帳號:guest(3.128.199.6)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):傅學興
作者(外文):Fu, Hsueh-Hsing
論文名稱(中文):光通訊產品自製或外包決策之個案研究
論文名稱(外文):A Case Study of Make or Buy Decision Framework on Optical Communication Products
指導教授(中文):林則孟
口試委員(中文):朱詣尹
陳子立
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:工業工程與工程管理學系碩士在職專班
學號:100036516
出版年(民國):102
畢業學年度:101
語文別:中文
論文頁數:87
中文關鍵詞:光通訊自製或外包委外管理採購策略供應商評估
外文關鍵詞:optical communicationsmake or buyoutsourcing managementprocurement strategysupplier evaluation
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:242
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
全球光通訊產業在2000年底暴發「電信市場泡沫化」,使得全球光通訊產業進入長期的蕭條。台灣整體光通訊產業的發展也遭受嚴重影響,在經歷4~5年的低迷、整合、淘汰、合併的變化後,終於在電信業者理性的投資、用戶端穩定成長及對頻寬需求的增加帶動下,全球光通市場步上了穩定成長的軌道。所以企業想在這一波強勁復甦的時機中脫穎而出,如何規劃與設計好供應鏈、如何掌握好自製或外包的時間決策點,以及如何做好委外管理等工作,應為台灣企業極為關鍵重要的課題。
本論文就以台灣光通訊產業中最具競爭力的主動零組件產業為研究對象,研究的目的是想藉由自製或外包決策模式相關文獻、書籍與供應鏈設計為理論基礎,探討光通訊產品自製或外包決策之關鍵因素,至於分析主要架構則選擇了參考Eric Sislian & Ahmet Satir (2000)的策略性自製或外包決策流程,最後再結合委外管理程序,制定出光通訊產品策略性自製或外包決策分析架構,研究實證結果發現:
(1) 光通訊產品自製或外包決策之關鍵因素,應包含策略層面與戰術層面兩個構面 進行分析。策略層面需考量「經營策略」、「供應鏈風險」與「經濟因素」等三個主要決策因子,戰術層面需考量「製程能力」、「製程的穩定性」和「外包策略風險」等三個次要決策因子。
(2) 光通訊產品自製或外包決策架構裡,應納入委外管理程序,其包含「採購策略」與「供應商評估」等管理活動,如此使得光通訊產品自製或外包決策過程中,不單僅考量自製或外包決策層面的問題,更兼具採購與供應商管理之功能,以提升該決策分析模式對公司的真實性與價值。亦可提供相關或有興趣之業界及學術界作為參考。

關鍵字:光通訊、自製或外包、委外管理、採購策略、供應商評估
The global optical communications industry in 2000 outbreak at the end of "telecommunications market bubble", which make the global optical communications industry into a long period of depression. Taiwan development of optical communications industry as a whole has also been seriously affected, after 4~5 years of downturn, after the consolidation, elimination, merge changes, finally are rational investment in the telecom industry, client growth and demand for bandwidth increases along with the world optical communication market moves into a stable growth track. Enterprises in the wave of a strong recovery in time to stand out, How to plan and design a good supply chain, how having the right to make or buy decision points, as well as how to manage outsourcing work, Taiwan business topics of critical importance.
This papers on to Taiwan optical communications industry in the most with competitiveness of active component industry for research object, research of purpose is wanted to through make or buy decision-making mode related literature, and books and supply chain design for theory based, discussion optical communications products make or buy decision-making of key factors, as analysis main schema is select has reference Eric Sislian & Ahmet Satir (2000) of strategic sexual make or buy decision-making process finally combined with outsourcing management program to develop optical communications products are strategic make or buy decision analysis framework , Empirical results show:
(1) Optical Communication Products make or buy decisions critical factors that should contain a strategic level and tactical level two dimensions for analysis. Strategic level you need to consider "business strategy", "supply chain risk" and "economic factors" in three main decision-making factors you need to consider the tactical level "process capability", "process stability" and "outsourcing strategies risk" three secondary decision factors.
(2) Optical Communication Products make or buy decision-making structure, the management procedures should be included in outsourcing, which includes "procurement strategy" and "supplier evaluation" management activities, so making optical communication products make or buy decision-making process, not only consider the make or buy decision-making level of the problem, but both the purchasing and supplier management functions, decision analysis model to enhance the authenticity and value of the company. Also provide related or are interested in industry and academia as a reference.

Keywords : optical communications, make or buy, outsourcing management, procurement strategy, supplier evaluation
摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究範圍與假設 2
第四節 研究方法 3
第五節 論文架構 5
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 策略性自製或外包決策模式 6
第二節 採購管理策略 17
第三節 脈動速度與雙螺旋理論 21
第三章 產業概況及產品自製或外包決策模式分析 25
第一節 光通訊產業概況簡介 25
3.1.1 光通訊產業架構 25
3.1.2 光纖通訊技術演進與應用 25
3.1.3 光通訊產品定義與分類 28
3.1.4 台灣光通訊產業鏈分析 30
3.1.5 全球光通訊市場趨勢 33
3.1.6 台灣光通訊產業趨勢 36
第二節 光通訊產品自製或外包決策分析架構制定 37
3.2.1 光通訊產品策略性自製或外包決策關鍵因素 38
3.2.2 光通訊產品委外管理程序 43
3.2.3 光通訊產品策略性自製或外包決策分析架構圖 46
第四章 個案公司導入自製或外包決策模式之實證 48
第一節 個案公司概況簡介 48
4.1.1 公司經營理念 48
4.1.2 公司組織及工作職掌 49
4.1.3 公司產品簡介 51
4.1.4 生產製程簡介 52
4.1.5 核心競爭力與優勢分析 54
第二節 個案公司導入自製或外包決策模式分析 60
4.2.1 產品自製或外包決策模式現況 60
4.2.2 導入策略性自製或外包決策模式分析 61
4.2.3 導入策略性自製或外包決策分析架構結論與建議 76
第三節 採購策略制定與導入 79
第四節 光通訊產業雙螺旋動態分析 81
第五章 結論與建議 83
第一節 結論 83
第二節 建議與未來研究方向 84
參考文獻 85
1.方祥合,「TFT-LCD設備零配件自製或採購決策之個案分析」,國立清華大學碩士論文,2009。
2.光電科技協進會(PIDA),2012~2013年全球光電市場與光電產業總論,第七章 全球光通訊市場與台灣產業。
3.李筠譯,Charles H. Fine著,「Clockspeed/脈動速度下的決策者」,大塊文化,2000。
4.李駿恆,「藍芽Dongle委外或自製決策個案探討」,國立清華大學EMBA碩士論文,2006。
5.利豐研究中心編著,「供應鏈管理:利豐集團的實踐經驗」,香港:三聯書店,2003。
6.何應欽編譯,David Simchi-Levi,Philip Kaminsky,Edith Simchi-Levi著,「供應鏈設計與管理」,麥格羅‧希爾出版集團,2009.6。
7.張木榮,「無線監控產品自製或外包決策之個案研究」,國立清華大學EMBA碩士論文,2005。
8.陳朝煌,「影像掃描器產業因應快速全球化之運籌策略研究-以虹光公司為例」,國立交通大學EMBA碩士論文,2003。
9.劉文良,「供應鏈管理」,碁峰出版社,2008.10。
10.詹睿然,「台灣光收發器產品之市場概述」,工研院經資中心IEK-ITIS計畫,ITIS評析,2003。
11. 詹睿然,「光收發器產品之種類概述」,工研院經資中心IEK-ITIS計畫,ITIS評析,2003。
12.詹睿然,「台灣光收發器市場之現況分析與探討」,工研院經資中心IEK-ITIS計畫,ITIS評析,2003。
13.楊振富‧潘勛譯,Thomas L. Friedman著,「The World Is Flat/世界是平的」,雅言文化,2007.11。
14.Dermot, Shorten & Michael, Pfitzmann & Arvind, Kaushal,“ Make Versus Buy : A Decision Framework ”,Booz Allen Hamiton,2006.
15.Fine, Charles H.,“ Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantages,” Reading Mass., Perseus Book, 1998.
16.Fine, C. H. and D. E. Whitney,“ Is the Make-Buy Decision Process a Core Competence?”Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1996.
17.Fine, Charles H. and Roger, Vardan and Pethick, Robert and El- Hout, Jamal,“ Rapid-Response Capability in Value Chain Design” . MIT Sloan
Management Review, pp.69—75. winter 2002.
18.Goehlich, R.A., Make-or-Buy decisions in Aerospace Organizations Development of a Make-or-Buy Decision-supporting Process,pp 39-94.
19.Kraljic, P.,“ Purchasing Must Become Supply Management. ”Harvard Business Review, September-October 1983, pp. 109-17.
20.Kremic, T. and Tukel, O.I.,“Assisting public organizations in their outsourcing endeavors: a decision support model”, working paper, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH. 2003.
21.Loh, L. and Venkatraman, N., Information technology outsourcing as an administrative innovation: imitative behavior as an explanation of the diffusion pattern. MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper. December 1991.
22.Leenders, M.R and Fearon, H.H and England, W.B (1989) Purchasing and materials management, 9th Ed. Richard D. Irwin Inc. Homewood.
23.Platts*, K.W. and D.R. Probert, L., CaH n ez,Make vs. buy decision : A process incorporating multi-attribute decision-making, Department of Engineering, Manufacturing Engineering, University of Cambridge, Mill Lane, Cambridge CB2 IRX, UK Received 19 April 2000;accepted 24 October 2000.
24.Sislian, E. and Satir, A.,“ Strategic Sourcing: A Framework and a Case Study ”,ISM Articles Resources, 2000.
25.Welch, J.A. and Nayak, R.P. (1992),“Strategic sourcing: a
progressive approach to the make-or-buy decision“,Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 6 No. 1,pp. 23-32.
(此全文未開放授權)
電子全文
摘要
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *