本研究目的在於探討運用作息本位模式於集中式特教班之實施歷程，包含與一位班級教師、兩位特殊幼兒家長和專業團隊（職能治療師、語言治療師與臨床心理師）的實施情形與困境，也探討作息本位模式對於兩位大班特殊幼兒功能性目標之成效，並瞭解學前特教師與特殊幼兒家長對作息本位模式之看法。本研究採用行動研究法，運用作息本位晤談、研究手札、半結構式訪談，以及課堂投入、獨立性和社會關係評量表等研究工具進行資料蒐集與分析。研究結果如下：
一、在學前特教班運用作息本位模式的實施歷程為三個階段：準備與合作初期、合作中期和合作末期。在準備與合作初期，研究者取得班級教師和特殊幼兒家長對特殊幼兒功能性目標的共識；觀摩並省思班級教師與專業團隊的互動方式。在合作中期，研究者調整心態主動與專團成員交流；發現家長對在家實施策略的接受度低。最後，在合作末期，研究者與班級教師、專團成員滾動式修正策略以突破特殊幼兒進步困境，並考量特殊幼兒家庭因素提供合適策略。
二、在學前特教班運用作息本位模式對於兩位特殊幼兒功能性目標皆有所提升，卻呈現不同的改變情形。
三、在學前特教班運用作息本位模式，有助於學前特教師擬定功能性IEP目標、促進家庭參與、安排班級作息規劃，與專團成員進行合作；同時，作息本位模式有助於特殊幼兒家長實際參與特殊幼兒IEP目標、執行與觀察特殊幼兒的策略與進步，連結至學校、家庭與早療資源促進多方交流與合作。

The purpose of this study was to explore the implementation process of a routines-based model in a self-contained class. Additionally, it aimed to investigate the challenges encountered by a preschool special education teacher, two parents of children with special needs, and a professional team consisting of an occupational therapist, a speech therapist, and a clinical psychologist. The study also examined the effectiveness of the routines-based model in achieving functional goals for the participating children. Furthermore, it sought to gather perspectives on the model from the parents and a preschool special education teacher. This study employed an action research method, utilizing tools such as routines-based interviews, research journals, semi-structured interviews, and classroom measures of engagement, independence, and social relationships for data collection and analysis. The main findings of this study are summarized below.
1.The implementation process can be divided into three stages: initial preparation and cooperation, mid-term cooperation, and final cooperation. During the initial preparation and cooperation stage, the researcher established consensus with the class teacher and parents of children with special needs regarding the functional goals for the children. They also observed and reflected on interactions between the class teacher and the professional team. In the mid-term cooperation stage, the researcher adjusted their approach to actively communicate with members of the professional team. They discovered that parents showed low acceptance of implementing strategies at home. Finally, in the final cooperation stage, the researcher, along with the class teacher and professional team members, continuously adjusted strategies to address challenges in the progress of children with special needs. They also provided suitable strategies, taking into account the family dynamics of the children with special needs.
2.Both children with special needs achieved functional goals, but they experienced different changes.
3.The routines-based model was beneficial for a preschool special education teacher in formulating functional IEP goals, promoting family participation, planning class routines, and collaborating with professional team members. Additionally, the model proved advantageous for parents of children with special needs, enabling them to actively participate in setting IEP goals, implementing and observing strategies, and monitoring their children's progress. It facilitated connections between school, family, and early intervention resources to enhance communication and cooperation.

表目錄VIII
圖目錄IX
第一章緒論1
第一節研究背景與動機1
一、學前家長參與的重要性1
二、作息融入之於集中式特教班特殊幼兒3
三、家長參與之於特殊幼兒功能性目標4
四、作息本位模式應用與相關文獻探討5
第二節研究目的與待答問題7
第三節名詞釋義8
一、集中式特教班（Self-Contained Class）8
二、特殊幼兒（Children with Special Needs）8
三、家長參與（Parent Involvement）8
四、作息本位模式（Routines-Based Model, RBM）9
五、功能性目標（Functional Goal）9
第二章文獻探討10
第一節學前特殊教育之家長參與10
一、家長參與之意涵10
二、家長參與之於學前特教的重要性11
三、家長參與相關研究分析12
第二節功能性目標之內涵與相關研究18
一、功能性目標的意涵與重要性18
二、功能性目標與作息本位模式之相關研究分析19
第三節作息本位模式之相關研究22
一、作息本位模式之意涵22
二、作息本位模式之應用23
三、作息本位模式於台灣之實施28
四、作息本位模式應用於教育場域之相關研究32
第三章研究方法36
第一節研究架構36
第二節研究場域與參與者42
第三節研究工具49
第四節作息本位模式方案之實施內容52
第五節資料處理與分析53
第四章研究結果與討論55
第一節初出茅廬－準備與合作初期57
第二節集思廣益－合作中期74
第三節同心協力－合作末期85
第四節學前特教師與特殊幼兒家長參與本研究之想法97
第五章結論與建議106
第一節結論106
一、在學前特教班運用作息本位模式，支持特殊幼兒的實施歷程106
二、在學前特教班運用作息本位模式對特殊幼兒功能性目標之成效108
三、在學前特教班運用作息本位模式，了解學前特教師與特殊幼兒家長 對作息本位模式的想法108
第二節研究限制109
第三節研究建議110
一、實務建議110
二、未來研究建議111
參考文獻112
一、中文部分112
二、英文部分115
附錄一 教師參與研究同意書119
附錄二 家長參與研究同意書120
附錄三 作息晤談報告書121
附錄四 課堂投入、獨立性及社會關係評量表126
附錄五 目標達成量表141
附錄六 目標作息對照觀察紀錄表142
附錄七 研究手札143
附錄八 半結構式訪談144
附錄九 目標達成量表（範例）146
附錄十 目標作息對照觀察紀錄表（範例）152

一、中文部分
McWilliam, R. A. & Casey, A. M.（2014）。兒童學前課堂投入—提升兒童生活參與〔黃靄雯、劉淑雯、康琳茹譯〕。華騰文化。（原著出版年：2008）。
McWilliam, R. A.（2015）。作息本位之早期介入：藉由常規支持幼兒及其家庭〔黃靄雯、康琳茹、蘇慧菁譯〕。華騰文化。（原著出版年：2010）。
朱思穎（2015）。家長對特殊需求幼兒自我決策能力之看法：從作息本位談起。幼兒保育學刊，12，1-15。
江筱穎（2017）。學前教保人員參與執行作息本位課堂模式之探討。﹝碩士論文，長庚大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
何怡君（2017）。學齡前自閉症兒童家長參與居家動作介入之行動研究。﹝碩士論文。國立臺北教育大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
吳盈瑤、孫淑柔（2014）。臺中市家長參與身心障礙幼兒轉銜服務之調查研究。特殊教育學報，（39），1-30。
吳恩綸（2019）。發展遲緩兒童及其家庭參與作息本位模式的療育經驗探究。﹝碩士論文，國立臺北大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
李曼曲（2016）。以家庭為中心的早期療育發展沿革。國教新知，63（4），46-54。
李聞一（2022）。從生態系統觀點探討學前融合班教保服務人員執行作息本位模式之研究。﹝碩士論文，長庚大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
林志祥（2022）。發展遲緩兒童家庭參與作息本位模式之家庭成果探究。﹝碩士論文，國立政治大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
林雨靜（2018）。家長參與分享式閱讀方案對發展遲緩幼兒故事理解之成效。﹝碩士論文。臺北市立大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
林郁宜、林秀錦、柯秋雪（編）（2013）。學前融合教育親師手冊。國立台北教育大學特殊教育中心叢書。
邱志鴻（2013）。從職場實習到就業─親師合作支持高職特教班學生參與就業轉銜。﹝碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
邱愉眉（2019）。以作息本位訪談支持幼兒園教師擬定目標。﹝碩士論文，長庚大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
邱菊英（2013）。學前特教班親師合作之行動研究。﹝碩士論文，國立臺東大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
柯秋雪（2020）。兩歲特殊幼兒上學了：親師合作實施個別化教育計畫之研究。教育學報，48（1），87-107。
唐榮昌、李淑惠（2011）。從特殊教育鑑定看家長參與的重要。雲嘉特教期刊，14，1-4。
翁曉柔（2020）。親師合作運用手語教學增進聾兒溝通能力之行動研究。﹝碩士論文，國立東華大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
張德銳、簡賢昌、高紅瑛、丁一顧、李俊達、林芳如、高敏麗、張淑娟、鄒小蘭、蔡美錦（2014）。教學行動研究：實用手冊與理論介紹（二版）。高等教育出版社。
教育部（2017）。幼兒園教保活動課程大綱。臺北市：教育部國民及學前教育署。
幼兒教育及照顧法（民國111年6月29日）修正公布。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0070031
特殊教育法（民國112年6月21日）修正公布。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0080027
梁佳頤（2019）。修改版作息本位介入對自閉症兒童發展及生活功能之成效研究。﹝碩士論文，長庚大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
陳采緹（2009）。以家庭中心取向早期介入服務模式建構親職教育。特教論壇，（7），18-33。
曾昭輝（2015）。學校文化、校長領導、家長參與對教師工作士氣影響之研究-以新北市公立國小教師為例。﹝碩士論文。臺北市立大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
黃志雄（2011）。親師共同參與重度障礙學生個別化教育計畫之研究。特殊教育與復健學報，（24），27-56。
黃麗卿（2013）。家長參與特殊幼兒個別化教育計畫現況之研究。[未出版碩士論文] 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
廖華芳、黃靄雯、孫世恒、蘇慧菁、楊美華、潘懿玲、陳順隆（2022）。作息本位模式及在臺灣推廣簡介。物理治療，47（3），196-216.
趙美媛（2011）。以日常作息為基礎之到宅介入於發展遲緩嬰幼兒之成效﹝碩士論文，長庚大學﹞。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
劉彥吟（2023）。應用以作息為本位模式於學前特教班親師溝通之個案研究。﹝碩士論文。國立臺中教育大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
潘世尊（2014）。教育行動研究的困境與挑戰。教育理論與實踐學刊，（30），119-147。
潘淑滿（2022）。質性研究：理論與應用（第二版）。心理。
潘懿玲、王湘慧、廖華芳（2021）。兒童及其家庭之評估與工具介紹。在廖華芳、孫世恒、陳麗秋、潘懿玲、程欣儀、蔡鏞申等編著。兒童物理治療學：四版。禾楓書局。
蔡孟螢、劉淑靜（2017）。以家庭為中心之作息本位介入於唐氏症孩童：個案報告。物理治療，42（2），190-191。
戴孜玲、黃靄雯、潘懿玲（2018）。【論文摘要】家長與專業人員合作以作息本位訪談設定目標－個案報告。物理治療，43（2），137-138。
謝侑容（2021）。家長參與高級中等教育階段集中式特教班學生離校轉銜之研究。﹝碩士論文。國立清華大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
嚴厚嫺（2013）。以家庭為中心的親師合作運用在重度智能障礙兒童生活自理技能之行動研究。﹝碩士論文。國立臺北教育大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
 
二、英文部分
Azad, G. F., Kim, M., Marcus, S. C., Sheridan, S. M., & Mandell, D. S. (2016). Parent‐teacher communication about children with autism spectrum disorder: an examination of collaborative problem‐solving. Psychology in the Schools, 53(10), 1071-1084.
Boavida, T., Aguiar, C., & McWilliam, R. A. (2014). A training program to improve IFSP/IEP goals and objectives through the routines-based interview. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 33(4), 200-211.
Boavida, T., Aguiar, C., McWilliam, R. A., & Correia, N. (2016). Effects of an In-Service Training Program Using the Routines-Based Interview. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 36(2), 67-77.
Boavida, T., Aguiar, C., McWilliam, R. A., & Pimentel, J. S. (2010). Quality of individualized education program goals of preschoolers with disabilities. Infants & Young Children, 23(3), 233-243.
Bruder, M. B. (2010). Early childhood intervention: A promise to children and families for their future. Exceptional children, 76(3), 339-355.
Casey, A. M., & McWilliam, R. A. (2007). The STARE: Data collection without the scare. Young Except. Child, 11, 2-15.
Cheslock, M. A., & Kahn, S. J. (2011). Supporting families and caregivers in everyday routines. The ASHA Leader, 16(11), 10-13.
Chu, S. Y. (2014). Perspectives of teachers and parents of Chinese American students with disabilities about their home–school communication. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 58(4), 237-248.
Darrah, J., Wiart, L., Magill‐Evans, J., Ray, L., & Andersen, J. (2012). Are family‐centred principles, functional goal setting and transition planning evident in therapy services for children with cerebral palsy?. Child: care, health and development, 38(1), 41-47.
Dunst, C. J., Bruder, M. B., & Espe-Sherwindt, M. (2014). Family Capacity-Building in Early Childhood Intervention: Do Context and Setting Matter?. School Community Journal, 24(1), 37-48.
Dunst, C. J., Bruder, M. B., Trivette, C. M., Raab, M., & McLean, M. (2001). Natural learning opportunities for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. Young Exceptional Children, 4(3), 18-25.
Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Raab, M. (2013). An implementation science framework for conceptualizing and operationalizing fidelity in early childhood intervention studies. Journal of Early Intervention, 35(2), 85-101.
García-Grau, P., McWilliam, R. A., Bull, K., & Foster, J. (2022). Good Goals Matter: Functional Child Goals, Family Goals, and Parent Perceptions of Difference in Performance. Infants & Young Children, 35(2), 106-119.
Goldschmidt, K. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Technology use to support the wellbeing of children. Journal of pediatric nursing, 53, 88-90.
Hughes-Scholes, C. H., & Gavidia-Payne, S. (2016). Development of a Routines-Based Early Childhood Intervention model. Educar em Revista(59), 141-154.
Hughes-Scholes, C. H., Gatt, S. L., Davis, K., Mahar, N., & Gavidia- Payne, S. (2016). Preliminary Evaluation of the Implementation of a Routines-Based Early Childhood Intervention Model in Australia. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 36(1), 30-42.
Hwang, A. W., Chao, M. Y., & Liu, S. W. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of routines-based early intervention for children with or at risk for developmental delay. Res Dev Disabil, 34(10), 3112-3123.
Jennings, D., Hanline, M. F., &Woods, J. (2012). Using routines-based intervention in early childhood special education. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 40(2), 14-22.
Kashinath, S., Woods, J., & Goldstein, H. (2006). Enhancing generalized teaching strategy use in daily routines by parents of children with autism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 466-485.
Lamônica, D. A. C., Giacheti, C. M., Haduo, M. D. H., Dos Santos, M. J. D., da Silva, N. C., & Pinato, L. (2021). Sleep quality, functional skills, and communication in preschool-aged children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 116, 104024.
Mas, J. M., Dunst, C. J., Hamby, D. W., Balcells-Balcells, A., García-Ventura, S., Baqués, N., & Giné, C. (2020). Relationships between family-centred practices and parent involvement in early childhood intervention. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 37(1), 1–13.
McWilliam R. A., Younggren N. (2020). Measure of engagement, independence, and social relationships. Brookes.
McWilliam, R. A. (1992). Family-centered intervention planning: A routines-based approach. ERIC.
McWilliam, R. A. (2010a). Early intervention in natural environments: A five component model. Early Steps, 1-16.
McWilliam, R. A. (2010b). Routines-Based Early Intervention: Supporting Young Children and Their Families. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Company.
McWilliam, R. A., & Casey, A. M. (2008). Engagement of every child in the preschool classroom. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company Baltimore.
McWilliam, R. A., Boavida, T., Bull, K., Cañadas, M., Hwang, A. W., Józefacka, N., Lim, H. H., Pedernera, M., Sergnese, T., & Woodward, J. (2020). The Routines-Based Model Internationally Implemented. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(22), 8308.
McWilliam, R. A., Tocci, L., & Harbin, G. L. (1998). Family-centered services: Service providers' discourse and behavior. Topics in early childhood special education, 18(4), 206-221.
Milne, S., Campbell, L., & Cottier, C. (2020). Accurate assessment of functional abilities in pre‐schoolers for diagnostic and funding purposes: A comparison of the Vineland‐3 and the PEDI‐CAT. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 67(1), 31-38.
NAEYC (2011). Technology in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (Proposed May 2011). Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/ files/naeyc/file/positions/Draft%20Technology%20 in%20Early%20Childhood%20Programs%204-29- 2011.pdf.
Narzisi, A. (2020). Handle the autism spectrum condition during Coronavirus (COVID-19) stay at home period: Ten tips for helping parents and caregivers of young children. Brain sciences, 10(4), 207.
ÖHRVALL, A. M., ELIASSON, A. C., Löwing, K., Ödman, P., & Krumlinde‐Sundholm, L. E. N. A. (2010). Self‐care and mobility skills in children with cerebral palsy, related to their manual ability and gross motor function classifications. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 52(11), 1048-1055.
Rakap, S., & Balikci, S. (2017). Using embedded instruction to teach functional skills to a preschool child with autism. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 63(1), 17-26.
Shaw, P. A., & Shaw, A. (2023). COVID-19 and remote learning: Experiences of parents supporting children with special needs and disability during the pandemic. Education 3-13, 51(3), 371-385.
Simó-Pinatella, D., Goei, S. L., Carvalho, M., & Nelen, M. (2022). Special education teachers’ experiences of addressing challenging behaviour during the pandemic. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 37(6), 907-920.
Toseeb, U., Asbury, K., Code, A., Fox, L., & Deniz, E. (2020). Supporting Families with Children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities During COVID-19.
Vermunt, N. P., Harmsen, M., Elwyn, G., Westert, G. P., Burgers, J. S., Olde Rikkert, M. G., & Faber, M. J. (2018). A three‐goal model for patients with multimorbidity: A qualitative approach. Health Expectations, 21(2), 528-538.
Wainer, A. L., Hepburn, S., & McMahon Griffith, E. (2017). Remembering parents in parent-mediated early intervention: An approach to examining impact on parents and families. Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 21(1), 5–17.
Wallace, K. S., & Rogers, S. J. (2010). Intervening in infancy: Implications for autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(12), 1300-1320.
Wang, P. J., Liao, H. F., Kang, L. J., Chen, L. C., Hwang, A. W., Lu, L., Tu, Y. K., & Morgan, G. A. (2021). Child and family factors that predict participation attendance in daily activities of toddlers with global developmental delay. Disability and rehabilitation, 43(13), 1849–1860.
Wolery, M., Sigalove Brashers, M., & Neitzel, J. C. (2002). Ecological congruence assessment for classroom activities and routines: Identifying goals and intervention practices in childcare. Topics in early childhood special education, 22(3), 131-142.