|
1. Sah, C.-T., R.N. Noyce, and W. Shockley, Carrier generation and recombination in pn junctions and pn junction characteristics. Proceedings of the IRE, 1957. 45(9): p. 1228-1243. 2. ; Available from: https://www.pveducation.org/pvcdrom/solar-cell-operation/iv-curve. 3. Chirilă, A., et al., Potassium-induced surface modification of Cu (In, Ga) Se2 thin films for high-efficiency solar cells. Nature materials, 2013. 12(12): p. 1107-1111. 4. Salomé, P., et al., Mo bilayer for thin film photovoltaics revisited. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2010. 43(34): p. 345501. 5. Contreras, M.A., et al., ACCELERATED PUBLICATION: Diode characteristics in state‐of‐the‐art ZnO/CdS/Cu (In1− xGax) Se2 solar cells. Progress in photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2005. 13(3): p. 209-216. 6. Lundberg, O., M. Edoff, and L. Stolt, The effect of Ga-grading in CIGS thin film solar cells. Thin Solid Films, 2005. 480: p. 520-525. 7. Lavrenko, T., T. Ott, and T. Walter, Impact of sulfur and gallium gradients on the performance of thin film Cu (In, Ga)(Se, S) 2 solar cells. Thin Solid Films, 2015. 582: p. 51-55. 8. Kato, T., Cu (In, Ga)(Se, S) 2 solar cell research in Solar Frontier: Progress and current status. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 2017. 56(4S): p. 04CA02. 9. Shay, J., S. Wagner, and H. Kasper, Efficient CuInSe2/CdS solar cells. Applied Physics Letters, 1975. 27(2): p. 89-90. 10. Gabor, A.M., et al., High‐efficiency CuIn x Ga1− x Se2 solar cells made from (In x, Ga1− x) 2Se3 precursor films. Applied physics letters, 1994. 65(2): p. 198-200. 11. Kamada, R., et al. New world record Cu (In, Ga)(Se, S) 2 thin film solar cell efficiency beyond 22%. in 2016 IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC). 2016. IEEE. 12. Jackson, P., et al., Effects of heavy alkali elements in Cu (In, Ga) Se2 solar cells with efficiencies up to 22.6%. physica status solidi (RRL)–Rapid Research Letters, 2016. 10(8): p. 583-586. 13. Repins, I., et al., 19· 9%‐efficient ZnO/CdS/CuInGaSe2 solar cell with 81· 2% fill factor. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and applications, 2008. 16(3): p. 235-239. 14. Romeo, A., et al., Development of thin‐film Cu (In, Ga) Se2 and CdTe solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2004. 12(2‐3): p. 93-111. 15. Kapur, V., U. Choudary, and A.K. Chu, Process of forming a compound semiconductive material. 1986. 16. Witte, W., et al., Gallium gradients in Cu (In, Ga) Se2 thin‐film solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2015. 23(6): p. 717-733. 17. Wang, Y.-H., et al., Surface Sulfurization of Cu (In, Ga) Se2 Solar Cells by Cosputtering In2S3 in the One-Step Sputtering Process. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2021. 4(10): p. 11555-11563. 18. Li, W., et al., Numerical analysis of the back interface for high efficiency wide band gap chalcopyrite solar cells. Solar Energy, 2019. 180: p. 207-215. 19. Kohara, N., et al., Electrical properties of the cu (in, ga) se2/MoSe2/mo structure. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2001. 67(1-4): p. 209-215. 20. Ong, K.H., et al., Review on substrate and molybdenum back contact in CIGS thin film solar cell. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2018. 2018. 21. Hsiao, K.-J., et al., Electrical impact of MoSe 2 on CIGS thin-film solar cells. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2013. 15(41): p. 18174-18178. 22. Karade, V., et al., Insights into kesterite's back contact interface: A status review. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2019. 200: p. 109911. 23. Zhu, X., et al., Determining factor of MoSe2 formation in Cu (In, Ga) Se2 solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2012. 101: p. 57-61. 24. He, Z., et al., Energy band alignment in molybdenum Oxide/Cu (In, Ga) Se2 interface for high-efficiency ultrathin Cu (In, Ga) Se2 solar cells from low-temperature growth. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2020. 3(4): p. 3408-3414. 25. Zeng, L., et al., Significant Passivation Effect of Cu (In, Ga) Se2 Solar Cells via Back Contact Surface Modification Using Oxygen Plasma. Solar RRL, 2021. 5(3): p. 2000572. 26. Greiner, M.T., et al., Transition metal oxide work functions: the influence of cation oxidation state and oxygen vacancies. Advanced Functional Materials, 2012. 22(21): p. 4557-4568. 27. López-Marino, S., et al., The importance of back contact modification in Cu2ZnSnSe4 solar cells: the role of a thin MoO2 layer. Nano Energy, 2016. 26: p. 708-721. 28. Lin, S., et al., Adjustment of alkali element incorporations in Cu (In, Ga) Se2 thin films with wet chemistry Mo oxide as a hosting reservoir. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2018. 174: p. 16-24. 29. Kotipalli, R., et al., Addressing the impact of rear surface passivation mechanisms on ultra-thin Cu (In, Ga) Se2 solar cell performances using SCAPS 1-D model. Solar Energy, 2017. 157: p. 603-613. 30. Salome, P.M., et al., Passivation of interfaces in thin film solar cells: Understanding the effects of a nanostructured rear point contact layer. Advanced Materials Interfaces, 2018. 5(2): p. 1701101. 31. Hanket, G., et al., Incongruent reaction of Cu–(InGa) intermetallic precursors in H 2 Se and H 2 S. Journal of Applied Physics, 2007. 102(7): p. 074922. 32. Han, A., et al., Improvement of Ga distribution in Cu (In, Ga)(S, Se) 2 film by pretreated Mo back contact. Solar energy, 2018. 162: p. 109-116. 33. Abou-Ras, D., et al., Formation and characterisation of MoSe2 for Cu (In, Ga) Se2 based solar cells. Thin Solid Films, 2005. 480: p. 433-438. 34. Li, H., et al., Texture control and growth mechanism of WSe2 film prepared by rapid selenization of W film. Applied Surface Science, 2017. 394: p. 142-148. 35. Mao, X., et al., Growth controlling behavior of vertically aligned MoSe2 film. Applied Surface Science, 2019. 487: p. 719-725. 36. Shin, B., N.A. Bojarczuk, and S. Guha, On the kinetics of MoSe2 interfacial layer formation in chalcogen-based thin film solar cells with a molybdenum back contact. Applied Physics Letters, 2013. 102(9): p. 091907. 37. Liu, Y.-J., C.-Y. Ou, and C.-H. Lu, Effects of Mo films prepared via different sputtering conditions on the formation of MoSe2 during selenization. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2018. 747: p. 621-628. 38. Yoon, J.H., et al., Electrical properties of CIGS/Mo junctions as a function of MoSe2 orientation and Na doping. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2014. 22(1): p. 90-96. 39. Gao, S., et al., Tailoring Mo (S, Se) 2 structure for high efficient Cu2ZnSn (S, Se) 4 solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2018. 176: p. 302-309. 40. Li, W., et al., Effect of sodium diffusion on the properties of CIGS solar absorbers prepared using elemental Se in a two-step process. Scientific reports, 2019. 9(1): p. 1-11. 41. Mirhosseini, H., et al., Reducing the Schottky barrier height at the MoSe2/Mo (110) interface in thin-film solar cells: Insights from first-principles calculations. Thin Solid Films, 2016. 606: p. 143-147. 42. Zhang, A., et al., Engineering the band offsets at the back contact interface for efficient kesterite CZTSSe solar cells. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2020. 3(11): p. 10976-10982. 43. Zhang, X., et al., Influence of WSe2 buffer layer at back electrode on performance of Cu2ZnSn (S, Se) 4 solar cells. Solar Energy, 2020. 199: p. 128-135. 44. Liu, H., et al., A vertical WSe 2–MoSe 2 p–n heterostructure with tunable gate rectification. RSC advances, 2018. 8(45): p. 25514-25518. 45. Kim, H.J., et al., Tuning of Thermoelectric Properties of MoSe2 Thin Films Under Helium Ion Irradiation. Nanoscale Research Letters, 2022. 17(1): p. 1-8. 46. Yu, Z.G., B.I. Yakobson, and Y.-W. Zhang, Realizing indirect-to-direct band gap transition in few-layer two-dimensional MX2 (M= Mo, W; X= S, Se). ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2018. 1(8): p. 4115-4121. 47. Bouttemy, M., et al., Thinning of CIGS solar cells: Part I: Chemical processing in acidic bromine solutions. Thin Solid Films, 2011. 519(21): p. 7207-7211.
|