帳號:guest(3.143.203.190)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):簡歆瑜
作者(外文):Chien, Hsin-Yu
論文名稱(中文):運用知識翻新活動促進國小四年級學生對話進展與提升協作問題解決能力之研究
論文名稱(外文):A Study on Using Knowledge Building Activities to Promoting Dialogue Progress and Enhancing Collaborative Problem-Solving Skills in 4th Grade Students
指導教授(中文):林倍伊
陳美如
指導教授(外文):Lin, Pei-Yi
Chen, Mei-Ju
口試委員(中文):洪煌堯
李元萱
口試委員(外文):Hong, Huang-Yao
Lee, Yuan-Hsuan
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:課程與教學碩士在職專班
學號:110092501
出版年(民國):112
畢業學年度:112
語文別:中文
論文頁數:170
中文關鍵詞:知識翻新活動知識論壇資訊課程對話進展協作問題解決能力
外文關鍵詞:Knowledge BuildingKnowledge ForumComputer Science ClassDialogueCollaborative Problem-Solving Skills
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
為了讓學生能適應社會的變化,我們對學生的期待不再只是記憶教科書裡的知識,而是期望他們能將所學應用在生活當中以面對未來的困難與挑戰,也因此「協作問題解決能力」逐漸受到重視,研究者希望透過知識翻新活動結合資訊課,並輔以知識論壇運用以創造「學生為中心」的學習環境,以議題融入的方式提供更多元且開放的交流空間,期望能夠活化過去單獨操作為主的資訊課程,讓學生在課程中共同解決問題並促進其對話。
本研究的目的是知識翻新活動促進國小四年級學生對話層次進展與協作問題解決能力發展的歷程,並依據研究結果提出具體的建議,希冀能作為教學現場的資訊教師及未來研究者的參考。為達成本研究之目的,係以三個國小四年級班級作為研究參與對象,共計77人,研究方法採個案研究法,以協作問題解決能力問卷進行前後測,並將學生在知識論壇中的回文內容進行語料編碼分析,呈現學生的對話和協作問題解決能力的進展歷程。

研究結果發現:
一、知識翻新活動有助於提升學生在知識論壇的互動。
二、知識論壇中的互動隨整體課程階段逐漸提高。
三、知識翻新活動有助於促進學生對話層次進展。
四、知識翻新活動能提升學生整體的協作問題解決能力。
五、學生在KF中的活動量、與對話層次與協作問題解決能力會互相影響
To help students adapt to social changes, our expectations for students have evolved beyond memorizing textbook knowledge. Instead, we anticipate them to apply their learning in real-life situations to confront future challenges. Therefore, "collaborative problem-solving skills " have been increasingly emphasized, and the researcher hopes to create a "student-centered" learning environment by combining knowledge-building activities with the information class, supplemented with the operation of knowledge forums. Through the integration of topics into the curriculum, the researcher aims to rejuvenate information courses that were once characterized by solitary tasks. This approach fosters collaborative problem-solving among students and encourages meaningful dialogues within the courses.
This study aims to explore the advancement of dialogues and collaborative problem-solving skills among fourth-grade students at the national elementary school. Furthermore, based on the study's findings, it intends to provide tailored recommendations for computer science teachers and future researchers in the education field. To accomplish the study's objectives, three fourth-grade classes, comprising a total of 77 students, were selected as the target population. The research methodology used was a case study approach, where a collaborative problem-solving questionnaire was used for pre and post-tests, and students' responses to the Knowledge Forum were analyzed for corpus coding to present students' progress in their conversational and collaborative problem-solving skills.

The study's findings revealed that:
1.Knowledge-building activities led to an increase in students' engagement within the Knowledge Forum.
2.Activity within the Knowledge Forum gradually increased in correlation with the curriculum's progression.
3.Knowledge-building activities enhance students' conversational progress.
4.Knowledge-building activities improve students' collaborative problem-solving skills.
5.The level of student activity in KF, as well as their dialogue depth and collaborative problem-solving skills, mutually influence each other."
摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 VI
圖目錄 VIII
第一章 緒論1
第一節 研究背景與動機1
第二節 研究目的與問題5
第三節 名詞釋義6
第四節 研究範圍與限制7
第二章 文獻探討9
第一節 知識翻新理論9
第二節 對話進展20
第三節 協作問題解決能力27
第三章 研究設計與實施37
第一節 研究設計37
第二節 教學設計與實施41
第三節 研究流程49
第四節 資料蒐集與分析50
第四章 研究結果與討論57
第一節 知識翻新活動中的互動分析57
第二節 對話層次進展72
第三節 協作問題解決能力情形89
第四節 個案分析108
第五章 結論與建議141
第一節 結論141
第二節 建議146
參考文獻 149
中文部分149
英文部分151
附錄161
一、研究者教學紀錄與省思161
二、協作問題解決能力問卷167
中文部分
王金國、孫台鼎(2014)。從學生的負向經 驗省思合作學習的實施。臺灣教育評論月刊,3(7),88-91。
王美琇 (2008)。小組討論中同儕互動之言談分析[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺東大學教育學系
王淑卿、葉宗一、王國華(2020)。合作問題解決自我效能量表發展與科學學習成就關係之探討。科學教育學刊,,28(4),353–377。 https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.202012_28(4).0003
洪國財、許菱雅(2021)。學生進行文化知識翻新以提升文化認同感與文化理解。教育與心理研究,44(3),099-125。
洪國財、許菱雅、洪煌堯(2021)。國小學生集體共構達悟族大船文化知識的知識翻新活動。教育研究月刊,324,038-056。
洪煌堯、蔡佩真、林倍伊(2014)。透過知識創新教學理念與學習平臺以培養國小學生自然課合作學習與翻新想法的習慣。科學教育學刊,22(4), 413-439。https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.2014.2204.04
紐文英(2020)。質性研究方法與論文寫作(第三版)。雙葉書廊。
教育部(2022)。教育部中小學數位教學指引。臺北:作者。
教育部(2023)。數位時代媒體素養教育白皮書。臺北:作者。
陳秀溶、王國華、蔡顯麞(2017)。國中自然課程「機械應用」融入「協同問題解決」之教學設計。科學教育月刊,404,19-29。https://doi.org/10.6216/SEM.201711_(404).0003
陳美如、曾子沁、曾莉婷(2021)。透過社群協作之知識翻新活動以促進在職教師碩士論文研究。教育研究月刊,324,057-078。
陳埩淑(2002)。教室談在教學上的涵意與應用。課程與教學季刊,5(4),125-140。
陳景花(2021)。知識翻新研究趨勢之文獻計量分析。教育研究月刊,324,018-037。
陳景花(2021)。運用知識論壇以協助大學生自主建構正向心理學理論模式之教學。教育與心理研究,44:2,063-090。
溫美玉(2017)。溫美玉備課趴2──閱讀理解與延伸寫作的五卡教學實錄。親子天下。


英文部分
Awwal, N., Griffi n, P., & Scalise, S. (2015). Platforms for delivery of collaborative tasks. In P. Griffi n & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach (pp. 105–113). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). An Attainable Version of High Literacy: Approaches to Teaching Higher-Order Skills in Reading and Writing. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179375
Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: One concept, two hills to climb. In S. C. Tan, H. J. So, J. Yeo (Eds.) Knowledge creation in education (pp. 35-52). Singapore: Springer.
Borge, M., Ong, Y. S., & Rosé, C. P. (2018). Learning to monitor and regulate collective thinking processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(1), 61-92.
Borge, M., Rosé, C. (2021). Quantitative Approaches to Language in CSCL. In: Cress, U., Rosé, C., Wise, A.F., Oshima, J. (eds) International Handbook of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_32
Care, E., Griffin, P., Scoular, C., Awwal, N., Zoanetti, N. (2015). Collaborative Problem Solving Tasks. In: Griffin, P., Care, E. (eds) Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Educational Assessment in an Information Age. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_4
Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: the language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Cesareni, D., Cacciamani, S., & Fujita, N. (2016). Role taking and knowledge building in a blended university course. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(1), 9-39.
Chan, C. K. K. & Chan, Y. -Y. (2011)Students’ Views of Collaboration and Online Participation in Knowledge Forum. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1445–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.003.
Chen, B., Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C.(2015). Advancing knowledge‐building discourse through judgments of promising ideas. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10, 345–366 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9225-z
Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver & Howard S. Barrows (2008) FacilitatingCollaborative Knowledge Building, COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 26:1, 48-94, DOI:10.1080/07370000701798495
Drageset, O.G. (2014). How Students Explain and Teachers Respond. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Fiore, S. M., Graesser, A., Greiff, S., Griffin, P., Gong, B., Kyllonen, P., Massey, C., O’neil, H., Pellegrino, J., Rothman, R., Soulé, H., & Davier, A. V. (2017). Collaborative Problem Solving: Considerations for the National Assessment of Educational Progress Collaborative Problem Solving: Considerations for the National Assessment of Educational Progress. National Center for Education Statistics.
Garcés Chiriboga, M. V., & Sarango Solano, F. E. (2022). Construcción colectiva del conocimiento en escenarios virtuales: Una experiencia con estudiantes universitarios: Collective Knowledge Building in Virtual Settings: An Experience with University Students. Cumbres, 8(2), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.48190/cumbres.v8n2a3
Griffi n, P., & Care, E. (2015). The ATC21S method. In P. Griffi n & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approaches (pp. 3–33). Dordrecht: Springer.
Griffi n, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E., (Eds.) (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills .Dordrecht: Springer.
Griffin, P & Care, E. (2018). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Springer.
Hamet Bagnou, J., Prigent, E., Martin, J. C., & Clavel, C. (2022). Adaptation and validation of two annotation scales for assessing social skills in a corpus of multimodal collaborative interactions. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1039169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1039169
Heller, P., Keith, R., & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. American Association of Physics Teachers, 60(7), 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17117
Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffi n, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. In P. Griffi n & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach (pp. 37–56). Dordrecht: Springer.
Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Jeong, H. (2021). An Overview of CSCL Methods. In: Cress, U., Rosé, C., Wise, A.F., Oshima, J. (eds) International Handbook of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_4
Hong, H. Y., Chen, B., & Chai, C. S. (2016). Exploring the Development of College Students’ Epistemic Views during Their Knowledge Building Activities. Computers & Education, 98, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.005.
Hong, H. Y., Ma, L., lin, P. Y., & Lee, K. Y. (2020). Advancing Third Graders’ Reading Comprehension through Collaborative Knowledge Building: A Comparative Study in Taiwan. Computers & Education, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103962
Hu¨bscher-Younger, T., & Narayanan, H. (2002). Influence of authority on convergence in collaborative learning. In T. D. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), Carrying forward the conversation: Proceedings of the international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (CSCL’02). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jennings, L. B., & Mills, H. (2009). Constructing a Discourse of Inquiry: Findings From a Five-Year Ethnography at One Elementary School. Teachers College Record, 111(7), 1583–1618. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100704
Kahrimanis, G., Meier, A., Chounta, I. A., Voyiatzaki, E., Spada, H., Rummel, N., & Avouris, N. (2009). Assessing Collaboration Quality in Synchronous CSCL Problem-Solving Activities: Adaptation and Empirical Evaluation of a Rating Scheme (Vol. 5794). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04636-0_25
Lee, A. V. Y., & Tan, S. C. (2018). Strategies for idea improvement using an idea-centric discourse analysis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning,13(3), 335-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9267-6
Lee, C. D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kuhl, P. K. (2020). The braid of human learning and development: Neuro-physiological processes and participation in cultural practices. In N. S. Nasir, C. D. Lee, R. Pea, & M. McKinney de Royston (Eds.), Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (pp. 24–43). Routledge.
Lei, C., & Chan, C. K. k. (2018). Developing Metadiscourse through Reflective Assessment in Knowledge Building Environments. Computers & Education, 126, 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.006
Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of Participation and Discourse in Elementary Students’ Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00042-7.
Lipponen, L., Rahikainen1), M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2001). Analyzing patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students' online science discussion. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings., & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European Perspectives on ComputerSupported Collaborative Learning. Proceedings of the First European Conference on CSCL (pp. 421-428). Maastricht, the Netherlands: Maastricht McLuhan Institute.
Lipponen, L., Veermans, M., Hakkarainen, K., & Palonen, T. (2003). Effective Participation and Discourse through a Computer Network: Investigating Elementary Students’ Computer Supported Interaction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27(4), 355–384. https://doi.org/10.2190/MGTW-QG1E-G66E-F3UD
Mo, J., 2017, Collaborative problem solving, PISA in Focus, No. 78, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/cdae6d2e-en.
Muhonen, H., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Pakarinen, E., Poikkeus, A. M., & Lerkkanen, M. K.(2017). Knowledge-building patterns in educational dialogue. International Journal of Educational Research, 81, 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.10.00
Näykki, P., Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S. & Kirschner, P. (2017). Monitoring makes a difference: quality and temporal variation in teacher education students’ collaborative learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(1), 31-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1066440
Nelson, L. M. (1999). Collaborative problem solving. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 241-268). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
O’Neil, H. F., Jr., Wang, S., Jr., & Lee, C. (2003). Assessment of teamwork skills via a teamwork questionnaire. In H. F. O’Neil Jr. & R. S. Perez (Eds.), Technology applications in education: A learning view (pp. 283–303). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
OECD (2017), "PISA 2015 collaborative problem solving framework", in PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-8-en
Penuel, William & Krumm, Andrew & Pazera, Carol & Singleton, Corinne & Allen, Anna‐Ruth & Deverel‐Rico, Clarissa. (2023). Belonging in science classrooms: Investigating its relation to students' contributions and influence in knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 10.1002/tea.21884.
Puntambekar, S. (2006). Analyzing Collaborative Interactions: Divergence, Shared Understanding and Construction of Knowledge. Computers & Education, 47(3), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.012. Roscoe, R.D., Chi, M.T.H. Tutor learning: the role of explaining and responding to questions. Instr Sci 36, 321–350 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9034-5
Rojas, M., Nussbaum, M., Guerrero, O. et al. Integrating a collaboration script and group awareness to support group regulation and emotions towards collaborative problem solving. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn 17, 135–168 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-022-09362-0
Rosen, Y., & Foltz, P. (2014). Assessing collaborative problem solving through automated technologies. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 9(3), 389–410.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B.Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67-98). Open Court.
Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum. In Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183-192). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1983). The development of evaluative, diagnostic, and remedial capabilities in children's composing. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language: Developmental and educational perspectives (pp. 67-95). London: John Wiley & Sons.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.),Encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 1370-1373). New York: Macmillan Reference.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, andtechnology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97-118).New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R. S., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989).Computer supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 51-68.
Soliman, D., Costa, S., & Scardamalia, M. (2021). Knowledge Building in Online Mode: Insights and Reflections. Education Sciences, 11(8), 425. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080425
Stadler, M., Herborn, K., Mustafić, M., & Greiff, S. (2020). The Assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving in PISA 2015: An Investigation of the Validity of the PISA 2015 CPS Tasks. Computers & Education, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103964
Tan, J. P-L., Caleon, I. S., Jonathan, C. R., & Koh, E. (2014). A Dialogic Frameword for Assessing Collective Creativity in Computer-Supported Collaborative Problem-Solving Tasks. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 9(3), 411-437.
Truxaw, M. P. (2020). Dialogic Discourse to Empower Students in Linguistically Diverse Elementary Mathematics Classrooms. Teacher Education Quarterly, 47(3), 120–144. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26977518
Tsang, H.W., Park, S.W., Chen, L.L., & Law, N. (2019). Assessing Collaborative Problem Solving: What and How? International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning.
van Aalst J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, 4(3), 259–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9069-5
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Har- vard University Press.
Wise, A., & Schwarz, B. (2017). Visions of CSCL: Eight provocations for the future of the field. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12, 423–467.
Yücel, Ü. A., & Usluel, Y. K. (2016). Knowledge Building and the Quantity, Content and Quality of the Interaction and Participation of Students in an Online Collaborative Learning Environment. Computers & Education, 97, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.015.
Zhan, Z., He, G., Li, T., He, L., & Xiang, S. (2022). Effect of Groups Size on Students’ Learning Achievement, Motivation, Cognitive Load, Collaborative Problem-Solving Quality, and In-Class Interaction in an Introductory AI Course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38, 1807–1818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12722
Zhang, J., Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley , E. A. (2011). Sustaining Knowledge Building as a Principle-Based Innovation at an Elementary School. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.528317
Zhuang, X., MacCann, C., Wang, L., Liu, L., & Roberts, R. D. (2008). Development and validity evidence supporting a teamwork and collaboration assessment for high school students. ETS Research Report Series, 2008(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2008.tb02136.x
(此全文20251113後開放外部瀏覽)
電子全文
摘要
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *