本研究旨在探討高社會支配性幼兒使用資源控制策略之情形。研究分為兩個部分，第一部分以新竹市私立幼兒園四至六歲幼兒為研究參與者，共110位，由教師填寫「社會支配性檢核表」「資源控制策略量表」與「道德行為量表」評估幼兒的狀況與請父母填寫「父母教養方式問卷」，進行描述統計、皮爾森積差相關與變異數之分析，藉以瞭解幼兒社會支配性之分布趨勢及與相關因素之關係。第二部分由研究者進入幼兒園觀察，選取由第一階段篩選出30名高社會支配性幼兒為對象，使用「資源控制策略觀察表」紀錄幼兒的資源控制策略使用情形，藉以瞭解高社會支配性幼兒之資源控制策略使用情形。
第一部分的研究結果發現，幼兒社會支配性的分布趨勢，在年齡上有所差異，但性別沒有差異。而在幼兒社會支配性之相關因素中，利社會控制策略及強制控制策略的分數，隨著年齡有逐漸增長的趨勢，並與社會支配性達顯著相關，而中班及小班的利社會控制策略及強制控制策都與社會支配性達顯著相關，但大班則無。此外，社會支配性較高的幼兒較多是雙策略控制者與利社會策略控制者。道德行為方面，幼兒的道德行為會隨著年齡的增長而有所提升，但控制年齡變量後，道德行為與社會支配性之間並無關聯性存在。父母教養方式方面，大班幼兒之社會支配性分數與「剝奪權利」達顯著相關，中班幼兒則是與「體罰」達顯著相關，「陪伴遊戲或活動」與兩種策略都達顯著的負相關，「學校參與」和強制控制策略達顯著的負相關。
第二部分資源控制策略的觀察方面，發現大班與中班的利社會控制策略次數明顯高於小班幼兒，中班的強制控制策略高於大班與小班，實施無母數檢定，發現利社會控制策略次數隨年齡上升，達顯著差異，但強制控制策略次數卻沒有達顯著差異。利社會控制策略的項目中以「提出建議或提示給其他幼兒」與「提供物品給其他幼兒」的次數最多，而「口頭誤導同伴」的次數最少，強制控制策略的項目中以「直接把同伴的物品拿走」與「阻止同伴」的次數最多，最少的是「肢體攻擊同伴」的項目。在資源控制策略的分類上，研究者與老師以利社會控制者與強制策略控制者分類較一致，差異較大的是雙策略控制者與典型者。而高社會支配性幼兒與高社會支配性幼兒互動時，較多使用利社會的策略，與一般社會支配性幼兒及低社會支配性幼兒互動時，較多使用強制策略。
本研究之結果除了增進吾人對瞭解幼兒社會支配性之瞭解，也提供家長與教育工作者之參考。

This study was designed to investigate the resource control strategies for high social dominant children, and the associations between resource control strategies and social dominance, measures of parenting, and moral behavior. A total of 110 preschoolers (ages 4–6) were rated by their teachers on social dominance, moral behavior, and resources control strategies and rated by their parent on parenting. The high dominant children were observed resource control behavior in a play situation.
The study indicated that there is significant difference in social dominance between age groups, while there is not between sexes. The points of prosocial control strategy and coercive control strategy increase as the age increases. Especially for 4 and 5 years old children, their prosocial control strategy, coercive control strategy and social dominance are highly correlated. The high social dominant children shows stronger resource control strategy. Most of them are bistrategic controllers and prosocial controllers.
Children’s moral behaviors become better and better along with the age increase, and are highly correlated with social dominance. While after controlling the age difference, the moral behaviors and social dominance are not correlated.
In parenting, The average score of social rewards is the highest, while the average score of corporal punishment and emotional discipline are the lowest. 6-years-old children’s social dominance is correlated with the deprivation of right. 5-years-old children’s social dominance is correlated with the corporal punishment of parenting. Then, it is found that prosocial control strategy and coercive control strategy are negatively correlated with company activity. School participation is negatively correlated with coercive control strategy.
Based on the observation of different age groups for resource control behaviors, prosocial control strategy is increasing along with the age increase, while coercive control strategy is not. Under the observation of prosocial control strategy, the number of times of giving suggestions or prompting the partner and offering objects are the most. Oppositely, the number of times of verbally misleading the partner is the fewest. Under the observation of coercive control strategy, the number of times of taking objects directly and thwarting the partner are the most. Oppositely, the number of times of physically aggressive is the fewest. For the classification of resource control strategy, researchers and teachers are the same on prosocial controllers, while the bistrategic controllers and typical controllers are different. High dominant children tend to use prosocial control strategy when interacting with high-dominant children. On the other hand, when interacting with lower dominant children, they tend to use coercive control strategy.
The study not only improved academic trends in domestic, but also provides references for parents and educators.

第一章 緒論..............................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機.................................1
第二節 研究目的與問題.................................5
第二章 文獻探討..........................................7
第一節 社會支配性的定義與相關理論.....................7
第二節 社會支配理論在幼兒領域之探討..................10
第三節 幼兒社會支配性之影響因素......................14
第四節 社會支配性之觀察與測量........................22
第五節 結語..........................................26
第三章 研究方法.........................................29
第一節 研究架構......................................29
第二節 研究對象......................................30
第三節 研究工具......................................31
第四節 研究程序......................................36
第五節 資料處理與分析................................37
第六節 研究倫理......................................38
第四章 研究結果與討論...................................39
第一節 幼兒社會支配性的分佈趨勢.......................39
第二節 幼兒社會支配性之相關因素探討...................41
第三節 高社會支配性幼兒之資源控制策略觀察分析.........49
第五章 結論與建議.......................................63
第一節 結論...........................................63
第二節 建議...........................................66
參考文獻 ...............................................67
附錄
附錄一 ................................................70
附錄二 ................................................71
附錄三 ................................................74
附錄四 ................................................75
附錄五 ................................................79
附錄六 ................................................78
附錄七 ................................................79
附錄八 ................................................80
附錄九 ................................................84

中文
林璟玲、林儒君（2009）。混齡班級幼兒同儕互動之研究－以社會計量法爲例。幼兒保育論壇，4，125-143。
連士慧、鍾志從(2014)。幼兒自尊與同儕社會地位之關聯。人類發展與家庭學報，16，52-78。
黃毅志（2008）。如何精確測量職業地位？「改良版台灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構。台東大學教育學報，19，151-160
蔡玉英(2013)。兩位幼兒同儕社會地位轉變之探究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立大學幼兒教育學系碩士班，台北市。

英文
Boulton, M. J., & Smith, P. K. (1990). Affective bias in children’s perceptions of dominance relationships. Journal of Child development, 61, 221-229.
Chance, M. R. A. (1967). Attention structure as a basis for primate rank order. Journal of Man, 2, 503-518.
Charlesworth, W. R., & Dzur, C. (1987). Gender comparisons of preschoolers’ behavior and resource utilization in group problem solving. Journal of Child Development, 58, 191-200.
Choi, J., Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R. (2011). The roots of social dominance: Aggression, prosocial behavior, and social interdependence. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 442-454.
Dewsbury, D. A. (1982). Social dominance, copulatory behavior, and differential reproduction in deer mice. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 95 (6), 880-895.
Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social information processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 (6), 1146-1158.
Dodge, S. R. (2013). Social dominance and theory of mind in early childhood. University of Central Oklahoma, Edmond.
Dominance. (2016). In Oxford English online dictionary. Retrieved October 6, 2016, from http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/56691?redirectedFrom=Dominance#eid.
Drews, C. (1993). The concept and definition of dominance in animal behaviour, Journal of Behaviour, 125 (3), 283–313.
Flack, J.C., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2003). Dominance style, social power, and conflict management in macaque societies: A conceptual framework. Emory University, Atlanta.
Gibson, J., Hussain, J., Holsgrove, S., Adams, S., & Green, J. (2011). Quantifying peer interactions for research and clinical use: The manchester inventory for playground observation. Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 32 (6), 2458–2466.
Hawker, D.S.J., & Boulton, M. J. (1997). Peer victimization and psychosocial adjustment: Findings with a British sample. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the social for research in child development. Washington, DC.
Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Journal of Developmental Review, 19, 97-132.
Hawley, P. H. (2002). Social dominance and prosocial and coercive strategies of resource control in preschoolers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 167–176.
Hawley, P. H. (2003). Strategies of control, aggression, and morality in preschoolers: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 213–235.
Hawley, P. H., Johnson, S. E., Mize, J.A., & McNamara, K. A. (2007). Physical attractiveness in preschoolers: Relationships with power, status, aggression and social skills. Journal of School Psychology. 45, 499-521.
Hawley, P. H., & Geldhof, G. H. (2012). Preschoolers’ social dominance, moral cognition,and moral behavior: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112, 18-35.
Hawley, P. H. (2014). Ontogeny and social dominance: a developmental view of human power patterns. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12(2), 318-342.
Hinde, R. A. (1974). Biological basis ofhuman social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Islam, G. (2014). Social Dominance Theory. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology (pp.1779-1781). Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Johns, C.J., Livson, N., & Peskin, H. (2003). Longitudinal hierarchical linear modeling analyses of california psychological inventory data from age 33 to 75: An examination of stability and change in adult personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(3), 294-308.
Keating, C. F., & Bai, D. L. (1986).Children's attributions of social dominance from facial cues. Journal of Child Development, 57(5),1269-1276.
Massey, A. R., Craven, J. B., & Swearingen, C. L. (2014). Preschool power play: Resource control strategies associated with health. Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation.
Mast, M. S. (2001). Gender differences and similarities in dominance hierarchies in same-gender groups based on speaking time. Journal of Sex Roles, 44(9), 537-556.
McDonald, K. L., Baden, R. E., & Lochman, J. E. (2013). Parenting Influences on the Social Goals of Aggressive Children, 17(1), 29-38.
Missakian, M. & Hamer, H. (1974). Aggression and dominance relations in young children. Calif: Synanon Foundation.
Bartlett, N. (2002). Physical and relational aggression and victimization among children : The role of familial and individual factors. Canada: Concordia University.
Neppl, T. K., & Murray, A. D. (1997). Social dominance and play patterns among preschoolers: Gender comparisons. Journal of Sex Roles, 36(5), 381-393.
Ostrov, J. M., & Guzzo, J. L. (2015).Prospective associations Between Prosocial Behavior and Social Dominance in Early Childhood: Are sharers the best leaders? Journal of Genetic Psychology, 176 (2), 130–138.
Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259-280.
Pellegrini, A. D., Roseth, C. J., Bohn, C.M., Ryzin, M. V., Vance, N., Cheatham, C. L., & Tarullo. A. (2007). Social dominance in preschool classrooms. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121(1), 54-64.
Pettit, G. S., Bakshi, A., Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1990). The emergence of social dominance in young boys’ play groups: Developmental differences and behavioral correlates. Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 1017–1025.
Pratto, F., & Stewart, A. L. (2011). Social dominance theory. In J. Daniel (Ed. ). The Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology. U.S.
Roseth, C. J., Pellegrini, A. D., Bohn, C. M., Ryzin, V. M., & Vance, N. (2007). Preschoolers' aggression, affiliation, and social dominance relationships: An observational, longitudinal study. Journal of School Psychology, 45(5), 479-497.
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W.M., & Laursen, B. (2011). Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. UK: Guilford Press.
Roseth, C.J., Pellegrini, A. D., Dupuis, D. N., Bohn, C. M., Hickey, M. C., Hilk, C. L., & Peshkam, A. (2010). Preschoolers’ bistrategic resource control, reconciliation, and peer regard. Journal of Social Development, 20(1), 185-211.
Schaub, H. (1995). Dominance fades with distance: An experiment on food competition in long-tailed macaques. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 109 (2), 196-202.
Shelton, K. K., Frick, P. J., & Wootton, J. (1996). Assessment of parenting practices in families of elementary school-age children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25, 317–329.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sluckin,a., & Smith, P. K. (1977).Two approaches to the concept of dominance in preschool. Journal of children. Child Development, 48, 917-923.
Strayer, F. F., & Strayer, J. (1976). An ethological analysis of social agonism and dominance relations among preschool children. Journal of Children Development, 47, 980-989.
Teisl, M.J. (2008). Biosocial investigation of child maltreatment and testosterone in children’s aggression. New York: Rochester University.
Vaughn, B. E., & Waters, E. (1981). Attention structure, sociometric status, and dominance: Interrelations, behavioral correlates, and relationships to social competence. Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(3), 275-288.
Wright, J. C., Zakriski, A. L., & Fisher, P. (1996). Age differences in the correlates of perceived dominance. Journal of Social Development, 5, 24–40.