本研究使用線上問卷調查並搭配次序probit模型（ordered probit model），用以探討企業之環境、社會與公司治理（Environmental, Social, and Governance，ESG）表現對求職者與已就業者工作選擇偏好之影響。研究結果顯示，當公司提供提升專業的機會、給予理想薪酬、並且在工作環境中保持適當的社交以及沒有歧視的表現時將降低員工離職的意願，而在與ESG相關變數方面，當公司有支持環境管理的實際投資和相關組織、有環境管理的績效與評價體系、有穩定員工就業的策略、有對利益相關者的ESG進行評價、有和利益相關者的成長執行雙贏的伙伴關係計劃、採用員工道德規範、會揭露嚴重影響組織決策的訊息和問題與會持續對外揭露訊息等，都是會影響工作選擇偏好的重要因素。另外，若將性別分開進行分析發現，公司沒有歧視的表現、支持環境管理的投資和組織、有環境管理績效與評價體系與利益相關者執行雙贏的伙伴關係計劃等因素，反而不會影響女性的工作選擇。

This study utilized an online survey coupled with the ordered probit model to explore the impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance of companies on the job preferences of job seekers and employed individuals. The findings revealed that when companies provide opportunities for professional growth, offer desirable compensation, maintain a conducive social working environment, and demonstrate a non-discriminatory culture, they reduce employees' willingness to quit their jobs. Regarding ESG-related variables, factors such as actual investments and related organizations supporting environmental management, having an environmental performance and evaluation system, adopting strategies for stable employee employment, evaluating ESG for stakeholders, implementing win-win partnership plans with stakeholders, adopting an employee code of ethics, disclosing information and issues significantly affecting organizational decisions, and continuing external disclosure, all play crucial roles in influencing job preferences. Furthermore, when gender is considered separately, factors such as non-discriminatory practices, investments and organizations supporting environmental management, having an environmental performance and evaluation system, and executing win-win partnership plans with stakeholders do not significantly affect the job choices of women.

摘要 ii
目次 iv
表目次 vi
圖目次 vi
第一章、緒論 1
1.1研究動機與目的 1
1.2研究流程 2
第二章、文獻回顧 4
2.1 ESG評價與公司績效 4
2.2工作選擇偏好 5
第三章、研究方法 8
3.1問卷設計 8
3.2 信效度分析 13
3.2.1信度 13
3.2.2效度 14
3.3次序probit 模型 14
3.4卡方獨立性檢定 17
3.5概似比檢定 18
第四章、實證分析結果 19
4.1資料來源 19
4.2變數說明與敘述性統計 19
4.2.1應變數 19
4.2.2自變數 19
4.3信效度分析結果 28
4.4 Likelihood Ratio Test分析 30
4.5卡方獨立性檢定分析 30
4.6迴歸分析結果 33
4.6.1工作相關變數 33
4.6.2 ESG相關變數 34
4.6.3個人相關變數 36
4.6.4男性迴歸分析 38
4.6.5女性迴歸分析結果 40
4.7邊際效果 42
4.8 ESG相關變數合併迴歸分析結果 49
第五章、結論與建議 53
5.1研究結論 53
5.2研究限制與政策建議 54
參考文獻 56
附錄一 60

Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Aouadi, A., & Marsat, S. (2018). Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? Evidence from international data. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 1027-1047.
Borjas, G. J. (2015). The slowdown in the economic assimilation of immigrants: Aging and cohort effects revisited again. Journal of Human Capital, 9(4), 483-517.
Bridges, P. S. (1989). Changes in activities with the shift to agriculture in the southeastern United States. Current Anthropology, 30(3), 385-394.
Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance research letters, 38, 101716.
Bundy, P., & Norris, D. (1992). What accounting students consider important in the job selection process. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 8(2), 1-6.
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2013). Regression Analysis of Count Data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, Y. C., Hung, M., & Wang, Y. (2018). The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. Journal of accounting and economics, 65(1), 169-190.
Chetty, R. (2015). Behavioral economics and public policy: A pragmatic perspective. American Economic Review, 105(5), 1-33.
Cohen, G. (2023). ESG risks and corporate survival. Environment Systems and Decisions, 43(1), 16-21.
Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (2021). Corporate stakeholders, corporate valuation and ESG. European Financial Management, 27(2), 196-207.
Csiszárik-Kocsír, Á., & Garia-Fodor, M. (2018). Motivation analysing and preference system of choosing a workplace as segmentation criteria based on a country wide research result focus on generation of Z. On-Line Journal Modelling the New Europe, (27), 67-85.
Fatemi, A., Fooladi, I., & Tehranian, H. (2015). Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 182-192.
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889.
Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric Analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & society, 36(1), 5-31.
Hamid, M. A. (2020). Job Selection Preferences: What Do Young Adults Want?. Global Business & Management Research, 12(4).
Heckman, J. J., & Honore, B. E. (1990). The empirical content of the Roy model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1121-1149.
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied Logistic Regression (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Jacobs, B. W., Singhal, V. R., & Subramanian, R. (2010). An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 430-441.
Jin, M., & Kim, B. (2022). The effects of ESG activity recognition of corporate employees on job performance: The case of South Korea. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(7), 316.
Jurgensen, C. E. (1978). Job preferences (What makes a job good or bad?). Journal of Applied psychology, 63(3), 267.
Kirchmayer, Z., & Fratričová, J. (2020). What motivates generation Z at work? Insights into motivation drivers of business students in Slovakia. Proceedings of the Innovation management and education excellence through vision, 6019, 6030.
Konrad, A. M., Ritchie Jr, J. E., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 126(4), 593.
Lazear, E. P. (2000). Performance pay and productivity. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1346-1361.
Long, J. S. (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Manchiraju, H., & Rajgopal, S. (2017). Does corporate social responsibility (CSR) create shareholder value? Evidence from the Indian Companies Act 2013. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(5), 1257-1300.
Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good... and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. And does it matter.
McGraw, K., Popp, J. S., Dixon, B. L., & Newton, D. J. (2012). Factors influencing job choice among agricultural economics professionals. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 44(2), 251-265.
Parfitt, C. (2020). ESG integration treats ethics as risk, but whose ethics and whose risk? Responsible investment in the context of precarity and risk-shifting. Critical sociology, 46(4-5), 573-587.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard business review, 84(12), 78-92.
Rothe, P., Lindholm, A. L., Hyvönen, A., & Nenonen, S. (2012). Work environment preferences–does age make a difference?. Facilities, 30(1/2), 78-95.
Shakil, M. H. (2022). Environmental, social and governance performance and stock price volatility: A moderating role of firm size. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(3), e2574.
Singh, D. A., & Gaur, A. S. (2013). Governance structure, innovation and internationalization: Evidence from India. Journal of International Management, 19(3), 300-309.
Sroufe, R. (2017). Integration and organizational change towards sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 315-329.
Takiimoto, M. Y., & Srisuphaolarn, P. (2021). The influence of ESG on generation Z: a review of preference for workplace (Doctoral dissertation, Thammasat University).
Wright, P., & Ferris, S. P. (1997). Agency conflict and corporate strategy: The effect of divestment on corporate value. Strategic management journal, 18(1), 77-83.
Yao, T. (2022). ESG education and job choice. Working paper.