帳號:guest(3.133.108.48)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):蕭伊倫
作者(外文):Hsiao,Yi-Lun
論文名稱(中文):體現認知融入國小二年級學童乘法單元之研究
論文名稱(外文):An investigation of 2nd grade students’ learning on mutiplication in an embodied-cognition approach instruction
指導教授(中文):林勇吉
指導教授(外文):Lin, Yung-Chi
口試委員(中文):陳致澄
許慧玉
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:數理教育研究所
學號:109198512
出版年(民國):111
畢業學年度:110
語文別:中文
論文頁數:133
中文關鍵詞:乘法單元國小二年級體現認知
外文關鍵詞:Embodied cognitionSecond GradersMultiplication
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:29
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
本研究目的在探討將體現認知轉化並融入數學課堂,對國小二年級學童的乘法學習成就與學習態度之影響,以及瞭解高中低成就學童之解題表現差異。本研究使用量化方法分析資料,再加以訪談高中低成就各3位學童前後測之解題歷程,樣本取自台中市大甲區某國小二年級兩個班級共51位學童,本研究採用準實驗研究,以研究者任教的班級為實驗組,另一班則為對照組。實驗組和對照組先進行自編的『前測「3、6、9、7的乘法」成就測驗』進行前測,並且進行平均數差異顯著性考驗假設分析;經過八節課的教學實驗,爾後以自編的『後測「3、6、9、7的乘法」成就測驗』,對實驗組和對照組實施後測,再進行描述性統計、獨立樣本單因子共變數分析、獨立樣本t檢定和成對樣本t檢定。質性資料來源則是對實驗組高中低成就一共九位學童進行前後測訪談,分析學童對於體現認知融入於數學課堂的成效與學習態度。

研究結果發現:
一、使用體現認知理論融入教學與一般講述教學的學習成就並無差異。
二、使用體現認知理論融入教學與一般講述教學的學習態度有顯著差異。
三、接受體現認知理論融入教學的高成就和中成就學童皆能正確理解乘法概念和比出動作;低成就學童能正確比出動作但乘法概念尚不穩定。
四、不論高中低成就學童皆認為接受體現認知理論融入教學很有趣,且能幫助學習數學和生活中運用乘法。
The purpose of this research is to explore the effect of transforming and integrating embodied cognitive theory into mathematics classrooms on the multiplication learning effectiveness and learning motivation of sophomores in elementary schools, as well as to understand the difference in high- and low-achieving students. This research mainly uses quantitative analysis data, supplemented by semi-structured interview data to evaluate the learning effectiveness of students. The sample is taken from 52 students in two classes of the second grade of an elementary school in Dajia District, Taichung City.

The results of the study found:
1. There was no difference in learning achievement between the integration of teaching using embodied cognition theory and traditional teaching.
2. There is a significant difference in learning attitudes between using embodied cognitive theory into teaching and raditional teaching.
3. Both high-achieving and middle-achieving students who receive the integration of embodied cognitive theory into teaching can correctly understand the concept of multiplication and match movements; low-achieving children can match movements correctly but the concept of multiplication is not yet stable.
4. All students who receive the integration of embodied cognitive theory into teaching find it interesting and helpful to learn mathematics and use multiplication in life.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題 5
第三節 研究名詞釋義 6
第四節 研究範圍與限制 8
第二章 文獻探討 10
第一節 體現認知與相關實徵研究 10
第二節 國小乘法概念分析與相關研究 16
第三章 研究方法 34
第一節 研究設計 34
第二節 研究對象 36
第三節 教學活動設計 38
第四節 實驗流程 42
第五節 研究工具 46
第六節 資料處理與分析 53
第四章 研究結果 55
第一節 成就測驗解題表現 55
第二節 學習態度表現 74
第三節 使用體現認知融入教學對不同程度學生解題表現之影響 89
第四節 使用體現認知融入教學對不同程度學生學習態度之影響 99
第五章 結論、討論與建議 105
第一節 結論 105
第二節 建議 109
參考文獻 111
英文文獻 111
中文文獻 115
英文文獻
Ahmann, J. S., & Glock, M. D. (1981). Evaluating student progress: Principles of tests and measurements. Allyn & Bacon.
Aiken Jr, L. R. (1976). Update on attitudes and other affective variables in learning mathematics. Review of educational research, 46(2), 293-311.
Alibali, M., & Nathan, M. J. (2007). Teachers' gestures as a means of scaffolding students' understanding: Evidence from an early algebra lesson. na.
Anghileri, J. (1989). An investigation of young children's understanding of multiplication. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(4), 367-385.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and brain sciences, 22(4), 637-660.
Beattie, G., & Shovelton, H. (1999). Mapping the range of information contained in the iconic hand gestures that accompany spontaneous speech. Journal of language and social psychology, 18(4), 438-462.
Belenky, D. M., & Schalk, L. (2014). The effects of idealized and grounded materials on learning, transfer, and interest: An organizing framework for categorizing external knowledge representations. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 27-50.
Bruner, J. S., & Kenney, H. J. (1965). Representation and mathematics learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 30(1), 50-59.
Butterworth, B. (1999). What counts: How every brain is hardwired for math. Free Press.
Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral cortex, 15(8), 1243-1249.
Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380.
Cassell, J., McNeill, D., & McCullough, K.-E. (1999). Speech-gesture mismatches: Evidence for one underlying representation of linguistic and nonlinguistic information. Pragmatics & cognition, 7(1), 1-34.
Chang, P., & Hammond, G. R. (1987). Mutual interactions between speech and finger movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19(2), 265-274.
Clark, F. B., & Kamii, C. (1996). Identification of multiplicative thinking in children in grades 1–5. Journal for research in mathematics education, 27(1), 41-51.
Clements, D. H. (2000). ‘Concrete’manipulatives, concrete ideas. Contemporary issues in early childhood, 1(1), 45-60.
Conant, L. L. (1896). The number concept: Its origin and development. Macmillan and Company.
Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition, 106(2), 1047-1058.
Cook, S. W., Yip, T. K., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2012). Gestures, but not meaningless movements, lighten working memory load when explaining math. Language and cognitive processes, 27(4), 594-610.
Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 11(6), 671-684.
Darian, A. (2012). Taking Action! Movement-based Learning For the Kindergarten Through Grade Three Learner A Case Study of a Waldorf Education Early Childhood Program. Arizona State University.
Davydov, V. V. e. (1991). A psychological analysis of the operation of multiplication. V. Davydov, & LP Steffe, Soviet Studies in Mathematics Education, 6, 9-85.
Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement.
Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for research in mathematics education, 16(1), 3-17.
Fischer, U., Moeller, K., Bientzle, M., Cress, U., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2011). Sensori-motor spatial training of number magnitude representation. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 18(1), 177-183.
Flaherty, G. (1992). The Learning Curve. Why Textbook Teaching Doesn't Work for All Kids. Vocational Education Journal, 67(6), 32.
Frick-Horbury, D., & Guttentag, R. E. (1998). The effects of restricting hand gesture production on lexical retrieval and free recall. The American journal of psychology, 111(1), 43.
Fuller, E., Deshler, J., Darrah, M., Trujillo, M., & Wu, X. (2016). Anxiety and personality factors influencing the completion rates of developmental mathematics students. First conference of International Network for Didactic Research in University Mathematics,
Fuson, K. C. (2012). Children’s counting and concepts of number. Springer Science & Business Media.
Fuster, J. M. (2002). Cortex and mind: Unifying cognition. Oxford university press.
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 9(3), 558-565.
Glenberg, A. M., Witt, J. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2013). From the revolution to embodiment: 25 years of cognitive psychology. Perspectives on psychological science, 8(5), 573-585.
Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological science, 12(6), 516-522.
Goldin‐Meadow, S., & Sandhofer, C. M. (1999). Gestures convey substantive information about a child’s thoughts to ordinary listeners. Developmental Science, 2(1), 67-74.
Graham, J. A., & Heywood, S. (1975). The effects of elimination of hand gestures and of verbal codability on speech performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5(2), 189-195.
Greer, B. (1992). Multiplication and division as models of situations.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis(6th Ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hart, K. M., Brown, M., Kuchemann, D., Kerslake, D., Ruddock, G., & McCartney, M. (1981). Children's understanding of mathematics: 11-16. John Murray London.
Hoffman, B. (2010). “I think I can, but I'm afraid to try”: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and mathematics anxiety in mathematics problem-solving efficiency. Learning and individual differences, 20(3), 276-283.
Hu, F.-T., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2015). Getting the point: Tracing worked examples enhances learning. Learning and Instruction, 35, 85-93.
Ionescu, T., & Vasc, D. (2014). Embodied cognition: challenges for psychology and education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 275-280.
Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1997). What's communication got to do with it? Gesture in children blind from birth. Developmental psychology, 33(3), 453.
Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1998). Why people gesture when they speak. Nature, 396(6708), 228-228.
Iverson, J. M., & Goldin‐Meadow, S. (2001). The resilience of gesture in talk: Gesture in blind speakers and listeners. Developmental Science, 4(4), 416-422.
Kamii, C., & Joseph, L. L. (2004). Young children continue to reinvent arithmetic--2nd grade: Implications of Piaget's theory. Teachers College Press.
Kiefer, M., & Trumpp, N. M. (2012). Embodiment theory and education: The foundations of cognition in perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1(1), 15-20.
Kouba, V. L. (1989). Children's solution strategies for equivalent set multiplication and division word problems. Journal for research in mathematics education, 20(2), 147-158.
Krauss, R. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Current directions in psychological science, 7(2), 54-54.
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from (Vol. 6). New York: Basic Books.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal abouth Thought. Chicago University of Chicago Press.
Melinder, A., Konijnenberg, C., Hermansen, T., Daum, M. M., & Gredebäck, G. (2015). The developmental trajectory of pointing perception in the first year of life. Experimental Brain Research, 233(2), 641-647.
Moeller, K., Martignon, L., Wessolowski, S., Engel, J., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2011). Effects of finger counting on numerical development–the opposing views of neurocognition and mathematics education. Frontiers in psychology, 2, 328.
O'Brien, T. C., & Casey, S. A. (1983). Children Learning Multiplication Part I. School Science and Mathematics, 83(3), 246-251.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Seaman, M. A. (1995). The effect of time constraints and statistics test anxiety on test performance in a statistics course. The Journal of experimental education, 63(2), 115-124.
Pellecchia, G. L., Shockley, K., & Turvey, M. T. (2005). Concurrent cognitive task modulates coordination dynamics. Cognitive science, 29(4), 531-557.
Piaget, J. (1953). How children form mathematical concepts. Scientific American, 189(5), 74-79.
Piaget, J. (2013). Child's Conception of Number: Selected Works vol 2. Routledge.
Ping, R., & Goldin‐Meadow, S. (2010). Gesturing saves cognitive resources when talking about nonpresent objects. Cognitive science, 34(4), 602-619.
Pouw, W. T., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2014). An embedded and embodied cognition review of instructional manipulatives. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 51-72.
Rauscher, F. H., Krauss, R. M., & Chen, Y. (1996). Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological science, 7(4), 226-231.
Ravizza, S. (2003). Movement and lexical access: Do noniconic gestures aid in retrieval? Psychonomic bulletin & review, 10(3), 610-615.
Reiff, J. C. (1992). Learning Styles. What Research Says to the Teacher Series.
Riseborough, M. G. (1981). Physiographic gestures as decoding facilitators: Three experiments exploring a neglected facet of communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5(3), 172-183.
Russell, B. (1993). Introduction to mathematical philosophy. Courier Corporation.
Schwartz, J. L. (1988). Intensive quantity and referent transforming arithmetic operations. Research Agenda for Mathematics Education Number Concepts and Operations in the Middle Grades, 2, 41-52.
Sloutsky, V. M., Kaminski, J. A., & Heckler, A. F. (2005). The advantage of simple symbols for learning and transfer. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 12(3), 508-513.
Sriampai, P. (1988). Attitude toward mathematics, mathematics anxiety, and mathematics achievement related to gender and academic program University of Missouri-Columbia].
Steffe, L. P. (1988). Children’s construction of number sequences and multiplying schemes. Number concepts and operations in the middle grades, 2, 119-140.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2004). RETRACTED ARTICLE: Successful Intelligence in the Classroom. Theory into practice, 43(4), 274-280.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285.
Tran, C., Smith, B., & Buschkuehl, M. (2017). Support of mathematical thinking through embodied cognition: Nondigital and digital approaches. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 1-18.
Treffner, P., & Peter, M. (2002). Intentional and attentional dynamics of speech–hand coordination. Human Movement Science, 21(5-6), 641-697.
Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience MIT press. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Vergnaud, G. (1983). Multiplicative structures. In (Eds.) R. Lesh and M. Landau: Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes. In: London: Academic Press.
Wagner, S. M., Nusbaum, H., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). Probing the mental representation of gesture: Is handwaving spatial? Journal of memory and language, 50(4), 395-407.
Whitall, J. (1996). On the interaction of concurrent verbal and manual tasks: Which initial task conditions produce interference? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67(3), 349-354.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 9(4), 625-636.

中文文獻
江娟如 (2018)。互動式 APP-Plickers 融入國小二年級數學科教學之研究-以三位數的加減為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立清華大學教育與學習科技學系,新竹市。
呂玉琴 (1996)。國小學生的數與計算概念。 研習資訊,199602 (13:1),58-65。(教育部臺灣省國民學校教師研習會研習資訊雜誌社)
李佳芬, 顏榮泉, & 顏晴榮 (2013)。不同教學策略活化課程對國小三年級學童數學成就及其態度之影響。科學教育月刊(360),32-42。
汪雅惠 (2010)。以經驗察覺與歸納配合後設認知策略對多類型乘除題型的概念連結與教學之學習歷程及成效的研究-以國小二年級學童為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,
臺南市。
宋藍琪 (2007)。融入數學史教學對小五學生數學學習成效之實驗研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中大學,臺中市。
林勇吉 (2021)。數學與肢體運動: 應用體現認知於數學教學。臺灣數學教師, 42(1),17-28。
林碧珍 (1991)。國小兒童對於乘除法應用問題之認知結構。新竹師院學報,(5),221-288。
邱裕淵 (2000)。淺談乘法教學。師友月刊,(398),88-91。
洪千惠 (2005)。國小二年級學童整數乘法教材教學實驗之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院,新竹市。
徐永康 (2015)。全人教育與體現認知論(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
徐素貞 (2007)。探討教學前後正整數乘法的知識結構-以四年級為例(未出版之碩士論文), 臺中教育大學,臺中市。
高萌禪 (2016)。二年級學童乘法概念表現之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。 國立臺中教育大學,台中市。
國家教育研究院課程及教學研究中心 (2020)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校數學領域課程手冊。國家教育研究院課程及教學研究中心。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=197。
康軒文教事業股份有限公司 (2020a)。國民小學數學教師手冊(教學篇)。康軒文教事業股份有限公司。
康軒文教事業股份有限公司 (2020b)。國民小學數學教師手冊(資料篇)。康軒文教事業股份有限公司。
張俊彥, 李哲迪, 林碧珍, 張美玉, 張瑋寧, 曹博盛, 楊文金, 蕭儒棠, & 謝易伸 (2019)。TIMSS2019國際數學與科學教育成就趨勢調查國家報告。 取自 https://tilssc.naer.edu.tw/team/timss2019/resault。
張春興 (1988)。知之歷程與教之歷程: 認知心理學的發展及其在教育上的應用。教育心理學報,(21),17-38。
張春興 (1996)。教育心理學: 三化取向的理論與實踐。台北:東華。
教育部 (2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校-數學領域。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-14113, c1594-1.php。
教育部國民及學前教育署(2022)。108課綱資訊網十二年國民基本教育。
取自https://12basic.edu.tw/12about.php。
許佩婉 (2008)。歸納教學配合後設認知對乘法四類型概念理解的歷程及成效之研究-以國小二年級為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
許美華 (2000)。國小二年級學童正整數乘法問題解題活動類型之縱貫研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所,屏東市。
許清陽 (2001)。國小高年級學童數字常識發展之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所,嘉義市。
郭生玉 (1989)。心理與教育測驗。精華總經銷。
陳竹村 (1997)。數與計算教材設計對於乘法算則的一些看法。國民小學數學科新課程概說 (中年級)—協助兒童認知發展的數學課程。臺北:教育部臺灣省國民學校教師研習會。
陳孟婉 (2015)。電子教科書APP融入教學對國小二年級乘法學習之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
陳淑琳 (2002)。國小二年級學童乘法文字題解題歷程之研究–以屏東市一所國小為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。屏東師範學院,屏東市。
陳嘉皇 (2011)。設計一般化活動促進學童乘法概念理解。台灣數學教師(27),12-30。
陸貞苑 (2013)。單位量圖示法提升學童乘法能力之探討─ 以國小二年級為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
甯自強 (1992)。兒童的整數詞意義。第八屆科學教育年會。高雄市:國立高雄師範大學。
甯自強 (1994)。新課程對乘法啟蒙教材的處理。台北縣:台灣省國民學校教師研習會。
甯自強 (1998)。涂景翰的數概念。科學教育學刊,6(3), 255-269。
臺灣PISA國家研究中心(2022)。歷屆學生表現。取自
https://pisa.irels.ntnu.edu.tw/performed.html。
劉秋木 (2015)。國小數學科教學研究。台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
劉星麟 (2021)。數學繪本融入國小二年級乘法概念學習扶助之個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立清華大學,新竹市。
羅衣汝 (2020)。以萬用揭示板為輔具融入教學對國小二年級學童乘法 (二)單元表現之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
譚寧君 (1990)。兒童數學態度與解題能力之分析探討。文景。
譚寧君, & 涂金堂 (2000)。國小數學實驗班與非實驗班學生數學學習成效之比較研究。國立臺北師範學院學報,(13),397~434。
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *