1962年由《寂靜的春天》提醒了世人關心環境議題，發展至今，由聯合國提出的永續發展指標成為世界依循的項目，其中，人口眾多的都市，其永續發展不容忽視。世界衛生組織（World Health Organization, WHO）將都市綠地（Urban green spaces, UGS）定義「為任何有植被覆蓋的城市土地」，許多研究皆顯示都市綠地是現在都市不可或缺重要元素之一，其中包括非正式綠地(Informal urban greenspace, IGS)。
非正式綠地是沉沒在都市角落裡卻有助於都市的綠色基盤、綠地生態系統、優化居住環境，甚至在一地區的生活文化中佔有一席之地。由於這些土地相較零碎，多數是閒置或是私人利用，但往往有著空放或半開放公共性質，使人們可以過接近使用或是在視覺上享受非正式綠地所帶來的服務，因此本研究透過文獻回顧，了解與探尋非正式綠地其特徵、型態，並利用環境效率之概念，以資料包絡分析法(DEA)進行運算評估非正式綠地的投入對於永續都市發展產出的效率，進一步確認非正式綠地在都市環境中的角色及重要性價值。
經實證結果，非正式綠地儘管零碎且細小，藉由投入展出指標之計算其環境效率，仍起到提升之作用，然而部分非正式綠地可使都市環境降溫1℃，從相關係數可知當綠覆率大於0.15時，可以明顯改善熱島溫度，進一步對都市生活品質產生積極影響；非正式綠地對於空污的影響並不顯著，只有微幅改善，可能之原因為非正式綠地並不如公園綠地種植喬木為主；對於逕流量之影響正式綠地可能導致地表逕流量增加，綜合上述結果，非正式綠地對於都市生態環境及永續發展謹啟到輔助作用，且並非面積越大效率值越高。

In 1962, "Silent Spring" reminded the world to care about environmental issues. Today, the sustainable development indicators proposed by the United Nations have become a project followed by the world. Among them, the sustainable development of cities with a large population cannot be ignored. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines urban green spaces (UGS) as "any urban land covered with vegetation." Many studies have shown that urban green spaces are one of the indispensable and important elements of today's cities. Among them Including informal urban greenspace (IGS).
Informal green spaces are sunken in urban corners but contribute to the city’s green foundation, green space ecosystem, optimize the living environment, and even occupy a place in the living culture of a region. Since these lands are relatively fragmented, most of them are idle or used privately, but they often have vacant or semi-open public properties, allowing people to use them too close or visually enjoy the services brought by informal green spaces. Therefore, this study Through literature review, understand and explore the characteristics and types of informal green spaces, and use the concept of environmental efficiency to calculate and evaluate the efficiency of informal green space inputs on sustainable urban development outputs using data envelopment analysis (DEA). , further confirming the role and importance value of informal green spaces in the urban environment.
Empirical results show that although informal green spaces are fragmented and small, their environmental efficiency can still be improved by calculating the input display indicators. However, some informal green spaces can cool the urban environment by 1°C. From the correlation coefficient, it can be seen that when green When the coverage rate is greater than 0.15, the heat island temperature can be significantly improved and further have a positive impact on the quality of urban life. The impact of informal green space on air pollution is not significant, with only a slight improvement. The possible reason is that informal green space is not as good as park green space planting. Mainly trees; the impact of formal green spaces on runoff may lead to an increase in surface runoff. Based on the above results, informal green spaces play a supporting role in urban ecological environment and sustainable development, and the larger the area, the higher the efficiency value.

目錄
第一章 緒論 .................................. 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 ......................... 1
第二節 研究方法與流程.......................... 3
第二章 文獻回顧 ............................... 7
第一節 非正式綠地 ............................. 7
第二節 永續發展及公園綠地相關指標 .............. 16
第三節 環境效率 .............................. 29
第三章 研究方法及設計 ......................... 37
第一節 研究架構與設計 ......................... 37
第二節 非正式綠地環境指標 ..................... 38
第三節 非正式綠地環境效率評估方式 .............. 47
第四章 實證分析 .............................. 49
第一節 研究範圍基本分析 ....................... 49
第二節 投入產出指標分析 ....................... 52
第三節 效率評估............................... 65
第五章 結論與建議 ............................ 93
第一節 研究結果與討論 ........................ 93
第二節 後續相關研究之建議 .................... 94
參考文獻 .................................... 96
附錄 ....................................... 108
附表一 非正式綠地效率評估投入產出資料表 ....... 108
附錄二 無非正式綠地效率評估投入產出資料表 ..... 111
附錄三 83個DMU差額變數分析表 .................. 114

中文文獻
1.《市區道路及附屬工程設計規範》（民國111年2月修正版）。
2.《臺灣地區雨量測站降雨強度-延時Horner公式參數分析》（民國106年12月）。
3.Ebenezer Howard（2020）。百年眾望經典．明日田園城市（吳鄭重譯，初版）。聯經。（原著初版於1989年）。
4.Rachel Louise Carson (2017)。寂靜的春天：自然文學不朽經典全譯本（黃中憲，二版）。野人。（原著出版於1962）。
5.中華民國內政部（2021年07月29日）。中華民國內政部地方行政區簡介。https://www.moi.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=13900。檢索日期2022年11月3日。
6.王小璘、曾詠宜（2003）。都市公園綠地區位景觀生態評估之研究。設計學報，8(3)，53-74。https://doi.org/10.6381/JD.200312.0053
7.王秀娟（2002）。 綠地計劃之理論與實證 。臺北市：田園城市出版社。
8.江彥政、陳怡伶、黃光亮、翁珮怡（2011）。綠地空間對鄰近民眾健康之影響。造園景觀學報，17(3)，23-40。
9.吳宓珊（2008）。臺灣主要都市環境發展效率評估。國立成功大學博士論文（未出版）。
10.吳忠唐（2013）。應用資料包絡分析法評估世界主要國家之能源效率、減碳效率、與環境經濟效率。國立臺北大學碩士論文（未出版）。
11.李竑逸（2020）。氣候變遷下離島土地調適環境效率評估之研究以金門縣為例。國立清華大學碩士論文（未出版）。
12.李煜舲、 許文貴、黃開明（2022）。〈利用DEA 模式計算臺灣鐵路最佳土地開發之研究〉。《中國土木水利工程學刊》，34（6）：459-466。https://doi.org/10.6652/JoCICHE.202210_34(6).0001
13.林子平（2002）。都市水循環之研究─地表不透水率之調查及逕流量實測解析。國立成功大學碩士論文（未出版）。
14.林向斌（2005）。以景觀生態法分析都市綠地變遷之研究—以桃園市、八德市、龜山鄉為例。銘傳大學碩士論文（未出版）。
15. 林哲緯（2015）。土地利用管理對集水區逕流改變之影響評估。中國科技大學碩士論文（未出版）。
16.林晏州、陳玉清（2004）。都市公園綠地建設對粒狀空氣污染物質之改善效果研究。中國園藝，50(2)，219-231。https://doi.org/10.6964/JCSHS.200406.0219
17.林真德（2020）。都市周邊地區農地轉用之環境效率分析—以臺南市為例。國立成功大學碩士論文（未出版）。
18.林睿騏 （2022）。以嵌套結構檢視都市綠地對群集生態的影響。國立臺灣大學碩士論文（未出版）
19.林璇姿（2005）。都市公園綠地連接度之探討—以臺北市大安區為例。東海大學碩士論文（未出版）。
20.林憲德（2001）。臺灣海岸型城市之都市熱島現象與改善對策解析---以臺南、高雄及新竹為例。都市與計劃，28.。
21.林憲德、陳冠廷、郭曉青（2001）。臺灣中型都市熱島現象與土地利用之觀測解析。規劃學報，28，47-64。https://doi.org/10.6404/JP.200112.0047
22.邵鈺涵、徐欣瑜、袁嘉（2021）。城市荒野景觀：內涵與價值審視。景觀設計學，9(1)，14-25。https://doi.org/ 10.15302/J-LAF-1-020039
23.施翠芸（2007）綠園道功能與滿意度關係之研究。國立臺灣大學碩士論文（未出版）。
24.柯佩婷（2006）。都市土地使用發展之環境績效評估-以永康市為例。國立成功大學博士論文（未出版）。
25.高強、黃旭男、Sueyoshy,T(2003)。管理績效評估：資料包絡分析法。臺北市：華泰文化事業公司。
26.章容甄（2003）。臺北市都市綠資源之生態功能研究─感受性系統模型之應用。國立臺北大學碩士論文（未出版）。
27.許詠晴（2022）。由景觀生態學觀點討論都市熱島現象與土地使用之關係。國立成功大學碩士論文（未出版）。
28.郭幸福（2010）都市土地發展之環境轉變效率影響因素之研究。國立成功大學博士論文（未出版）。
29.郭瓊瑩（2003）。水與綠網路規劃：理論與實務。詹氏書局，ISBN：9789577052681
30.陳巧穎、林俊成、王培蓉、許立達、吳治達（2018）。空氣品質淨化區綠地特徵與顆粒污染物之關聯初探。中華林學季刊，51(2)，161-171。
31.陳俊合（2016）。景觀生態規劃方案評選模式研究–分析階層程序（AHP）法應用。建築與規劃學報，17(2-3)，117-136。
32.陳冠廷（2000）。臺灣中小型都市熱島效應之觀測解析。國立成功大學碩士論文（未出版）。
33.陳映融（2018）。應用空間資訊技術以探討細懸浮微粒與環境綠蔽度對腎臟疾病風險之影響。國立嘉義大學碩士論文（未出版）。
34.陳美智（2004）。都市空氣汙染防治系統動態分析。國立成功大學碩士論文（未出版）。
35.陳婉儀（2013）。都市生態嵌塊體評估指標體系之研究。朝陽科技大學碩士論文（未出版）。
36.陳莉、李佩武、李貴才、蘇笛、袁雪竹（2009）。應用CITYGREEN模型評估身殉式綠地淨化空氣與固碳釋氧效益。生態學報，29(1)，272-282。
37.曾能汀（2006）閒置空間再利用為藝文用途之關鍵成功因素分析--以二十號倉。庫為例。國立雲林科技大學碩士論文（未出版）。
程韋涵（2012）。低碳城市效率評估與影響因素分析。國立成功大學博士論文（未出版）。
39.黃章展、吳佩玲、侯錦雄、陳義勛（2012）。應用BAF概念於綠色旅遊基地規劃。造園景觀學報，18(2)，1-18。
40.黃皓軒（2010）。都市公園綠地環境效益價值—以嘉義市為例。國立成功大學碩士論文（未出版）。
41.黃絢詩（2006）。都市綠網生態環境教育評估研究。國立臺中教育大學碩士論文（未出版）。
42.黃詩涵（2018）。臺北都會區土地使用變遷對綠色基盤及生態系統服務的影響。國立臺北大學碩士論文（未出版）。
43.新竹市政府民政處（2022年11月1日）。新竹市政府民政處各區人口統計。
44.新竹市政府都市發展處都市發展資訊整合平臺。https://urbangis.hccg.gov.tw/
45.楊文杉（2011）。土地利用型態組成與都市微氣候關係之環域分析研究—以臺中市為例。逢甲大學碩士論文（未出版）。
46.葉晉嘉、劉麗娟、吳濟華（2006）。〈運用資料包絡分析法評量臺灣地區城市健康度之研究〉。《健康城市學刊》，4，129-140。
47.詹逸翔（2020）。都市綠地平面格局與冷島強度之關係：以新竹市為例。國立清華大學碩士論文（未出版）。
48.鄒克萬 、郭幸福、柯佩婷（2010）。評估都市土地使用變遷之自然環境效率-以永康市為例。都市與計劃， 37 (1)， 143-165。 NSC96-2415-H-006-007-MY2
49.鄒克萬、黃書偉（2007）。都市土地利用變遷對自然環境衝擊之空間影響分析。地理學報,48,1-18。NSC96-2415-H-006-007-MY2
50.鄒君瑋（2015）。從土地利用變遷與環境知覺之觀點探究農村景觀管理策略。國立中興大學博士論文（未出版）。
51.鄔建國（2003）景觀生態學-格局、過程、尺度與等級。五南書局。
52.劉若瑜（2000）。由生態設計觀點評估都市基質之研究-以臺中市東區及南屯區為例。東海大學碩士倫文（未出版）。
53.歐陽嶠暉（2005）。都市環境學。詹氏書局。ISBN：9789577053114
54.蔡佩蓉（2018）都市綠地系統氣候調節效益之研究。國立清華大學碩士論文（未出版）。
55.蔡厚男（2021）。公園綠地系統規劃設計手冊暨操作案例-研究成果技術報告，頁7，內政部營建署委託中華民國景觀學會，臺北。
56.鄭宇廷（2009）以生態經濟觀點探討都市綠地系統之研究–以臺中市為例。私立東海大學碩士論文（未出版）。
57.鄭偉安（2016）。都市公園綠地對於房價之影響‒以高雄市區為例。國立中山大學碩士論文（未出版）。
58.藍婉齡（2011）。都會區綠資源生態系統評估體系建構之研究。逢甲大學碩士論文（未出版）。
59.蘇泳嫻、黃光慶、陳修治、陳水森、李智山（2011）。城市綠地的生態環境效應研究進展。生態學報，31(23)，7287-7300。
英文文獻
1.Aaron S Heller, Tracey C Shi, C E Chiemeka Ezie, Travis R Reneau, Lara M Baez, Conor J Gibbons & Catherine A Hartley (2020). Association between real-world experiential diversity and positive affect relates to hippocampal –striatal functional connectivity. Nature Neuroscience, 23(7), 800–804.
2.Adeeb A. Kutty, Murat Kucukvar, Galal M. Abdella, Muhammet Enis Bulak & Nuri Cihat Onat (2022). Sustainability performance of European smart cities: A novel DEA approach withdouble frontiers. Sustainable Cities and Society, 81 (2022),103777.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103777
3.Aiguo Dai (2011). Drought under global warming: a review. WIREs Climate Change ,2(1) ,45-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.81
4.Alessandro Ossola, Dexter H Locke, Brenda B. Lin & Emily S Minor (2019). Yards increase forest connectivity in urban landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 34(1), 2935–2948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00923-7
5.Andre Viljoen & Katrin Bohn (2014). Second Nature Urban Agriculture: Designing Productive Cities. Routledge. ISBN: 9781317674511
6.Andrea Staccione, Arthur Hrast Essenfelder, Stefano Bagli & Jaroslav Mysiak. Connected urban green spaces for pluvial flood risk reduction in the Metropolitan area of Milan. Sustainable Cities and Society, 104 (2024),105288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105288
7.Andrew CK Lee, Hannah Jordan & Jason Horsley (2015). Value of urban green spaces in promoting healthy living and wellbeing: Prospects for planning. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy,8,131-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S61654
8.Ashlea Hunter & Gary W. Luck (2015). Defining and measuring the social-ecological quality of urban greenspace: A semi-systematic review. Urban Ecosystems,18(4), 1139–1163.
9.Bronte E. Van Helden, Paul G. Close & Rochelle Steven (2020). Mammal conservation in a changing world: Can urban gardens play a role?. Urban Ecosystems, 23(3), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00935-1
10.Camilo Ordóñez, Judy Bush, Stephen J. Livesley, Marco Amati, Joe Hurley, Alex English, Dave Callow, Kelly Hertzog, Meg Caffin & Stephen Frank (2020). Global review of incentive schemes for the retention and successful establishment of trees on private urban land – Expert Opinions and Case Study Synthesis. The University of Melbourne, NY18002.
11.Caoimhe Twohig-Bennett & Andy Jones (2018). The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta- analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environmental Research, 166, 628–637.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.030
12.Catherine Evans & Robert Freestone (2010). From Green Belt to Green Web: Regional Open Space Planning in Sydney, 1948-1963. Planning Practice and Research 25(2):223-240. DOI:10.1080/02697451003740254
13.Cecil Konijnendijk, Matilda Annerstedt, Anders Busse Nielsen & Sreetheran Maruthaveeran (2013). Benefits of urban parks: A systematicreview. A Report for IPFRA. IFPRA.
14.Cecily Jane Maller (2009). Promoting children’s mental, emotional and social health through contact with nature: a model. Health Education,109(6),522-543. https://doi.org/10.1108/09654280911001185
15.Charles C. Branas, Rose A. Cheney, John M. MacDonald, Vicky W. Tam, Tara D. Jackson & Thomas R. Ten Have (2011). A difference-in-differences analysis of health, safety, andgreening vacant urban space. American Journal of Epidemiology, 174(11), 1296–1306. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwr273
16.Christoph D.D. Rupprecht & Jason Antony Byrne (2014). Informal urban greenspace: a typology and trilingual systematic review of its role for urban residents and trends in the literature. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening.13:597–611.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.09.002
17.Christoph D.D. Rupprecht, Jason Antony Byrne & Alex Y. Lo (2016). Memories of vacant lots: How and why residents used informal urban green space as children and teenagers in Brisbane, Australia, and Sapporo, Japan. Childrens Geographies, 14(3), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2015.1048427
18.Christopher L. Ambrey & Christopher M. Fleming (2014). Public greenspace and life satisfaction in urban Australia. Urban Studies, 51(6), 1290–1321.https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.124302
19.Dagmar Haase, Sigrun Kabisch, Annegret Haase, Erik Andersson, Ellen Banzhaf, Francesc Baró, Miriam Brenck, Leonie K. Fischer, Niki Frantzeskaki , Nadja Kabisch , Kerstin Krellenberg, Peleg Kremer, Jakub Kronenberg, Neele Larondelle, Juliane Mathey, Stephan Pauleit, Irene Ring m, Dieter Rink, Nina Schwarz & Manuel Wolff (2017). Greening Cities - to Be Socially Inclusive? about the Alleged Paradox of Society and Ecology in Cities. Habitat Int. 64:41–48.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.005
20.Dalai Ma, Jiawei Zhang, Bitan An, Zuman Guo, Fengtai Zhang, Yin Yan & Guochuan Peng (2024). Research on urban land green use efficiency and influencing factors based on DEA and ESTDA models: Taking 284 cities in China as an example.Ecological Indicators
,160,111824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111824
21.Daniele La Rosa & Riccardo Privitera (2013). Characterization of non-urbanized areas for land-use planning of agricultural and green infrastructure in urban contexts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109 (1), 94-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.012
22.Daniels, G.D., & Kirkpatrick, J. B. (2006). Does variation in garden characteristics influence the conservation of birds in suburbia? Biological Conservation, 133(3), 326-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.011
23.David Armson, Mohammad Asrafur Rahman & Anthony Roland Ennos (2013). A comparison of the shading effectiveness of five different street tree species in Manchester, UK. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 2013. 39(4): 157–164.DOI：10.48044/jauf.2013.021
24.David J. Nowak, Daniel E. Crane & Jack C. Stevens (2006). Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 4(3-4), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.007
25.David J. Nowak, Satoshi Hirabayashi, Allison Bodine & Robert Hoehn (2013). Modeled PM2.5 removal by trees in ten U.S. cities and associated health effects. Environmental Pollution,178, 395-402.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.050.
26.Diana E. Bowler, Lisette Buyung-Ali, Teri M. Knight & Andrew S. Pullin (2010). Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(3), 147–155.
27.Dieter Rink & Harriet Herbst (2011). From wasteland to wilderness: Aspects of a new form of urban nature. Applied Urban Ecology: A Global Framework, pp. 82–92.
28.Donghwan Ki & Sugie Lee. (2021). Analyzing the effects of Green View Index of neighborhood streets on walking time using Google Street View and deep learning. Landscape and Urban Planning,205(1),103920.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103920
29.Dongsook Kim & Kazuoki Ohara (2010). A Study on the Role of Gardening and Planning of Green Environments for Daily Use by Residents in Senior Housing. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering,9(1),55-61. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.9.55
30.Elysia Lucas, Ángel Galán-Martín, Carlos Pozo, Miao Guo & Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez (2021). Global environmental and nutritional assessment of national food supply patterns: Insights from a data envelopment analysis approach. Science of the Total Environment,755,142826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142826
31.Eric F. Lambin, B.L. Turner, Helmut J. Geist, Samuel B. Agbola, Arild Angelsen, John W. Bruce, Oliver T. Coomes, Rodolfo Dirzo, Günther Fischer, Carl Folke, P.S. George,Katherine Homewood, Jacques Imbernon, Rik Leemans, Xiubin Li, Emilio F. Moran,Michael Mortimore, P.S. Ramakrishnan, John F. Richards, Helle Skånes, & Jianchu Xu (2001). The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change,11 (2001), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3
32.Eugenia C Garvin, Carolyn C Cannuscio & Charles C Branas (2013). Greening vacant lots to reduce violent crime: a randomised controlled trial. Injury Prevention, 19(3) https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040439
33.Florgård, C. (2007). Treatment measures for original natural vegetation preserved in the urban green infrastructure at Jarvafaltet, Stockholm. In M. Stewart, M. Ignatieva, J. Bowring, S.Egoz, & I. Melnichuk (Eds.), Globalisation of landscape architecture: Issues for education and practice (pp. 100–102). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg’s State Polytechnic University Publishing House.
34.Forman T. T. Richard & Moore N. Perry (1986). Theoretical Foundations for Understanding Boundaries in Landscape Mosaics. Springer, New York. ISBN:9781461276777
35.Forman T. T. Richard (1995). Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and. Regions.
36.Francesco Ferrini, Alessio Fini, Jacopo Mori, & Antonella Gori (2020). Role of Vegetation as a Mitigating Factor in the Urban Context. Sustainability,12(10),4247. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su12104247
37.Francis Atta Sarpong, Jianmin Wang, Benjamin Blandful Cobbinah, Jesse Jackson Makwetta & Jie Chen (2022). The drivers of energy efficiency improvement among nine selected West African countries: A two-stage DEA methodology. Energy Strategy Reviews,43 (2022),100910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100910
38.Frauke Weber, Ingo Kowarik & Ina Säumel (2014). Herbaceous plants as filters: immobilization of particulates along urban street corridors. Environ. Pollut. 186, 234-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.12.011.
39.Gary Conley, Robert I. McDonald, Tyler Nodine, Teresa Chapman, Craig Holland, Christopher Hawkins, Nicole Beck (2022). Assessing the influence of urban greenness and green stormwater infrastructure on hydrology from satellite remote sensing. Science of the Total Environment,817,252726.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152723
40.Hazel Easthope & S. Judd (2010). Living Well in Greater Density. City Futures Research Centre Faculty of the Built Environment University of New South Wales Sydney.ISSN:1448-7950
41.Henry Wüstemann, Dennis Kalisch & Jens Kolbe (2017). Access to urban green space and environmental inequalities in Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning,164,124-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.04.002
42.Ingo Kowarik (2011). Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environmental ollution, 159, 1974–1983.
43.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. ISBN 978-92-9169-160-9
44.Jason Hirst, Jonathan Morley & Katie Bang (2008). Functional landscapes: Assessing elements of Seattle Green Factor. The Berger Partnership PS.
45.Jennifer R. Wolch, Jason Byrne, & Joshua P. Newell (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
46.Jenny Roe & Peter Aspinall (2011). The restorative outcomes of forest school and convention
47.Jingli Yana, Wendy Y. Chen, Zixiao Zhang, Wenxing Zhao, Min Liu, & Shan Yin (2024). Mitigating PM2.5 exposure with vegetation barrier and building designs in urban open-road environments based on numerical simulations. Landscapeand Urban Planning,241(2024)104918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104918
48.John Macdonald, Viet Nguyen Viet, Shane T Jensen & Charles C Branas (2021). Reducing crime by remediating vacant lots: The moderating effect of nearby land uses. Journal of Experimental Criminology,18(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09452-9
49.Kalevi Korpela & Terry Hartig (1996). Restorative qualities of favorite places. Journal of Environmental Psychology,16(3),221-233. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0018
50.Kamil Rysz & Kinga Mazurek-Matuszewska (2015). Contemporary foundations of the theory of urban development case study smart, slow and compact city theory. Environmental & Socio economic Studies, 3(4), 3946. https://doi.org/10.1515/environ 2015-0072
51.Karen A. Franck & Quentin Stevens (2007). Loose Space: Possibility and Diversity in Urban life. Routledge.
52.Kristína Baculáková (2016). Application of creative ecology theory to concepts of smart and sustainable city as possible solution to urban development problems – case of Riga. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 7(4),594-600. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v7.4(16).05
53.Lahouari Bounoua, Ping Zhang, Georgy Mostovoy, Kurtis Thome, Jeffrey Masek, Marc Imhoff, Marshall Shepherd, Dale Quattrochi, Joseph Santanello & Julie Silva (2015). Impact of urbanization on US surface climate. Environmental Research Letters, 10,8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084010
54.Laura Costadone, Tin-Yu Lai, Pekka Hurskainen & Leena Kopperoinen (2024). Co-creating urban ecosystem accounting: Physical and monetary accounts of runoff
retention service provided by urban green spaces. Ecosystem Services, 65,101576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101576
55.Lucy E Keniger, Kevin J. Gaston, Katherine N. Irvine & Richard A Fuller (2013). What are the benefits of interacting with nature? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(3), 913–935.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10030913
56.Majid Abdi, Abbas Rohani, Farshad Soheilifard & Morteza Taki (2023). Energy optimization and its effects on the environmental repercussions of honey production. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators,17(2023),100230.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2023.100230
57.Mani Dhingra & Subrata Chattopadhyay (2016). Advancing smartness of traditional settlements-case analysis of Indian and Arab old cities. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 5(2), 549–563.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.08.004
58.Marc G Berman, John Jonides & Stephen Kaplan (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207–1212.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x
59.Matthew Tallis, Gail Taylor, Danielle Sinnett & Peter Freer-Smith (2011). Estimating the removal of atmospheric particulate pollution by the urban tree canopy of London, under current and future environments. Landscape and Urban Planning ,103(2), 129-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.003.
60.Maurizio Bevilacqua & Marcello Braglia (2002). Environmental efficiency analysis for ENI oil refineries. Journal of Cleaner Production,10(1),85-92.
61.Michelle L. Bell (2006). The use of ambient air quality modeling to estimate individual and population exposure for human health research: a case study of ozone in the Northern Georgia Region of the United States. Environment International,32(5),586-593.
62.Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Guide to the Millennium Assessment Reports. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Index-2.html.
63.Mira Lehberger, Anne-Katrin Kleih, & Kai Sparke. (2021). Self-reported well-being and the importance of green spaces – A comparison of garden owners and non-garden owners in times of COVID-19. Landscape and Urban Planning, 212 (2021) ,104108.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104108
64.Muhammad Jabbar, Mariney Mohd Yusoff, & Aziz Shafie (2021).Assessing the role of urban green spaces for human wellbeing： a systematic review. GeoJournal.20 July 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10474-7
65.Omid Kardan, Peter Gozdyra, Bratislav Misic, Faisal Moola, Lyle J. Palmer, TomášPaus & Marc G. Berman(2015). Neighborhood greenspace and health in a large urban center. Scientific Reports, 5, 11610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11610.
66.Peter Del Tredici (2010). Spontaneous Urban Vegetation: Reflections of Change in a Globalized World. Nature and Culture,5(3),299-315.https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2010.050305
67.Pyle, R. M. (1978). The extinction of experience. Horticulture, 56(1), 64–67.
68.R F Hunter, C Cleland, A Cleary, M Droomers, B W Wheeler, D Sinnett, M J Nieuwenhuijsen & M Braubach (2019). Environmental, Health, Wellbeing, Social and Equity Effects of Urban green Space Interventions: A Meta-Narrative Evidence Synthesis. Environment International, 130, 104923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.104923
69.R. Emmanuel (2005). Thermal comfort implications of urbanization in a warm-humid city: The Colombo Metropolitan Region (CMR), Sri Lanka. Building and Environment ,40(12),1591-1601. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.12.004
70.Rita Sousa-Silva, & Chad Zanocco (2023). Assessing public attitudes towards urban green spaces as a heat adaptation strategy: Insights from Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning,245(2024) 105013.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105013
71.Robert R Dunn, Michael C Gavin, Monica C Sanchez & Jennifer N Solomon (2006). The Pigeon Paradox: Dependence of Global Conservation on Urban Nature. Conservation Biology, 20(6),1814-1816.http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00533.x
72.Rupali Khare, Vasanta Govind Kumar Villuri & Devarshi Chaurasia (2021). Urban sustainability assessment: The evaluation of coordinated relationship between BRTS and land use in transit-oriented development mode using DEA model. Ain Shams Engineering Journal,12 (2021),107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.08.012
73.S. Suriya & B.V. Mudgal (2012). Impact of urbanization on flooding: The Thirusoolam sub watershed – A case study. Journal of Hydrology,412, 210-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.008
74.Senate Department for Urban Development, Berlin. (1990). The Biotope Area Factor as an Ecological Parameter.
75.Simon Bell, Catharine Ward Thompsona , & Penny Travloua (2003). Contested views of freedom and control: Children, teenagers and urban fringe woodlands in Central Scotland. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2(2),87-100.https://doi.org/10.1078/1618-8667-00026
76.Simone Russo, Andrea F Marchese, J Sillmann & GiuseppinaImmé (2016). When will unusual heat waves become normal in a warming Africa? Environmental Research Letters,11(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054016
77.Stephan Pauleit, Roland Ennos & Yvonne Golding (2005). Modeling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change—a study in Merseyside, UK. Landscape and urban planning, 71(2),295-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.03.009
78.Takele Sambeto Bibi (2022). Modeling urban stormwater management in the town of Dodola based on landuse and climate change using SWMM 5.1. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 44 (2022),101267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101267
79.Terry Hartig, Richard Mitchell, Sjerp de Vries, & Howard Frumkin. (2014). Nature and Health. Annu. Rev. Public Health.35,207–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
80.Thomas Campagnaro, Daniel Vecchiato, Arne Arnberger, Riccardo Celegato, Riccardo Da Re , Riccardo Rizzetto, Paolo Semenzato, Tommaso Sitzia, Tiziano Tempesta & Dina Cattaneo (2020). General, stress relief and perceived safety preferences for green spaces in the historic city of Padua (Italy). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,52, 126695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126695
81.United Nations Publications (2022). Cities Report 2022—Envisaging the Future of Cities. United Nations.
82.V. Whitford, A.R. Ennos & J.F. Handley (2001). “City form and natural process”-indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning,57(2),91-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00192-X
83.Wei Zheng, Geoffrey Qiping Shen, Hao Wang, Jingke Hong & Zhengdao Li (2017). Decision support forsustainable urban renewal: A multi-scale model. Land Use Policy, 69, 361-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.019
84.Weimin Wang, Kai Liu , Rong Tang & Shudong Wang(2019). Remote sensing image-based analysis of the urban heat island effect in Shenzhen, China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 110(2019),168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2019.01.002
85.World Bank. (2020, 13 October 2020). Urban population (% of total population). The World Bank Group. Retrieved 16 October 2020 from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS.
86.World Health Organization (2020). Urban green spaces: a brief for action.
87.Xiao-jiang Li & Debarchana Ghosh (2018). Associations between body mass index and urban “green” streetscape in Cleveland, Ohio, USA. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.15(10).https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102186
88.Xingcheng Ge, Jun Xu, Yong Xie, Xin Guo & Deyan Yang (2021). Evaluation and dynamicevolution of Eco-Efficiency of resource-based cities—A case study of typicalresource-based cities in China. Sustainability, 13, 6802.https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126802
89.Yitea Seneshaw Getahun, & Van Lanen HAJ (2015). Assessing the Impacts of Land Use-Cover Change on Hydrology of Melka Kuntrie Subbasin in Ethiopia, Using a Conceptual Hydrological Model. Hydrology Current Research.
90.Yuping Bai, Xiangzheng Deng, Sijian Jiang, Qian Zhang & Zhan Wang (2018). Exploring the relationship between urbanization and urban eco-efficiency: Evidence from prefecture-level cities in China. Journal of Cleaner Production,195(10),1487-1496.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.115