帳號:guest(3.145.12.195)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):蔡亞昕
作者(外文):Tsai, Ya-Hsin
論文名稱(中文):公司治理評鑑級距排名變動與股權結構變化之關聯性
論文名稱(外文):Correlation between Changes in Corporate Governance Evaluation Grades and Variations in Equity Structure
指導教授(中文):黃裕烈
指導教授(外文):Huang, Yu-Lieh
口試委員(中文):徐之強
徐士勛
吳俊毅
口試委員(外文):Hsu, Chih-Chiang
Hsu, Shih-Hsun
Wu, Jyun-Yi
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:財務金融碩士在職專班
學號:111079504
出版年(民國):113
畢業學年度:112
語文別:中文
論文頁數:33
中文關鍵詞:公司治理評鑑外資持股股權結構
外文關鍵詞:corporate governance evaluationshareholding ratios of foreign institutional investorscompany’s equity structure
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:17
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
本研究旨在探討台灣上市公司在公司治理評鑑級距排名的變動與上市公司股權結構變化之間的關聯性,並著重於外資持股比率的變動。本文透過多元線性迴歸模型,使用 TEJ 台灣經濟新報及台灣證券交易所公司治理評鑑中心之公開資料,來分析公司治理評鑑排名的變化是否會影響該公司的股權結構。研究結果發現,公司治理評鑑排名的下降與外國機構投資者持股比率的年減幅度呈現正向關聯,顯示相比於公司治理質量的提升,外資對公司治理水準的退步更為敏感。此外,本研究亦發現,外國機構投資者持股比率的年增率與股東權益報酬率的年增率呈現正向關係,但與董監事持股比率的年增率呈負向關係,說明外國投資者傾向於投資治理結構相對良好、資訊透明度高,且股權相對分散的公司。這些結果不僅為上市公司之改進治理結構與機構法人之投資決策提供了實證支持,也為機構投資者和政策制訂者提供了參考的方向,希冀透過研究結果增進公司治理的實踐並強化資本市場的吸引力。
This study aims to investigate correlation between changes in corporate governance evaluation grades and variations in equity structure among TWSE-listed companies, focusing specifically on variations in foreign institutional investors’ shareholding ratios. Utilizing public data from the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) and the Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Evaluation Center, this study employs a multiple linear regression model to analyze whether changes in corporate governance rating grades affect equity structure of these companies. The findings reveal that a decline in corporate governance grades is positively correlated with an annual reduction in shareholding ratios of foreign institutional investors, suggesting that they are more sensitive to deteriorations in governance quality than to improvements. Moreover, the study also finds a positive relationship between changes in shareholding ratios of foreign institutional investors and return on equity (ROE), but a negative relationship with the shareholding ratios of directors and supervisors, indicating that foreign investors tend to invest in companies with well-structured governance, high transparency, and less concentrated ownership. These results not only provide empirical support for the relationship between governance structures and institutional investors’ decisions but also serve as a reference for investors and policymakers. By implementing these findings, we could strengthen the practice of corporate governance and optimize the attractiveness of the capital market.
1. 前言 …………………………………………………………………1
2. 文獻回顧 ………………………………………………………4
3. 研究方法 ………………………………………………………8
4. 實證結果 ……………………………………………………17
5. 結論 ………………………………………………………………24
6. 附錄 ………………………………………………………………26
參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………30
中文文獻
1. 吳晨安 (2022),「公司治理評鑑結果與未來企業經營績效之關聯性研究」,碩士論文,台北:國立臺灣大學財務金融學系。
2. 林冠廷 (2022),「公司治理與法人持股之關聯性」,碩士論文,高雄:國立中山大學金融創新產業碩士專班。
3. 徐宇聲 (2015),「外資持股比例與公司治理之關聯性」,碩士論文,桃園:國立中央大學財務金融學研究所。
4. 張裕任 (2008),「安全性, 資訊不對稱, 公司治理與外資持股偏好之關連性」,博士論文,台北:國立臺灣大學會計學研究所。

英文文獻
1. Amel-Zadeh, A., and Serafeim, G. (2018), “Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey,” Financial Analysts Journal, 74, 87-103.
2. Bajaher, M., Habbash, M., and Alborr, A. (2022), “Board governance, ownership structure and foreign investment in the Saudi capital market,” Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 20, 261-278.
3. Barako, D. G., Hancock, P., and Izan, H. Y. (2006), “Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan companies,” Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14, 107-125.
4. Byun, H. Y., Hwang, L. S., and Lee, W. J. (2011), “How does ownership concentration exacerbate information asymmetry among equity investors?” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 19, 511-534.
5. Chen, E., and Gavious, I. (2015), “Does CSR have different value implications for different shareholders?” Finance Research Letters, 14, 29-35.
6. Chiang, Y. C., and Chih-Chen, K. (2006), “Characteristics of firms owned by foreigners on the Taiwanese stock market: an analysis,” International Journal of Management, 23, 721.
7. Crifo, P., and Forget, V. D. (2015), “The economics of corporate social responsibility: A firm‐level perspective survey,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 29, 112-130.
8. Cui, J., Jo, H., and Na, H. (2018), “Does corporate social responsibility affect information asymmetry?” Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 549-572.
9. Dahlquist, M., and Robertsson, G. (2001), “Direct foreign ownership, institutional investors, and firm characteristics,” Journal of Financial Economics, 59, 413-440.
10. Dahlquist, M., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R. M., and Williamson, R. (2003), “Corporate governance and the home bias,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38, 87-110.
11. Easley, D., Kiefer, N. M., and O'Hara, M. (1997), “One day in the life of a very common stock,” The Review of Financial Studies, 10, 805-835.
12. Enders, W. (2008), Applied Econometric Time Series. John Wiley & Sons.
13. Eng, L. L. and Mak, Y. T. (2003), “Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure,” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22, 325-345.
14. Greening, D. W., and Turban, D. B. (2000), “Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce,” Business & Society, 39, 254-280.
15. Hong, H., and Kacperczyk, M. (2009), “The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets,” Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 15-36.
16. Humphrey, J. E., and Tan, D. T. (2014), “Does it really hurt to be responsible?” Journal of Business Ethics, 122, 375-386.
17. Jiang, L., and Kim, J. B. (2004), “Foreign equity ownership and information asymmetry: Evidence from Japan,” Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 15, 185-211.
18. Jo, H., and Harjoto, M. A. (2011), “Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility,” Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 351-383.
19. Kim, I. J., Eppler-Kim, J., Kim, W. S., and Byun, S. J. (2010), “Foreign investors and corporate governance in Korea,” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 18, 390-402.
20. Kitzmueller, M., and Shimshack, J. (2012), “Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility,” Journal of Economic Literature, 50, 51-84.
21. Lagasio, V., and Cucari, N. (2019), “Corporate governance and environmental social governance disclosure: A meta‐analytical review,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 701-711.
22. Leuz, C., Lins, K. V., and Warnock, F. E. (2010), “Do foreigners invest less in poorly governed firms?” The Review of Financial Studies, 23, 3245-3285.
23. Mangena, M., and Tauringana, V. (2007), “Disclosure, corporate governance and foreign share ownership on the Zimbabwe stock exchange,” Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 18, 53-85.
24. Min, B. S., and Bowman, R. G. (2015), “Corporate governance, regulation and foreign equity ownership: Lessons from Korea,” Economic Modelling, 47, 145-155.
25. Neukirchen, D., Köchling, G., and Posch, P. N. (2023), “Do Institutional Investors Care About Operational Leanness?” British Journal of Management.
26. Simone, A., and Noel, H. (2021, June 07), “Which ESG factor drives excess return? Turns out it’s governance,” https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/blog/which-esg-factor-drives-excess-return-turns-out-its-governance/
27. Wang, H., Jiao, S., and Sun, G. (2024), “Investor interaction and the valuation of listed companies,” Research in International Business and Finance, 67, 102144.
28. Wang, M., and Hussainey, K. (2013), “Voluntary forward-looking statements driven by corporate governance and their value relevance,” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32, 26-49.
29. Yahia N. B., Chalwati A., Hmaied D., Khizer A. M., and Trabelsi, S. (2023), “Do foreign institutions avoid investing in poorly CSR-performing firms?” Journal of Banking & Finance, 157, 107029.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *