|
References [1] T. Baba, M. Hashida, and H. Katayose. ”virtualphilharmony”: a conducting system with heuristics of conducting an orchestra. In Proceedings of conference on new interfaces for musical expression (NIME10), Sydney, Australia, pages 263–270, 2010. [2] J. Borchers, E. Lee, W. Samminger, and M. M¨uhlh¨auser. Personal orchestra: a real- time audio/video system for interactive conducting. Multimedia Syst., 9(6):594, 2004. [3] E. Cambouropoulos, S. Dixon, W. Goebl, and G. Widmer. Human preferences for tempo smoothness. In Proceedings of the VII International Symposium on Systematic and Comparative Musicology, III International Conference on Cognitive Musicology. Jyv¨askyl¨a, Finland: University of Jyv¨askyl¨a, pages 18–26, 2001. [4] E. Chew, A. Franc¸ois, J. Liu, and A. Yang. Esp: a driving interface for expression synthesis. In Proceedings of the 2005 conference on New interfaces for musical ex- pression, pages 224–227. National University of Singapore, 2005. [5] E. Chew, J. Liu, and A. R. J. Franc¸ois. Esp: roadmaps as constructed interpretations and guides to expressive performance. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on Audio and music computing multimedia, pages 137–145. ACM, 2006. 22[6] S. Dahl and A. Friberg. Visual perception of expressiveness in musicians’ body move- ments. Music Perception, 24(5):433–454, 2007. [7] M. Hans, A. Slayden, M. Smith, B. Banerjee, and A. Gupta. Djammer: a new digital, mobile, virtual, personal musical instrument. In Multimedia and Expo, 2005. ICME 2005. IEEE International Conference on, pages 4 pp.–. IEEE, 2005. [8] A. LeBlanc and J. McCrary. Effect of Tempo on Children’s Music Preference. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31(4):283–294, 1983. [9] E. Lee, I. Gr¨ull, H. Kiel, and J. Borchers. conga: a framework for adaptive conducting gesture analysis. In Proceedings of the 2006 conference on New interfaces for musical expression, pages 260–265. IRCAM — Centre Pompidou, 2006. [10] E. Lee, H. Kiel, S. Dedenbach, I. Gr¨ull, T. Karrer, M. Wolf, and J. Borchers. isym- phony: an adaptive interactive orchestral conducting system for digital audio and video streams. In CHI ’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Sys- tems, pages 259–262. ACM, 2006. [11] E. Lee, T. M. Nakra, and J. Borchers. You’re the conductor: a realistic interactive con- ducting system for children. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on New interfaces for musical expression, pages 68–73. National University of Singapore, 2004. [12] J. Liu, E. Chew, and A. R. J. Franc¸ois. From driving to expressive music performance: ensuring tempo smoothness. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology, page 78. ACM, 2006. 23[13] Y.-L. Liu and Y.-S. Chen. iconduct:music control in the interactive conducting system. Technical report, 2009. [14] A. Maezawa, M. Goto, and H. G. Okuno. Query-by-conducting: An interface to retrieve classical-music interpretations by real-time tempo input. In Proceedings of 11th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, pages 477– 482. ISMIR 2010, 2010. [15] A. P. Montgomery. Effect of Tempo on Music Preferences of Children in Elementary and Middle School. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44(2):134–146, 1996. [16] T. Nakra, Y. Ivanov, P. Smaragdis, and C. Ault. The UBS virtual maestro: An inter- active conducting system. NIME2009, 10(4):250–255, 2009. [17] J. C. Peery and I. W. Peery. Effects of exposure to classical music on the musical preferences of preschool children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34(1):24– 33, 1986. [18] L.-W. Toh and Y.-S. Chen. An interactive conducting system using kinect. In Mul- timedia and Expo, 2013. ICME 2005. IEEE International Conference on, pages 1–6. IEEE, 2012. |