帳號:guest(3.142.245.158)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):郭宛筑
作者(外文):Kuo, Wan-Jhu
論文名稱(中文):笑一個!一個笑容勝過千言萬語。情感需求如何影響廣告偏好
論文名稱(外文):Smile! A Smile Speaks Louder Than Words. How Need for Affect Influences Advertising Preferences
指導教授(中文):高登第
指導教授(外文):Kao, Teng-Ti
口試委員(中文):郭素蕙
陳宜棻
口試委員(外文):Kuo, Su-Hui
Chen, Yi-Fen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:教育心理與諮商學系
學號:111096530
出版年(民國):113
畢業學年度:112
語文別:中文
論文頁數:111
中文關鍵詞:情感需求隱喻笑容廣告偏好
外文關鍵詞:Need For AffectMetaphorsSmilesAdvertising Preference
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:21
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
本研究主要探討不同情感需求(Need for Affect)的消費者是否會對廣告偏好產生影響,並以隱喻及笑容作為調節變項。本研究採用兩個實驗,分別進行實驗一2(隱喻:高度隱喻 vs. 低度隱喻)×2(笑容:真誠的笑容 vs. 虛假的笑容),以及實驗二2(隱喻:高度隱喻 vs. 低度隱喻)×2(笑容:燦爛的笑容 vs. 輕微的笑容)的受試者間實驗設計,包含四種不同的情境。實驗一及實驗二皆以量表測量受試者的情感需求傾向,並接續將四種不同類型的廣告隨機分配給受試者,透過結合隱喻及笑容的廣告圖文,去了解受試者們對廣告的偏好程度以及對廣告中隱喻及笑容的反應。研究結果顯示一、隱喻(高度隱喻與低度隱喻)與笑容(真笑與假笑)對於不同情感需求的消費者,在廣告偏好具有交互作用。二、當廣告是以高度隱喻的方式呈現,且出現真笑時,接近情感需求的消費者可能會比迴避情感需求的消費者產生更強烈的廣告偏好。三、當廣告是以低度隱喻的方式呈現,且出現真笑時,接近情感需求的消費者的廣告偏好與迴避情感需求的消費者無差異。四、廣告是以高度隱喻的方式呈現,且出現假笑時,迴避情感需求的消費者的廣告偏好與接近情感需求的消費者無差異。五、當廣告是以低度隱喻的方式呈現,且出現假笑時,迴避情感需求的消費者可能會比接近情感需求的消費者產生更強烈的廣告偏好。六、隱喻(高度隱喻與低度隱喻)與笑容(燦笑與微笑)對於不同情感需求的消費者,在廣告偏好具有交互作用。七、當廣告是以高度隱喻的方式呈現,且出現燦笑時,接近情感需求的消費者可能會比迴避情感需求的消費者產生更強烈的廣告偏好。八、當廣告是以低度隱喻的方式呈現,且出現燦笑時,接近情感需求的消費者的廣告偏好與迴避情感需求的消費者無差異。九、當廣告是以高度隱喻的方式呈現,且出現微笑時,迴避情感需求的消費者的廣告偏好與接近情感需求的消費者無差異。十、當廣告是以低度隱喻的方式呈現,且出現微笑時,迴避情感需求的消費者可能會比接近情感需求的消費者產生更強烈的廣告偏好。
本研究的結果可在實務上提供建議,相關業者可以根據本研究的結果去分析不同類型消費者的偏好和需求,進一步做出市場區隔並制定出更具針對性的行銷策略,進而提升廣告的效益,且能更有效地吸引和留住目標消費者。
This study primarily investigates whether consumers with different need for affect (NFA) have varying preferences for advertisements, with metaphors and smiles as moderating variables. The study conducts two experiments: Experiment 1 with a 2 (metaphor: highly metaphorical vs. low metaphorical) × 2 (smile: Duchenne smile vs. non-Duchenne smile) between-subjects design, and Experiment 2 with a 2 (metaphor: highly metaphorical vs. low metaphorical) × 2 (smile: broad smile vs. slight smile) between-subjects design, encompassing four different scenarios. Both experiments measured participants' need for affect using a scale, followed by random assignment of four types of advertisements to participants. Results demonstrated that: (1) There are interaction effects among metaphors (highly metaphorical vs. low metaphorical), smiles (Duchenne smile vs. non-Duchenne smile), and needs for affect on ad preferences. (2) When presented a highly metaphorical ad with Duchenne smile, consumers with high need for affect tend to show stronger ad preferences compared to those with low need for affect. (3) When presented a low metaphorical ad with Duchenne smile or a highly metaphorical ad with non-Duchenne smile, there is no difference in ad preferences between consumers with high and low need for affect. (4) When presented a highly metaphorical ad with Duchenne smile, consumers with low need for affect tend to show stronger ad preferences compared to those with high need for affect. (5) There are interaction effects among metaphors (highly metaphorical vs. low metaphorical), smiles (broad smile vs. slight smile), and needs for affect on ad preferences. (6) When presented a highly metaphorical ad with broad smile, consumers with high need for affect tend to show stronger ad preferences compared to those with a low need for affect. (7) When presented a low metaphorical ad with broad smile or a highly metaphorical ad with slight smile, there is no difference in ad preferences between consumers with high and low need for affect. (8) When presented a low metaphorical ad with slight smile, consumers with low need for affect tend to show stronger ad preferences compared to those with high.
The results of this study can provide practical recommendations. Relevant businesses can use these findings to develop appropriate marketing strategies, segmenting the market based on different types of consumers to achieve the maximum advertising effectiveness.
目錄
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景 1
1.2研究動機 1
1.3研究問題 2
1.4研究流程 2
第二章 文獻探討與假說推論 3
2.1情感需求(Need for Affect) 3
2.2隱喻 5
2.3笑容 6
2.4廣告偏好 10
2.5情感需求與隱喻(高度隱喻與低度隱喻)對於廣告偏好的交互作用 11
2.6情感需求與笑容(真笑與假笑)對於廣告偏好的交互作用 14
2.7情感需求、隱喻(高度隱喻與低度隱喻)與笑容(真笑與假笑)對於廣告偏好的交互作用 16
2.8情感需求與笑容(燦笑與微笑)對於廣告偏好的交互作用 19
2.9情感需求、隱喻(高度隱喻與低度隱喻)與笑容(燦笑與微笑)對於廣告偏好的交互作用 21
第三章 研究方法 25
3.1研究架構 25
3.2實驗及問卷設計 26
3.2.1實驗設計 26
3.2.2情感需求衡量 27
3.2.3隱喻操弄 29
3.2.4笑容操弄 29
3.2.5廣告圖文 32
3.2.6廣告偏好衡量 36
第四章 研究結果 37
4.1實驗一 37
4.1.1資料收集 37
4.1.2情感需求衡量 38
4.1.3隱喻操弄檢定 38
4.1.4笑容操弄檢定 39
4.1.5廣告偏好衡量 39
4.1.6假說檢驗 39
4.1.7實驗一假說驗證結果彙整 47
4.2實驗二 48
4.2.1資料收集 48
4.2.2情感需求衡量 49
4.2.3隱喻操弄檢定 49
4.2.4笑容操弄檢定 50
4.2.5廣告偏好衡量 50
4.2.6假說檢驗 50
4.2.7實驗二假說驗證結果彙整 58
第五章 討論 59
5.1綜合討論 59
5.1.1情感需求與隱喻對廣告偏好的影響 59
5.1.2情感需求與笑容對廣告偏好的影響 59
5.1.3情感需求、隱喻與笑容對廣告偏好的影響 60
5.2學術貢獻 61
5.3實務貢獻 61
5.4研究限制與未來發展 63
5.4.1研究限制 63
5.4.2未來發展 63
參考文獻 64
附錄一 實驗一問卷一 72
附錄二 實驗一問卷二 77
附錄三 實驗一問卷三 82
附錄四 實驗一問卷四 87
附錄五 實驗二問卷一 92
附錄六 實驗二問卷二 97
附錄七 實驗二問卷三 102
附錄八 實驗二問卷四 107

圖目錄
圖1 研究流程 2
圖2 實驗一研究架構 25
圖3 實驗二研究架構 26
圖4 實驗一情感需求與隱喻對廣告偏好交互作用之影響 41
圖5 實驗一情感需求與笑容對廣告偏好交互作用之影響 42
圖6 實驗一情感需求、隱喻及笑容對廣告偏好交互作用之影響 44
圖7 實驗一情感需求、隱喻及笑容對廣告偏好交互作用之影響 46
圖8 實驗二情感需求與隱喻對廣告偏好交互作用之影響 52
圖9 實驗二情感需求與笑容對廣告偏好交互作用之影響 53
圖10 實驗二情感需求、隱喻及笑容對廣告偏好交互作用之影響 55
圖11 實驗二情感需求、隱喻及笑容對廣告偏好交互作用之影響 57

表目錄
表1 情感需求量表(中英文對照) 27
表2 真誠的笑容 30
表3 虛假的笑容 30
表4 燦爛的笑容 31
表5 輕微的笑容 32
表6實驗一廣告圖文 33
表7 實驗二廣告圖文 35
表8 實驗一受試者描述統計表 37
表9 實驗一情感需求衡量 38
表10 實驗一隱喻操弄檢定 38
表11 實驗一笑容操弄檢定 39
表12 實驗一情感需求與隱喻對廣告偏好的變異數分析 40
表13 實驗一情感需求與隱喻對廣告偏好交互作用之影響 40
表14 實驗一情感需求與笑容對廣告偏好的變異數分析 41
表15 實驗一情感需求與笑容對廣告偏好交互作用之影響 42
表16 實驗一情感需求與笑容對廣告偏好的變異數分析(在高度隱喻的情況下) 43
表17 實驗一情感需求與笑容對廣告偏好的變異數分析(在低度隱喻的情況下) 43
表18 實驗一情感需求、隱喻及笑容對廣告偏好交互作用之影響 44
表19 實驗一情感需求、隱喻及笑容對廣告偏好交互作用之影響 45
表20 實驗一假說驗證結果彙整 47
表21 實驗二受試者描述統計表 48
表22 實驗二情感需求衡量 49
表23 實驗二隱喻操弄檢定 49
表24 實驗二笑容操弄檢定 50
表25 實驗二情感需求與隱喻對廣告偏好的變異數分析 51
表26 實驗二情感需求與隱喻對廣告偏好交互作用之影響 51
表27 實驗二情感需求與笑容對廣告偏好的變異數分析 52
表28 實驗二情感需求與笑容對廣告偏好交互作用之影響 53
表29 實驗二情感需求與笑容對廣告偏好的變異數分析(在高度隱喻的情況下) 54
表30 實驗二情感需求與笑容對廣告偏好的變異數分析(在低度隱喻的情況下) 54
表31 實驗二情感需求、隱喻及笑容對廣告偏好交互作用之影響 55
表32 實驗二情感需求、隱喻及笑容對廣告偏好交互作用之影響 56
表33 實驗二假說驗證結果彙整 58

1.Abel, E. L., & Kruger, M. L. (2010). Smile intensity in photographs predicts longevity. Psychological Science, 21(4), 542-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363775
2.Adams Jr, R. B., & Kleck, R. E. (2003). Perceived gaze direction and the processing of facial displays of emotion. Psychological Science, 14(6), 644-647. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1479.x
3.Ahn, H., Yim, M. Y.-C., & Sung, Y. (2022). When verbal metaphors become more persuasive: the interplay between goal orientation of ad claims and metaphor. International Journal of Advertising, 41(3), 541-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1900502
4.Anand, P., & Sternthal, B. (1989). Strategies for Designing Persuasive Messages: Deductions from the Resource Matching Hypothesis. In Patricia C. & Alice M. T.(Eds.), Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising(pp.135-159). Lexington Books. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1988-98626-004
5.Andrzejewski, S. A., & Mooney, E. C. (2016). Service with a smile: does the type of smile matter? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29, 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.010
6.Ang, S. H. (2002). Effects of metaphoric advertising among mainland Chinese consumers. Journal of Marketing Communications, 8(3), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527260210148639
7.Ang, S. H., & Lim, E. A. C. (2006). The influence of metaphors and product type on brand personality perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2006.10639226
8.Appel, M., Gnambs, T., & Maio, G. R. (2012). A short measure of the need for affect. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(4), 418-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.666921
9.Appel, M., & Richter, T. (2010). Transportation and need for affect in narrative persuasion: A mediated moderation model. Media Psychology, 13(2), 101-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213261003799847
10.Barger, P. B., & Grandey, A. A. (2006). Service with a smile and encounter satisfaction: Emotional contagion and appraisal mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1229-1238. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.23478695
11.Bartsch, A., Appel, M., & Storch, D. (2010). Predicting emotions and meta-emotions at the movies: The role of the need for affect in audiences’ experience of horror and drama. Communication Research, 37(2), 167-190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209356441
12.Belanche, D., Flavián, C., & Pérez-Rueda, A. (2017). Understanding interactive online advertising: Congruence and product involvement in highly and lowly arousing, skippable video ads. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 37(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2016.06.004
13.Berg, H., Söderlund, M., & Lindström, A. (2015). Spreading joy: examining the effects of smiling models on consumer joy and attitudes. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32(6), 459-469. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-03-2015-1356
14.Bleier, A., & Eisenbeiss, M. (2015). The importance of trust for personalized online advertising. Journal of Retailing, 91(3), 390-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2015.04.001
15.Bogodistov, Y., & Dost, F. (2017). Proximity begins with a smile, but which one? Associating non-Duchenne smiles with higher psychological distance. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 272863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01374
16.Brennan, I., & Bahn, K. D. (2006). Literal versus extended symbolic messages and advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of need for cognition. Psychology & Marketing, 23(4), 273-295. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20111
17.Broeder, P., & Goorden, D. (2019). The cross-cultural impact of the ingenuine smiling celebrity in online advertising. Tourism and Management Studies, 15(4), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.18089/tms.2019.150403
18.Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., Steen, G. J., & Iepsma, M. A. (2015). Making ads less complex, yet more creative and persuasive: The effects of conventional metaphors and irony in print advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 515-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2014.996200
19.Chang, C.-T., & Yen, C.-T. (2013). Missing ingredients in metaphor advertising: The right formula of metaphor type, product type, and need for cognition. Journal of Advertising, 42(1), 80-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2012.749090
20.Cui, J., Colston, H. L., & Jiang, G. (2024). Is that a genuine smile? Emoji-based sarcasm interpretation across the lifespan. Metaphor and Symbol, 39(3), 195-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2024.2314595
21.De Vries, L., Gensler, S., & Leeflang, P. S. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.003
22.De Vries, L., Gensler, S., & Leeflang, P. S. (2017). Effects of traditional advertising and social messages on brand-building metrics and customer acquisition. Journal of Marketing, 81(5), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0178
23.Dehay, E. K., & Landwehr, J. R. (2019). A MAP for effective advertising: the metaphoric advertising processing model. AMS Review, 9(3), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-018-0131-1
24.Deng, H., Zhao, N., & Wang, Y. (2023). Identifying Chinese social media users' need for affect from their online behaviors. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1045279. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1045279
25.Deutsch, F. M., LeBaron, D., & Fryer, M. M. (1987). What is in a smile? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(3), 341-352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00908.x
26.Dolan, R., Conduit, J., Fahy, J., & Goodman, S. (2016). Social media engagement behaviour: a uses and gratifications perspective. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3-4), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2015.1095222
27. Ekman, P. (1992). Facial expressions of emotion: New findings, new questions. Psychological Science, 3(1), 34-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00253.x
28.Ekman, P., Davidson, R. J., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). The Duchenne smile: Emotional expression and brain physiology: II. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 342. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.342
29.Ekman, P., Freisen, W. V., & Ancoli, S. (1980). Facial signs of emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1125. https://doi.org/10.1037/H0077722
30.Farroni, T., Menon, E., & Johnson, M. H. (2006). Factors influencing newborns’ preference for faces with eye contact. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95(4), 298-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2006.08.001
31.Gkiouzepas, L., & Hogg, M. K. (2011). Articulating a new framework for visual metaphors in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367400107
32.Gomez-Uribe, C. A., & Hunt, N. (2015). The netflix recommender system: Algorithms, business value, and innovation. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 6(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1145/2843948
33.Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A., & Nordfält, J. (2017). The future of retailing. Journal of Retailing, 93(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2016.12.008
34.Gunnery, S. D., & Hall, J. A. (2014). The Duchenne smile and persuasion. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38, 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-014-0177-1
35.Gunnery, S. D., Hall, J. A., & Ruben, M. A. (2013). The deliberate Duchenne smile: Individual differences in expressive control. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 37, 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-012-0139-4
36.Gunnery, S. D., & Ruben, M. A. (2016). Perceptions of Duchenne and non-Duchenne smiles: A meta-analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 30(3), 501-515. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1018817
37.Haddock, G., Maio, G. R., Arnold, K., & Huskinson, T. (2008). Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(6), 769-778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208314871
38.Harker, L., & Keltner, D. (2001). Expressions of positive emotion in women's college yearbook pictures and their relationship to personality and life outcomes across adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.112
39.Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Emotional contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 96-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953
40.Hatzithomas, L., Manolopoulou, A., Margariti, K., Boutsouki, C., & Koumpis, D. (2021). Metaphors and body copy in online advertising effectiveness. Journal of Promotion Management, 27(5), 642-672. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2021.1880520
41.Hellier, P. K., Geursen, G. M., Carr, R. A., & Rickard, J. A. (2003). Customer repurchase intention: A general structural equation model. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11/12), 1762-1800. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310495456
42.Hennig-Thurau, T., Groth, M., Paul, M., & Gremler, D. D. (2006). Are all smiles created equal? How emotional contagion and emotional labor affect service relationships. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.3.058
43.Hess U., Beaupré M., Cheung N. (2002). Who to whom and why – Cultural differences and similarities in the function of smiles. In Abel M. (Ed.), An Empirical Reflection on the Smile(pp. 187–216). The Edwin Mellen Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2003-06930-008
44.Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 404-420. https://doi.org/10.1086/209123
45.Horstmann, G. (2003). What do facial expressions convey: Feeling states, behavioral intentions, or actions requests? Emotion, 3(2), 150. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.2.150
46.Huang, T.-L., & Liao, S. (2015). A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: the moderating role of cognitive innovativeness. Electronic Commerce Research, 15, 269-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-014-9163-2
47.Ilicic, J., Baxter, S. M., & Kulczynski, A. (2016). The impact of age on consumer attachment to celebrities and endorsed brand attachment. Journal of Brand Management, 23, 273-288. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2016.5
48.Jeong, S. H. (2008). Visual metaphor in advertising: Is the persuasive effect attributable to visual argumentation or metaphorical rhetoric? Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010701717488
49.Kao, D. T. (2019). The impact of envy on brand preference: brand storytelling and psychological distance as moderators. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 28(4), 515-528. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-08-2018-2004
50.Kao, D. T., Zhang, L., Yu, A. P. I., & Wu, P. H. (2017). Do ad metaphors enhance or dilute the consumers' brand preferences? Exploring the moderating role of goal orientation. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 16(5), 474-482. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1657
51.Katz, E., Blumler, J., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Uses and gratification theory. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1086/268109
52.Keh, H. T., Ren, R., Hill, S. R., & Li, X. (2013). The beautiful, the cheerful, and the helpful: The effects of service employee attributes on customer satisfaction. Psychology & Marketing, 30(3), 211-226. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20599
53.Keller, P. A., & Block, L. G. (1997). Vividness effects: A resource-matching perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(3), 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1086/209511
54.Kim, A. J., & Ko, E. (2012). Do social media marketing activities enhance customer equity? An empirical study of luxury fashion brand. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1480-1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.014
55.Kim, T., & Read, G. L. (2021). Free smiles are worth a lot for social media influencers: The mediating roles of warmth, competence, and admiration. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(2), 135-140. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0323
56.King, L. A. (1998). Ambivalence over emotional expression and reading emotions in situations and faces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 753. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.753
57.Kraus, M. W., & Chen, T.-W. D. (2013). A winning smile? Smile intensity, physical dominance, and fighter performance. Emotion, 13(2), 270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030745
58.Kring, A. M., & Gordon, A. H. (1998). Sex differences in emotion: expression, experience, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.686
59.Krumhuber, E., & Manstead, A. S. (2009). Are you joking? The moderating role of smiles in the perception of verbal statements. Cognition and Emotion, 23(8), 1504-1515. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802431726
60.Kulczynski, A., Ilicic, J., & Baxter, S. M. (2016). When your source is smiling, consumers may automatically smile with you: Investigating the source expressive display hypothesis. Psychology & Marketing, 33(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20857
61.Lagerwerf, L., & Meijers, A. (2008). Openness in metaphorical and straightforward advertisements: Appreciation effects. Journal of Advertising, 37(2), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367370202
62.Lau, S. (1982). The effect of smiling on person perception. The Journal of Social Psychology, 117(1), 63-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1982.9713408
63. Lee, S. Y., Jung, S., Jung, H. Y., Choi, S. T., & Oh, S. (2019). Imagination matters: do consumers’ imagery processing and self-regulatory goals affect the persuasiveness of metaphor in advertising? International Journal of Advertising, 38(8), 1173-1201. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1596445
64.Lee, Y. H., & Lim, E. A. C. (2010). When good cheer goes unrequited: How emotional receptivity affects evaluation of expressed emotion. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1151-1161. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.6.1151
65.Maio, G. R., & Esses, V. M. (2001). The need for affect: Individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. Journal of Personality, 69(4), 583-614. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.694156
66.Malthouse, E. C., & Li, H. (2017). Opportunities for and pitfalls of using big data in advertising research. Journal of Advertising, 46(2), 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1299653
67.McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (1992). On resonance: A critical pluralistic inquiry into advertising rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2), 180-197. https://doi.org/10.1086/209295
68.McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (1999). Visual rhetoric in advertising: Text-interpretive, experimental, and reader-response analyses. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1086/209549
69.McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (2003). Visual and verbal rhetorical figures under directed processing versus incidental exposure to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 579-587. https://doi.org/10.1086/346252
70.Mehu, M., Little, A. C., & Dunbar, R. I. (2007). Duchenne smiles and the perception of generosity and sociability in faces. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 5(1), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.1556/jep.2007.1011
71.Muntinga, D. G., Moorman, M., & Smit, E. G. (2011). Introducing COBRAs: Exploring motivations for brand-related social media use. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 13-46. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-30-1-013-046
72.Petroshius, S. M., & Crocker, K. E. (1989). An empirical analysis of spokesperson characteristics on advertisement and product evaluations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 17, 217-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729813
73.Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2002). The development, change, and transformation of rhetorical style in magazine advertisements 1954–1999. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673681
74.Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2004). Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing Theory, 4(1-2), 113-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593104044089
75.Pieters, R., Warlop, L., & Wedel, M. (2002). Breaking through the clutter: Benefits of advertisement originality and familiarity for brand attention and memory. Management Science, 48(6), 765-781. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.6.765.192
76.Pixton, T. S. (2011). Happy to see me, aren’t you, Sally? Signal detection analysis of emotion detection in briefly presented male and female faces. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52(4), 361-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00879.x
77.Poels, K., & Dewitte, S. (2019). The role of emotions in advertising: A call to action. Journal of Advertising, 48(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2019.1579688
78.Reed, L. I., Zeglen, K. N., & Schmidt, K. L. (2012). Facial expressions as honest signals of cooperative intent in a one-shot anonymous Prisoner's Dilemma game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(3), 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.09.003
79.Rosenbaum, J. E., & Johnson, B. K. (2016). Who’s afraid of spoilers? Need for cognition, need for affect, and narrative selection and enjoyment. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(3), 273. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000076
80.Roy, R., & Phau, I. (2014). Examining regulatory focus in the information processing of imagery and analytical advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 43(4), 371-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2014.888323
81.Scanlon, A. E., & Polage, D. C. (2023). The strength of a smile: Duchenne smiles improve advertisement and product evaluations. International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities, 2(1), 4.
82.Scarr, S. (1992). Developmental theories for the 1990s: Development and individual differences. Child Development, 63(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb03591.x
83.Seidel, E.-M., Habel, U., Kirschner, M., Gur, R. C., & Derntl, B. (2010). The impact of facial emotional expressions on behavioral tendencies in women and men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(2), 500. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018169
84.Sekunova, A., & Barton, J. J. (2008). The effects of face inversion on the perception of long-range and local spatial relations in eye and mouth configuration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5). https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1129
85.Sirgy, M. J., Grewal, D., Mangleburg, T. F., Park, J.-o., Chon, K.-S., Claiborne, C. B., Johar, J. S., & Berkman, H. (1997). Assessing the predictive validity of two methods of measuring self-image congruence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25, 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070397253004
86.Söderlund, M., & Rosengren, S. (2010). The happy versus unhappy service worker in the service encounter: Assessing the impact on customer satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 17(2), 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2010.01.001
87.Sopory, P., & Dillard, J. P. (2002). The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta‐analysis. Human communication research, 28(3), 382-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00813.x
88.Soussignan, R. (2002). Duchenne smile, emotional experience, and autonomic reactivity: a test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Emotion, 2(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1037//1528-3542.2.1.52
89.Surakka, V., & Hietanen, J. K. (1998). Facial and emotional reactions to Duchenne and non-Duchenne smiles. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 29(1), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(97)00088-3
90.Trivedi, R. H., & Teichert, T. (2019). The effect of ad smiles on consumer attitudes and intentions: Influence of model gender and consumer gender. Journal of Business Research, 99, 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.052
91.Tucker, C. E. (2014). Social networks, personalized advertising, and privacy controls. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(5), 546-562. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0355
92. Van Mulken, M., Van Hooft, A., & Nederstigt, U. (2014). Finding the tipping point: Visual metaphor and conceptual complexity in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43(4), 333-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2014.920283
93. Van’t Wout, M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2008). Friend or foe: The effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making. Cognition, 108(3), 796-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.002
94.Voorveld, H. A., Van Noort, G., Muntinga, D. G., & Bronner, F. (2018). Engagement with social media and social media advertising: The differentiating role of platform type. Journal of Advertising, 47(1), 38-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1405754
95.Wang, Z., He, X., & Liu, F. (2015). Examining the effect of smile intensity on age perceptions. Psychological Reports, 117(1), 188-205. https://doi.org/10.2466/07.PR0.117c10z7
96.Wang, Z., Mao, H., Li, Y. J., & Liu, F. (2017). Smile big or not? Effects of smile intensity on perceptions of warmth and competence. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(5), 787-805. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw062
97.Wild, B., Erb, M., & Bartels, M. (2001). Are emotions contagious? Evoked emotions while viewing emotionally expressive faces: quality, quantity, time course and gender differences. Psychiatry Research, 102(2), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1781(01)00225-6
98.Yoo, C., & MacInnis, D. (2005). The brand attitude formation process of emotional and informational ads. Journal of Business Research, 58(10), 1397-1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.03.011
99.Zhu, H., Zhou, Y., Wu, Y., & Wang, X. (2022). To smile or not to smile: The role of facial expression valence on mundane and luxury products premiumness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102861




 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top

相關論文

1. 愈尷尬愈樂意捐錢?自我建構對捐款意願之影響:以消費者尷尬之場合與慈善廣告框架為干擾變數
2. 內隱理論對品牌吸引力的影響— 以產品種類廣度與搭銷商品互補性為干擾變數
3. 自戀者的異想世界:以品牌傲慢性及社交風險廣告作為調節變項
4. 錯過的永遠最美?猶豫不決對未行動後悔的影響:以促銷框架與訊息規範焦點為調節變項
5. 不想當邊緣人?消費者社會排除對補償偏好的影響- 以數字可除性與笑容強度為調節變項
6. 暗戀你使我無法平靜!完美主義對產品評價之影響: 以保密消費與產品名稱波動性為干擾變數
7. 戀愛讓你與眾不同嗎?求偶思維對於品牌偏好的影響:以廣告隱喻性與產品稀少性為干擾變數
8. 小反而更大?折扣對於募資意願的影響:以目標接近性、時間距離作為調節變項
9. 理性與感性的交戰。消費者建構水準在產品吸引力中的角色:以文字彎曲度和顏色組合為調節變項
10. 自我與他人孰重?自我建構對品牌偏好的影響: 以品牌傳記與購物任務情境為調節變數
11. 過往總是最美?認知風格對廣告喜好度的影響:以懷舊廣告與敘述視角為調節變數
12. 錢可以買幸福?自我差距對主觀幸福感的影響:論產品類型與補償性消費之調節與中介效果
13. 量體裁衣,因人而異。規範焦點對溝通效果的影響
14. 音樂有顏色?連帶色覺程度與情緒對廣告喜好度之影響:以音樂調性與音樂速度為調節變項
15. 你選好了嗎?矛盾心理對選擇困難的影響-以考慮集大小與時間距離為干擾變數
 
* *