帳號:guest(3.144.222.72)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):吳文琪
作者(外文):Wu, Wen-Chi
論文名稱(中文):十二年國教變革下國民小學校長認定領導、教師心理賦權與教師建言行為關係之研究
論文名稱(外文):The Relationships among School Principal’s Identity Leadership, Teacher’s Psychological Empowerment and Teacher’s Voice Behavior under the Reform of 12-Year Basic Education in Elementary Schools
指導教授(中文):謝傳崇
指導教授(外文):Hsieh, Chuan-Chung
口試委員(中文):葉連祺
吳勁甫
口試委員(外文):Yeh, Lain-Chyi
Wu, Jin-Fu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:教育行政碩士在職專班
學號:109093501
出版年(民國):111
畢業學年度:110
語文別:中文
論文頁數:94
中文關鍵詞:十二年國教校長認定領導教師心理賦權教師建言行為
外文關鍵詞:12-year basic educationprincipal’s identity leadershipteacher’s psychological empowermentteacher’s voice behavior
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:39
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
本研究旨在瞭解國小校長認定領導、教師心理賦權與教師建言行為的現況,並探討上述三者的相關情形。研究方法為文獻分析、問卷調查,研究對象為臺灣地區公立國民小學現職教師,以分層比例隨機抽樣方式,總計發出1084份問卷,回收884份,整體回收率81.5%;有效樣本共為672份。問卷回收後分別以描述性統計、Bootstrap,及結構方程模式進行資料分析。研究結果發現國小校長認定領導現況達中高度知覺,其中以「維護成員利益」表現最佳;教師心理賦權現況達中高度知覺,其中以「意義」表現最佳;教師建言行為現況達中高度知覺,其中以「促進性建言」表現最佳。此外,國小校長認定領導、教師心理賦權與教師建言行為三者之理論模式關係獲得支持,教師心理賦權具有中介效果。本研究依據結果建議校長經營校園認定關係,以提升認定領導效能;鼓勵教師專業進修,強化教師心理賦權;營造支持與信任氛圍,提升教師良善建言;運用校長認定領導,激發教師心理賦權,有效提升教師建言行為。
This study aims to investigate the current status and interrelationship of principal’s identity leadership, teacher’s psychological empowerment and teacher’s voice behavior under the reform of 12-year basic education in elementary schools. The research methods included literature review and questionnaire survey. The survey targeted teachers in Taiwan’s public elementary school. The study issued a total of 1084 questionnaires, with the return rate of 81.5%, among which there were 672 valid questionnaires. The data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, Bootstrap and structural equation modeling (SEM). The results show that currently principal’s identity leadership is middle and high perceived, especially for “Identity advancement: Doing it for us”. Secondly, teacher’s psychological empowerment is middle and high perceived, especially for “meaning”. Thirdly, teacher’s voice behavior is also middle and high perceived, especially for “promotive”. There is a moderate positive correlation between the principal’s identity leadership, teacher’s psychological empowerment and teacher’s voice behavior. In addition, theoretical models are supported among principal’s identity leadership, teacher’s psychological empowerment and teacher’s voice behavior. Furthermore, teacher’s psychological empowerment act as intermediary between two other factors. Based on the conclusions, it is suggested that principals should manage the identity relationship of the campus to enhance the identity leadership effectiveness; encouraging teachers' professional development, strengthen the teacher’s psychological empowerment; create an atmosphere of support and trust and enhance the teacher’s voice behavior; principal’s identity leadership can stimulate teacher’s psychological empowerment, which strongly improves teacher’s voice behavior.
目次

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題 5
第三節 名詞釋義 6
第四節 研究方法與步驟 8
第五節 研究範圍與限制 9
第二章 文獻探討 11
第一節 校長認定領導之意涵 11
第二節 教師心理賦權之意涵 14
第三節 教師建言行為之意涵 16
第四節 校長認定領導、教師心理賦權與教師建言行為之關係 19
第三章 研究設計與實施 29
第一節 研究架構 29
第二節 研究對象 31
第三節 研究工具 32
第四節 實施程序 34
第五節 資料處理與分析 35
第四章 研究結果與討論 37
第一節 國民小學校長認定領導、教師心理賦權與教師建言行為現況分析 37
第二節 不同背景之教師對於校長認定領導、教師心理賦權與教師建言行為差異情形之分析與討論 43
第三節 國民小學校長認定領導、教師心理賦權與教師建言行為相關情形 60
第四節 國民小學校長認定領導、教師心理賦權與教師建言行為之關係 64
第五章 結論與建議 71
第一節 結論 71
第二節 建議 76
參考文獻 81
壹、 中文部分 81
貳、 西文部分 82
附錄 90
附錄一 正式問卷 90
參考文獻
壹、 中文部分
王為國(2019)教師對十二年國民基本教育課程綱要實施的釋意。臺灣教育評論月刊, 8(10),31-36。
吳宗穎與丁學勤(2021)。十二年國教下學校領導者可採用的策略:析論教學領導、課程領導與學習領導。臺灣教育評論月刊,10(4),111-116。
吳清山(2019)。認同領導。教育研究月刊,307,118-119。
吳明隆與涂金堂(2012)。SPSS 與統計應用分析(二版)。五南。
林守紀、周麗芳、任金剛與曾春榮(2017)。員工建言行為:回顧與未來。人力資源管理學報, 17(1),1-33。
周麗芳、任金剛與林守紀(2013)。轉型領導與建言行為:文化價值觀的關鍵角色。組織與管理,6(2),115-159。
封子奇、王雪、金盛華、楊金花與彭芸爽(2014)。領導力的社會認同理論:主要內容及研究進展。心理學探新,34(2),166。
段錦雲與淩斌(2011)。中國背景下員工建言行為結構及中庸思維對其的影響。心理學報,43(10),1185–1197。
洪贊凱與曾鈺雯(2012)。從印象管理觀點探討組織個體政治技巧與建言行為之關係。人力資源管理學報,12(2),1-23。
楊君琦與毛雯慧(2018)。員工與主管適配度,心理賦權與建言行為關係之研究-職場友誼的調節角色。科技與人力教育季刊,5(1),1-24。
楊美玉與柯佑宗(2015)。人們為何能勇於建言?建言自我效能與團隊建言行為的效果。臺大管理論叢,25(3),39-66。
陳惠芳與陳怡菁(2006)。工作特性變動與心理賦權對組織承諾之影響研究-以民營化中之公營事業為例。人力資源管理學報,6(2),49-69。
教育部(2017)。攜手共進,十二年國教課綱之推動與落實。台北:教育部。線上檢索日期:2021年12月31日。取自:https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=5B918869ED5FEC0B
陳殷哲與蔡毓靜(2020)。情緒勞務與建言行為關係之研究-以主動性人格為調節變項。企業管理學報,45(4),33-61。
陳儒晰與林麗玲(2008)。幼兒園課程評鑑的教師賦權議題之探究。育達學院學報(15),39-60。
潘玉龍(2019)。學校創新經營在校務經營之評析。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(3),151-159。
游佳臻(2014)。員工建言行為回顧性研究。科技與人力教育季刊,1(2),20-32。
廖珮妏與呂辰軒(2019)。教師主動性人格增進其建言行為!由特質活化理論檢視知覺學校組織支持的潛在調節效果。管理實務與理論研究,13(1),1-21。
廖巍庭與吳恬妤(2020)。部屬工作投入、建言行為與工作壓力關係之研究:領導成員交換關係之調節。國防管理學報,41(1),77-92。
熊欣華、蔡年泰與陳建安(2013)。員工意見表達行為:前因及其對主管績效評量之影響。臺大管理論叢,23(2),133-163。
謝傳崇(2013)。卓越領導的核心信念:校長學術樂觀。臺灣教育評論月刊,2(5),30-32。
謝傳崇(2014)。國民小學校長正向領導對教師學術樂觀影響之研究—以學校創新文化為中介變項。學校行政,2,33-56。
謝傳崇(2021)。認定領導的意涵與發展。學校行政,131,106-117。

貳、 西文部分
Ashford, S. J., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Christianson, M. K. (2009). Leadership, voice, and silence. In J. Greenberg & M. S. Edwards (Eds.), Voice and silence in organizations: 175-201. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of social and clinical psychology, 4(3), 359-373.
Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of applied psychology, 88(1), 87.
Burris, E. R., Rockmann, K. W., & Kimmons, Y. S. (2017). The value of voice to managers: Employee identification and the content of voice. Academy of Management journal, 60(6), 2099-2125.
Blau, J. R., & Alba, R. D. (1982). Empowering nets of participation. Administrative science quarterly, 363-379.
Bowen, D., & Lawler, E. (1992). The empowerment of service workers: what, why, how, and when. Sloan Management Review, 33(3), 31-39.
Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1997). The micropolitical orientation of facilitative school principals and its effects on teachers’ sense of empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration.
Chan, W.-Y., Lau, S., Nie, Y., Lim, S., & Hogan, D. (2008). Organizational and Personal Predictors of Teacher Commitment: The Mediating Role of Teacher Efficacy and Identification With School. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 597-630. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208318259
Chen, A. S.-Y., & Hou, Y.-H. (2016). The effects of ethical leadership, voice behavior and climates for innovation on creativity: A moderated mediation examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.007
Chen, S.-J., Wang, M.-J., & Lee, S.-H. (2018). Transformational leadership and voice behaviors. Personnel Review, 47(3), 694-708. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-01-2017-0016
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of management review, 13(3), 471-482.
Corsun, D. L., & Enz, C. A. (1999). Predicting psychological empowerment among service workers: The effect of support-based relationships. Human relations, 52(2), 205-224.
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management journal, 50(4), 869-884.
Duan, J., Li, C., Xu, Y., & Wu, C. h. (2017). Transformational leadership and employee voice behavior: A Pygmalion mechanism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(5), 650-670.
Dundon, T., Wilkinson, A., Marchington, M., & Ackers, P. (2004). The meanings and purpose of employee voice. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(6), 1149-1170.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of research in personality, 19(2), 109-134.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Epitropaki, O., Kark, R., Mainemelis, C., & Lord, R. G. (2017). Leadership and followership identity processes: A multilevel review. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 104-129.
Ford, R. C., & Fottler, M. D. (1995). Empowerment: A matter of degree. Academy of Management Perspectives, 9(3), 21-29.
Forsyth, P. B., Adams, C. M., & Hoy, W. K. (2011). Collective trust. Why schools can’t improve.
Gao, L., Janssen, O., & Shi, K. (2011). Leader trust and employee voice: The moderating role of empowering leader behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(4), 787-798.
Gao, A., & Jiang, J. (2019). Perceived empowering leadership, harmonious passion, and employee voice: the moderating role of job autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1484.
Haslam, S. A. (2017). The social identity approach to education and learning: Identification, ideation, interaction, influence and ideology.
Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2020). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. Routledge.
Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and social psychology review, 5(3), 184-200.
House, R., Javidan, M., & Dorfman, P. (2001). Project GLOBE: An introduction. Applied Psychology, 50, 489–505.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states (Vol. 25). Harvard university press.
Janssen, O., & Gao, L. (2015). Supervisory responsiveness and employee self-perceived status and voice behavior. Journal of management, 41(7), 1854-1872.
Javed, B., Abdullah, I., Zaffar, M. A., ul Haque, A., & Rubab, U. (2019). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(4), 554-571.
Kõiv, K., Liik, K., & Heidmets, M. (2019). School leadership, teacher’s psychological empowerment and work-related outcomes. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(7), 1501-1514. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-08-2018-0232
Krug, H., Geibel, H. V., & Otto, K. (2020). Identity leadership and well-being: team identification and trust as underlying mechanisms. Leadership & Organization Development Journal.
Krug, H., Haslam, S. A., Otto, K., & Steffens, N. K. (2021). Identity Leadership, Social Identity Continuity, and Well-Being at Work During COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
Kuenzi, M., & Schminke, M. (2009). Assembling fragments into a lens: A review, critique, and proposed research agenda for the organizational work climate literature. Journal of management, 35(3), 634-717.
Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189-202.
Li, Y., Shi, Y., & Mao, Y. (2017). Empowering leadership and employee voice: The mediating role of psychological ownership. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 35, 140-145.
Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management journal, 55(1), 71-92.
Lee, A. N., & Nie, Y. (2013). Development and validation of the school leader empowering behaviours (SLEB) scale. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 485-495.
Lee, A. N., & Nie, Y. (2014). Understanding teacher empowerment: Teachers' perceptions of principal's and immediate supervisor's empowering behaviours, psychological empowerment and work-related outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41, 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.03.006
Landau, J. (2009). When employee voice is met by deaf ears. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 74(1), 4–28.
Mavor, K. I., Platow, M., & Bizumic, B. (2017). Self and social identity in educational contexts. Routledge New York.
Menon, S. T. (1999). Psychological empowerment: Definition, measurement, and validation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 31(3), 161.
Minai, M. H., Jauhari, H., Kumar, M., & Singh, S. (2020). Unpacking transformational leadership: dimensional analysis with psychological empowerment. Personnel Review.
Maynes, T. D., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2014). Speaking more broadly: An examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. Journal of applied psychology, 99(1), 87.
Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management annals, 5(1), 373-412.
Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: a cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of applied psychology, 96(1), 183.
Nemeth, C. J., & Staw, B. M. (1989). The tradeoffs of social control and innovation in groups and organizations. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 175-210). Elsevier.
Okyireh, M. A., & Simpeh, K. N. (2016). Exploring the Nature of Psychological Empowerment of Women Entrepreneurs in a Rural Setting in Greater Accra, Ghana. Journal of Business, 4(6), 138-141.
Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of management, 36(3), 633-662.
Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Jans, L. (2013). A single‐item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British journal of social psychology, 52(4), 597-617.
Postmes, T., Wichmann, L. J., van Valkengoed, A. M., & van der Hoef, H. (2019). Social identification and depression: A meta‐analysis. European journal of social psychology, 49(1), 110-126.
Prati, G., & Zani, B. (2013). The relationship between psychological empowerment and organizational identification. Journal of Community Psychology, 41(7), 851-866.
Qian, J., Li, X., Wang, B., Song, B., Zhang, W., Chen, M., & Qu, Y. (2018). A Role Theory Perspective on How and When Goal-Focused Leadership Influences Employee Voice Behavior [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1244). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01244
Quinn, R. E., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1997). The road to empowerment: Seven questions every leader should consider. Organizational dynamics, 26(2), 37-49.
Rusbult, C. E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous III, A. G. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of Management journal, 31(3), 599-627.
Sağnak, M. (2017). Ethical leadership and teachers’ voice behavior: The mediating roles of ethical culture and psychological safety. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(4).
Sherf, E. N., Parke, M. R., & Isaakyan, S. (2021). Distinguishing voice and silence at work: Unique relationships with perceived impact, psychological safety, and burnout. Academy of Management journal, 64(1), 114-148.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological methods, 7(4), 422.
Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., Platow, M. J., Fransen, K., Yang, J., Ryan, M. K., Jetten, J., Peters, K., & Boen, F. (2014). Leadership as social identity management: Introducing the Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) to assess and validate a four-dimensional model. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 1001-1024.
Steffens, N. K., Slade, E. L., Stevens, M., Haslam, S. A., & Rees, T. (2019). Putting the ‘we’into workout: The association of identity leadership with exercise class attendance and effort, and the mediating role of group identification and comfort. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 45, 101544.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483-504.
Spreitzer, G. M., & Doneson, D. (2005). Musings on the past and future of employee empowerment. Handbook of organizational development, 4, 5-10.
Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of applied psychology, 84(3), 416.
Sudman, S. (1976). Applied sampling (No. 04; HN29, S8.). New York: Academic Press.
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied psychology, 88(3), 500.
Tetik, N. (2016). The effects of psychological empowerment on job satisfaction and job performance of tourist guides. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(2), 221-239.
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management review, 15(4), 666-681.
Turnipseed, D. L., & VandeWaa, E. A. (2020). The little engine that could: The impact of psychological empowerment on organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior.
Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: The effects of personal control and organizational identification. Academy of Management journal, 51(6), 1189-1203.
Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2012). Ask and you shall hear (but not always): Examining the relationship between manager consultation and employee voice. Personnel Psychology, 65(2), 251-282.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergrop conflict. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations, 33–47. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. basil Blackwell.
Van Dick, R., Lemoine, J. E., Steffens, N. K., Kerschreiter, R., Akfirat, S. A., Avanzi, L., Dumont, K., Epitropaki, O., Fransen, K., & Giessner, S. (2018). Identity leadership going global: Validation of the Identity Leadership Inventory across 20 countries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(4), 697-728.
Van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 25, 243-295.
Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L. L., & Parks, J. M. (1995). Extra-role behaviors-in pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters). RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, VOL 17, 1995, 17, 215-285.
Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management journal, 41(1), 108-119.
Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of management studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.
Wei, X. Y., Hisrich, R. D., & Peng, X. (2020). Chinese employees' psychological empowerment and voice behavior: Organizational justice as a moderator [Article]. Social Behavior and Personality, 48(6), 12, Article e8792. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8792
Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American journal of community psychology, 23(5), 581-599.
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management journal, 44(4), 682-696.
Zheng, X., Zheng, X., & Tang, N. (2014). The impact on employees’ voice by employee medium recognition of integrals: Psychological empowerment as mediator [In Chinese]. Shanghai Management Science, 36, 78–82.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *