帳號:guest(3.148.102.84)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):林潤琪
作者(外文):Lin, Run-Qi
論文名稱(中文):企業污染排放與經營風險
論文名稱(外文):Corporate Pollution and Operating Risks
指導教授(中文):謝佩芳
指導教授(外文):Hsieh, Pei-Fang
口試委員(中文):潘虹華
王衍智
梁婉麗
口試委員(外文):Pan, Hong-Hua
Wang, Yan-Zhi
Liang, Woan-Lih
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:計量財務金融學系
學號:109071467
出版年(民國):112
畢業學年度:111
語文別:英文
論文頁數:37
中文關鍵詞:營運風險系統性風險企業污染現金流波動性
外文關鍵詞:operating riskpollution emissionsystematic riskcash flow volatility
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:39
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
本篇文章調查了台灣企業的污染排放是否對其營運風險有影響這一實證問題。我收集了台灣環境保護局(EPA)提供的企業的空氣、水、廢物和有毒污染排放情況。我發現,整體污染排放量大的公司將有更高的營運風險,提高了資本供應商的要求回報率。污染排放高的公司,如果現金持有量少,資產增長率快,對經營風險的影響就更大。經驗證據顯示,基礎風險和公司的污染排放之間有很強的關聯性。
This study investigates the empirical question of whether Taiwanese corporations' pollution emissions have an impact on their operating risk. I collect the air, water, waste, and toxic pollution emission of firms provided by the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) in Taiwan. I discover that companies with greater overall pollution emissions will have higher operating risks, raising the required rate of returns from capital suppliers. Firms with high pollution emissions that have less cash holding and faster asset growth rates have a greater influence on operating risk. The empirical evidence shows a strong correlation between foundational risk and the firm's pollution emissions.
Abstract-------I
摘要 -------II
致謝辭-------III
1. Introduction-------1
2. Literature-------5
2.1 Environmental Performance and Operating Risk-------5
2.2 Environmental Performance and Capital Suppliers’ Risk-------6
3. Methodology-------8
4. Hypothesis-------8
5. Data-------10
6. Empirical Result-------14
6.1 Baseline Result-------14
6.2 Channels-------16
6.3 Robustness Test-------18
7. Conclusion-------21
8. Reference-------23
9. Figure-------26
Figure 1-------26
Figure 2-------27
10. Table-------28
Table 1: Summary Statistic-------28
Table 2: Regression of Operating Risk and Total Pollution-------29
Table 3: Channel Results-------30
Table 4: Each Type of Pollution and Operating Risk-------32
Table 5: Each Type of Pollution and Equity Risk-------34
11. Appendix Table-------36
Table A-------36

Grimmer, M., & Bingham, T. (2013). Company environmental performance and consumer purchase intentions. Journal of business research, 66(10), 1945-1953.
Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management science, 65(10), 4451-4469.
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of marketing, 70(4), 1-18.
Hsu, P. H., Li, K., & Tsou, C. Y. (2023). The pollution premium. The journal of finance, 78(3), 1343-1392.
Jin, L., Merton, R. C., & Bodie, Z. (2006). Do a firm's equity returns reflect the risk of its pension plan. Journal of financial economics, 81(1), 1-26.
Chava, S. (2014). Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Management science, 60(9), 2223-2247.
Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk?. Journal of financial economics, 142(2), 517-549.
Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. T. (2020). Carbon premium around the world.
Garvey, G. T., Iyer, M., & Nash, J. (2018). Carbon footprint and productivity: does the “E” in ESG capture efficiency as well as environment. Journal of investment management, 16(1), 59-69.
Krüger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of financial economics, 115(2), 304-329.
Ottaviani, M., & Sørensen, P. N. (2015). Price reaction to information with heterogeneous beliefs and wealth effects: Underreaction, momentum, and reversal. American economic review, 105(1), 01-34.
Dunn, J., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2018). Assessing risk through environmental, social and governance exposures. Journal of investment management, 16(1), 4-17.
Ilhan, E., Sautner, Z., & Vilkov, G. (2021). Carbon tail risk. The review of financial studies, 34(3), 1540-1571.
Hoepner, A. G., Oikonomou, I., Sautner, Z., Starks, L. T., & Zhou, X. (2018). ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk.
Hong, H., Wang, N., & Yang, J. (2021). Welfare consequences of sustainable finance (No. w28595). National bureau of economic research.
Heinkel, R., Kraus, A., & Zechner, J. (2001). The effect of green investment on corporate behavior. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 36(4), 431-449.
Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of banking & finance, 35(7), 1794-1810.
Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2014). The effects of corporate social performance on the cost of corporate debt and credit ratings. Financial review, 49(1), 49-75.
Pástor, Ľ., Stambaugh, R. F., & Taylor, L. A. (2021). Sustainable investing in equilibrium. Journal of financial economics, 142(2), 550-571.
El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of banking & finance, 35(9), 2388-2406.
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009). The debate over doing good: Corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of marketing, 73(6), 198-213.
Mandelker, G. N., & Rhee, S. G. (1984). The impact of the degrees of operating and financial leverage on systematic risk of common stock. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 19(1), 45-57.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *