|
1.Du, C., et al., FGF2/FGFR signaling promotes cumulus–oocyte complex maturation in vitro. Reproduction, 2021. 161(2): p. 205-214. 2.Coleman, A.B., et al., Chemosensitization by fibroblast growth factor-2 is not dependent upon proliferation, S-phase accumulation, or p53 status. Biochemical Pharmacology, 2002. 64(7): p. 1111-1123. 3.Bikfalvi, A., et al., Biological Roles of Fibroblast Growth Factor-2*. Endocrine Reviews, 1997. 18(1): p. 26-45. 4.Kanazawa, S., et al., bFGF regulates PI3-kinase-Rac1-JNK pathway and promotes fibroblast migration in wound healing. PLoS One, 2010. 5(8): p. e12228. 5.Laddha, A.P. and Y.A. Kulkarni, VEGF and FGF-2: Promising targets for the treatment of respiratory disorders. Respiratory Medicine, 2019. 156: p. 33-46. 6.Zehe, C., et al., Cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans are essential components of the unconventional export machinery of FGF-2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. 103(42): p. 15479-84. 7.Kostas, M., et al., Translocation of Exogenous FGF1 and FGF2 Protects the Cell against Apoptosis Independently of Receptor Activation. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2018. 430(21): p. 4087-4101. 8.Akl, M.R., et al., Molecular and clinical significance of fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2/bFGF) in malignancies of solid and hematological cancers for personalized therapies. Oncotarget, 2016. 7(28): p. 44735-44762. 9.La Venuta, G., et al., The Startling Properties of Fibroblast Growth Factor 2: How to Exit Mammalian Cells without a Signal Peptide at Hand. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2015. 290(45): p. 27015-27020. 10.Koledova, Z., et al., Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 Protein Stability Provides Decreased Dependence on Heparin for Induction of FGFR Signaling and Alters ERK Signaling Dynamics. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2019. 7: p. 331. 11.Benington, L., et al., Fibroblast Growth Factor 2-A Review of Stabilisation Approaches for Clinical Applications. Pharmaceutics, 2020. 12(6). 12.Sauer, D.G., et al., A two-step process for capture and purification of human basic fibroblast growth factor from E. coli homogenate: Yield versus endotoxin clearance. Protein Expression and Purification, 2019. 153: p. 70-82. 13.Sauer, D.G., et al., Separation of truncated basic fibroblast growth factor from the full-length protein by hydrophobic interaction chromatography. Separation and Purification Technology, 2021. 254: p. 117564. 14.Yoon, J.-Y., et al., Ultrahigh protein adsorption capacity and sustained release of nanocomposite scaffolds: implication for growth factor delivery systems. RSC Advances, 2017. 7(27): p. 16453-16459. 15.Goto, R., M. Nakahata, and S. Sakai, Phenol-Grafted Alginate Sulfate Hydrogel as an Injectable FGF-2 Carrier. Gels, 2022. 8(12). 16.Vaishya, R., et al., Long-term delivery of protein therapeutics. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 2015. 12(3): p. 415-40. 17.Lieser, R.M., et al., Site-Specific Bioconjugation Approaches for Enhanced Delivery of Protein Therapeutics and Protein Drug Carriers. Bioconjugate Chemistry, 2020. 31(10): p. 2272-2282. 18.Castañeda Ruiz, A.J., et al., Alternative Excipients for Protein Stabilization in Protein Therapeutics: Overcoming the Limitations of Polysorbates. Pharmaceutics, 2022. 14(12). 19.Leader, B., Q.J. Baca, and D.E. Golan, Protein therapeutics: a summary and pharmacological classification. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2008. 7(1): p. 21-39. 20.Gandhi, R.P., et al., A systematic review of therapeutic proteins as a promising approach to treat various diseases. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2023. 22(1): p. 157-169. 21.Dingman, R. and S.V. Balu-Iyer, Immunogenicity of Protein Pharmaceuticals. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2019. 108(5): p. 1637-1654. 22.Murray, J.E., N. Laurieri, and R. Delgoda, Chapter 24 - Proteins, in Pharmacognosy, S. Badal and R. Delgoda, Editors. 2017, Academic Press: Boston. p. 477-494. 23.Wang, W., Advanced protein formulations. Protein Science, 2015. 24(7): p. 1031-9. 24.Dobrovolskaia, M.A. and M. Bathe, Opportunities and challenges for the clinical translation of structured DNA assemblies as gene therapeutic delivery and vaccine vectors. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, 2021. 13(1): p. e1657. 25.Ibraheem, D., A. Elaissari, and H. Fessi, Gene therapy and DNA delivery systems. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2014. 459(1): p. 70-83. 26.Saraswat, P., et al., DNA as therapeutics; an update. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2009. 71(5): p. 488-98. 27.Qureischi, M., et al., Chapter One - mRNA-based therapies: Preclinical and clinical applications, in International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology, F. Aranda, P. Berraondo, and L. Galluzzi, Editors. 2022, Academic Press. p. 1-54. 28.Sahin, U., K. Karikó, and Ö. Türeci, mRNA-based therapeutics — developing a new class of drugs. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2014. 13(10): p. 759-780. 29.Deng, Z., et al., mRNA Vaccines: The Dawn of a New Era of Cancer Immunotherapy. Frontiers in Immunology, 2022. 13: p. 887125. 30.Hou, X., et al., Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery. Nature Reviews Materials, 2021. 6(12): p. 1078-1094. 31.Vlatkovic, I., Non-Immunotherapy Application of LNP-mRNA: Maximizing Efficacy and Safety. Biomedicines, 2021. 9(5). 32.Zhang, C., et al., Ranking mAb-excipient interactions in biologics formulations by NMR spectroscopy and computational approaches. MAbs, 2023. 15(1): p. 2212416. 33.Patel, R., J. Barker, and A. ElShaer, Pharmaceutical Excipients and Drug Metabolism: A Mini-Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020. 21(21). 34.Benington, L.R., et al., Stabilisation of Recombinant Human Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF-2) against Stressors Encountered in Medicinal Product Processing and Evaluation. Pharmaceutics, 2021. 13(11). 35.Kamerzell, T.J., et al., Protein–excipient interactions: Mechanisms and biophysical characterization applied to protein formulation development. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2011. 63(13): p. 1118-1159. 36.Zhang, H., et al., Polysorbates versus Hydroxypropyl Beta-Cyclodextrin (HPβCD): Comparative Study on Excipient Stability and Stabilization Benefits on Monoclonal Antibodies. Molecules, 2022. 27(19). 37.Stolzke, T., et al., Hydroxylpropyl-β-cyclodextrin as Potential Excipient to Prevent Stress-Induced Aggregation in Liquid Protein Formulations. Molecules, 2022. 27(16). 38.Song, Y.H., et al., Distribution of fibroblast growth factors and their roles in skin fibroblast cell migration. Molecular Medicine Reports, 2016. 14(4): p. 3336-3342. 39.Linares-Fernández, S., et al., Combining an optimized mRNA template with a double purification process allows strong expression of in vitro transcribed mRNA. Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids, 2021. 26: p. 945-956. 40.Schlessinger, J., et al., Crystal structure of a ternary FGF-FGFR-heparin complex reveals a dual role for heparin in FGFR binding and dimerization. Molecular Cell, 2000. 6(3): p. 743-50. 41.Soleyman, M.R., et al., High-level Expression and Purification of Active Human FGF-2 in Escherichia coli by Codon and Culture Condition Optimization. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 2016. 18(2): p. e21615. 42.Booth, W.T., et al., Impact of an N-terminal Polyhistidine Tag on Protein Thermal Stability. ACS Omega, 2018. 3(1): p. 760-768. 43.Pardi, N., et al., In vitro transcription of long RNA containing modified nucleosides. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2013. 969: p. 29-42. 44.Ohtake, S., Y. Kita, and T. Arakawa, Interactions of formulation excipients with proteins in solution and in the dried state. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2011. 63(13): p. 1053-1073. 45.Hunter, A.K., et al., Identification of compendial nonionic detergents for the replacement of Triton X-100 in bioprocessing. Biotechnology Progress, 2022. 38(2): p. e3235. 46.Rose, K., Interaction of ATP with fibroblast growth factor 2: biochemical characterization and consequence for growth factor stability. BMC Biochemistry, 2011. 12: p. 14. 47.Oćwieja, M. and A. Barbasz, Sodium hexametaphosphate–induced enhancement of silver nanoparticle toxicity towards leukemia cells. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2020. 22(6): p. 167. 48.Rahman, M.S., et al., Recent Developments of Carboxymethyl Cellulose. Polymers, 2021. 13(8): p. 1345. 49.Chen, Y.M., et al., Self-healing and photoluminescent carboxymethyl cellulose-based hydrogels. European Polymer Journal, 2017. 94: p. 501-510. 50.Tang, L., et al., Study on synergistic effects of carboxymethyl cellulose and LIPUS for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2022. 286: p. 119278. 51.Nawrocka, D., et al., Stable Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 Dimers with High Pro-Survival and Mitogenic Potential. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020. 21(11).
|