|
1. Liu, G. Y. et al. Precise control of microtubule disassembly in living cells. EMBO J. 41, (2022). 2. Janke, C. & Magiera, M. M. The tubulin code and its role in controlling microtubule properties and functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 307–326 (2020). 3. Cleary, J. M. & Hancock, W. O. Molecular mechanisms underlying microtubule growth dynamics. Curr. Biol. 31, R560–R573 (2021). 4. Yang, W. T. et al. The Emerging Roles of Axonemal Glutamylation in Regulation of Cilia Architecture and Functions. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology vol. 9 (2021). 5. Prosser, S. L. & Pelletier, L. Mitotic spindle assembly in animal cells: A fine balancing act. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 187–201 (2017). 6. Antanavičiūtė, I., Gibieža, P., Prekeris, R. & Skeberdis, V. A. Midbody: From the regulator of cytokinesis to postmitotic signaling organelle. Med. 54, 1–10 (2018). 7. Doxsey, S., McCollum, D. & Theurkauf, W. Centrosomes in cellular regulation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 411–434 (2005). 8. Hildebrandt, F., Benzing, T. & Katsanis, N. Ciliopathies. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 1533–1543 (2011). 9. Sferra, A., Nicita, F. & Bertini, E. Microtubule dysfunction: A common feature of neurodegenerative diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1–36 (2020). 10. Parker, A. L., Kavallaris, M. & McCarroll, J. A. Microtubules and their role in cellular stress in cancer. Front. Oncol. 4 JUN, 1–19 (2014). 11. Akhmanova, A. & Steinmetz, M. O. Control of microtubule organization and dynamics: Two ends in the limelight. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 711–726 (2015). 12. Roll-Mecak, A. & McNally, F. J. Microtubule-severing enzymes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 22, 96–103 (2010). 13. Allison, R., Edgar, J. R. & Reid, E. Spastin MIT Domain Disease-Associated Mutations Disrupt Lysosomal Function. Front. Neurosci. 13, 1–14 (2019). 14. Sharp, D. J. & Ross, J. L. Microtubule-severing enzymes at the cutting edge. J. Cell Sci. 125, 2561–2569 (2012). 15. Roll-Mecak, A. & Vale, R. D. Making more microtubules by severing: A common theme of noncentrosomal microtubule arrays? J. Cell Biol. 175, 849–851 (2006). 16. Roll-Mecak, A. & Vale, R. D. The Drosophila homologue of the hereditary spastic paraplegia protein, spastin, severs and disassembles microtubules. Curr. Biol. 15, 650–655 (2005). 17. Ghosh, D. K., Dasgupta, D. & Guha, A. Models, Regulations, and Functions of Microtubule Severing by Katanin. ISRN Mol. Biol. 2012, 1–14 (2012). 18. Hazan, J. et al. Spastin, a new AAA protein, is altered in the most frequent form of autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia. Nat. Genet. 23, 296–303 (1999). 19. Claudiani, P., Riano, E., Errico, A., Andolfi, G. & Rugarli, E. I. Spastin subcellular localization is regulated through usage of different translation start sites and active export from the nucleus. Exp. Cell Res. 309, 358–369 (2005). 20. Solowska, J. M. et al. Quantitative and functional analyses of spastin in the nervous system: Implications for hereditary spastic paraplegia. J. Neurosci. 28, 2147–2157 (2008). 21. Solowska, J. M., Rao, A. N. & Baas, P. W. Truncating mutations of SPAST associated with hereditary spastic paraplegia indicate greater accumulation and toxicity of the M1 isoform of spastin. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 1728–1737 (2017). 22. White, S. R., Evans, K. J., Lary, J., Cole, J. L. & Lauring, B. Recognition of C-terminal amino acids in tubulin by pore loops in Spastin is important for microtubule severing. J. Cell Biol. 176, 995–1005 (2007). 23. Han, H. et al. Structure of spastin bound to a glutamate-rich peptide implies a hand-over-hand mechanism of substrate translocation. J. Biol. Chem. 295, 435–443 (2020). 24. Jessop, M., Felix, J. & Gutsche, I. AAA+ ATPases: structural insertions under the magnifying glass. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 66, 119–128 (2021). 25. Eckert, T., Le, D. T. Van, Link, S., Friedmann, L. & Woehlke, G. Spastin’s Microtubule-Binding Properties and Comparison to Katanin. PLoS One 7, 1–16 (2012). 26. Roll-Mecak, A. & Vale, R. D. Structural basis of microtubule severing by the hereditary spastic paraplegia protein spastin. Nature (2008) doi:10.1038/nature06482. 27. Steinmetz, M. O. & Prota, A. E. Microtubule-Targeting Agents: Strategies To Hijack the Cytoskeleton. Trends Cell Biol. 28, 776–792 (2018). 28. Rovini, A., Savry, A., Braguer, D. & Carré, M. Microtubule-targeted agents: When mitochondria become essential to chemotherapy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Bioenerg. 1807, 679–688 (2011). 29. LeDizet, M. & Piperno, G. Cytoplasmic microtubules containing acetylated α-tubulin in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: Spatial arrangement and properties. J. Cell Biol. 103, 13–22 (1986). 30. Xu, Z. et al. Microtubules acquire resistance from mechanical breakage through intralumenal acetylation. Science (80-. ). 356, 328–332 (2017). 31. Xie, R., Nguyen, S., McKeehan, W. L. & Liu, L. Acetylated microtubules are required for fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes. BMC Cell Biol. 11, 89 (2010). 32. Friedman, J. R., Webster, B. M., Mastronarde, D. N., Verhey, K. J. & Voeltz, G. K. ER sliding dynamics and ER-mitochondrial contacts occur on acetylated microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 190, 363–375 (2010). 33. Molero, J. C., Whitehead, J. P., Meerloo, T. & James, D. E. Nocodazole Inhibits Insulin-stimulated Glucose Transport in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes via a Microtubule-independent Mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 43829–43835 (2001). 34. Huby, R. D. J., Weiss, A. & Ley, S. C. Nocodazole inhibits signal transduction by the T cell antigen receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 12024–12031 (1998). 35. Bates, D. & Eastman, A. Microtubule destabilising agents: far more than just antimitotic anticancer drugs. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 83, 255–268 (2017). 36. Van Haren, J. et al. Local control of intracellular microtubule dynamics by EB1 photodissociation. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 252–261 (2018). 37. Adikes, R. C., Hallett, R. A., Saway, B. F., Kuhlman, B. & Slep, K. C. Control of microtubule dynamics using an optogenetic microtubule plus end-F-actin cross-linker. J. Cell Biol. 217, 779–793 (2018). 38. Borowiak, M. et al. Photoswitchable Inhibitors of Microtubule Dynamics Optically Control Mitosis and Cell Death. Cell 162, 403–411 (2015). 39. Valente, A. J., Maddalena, L. A., Robb, E. L., Moradi, F. & Stuart, J. A. A simple ImageJ macro tool for analyzing mitochondrial network morphology in mammalian cell culture. Acta Histochem. 119, 315–326 (2017). 40. Lefebvre, A. E. Y. T., Ma, D., Kessenbrock, K., Lawson, D. A. & Digman, M. A. Automated segmentation and tracking of mitochondria in live-cell time-lapse images. Nat. Methods (2021) doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01234-z. 41. Derose, R., Miyamoto, T. & Inoue, T. Manipulating signaling at will: Chemically-inducible dimerization (CID) techniques resolve problems in cell biology. Pflugers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 465, 409–417 (2013). 42. Fan, C.-H. H. et al. Manipulating cellular activities using an ultrasound-chemical hybrid tool. ACS Synth. Biol. 6, acssynbio.7b00162 (2017). 43. Hong, S. R. et al. Spatiotemporal manipulation of ciliary glutamylation reveals its roles in intraciliary trafficking and Hedgehog signaling. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–13 (2018). 44. Rodrigues, T. B. & Ballesteros, P. Spastin and Microtubules: Functions in Health and Disease. J. Neurosci. Res. 3253, 3244–3253 (2007). 45. Lacroix, B. et al. Tubulin polyglutamylation stimulates spastin-mediated microtubule severing. J. Cell Biol. 189, 945–954 (2010). 46. Cupido, T., Pisa, R., Kelley, M. E. & Kapoor, T. M. Designing a chemical inhibitor for the AAA protein spastin using active site mutations. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 444–452 (2019). 47. Aillaud, C. et al. Vasohibins/SVBP are tubulin carboxypeptidases (TCPs) that regulate neuron differentiation. Science (80-. ). 1453, 1448–1453 (2017). 48. van Dijk, J. et al. A Targeted Multienzyme Mechanism for Selective Microtubule Polyglutamylation. Mol. Cell 26, 437–448 (2007). 49. Gillingham, A. K. & Munro, S. The PACT domain, a conserved centrosomal targeting motif in the coiled-coil proteins AKAP450 and pericentrin. EMBO Rep. 1, 524–529 (2000). 50. Schuh, M. An actin-dependent mechanism for long-range vesicle transport. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 1431–1436 (2011). 51. Ba, Q., Raghavan, G., Kiselyov, K. & Yang, G. Whole-Cell Scale Dynamic Organization of Lysosomes Revealed by Spatial Statistical Analysis. Cell Rep. 23, 3591–3606 (2018). 52. Noordstra, I. & Akhmanova, A. Linking cortical microtubule attachment and exocytosis. F1000Research 6, 1–12 (2017). 53. Meiring, J. C. M., Shneyer, B. I. & Akhmanova, A. Generation and regulation of microtubule network asymmetry to drive cell polarity. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 62, 86–95 (2020). 54. Jaqaman, K. et al. Robust single-particle tracking in live-cell time-lapse sequences. Nat. Methods 5, 695–702 (2008). 55. Guo, Y. et al. Visualizing Intracellular Organelle and Cytoskeletal Interactions at Nanoscale Resolution on Millisecond Timescales. Cell 175, 1430-1442.e17 (2018). 56. Terasaki, M., Chen, L. B. & Fujiwara, K. Microtubules and the endoplasmic reticulum are highly interdependent structures. J. Cell Biol. 103, 1557–1568 (1986). 57. Bannai, H., Inoue, T., Nakayama, T., Hattori, M. & Mikoshiba, K. Kinesin dependent, rapid, bi-directional transport of ER sub-compartment in dendrites of hippocampal neurons. J. Cell Sci. 117, 163–175 (2004). 58. Shibata, Y., Hu, J., Kozlov, M. M. & Rapoport, T. A. Mechanisms shaping the membranes of cellular organelles. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 25, 329–354 (2009). 59. Poteryaev, D., Squirrell, J. M., Campbell, J. M., White, J. G. & Spang, A. Involvement of the Actin Cytoskeleton and Homotypic Membrane Fusion in ER Dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 2139–2153 (2005). 60. Lu, L., Ladinsky, M. & Kirchhausen, T. Cisternal Organization of the Endoplasmic Reticulum during Mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 3471–3480 (2009). 61. Schroeder, L. K. et al. Dynamic nanoscale morphology of the ER surveyed by STED microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 218, 83–96 (2019). 62. Westermann, B. Mitochondrial fusion and fission in cell life and death. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 872–884 (2010). 63. Schwarz, T. L. Mitochondrial trafficking in neurons. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 3, 1–16 (2013). 64. Murota, Y., Tabu, K. & Taga, T. Requirement of ABC transporter inhibition and Hoechst 33342 dye deprivation for the assessment of side population-defined C6 glioma stem cell metabolism using fluorescent probes. BMC Cancer 16, 1–7 (2016). 65. Csordás, G. et al. Imaging Interorganelle Contacts and Local Calcium Dynamics at the ER-Mitochondrial Interface. Mol. Cell 39, 121–132 (2010). 66. Zheng, P. et al. DNA damage triggers tubular endoplasmic reticulum extension to promote apoptosis by facilitating ER-mitochondria signaling. Cell Res. 28, (2018). 67. Pimm, M. L. & Henty-Ridilla, J. L. New twists in actin-microtubule interactions. Mol. Biol. Cell 32, 211–217 (2021). 68. Dogterom, M. & Koenderink, G. H. Actin–microtubule crosstalk in cell biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 38–54 (2019). 69. Kuo, C. H. et al. VEGF-Induced Endothelial Podosomes via ROCK2-Dependent Thrombomodulin Expression Initiate Sprouting Angiogenesis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 41, 1657–1671 (2021). 70. Dou, Y., Arlock, P. & Arner, A. Blebbistatin specifically inhibits actin-myosin interaction in mouse cardiac muscle. Am. J. Physiol. - Cell Physiol. 293, 1148–1153 (2007). 71. Cojoc, D. et al. Properties of the force exerted by filopodia and lamellipodia and the involvement of cytoskeletal components. PLoS One 2, (2007). 72. Inoue, T., Heo, W. Do, Grimley, J. S., Wandless, T. J. & Meyer, T. An inducible translocation strategy to rapidly activate and inhibit small GTPase signaling pathways. Nat. Methods 2, 415–418 (2005). 73. Waterman-Storer, C. M., Worthylake, R. A., Liu, B. P., Burridget, K. & Salmon, E. D. Microtubule growth activates Rac1 to promote lamellipodial protrusion in fibroblasts. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 45–50 (1999). 74. Valenstein, M. L. & Roll-Mecak, A. Graded Control of Microtubule Severing by Tubulin Glutamylation. Cell 164, 911–921 (2016). 75. Lacroix, B. et al. Tubulin polyglutamylation stimulates spastin-mediated microtubule severing. J. Cell Biol. 189, 945–954 (2010). 76. Kuo, Y. W., Trottier, O., Mahamdeh, M. & Howard, J. Spastin is a dual-function enzyme that severs microtubules and promotes their regrowth to increase the number and mass of microtubules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116, 5533–5541 (2019). 77. Yu, W. et al. The microtubule-severing proteins spastin and katanin participate differently in the formation of axonal branches. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, (2008). 78. Basnet, N. et al. Direct induction of microtubule branching by microtubule nucleation factor SSNA1. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 1172–1180 (2018). 79. Errico, A., Claudiani, P., D’Addio, M. & Rugarli, E. I. Spastin interacts with the centrosomal protein NA14, and is enriched in the spindle pole, the midbody and the distal axon. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13, 2121–2132 (2004). 80. Wang, J. T., Kong, D., Hoerner, C. R., Loncarek, J. & Stearns, T. Centriole triplet microtubules are required for stable centriole formation and inheritance in human cells. bioRxiv 110, 1–17 (2017). 81. Borowiak, M. et al. Photoswitchable Inhibitors of Microtubule Dynamics Optically Control Mitosis and Cell Death. Cell 162, 403–411 (2015). 82. Müller-Deku, A. et al. Photoswitchable paclitaxel-based microtubule stabilisers allow optical control over the microtubule cytoskeleton. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–12 (2020). 83. Kesarwani, S. et al. Genetically encoded live-cell sensor for tyrosinated microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 219, (2020).
|