|
一、 中文部份 劉燿誠(2008)。應用二階式概念診斷測驗探究中學生生物恆定性知另有概念。國立彰化師範大學生物學系碩士論文。 楊坤元、張賴妙理(2004)。發展和應用二階式診斷工具來偵測國中一年級學生知遺傳學另有概念。科學教育學刊,12(1),107-131。 洪榮炎(2002)。多元評量模式對國小學童自然科認知能力的區辨性及預測性之研究─以「電磁鐵」、「電動機」為例。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。 葉誌鑑(2001)。國小高年級學童電磁鐵概念分析之研究。台北市立師範學院科學 教育研究所碩士論文。 二、 英文部分 Carey, S. (2000). The Origin of Concepts. Cognition and Development, 1(1), 37-41. doi: 10.1207/S15327647JCD0101N_3 Chini, J. J., Madsen, A., Gire, Elizabeth., Rebello, S. N., & Puntambekar, S. (2012). Exploration of factors that affect the comparative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives in an undergraduate laboratory. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8, (010113), 1-12. de Jong, T., Linn, C. M., & Zacharia, C. Z. (2013). Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education. Science, 340, 305-308. doi: 10.1126/science.1230579 Gire, E., Carmichael, A., Chini, J. J., Rouinfar, A., Rebello, S., Smith, G., & Puntambekar, S. (2010). The effects of physical and virtual manipulatives on students' conceptual learning about pulleys. International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 10(9), 937-943. Hewson, W. P. (1981). A Conceptual Change Approach to Learning Science. Science Education, 3(4), 383-396. doi: 10.1080/0140528810304004 Hewson, G. M., & Hewson, W. P. (1983). Effect of instruction using students' prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(8), 731-743. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660200804 Jaakkola, T., & Nurmi, S. (2008). Fostering elementary school students’ understanding of simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 271-283. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00259.x Jaakkola, T., Nurmi, S., & Veermans, K. (2011). A Comparison of Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuits in Simulation Only and Simulation-Laboratory Contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1), 71-93. doi: 10.1002/tea.20386 Jiménez, M. P., Pedrajas, P. A., & Polo, J. (2003). Learning in Chemistry with Virtual Laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(3), 346-352. Lee, Y., & Law, N. (2001). Explorations in promoting conceptual change in electrical concepts via ontological category shift. Science Education, 23(2), 111-149. doi: 10.1080/09500690119851 Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11(3), 183-200. doi: 10.1007/BF00414279 Özmen, H. (2008). Determination of students' alternative conceptions about chemical equilibrium: a review of research and the case of Turkey. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9, 225-233. doi: 10.1039/B812411F Olympiou, G., & Zacharia, C. Z. (2012). Blending Physical and Virtual Manipulatives: An Effort to Improve Students’ Conceptual Understanding Through Science Laboratory Experimentation. Science Education, 96(1), 21-47. doi: 10.1002/sce.20463 Olympiou, G., Zacharia, C. Z., & de Jong, T. (2013). Making the invisible visible: enhancing students’ conceptual understanding by introducing representations of abstract objects in a simulation. Instructional Science, 41, 575-596. doi: 10.1007/s11251-012-9245-2 Planinic1, M., Boone, J. W., Krsnik, R., & Beilfuss, L. M. (2006). Exploring alternative conceptions from Newtonian dynamics and simple DC circuits: Links between item difficulty and item confidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 150-171. doi: 10.1002/tea.20101 Renkena, D. M., & Nunezb, N. (2013). Computer simulations and clear observations do not guarantee conceptual understanding. Learning and Instruction, 23, 10-23. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.08.006 Toth, E. E., Ludvico, R. L., & Morrow, L. B. (2014). Blended inquiry with hands-on and virtual laboratories: the role of perceptual features during knowledge construction. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(5), 614-630. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2012.693102 Toth, E. E., Morrow, L. B., & Ludvico, R. L. (2009). Designing Blended Inquiry Learning in a Laboratory Context: A Study of Incorporating Hands-On and Virtual Laboratories. Innovative Higher Education, 33, 333-344. doi: 10.1007/s10755-008-9087-7 Winn, J., & Shotton, J. (2006). The Layout Consistent Random Field for Recognizing and Segmenting Partially Occluded Objects. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1, 37-44. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2006.305 Zacharia, C. Z. (2007). Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 120-132. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00215.x Zacharia, C. Z., & de Jong, T. (2014). The Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuits of Introducing Virtual Manipulatives Within a Physical Manipulatives-Oriented Curriculum. Cognition and Instruction, 32(2), 101-158. doi: 10.1080/07370008.2014.887083 Zacharia, C. Z., & Olympiou, G. (2011). Physical versus virtual manipulative experimentation in physics learning. Learning and Instruction, 21, 317-331. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.001 Zacharia, C. Z., Olympiou, G., & Papaevripidou, M. (2008). Effects of Experimenting with Physical and Virtual Manipulatives on Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Heat and Temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 1021-1035. doi: 10.1002/tea.20260
|