

參考文獻
Allen, Thomas J., & Cohen, Stephen I. (1969). Information Flow in Research and Development Laboratories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(1), 12-19.
Board, National Science. (2010). Science and Engineering Indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 10-01).
Chrisman, James J., Hynes, Timothy, & Fraser, Shelby. (1995). Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: The case of the University of Calgary. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(4), 267-281.
Clark, Burton R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation: Emerald Group Pub.
Clark, Burton R. (2001). The Entrepreneurial University: New Foundations for Collegiality, Autonomy, and Achievement. Higher Education Management, 13(2), 9-24.
Cohen, Wesley M., Nelson, Richard R., & Walsh, John P. (2002). Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.
Eesley, Charles E. , & Miller, William F. . (2012). Impact: Stanford University's Economic Impact via Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 104.
Etzkowitz, Henry. (1983). Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva, 21(2-3), 198-233.
Etzkowitz, Henry. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121.
Etzkowitz, Henry, Webster, Andrew, Gebhardt, Christiane, & Terra, Branca Regina Cantisano. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313-330.
Geuna, Aldo, & Nesta, Lionel J. J. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy, 35(6), 790-807.
Harrison, Norma, & Samson, Danny. (2001). Technology Management: Text and International Cases: McGraw-Hill.
Henderson, Rebecca, Jaffe, Adam B., & Trajtenberg, Manuel. (1998). Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965–1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 119-127.
Jacob, Merle, Lundqvist, Mats, & Hellsmark, Hans. (2003). Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish University system: the case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy, 32(9), 1555-1568.
Jain, R.K., & Triandis, Harry C. (1990). Management of research and development organizations: managing the unmanageable: Wiley.
Kirby, David A. (2003). Entrepreneurship: McGraw-Hill.
Lazzeroni, Michela, & Piccaluga, Andrea. (2003). Towards the Entrepreneurial University. Local Economy, 18(1), 38-48.
Lerner, Josh. (2004). The University and the Start-Up:Lessons from the Past Two Decades. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1-2), 49-56.
Philpott, Kevin, Dooley, Lawrence, O'Reilly, Caroline, & Lupton, Gary. (2011). The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31(4), 161-170.
Röpke, Jochen. (1998). The Entrepreneurial University, Innovation, academic knowledge creation and regional development in a globalized economy. Working Paper Department of Economics. Philipps- Universität Marburg, . Germany.
Readings, Bill. (1996). The University in Ruins: Harvard University Press.
Roberts, Edward B. (1991). Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from Mit and Beyond: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, Edward B., & Eesley, Charles E. (2009). Entrepreneurial Impact: The Role of MIT.
Rosenberg, Nathan, & Nelson, Richard R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23(3), 323-348.
Salter, Ammon J., & Martin, Ben R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy, 30(3), 509-532.
Saxenian, Annalee. (1996). Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128: Harvard University Press.
Shane, Scott. (2004a). Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation: Edward Elgar Pub.
Shane, Scott. (2004b). Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 127-151.
Shane, Scott, & Stuart, Toby. (2002). Organizational Endowments and the Performance of University Start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154-170.
Siegel, Donald S., Waldman, David A., Atwater, Leanne E., & Link, Albert N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111-133.
Subotzky, George. (1999). Alternatives to the entrepreneurial university: New modes of knowledge production in community service programs. Higher Education, 38(4), 401-440.
Van Looy, Bart, Ranga, Marina, Callaert, Julie, Debackere, Koenraad, & Zimmermann, Edwin. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33(3), 425-441.
Williams, Gareth, & Kitaev, Igor (2005). Overview of National Policy Contexts for Entrepreneurialism in Higher Education Institutions. Higher Education Management and Policy, 17(3), 125-141.
Yin, Robert K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods: Sage Publications.