帳號:guest(18.227.105.140)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):林子馨
作者(外文):Lin, Tzu-Shin
論文名稱(中文):自紙本及平板電腦介入教學之觀點探討台灣書寫困難兒童的書寫歷程展現
論文名稱(外文):An Investigation of the Handwriting Development of the Taiwanese Children with Written Language Disorders from the Perspectives of Paper and Tablet Computer Interventions
指導教授(中文):楊叔卿
指導教授(外文):Young, Shelley Shwu-Ching
口試委員(中文):楊接期
江惠綾
口試委員(外文):Yang, Jie-Chi
Chiang, Huey-Ling
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:學習科學與科技研究所
學號:108291502
出版年(民國):110
畢業學年度:109
語文別:中文
論文頁數:195
中文關鍵詞:書寫歷程平板介入教學組字規則
外文關鍵詞:Handwriting progressTablet-based learningOrthographic knowledge
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:150
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
書寫是個體將思想以文字紀錄及傳承的行為,不但是一種複雜的心理動作技巧,同時也是學齡兒童展現學習成果的主要管道,其重要性不可言喻。然而對於台灣書寫困難兒童來說,目前不但書寫相關治療與教學上的針對性資源不足,國內外的漢字書寫歷程的研究更是缺乏,使得書寫困難兒童長期無法獲得有效的學習資源。因此,本研究以書寫困難兒童之錯字表現出發,探討(1)整體、(2)介入教學與否以及(3)使用不同教學媒材對於其漢字書寫歷程的影響。
本實驗採平衡對抗設計,以依照三種漢字組字規則挑選各16個、共48個高頻常用漢字做為教學內容,並以新北市一所醫院收案之21位國小一到六年級的書寫困難學齡兒童作為研究對象,進行為期六週、總介入時長為六小時的12堂書寫介入課程。個案被分成實驗組與控制組,分別以不同的順序接受紙本和平板電腦等兩個階段的介入教學。在實驗前、後以及更換介入教學方法時,每位個案皆會進行識寫字相關測驗,作為了解現階段書寫能力的主要評量工具。為探討書寫歷程,本研究進一步將測驗中的書寫表現依照書寫意圖以及書寫型態進行標記,而後根據此標記進行量化的結果探討。
實驗結果經量化與質性的分析後,本研究發現除了顯著的學習成效外,個案的錯誤書寫意圖及型態皆以穩定的比例於下次的測驗中書寫正確,並發現錯誤的書寫意圖與書寫型態之表現應獨立討論,與過去研究所提出之「錯字先於別字」觀點有所不同。另外,從整體書寫表現之進步幅度來看,推測組字結構規則不僅是漢字識字的重要里程碑,亦有助於書寫能力的提升。最後,儘管在本次實驗中平板電腦介入後的書寫表現仍有顯著提升,其書寫正確率進步幅度卻顯著低於紙本介入教學的成效。
綜合上述,本研究之結果提供未來在漢字書寫歷程、台灣書寫困難兒童之書寫介入教學、平板電腦介入教學等研究之研究方向與實驗設計之參考。
Handwriting is the action that individuals record their thoughts into written language. It is not only a complex psychological-motor skill, but also the primary medium for school-age children to express their learning outcomes. However, Taiwanese children with written language disorders (TCWLD) are lack of suitable interventions and instructions nowadays; moreover, less researches have studied Chinese handwriting development progress. Therefore, this study aimed to discover how (1) the overall, (2) the interventional instruction, and (3) different instructional mediums contribute to Chinese handwriting development progress.
By applying a counter-balanced experiment design, this study involved 48 Chinese characters from three Chinese structural rules as the learning contents; 21 TCWLD participants studying primary school were recruited in this experiment, and all of them had completed a total of 6 hours handwriting intervention. Participants were equally distributed into experimental and control groups, which two groups conducted APP and paper-based instructions in different order. Evaluations were taken before, in the middle of, and after the intervention; to discover handwriting progress, handwriting products from the three evaluations were tagged by intent and shape.
Beside significant learning outcomes, results showed that handwriting products in each intent and shape classes transferred into correct conventional characters steadily over the experiment. More, this finding didn’t support the idea of ‘writing incorrect shape of characters develops before incorrect usage of characters’ raised by past researches; discussion across handwriting intention and shape development should be made independently. Meanwhile, providing Chinese orthographic structural rules as a strategy seems to be effective in enhancing handwriting outcomes. Lastly, although the outcomes coming from APP instructions had raised significantly, the progress of correctness was statistically lower than those measured in paper-based instructions.
In conclusion, aforementioned results may provide some suggestions for future studies that relate to Chinese handwriting development, intervention, APP and technology-based instructional design.
摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
致謝 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 VI
圖目錄 IX
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 6
1.3 研究問題 7
1.4 名詞解釋 8
1.5 研究範圍與限制 11
第二章 文獻探討 12
2.1 書寫歷程 12
2.2 漢字書寫歷程 21
2.3 鷹架策略 35
2.4 行動載具介入學習 44
第三章 研究方法 57
3.1 研究設計與架構 57
3.2 研究對象與場域 60
3.3 研究流程 64
3.4 研究工具 71
3.5 資料分析與檢核 74
第四章 書寫鷹架APP系統設計 82
4.1 書寫鷹架APP架構及使用說明 82
4.2 書寫鷹架APP學習內容設計 84
4.3 書寫鷹架APP教學鷹架設計 92
第五章 資料分析與討論 95
5.1 個案背景資料分析 95
5.2 整體書寫歷程 100
5.3 介入教學書寫歷程 113
5.4 平板電腦及書寫鷹架APP書寫歷程 130
5.5 討論 151
第六章 研究結論與未來展望 157
6.1 研究結論 157
6.2 研究建議 160
6.3 未來展望 161
第七章 參考文獻 163
中文部分 163
英文部分 166
附錄一 兒童研究知情同意書 175
附錄二 成人研究知情同意書 179
附錄三 前/後測內容 185
附錄四 紙本教材範例 191

Aguayo, C., Cochrane, T., & Narayan, V. (2017). Key themes in mobile learning: Prospects for learner-generated learning through AR and VR. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(6).
Almaiah, M. A., & Al Mulhem, A. (2019). Analysis of the essential factors affecting of intention to use of mobile learning applications: A comparison between universities adopters and non-adopters. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1433-1468.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
Aragón-Mendizábal, E., Delgado-Casas, C., Navarro-Guzmán, J. I., Menacho-Jiménez, I., & Romero-Oliva, M. F. (2016). A comparative study of handwriting and computer typing in note-taking by university students. Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal, 24(2).
Bartolomeo, P., Bachoud-Lévi, A. C., Chokron, S., & Degos, J. D. (2002). Visually-and motor-based knowledge of letters: Evidence from a pure alexic patient. Neuropsychologia, 40(8), 1363-1371.
Bernacki, M. L., Greene, J. A., & Crompton, H. (2020). Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101827.
Berninger, V. W., Mizokawa, D. T., & Bragg, R. (1991). Scientific practitioner: Theory-based diagnosis and remediation of writing disabilities. Journal of school psychology, 29(1), 57-79.
Berninger, V. W., & Richards, T. L. (2002). Brain literacy for educators and psychologists. Elsevier.
Biotteau, M., Danna, J., Baudou, É., Puyjarinet, F., Velay, J. L., Albaret, J. M., & Chaix, Y. (2019). Developmental coordination disorder and dysgraphia: signs and symptoms, diagnosis, and rehabilitation. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 15, 1873.
Bloodgood, J. W. (1999). What's in a name? Children's name writing and literacy acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(3), 342-367.
Cao, F., Brennan, C., & Booth, J. R. (2015). The brain adapts to orthography with experience: evidence from English and Chinese. Developmental Science, 18(5), 785-798.
Cao, F., Vu, M., Lung Chan, D. H., Lawrence, J. M., Harris, L. N., Guan, Q., ... & Perfetti, C. A. (2013). Writing affects the brain network of reading in Chinese: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Human Brain Mapping, 34(7), 1670-1684.
Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development.
Chan, L., & Nunes, T. (1998). Children's understanding of the formal and functional characteristics of written Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(1), 115-131.
Chang, L. Y., Chen, Y. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (2018). GraphCom: A multidimensional measure of graphic complexity applied to 131 written languages. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 427-449.
Chen, C. H., Liu, G. Z., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). Interaction between gaming and multistage guiding strategies on students' field trip mobile learning performance and motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1032-1050.
Chen, C. M., Chen, L. C., & Yang, S. M. (2019). An English vocabulary learning app with self-regulated learning mechanism to improve learning performance and motivation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 237-260.
Chen, G. D., Chang, C. K., & Wang, C. Y. (2008). Ubiquitous learning website: Scaffold learners by mobile devices with information-aware techniques. Computers & education, 50(1), 77-90.
Chen, Z., & Zhou, B. (2012, September). Effective radical segmentation of offline handwritten Chinese characters towards constructing personal handwritten fonts. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM symposium on Document engineering (pp. 107-116).
Chung, C. J., Hwang, G. J., & Lai, C. L. (2019). A review of experimental mobile learning research in 2010–2016 based on the activity theory framework. Computers & education, 129, 1-13.
Chung, P. J., Patel, D. R., & Nizami, I. (2020). Disorder of written expression and dysgraphia: definition, diagnosis, and management. Translational pediatrics, 9(Suppl 1), S46.
Clay, M. M. (1966). Emergent reading behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1988). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 8(1), 2-10.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 53-64.
Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Gregory, K. H. (2017). The use of mobile learning in PK-12 education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 110, 51-63.
Davis, E. A., & Miyake, N. (2004). Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems. The journal of the learning sciences, 13(3), 265-272.
Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333(6045), 959-964.
Dinehart, L. H. (2015). Handwriting in early childhood education: Current research and future implications. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15(1), 97-118.
Döhla, D., & Heim, S. (2016). Developmental dyslexia and dysgraphia: What can we learn from the one about the other? Frontiers in psychology, 6, 2045.
Eberhand, D. M., Simons, G. F., & Fenning, C. D. (2020). Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 23rd edn. Dallas, TX: SIL International.
Feder, K. P., & Majnemer, A. (2007). Handwriting development, competency, and intervention. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49(4), 312-317.
Ferreiro, E. & Teberosky, N. (1982). Literacy before schooling. Portsmough, NH: Heinemann.
Frith, U. (1986). A developmental framework for developmental dyslexia. Annals of dyslexia, 36(1), 67-81.
Fu, Q. K., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Trends in mobile technology-supported collaborative learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016. Computers & Education, 119, 129-143.
Gangaiamaran, R., & Pasupathi, M. (2017). Review on use of mobile apps for language learning. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(21), 11242-11251.
Gauvain, M. (2020). Vygotsky's sociocultural theory. Encyclopedia of Infant and Early Childhood Development, 404-413
Ge, J., Peng, G., Lyu, B., Wang, Y., Zhuo, Y., Niu, Z., ... & Gao, J. H. (2015). Cross-language differences in the brain network subserving intelligible speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(10), 2972-2977.
Graham, S. (1992). Issues in handwriting instruction. Focus on exceptional children, 25(2).
Graham, S. (1999). Handwriting and spelling instruction for students with learning disabilities: A review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(2), 78-98.
Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277-303.
Graham, S., Berninger, V., Weintraub, N., & Schafer, W. (1998). Development of handwriting speed and legibility in grades 1–9. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(1), 42-52.
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Fink, B. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of educational psychology, 92(4), 620.
Grissmer, D., Grimm, K. J., Aiyer, S. M., Murrah, W. M., & Steele, J. S. (2010). Fine motor skills and early comprehension of the world: two new school readiness indicators. Developmental psychology, 46(5), 1008.
Hamstra-Bletz, L., & Blöte, A. W. (1993). A longitudinal study on dysgraphic handwriting in primary school. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(10), 689-699.
Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, 2, 115-140.
Haßler, B., Major, L., & Hennessy, S. (2016). Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2), 139-156.
Ho, C. A. (2011). Major Developmental Characteristics of Children's Name Writing and Relationships with Fine Motor Skills and Emergent Literacy Skills (Doctoral dissertation).
Ho, C. S. H., Yau, P. W. Y., & Au, A. (2003). Development of orthographic knowledge and its relationship with reading and spelling among Chinese kindergarten and primary school children. Reading Development in Chinese Children. Greenwood.
Hoy, M. M., Egan, M. Y., & Feder, K. P. (2011). A systematic review of interventions to improve handwriting. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78(1), 13-25.
Hsieh, Y. C. (2017). A case study of the dynamics of scaffolding among ESL learners and online resources in collaborative learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 115-132.
Hwang, G. J., & Fu, Q. K. (2019). Trends in the research design and application of mobile language learning: A review of 2007–2016 publications in selected SSCI journals. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 567-581.
James, K. H., & Engelhardt, L. (2012). The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in pre-literate children. Trends in neuroscience and education, 1(1), 32-42.
Janson, A., Sӧllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2020). Ladders for Learning: Is Scaffolding the Key to Teaching Problem-Solving in Technology-Mediated Learning Contexts? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(4), 439-468.
Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in learning technology, 20(1), n1.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of instructional development, 10(3), 2-10.
Keogh, B. K., & Smith, C. E. (1967). Visuo-motor ability for school prediction: A seven-year study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 25(1), 101-110.
Kiresuk, T. J., & Sherman, R. E. (1968). Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community mental health journal, 4(6), 443-453.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., Lee, H., & Norris, L. (2017). Mobile learning revolution: Implications for language pedagogy. The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning, 217-233.
Lai, C. H., Jong, B. S., Hsia, Y. T., & Lin, T. W. (2020). Integrating Flash Cards with Narratives for Mobile Learning of English Vocabulary. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(4), 4-16.
Lam, H. C. (2006). Orthographic awareness in learning Chinese characters. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Hong Kong.
Lam, S. S., Au, R. K., Leung, H. W., & Li-Tsang, C. W. (2011). Chinese handwriting performance of primary school children with dyslexia. Research in developmental disabilities, 32(5), 1745-1756.
Leong, D. J. (1998). Scaffolding emergent writing in the zone of proximal development. Literacy, 3(2), 1.
Li, L., Mok, M. M. C., & Wu, W. (2019). Chinese writing development of Kindergarten students over 12 months. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development.
Linda, F. L., Thanapalan, K. C., & Chan, C. C. (2014). Visual-perceptual-kinesthetic inputs on influencing writing performances in children with handWritten Language Disorders. Research in developmental disabilities, 35(2), 340-347.
Liu, Y., & Liu, D. (2020). Morphological awareness and orthographic awareness link Chinese writing to reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 1-20.
Longcamp, M., Boucard, C., Gilhodes, J. C., Anton, J. L., Roth, M., Nazarian, B., & Velay, J. L. (2008). Learning through hand-or typewriting influences visual recognition of new graphic shapes: Behavioral and functional imaging evidence. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 20(5), 802-815.
Luria, A. R. (1977). The development of writing in the child. Soviet Psychology, 16(2), 65-114.
Ma, L., Xiao, B., & Wang, C. (2010, September). Sparse representation based on K-nearest neighbor classifier for degraded Chinese character recognition. In Pacific-Rim Conference on Multimedia (pp. 506-514). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Major, L., Haßler, B., & Hennessy, S. (2017). Tablet use in schools: impact, affordances and considerations. In Handbook on digital learning for K-12 schools (pp. 115-128). Springer, Cham.
Mangen, A., Anda, L. G., Oxborough, G. H., & Brønnick, K. (2015). Handwriting versus keyboard writing: effect on word recall. Journal of writing research, 7(2).
Martens, P. (1996). I already know how to read: A child᾽s view of literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Mayes, S. D., Breaux, R. P., Calhoun, S. L., & Frye, S. S. (2019). High prevalence of dysgraphia in elementary through high school students with ADHD and autism. Journal of attention disorders, 23(8), 787-796.
McBride-Chang, C. (2004). Children's literacy development. London, England: Edward Arnold/Oxford Press.
Miller, H. B., & Cuevas, J. A. (2017). Mobile Learning and its Effects on Academic Achievement and Student Motivation in Middle Grades Students. International Journal for the Scholarship of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2), 91-110.
Mogali, S. R., Vallabhajosyula, R., Ng, C. H., Lim, D., Ang, E. T., & Abrahams, P. (2019). Scan and learn: quick response code enabled museum for mobile learning of anatomy and pathology. Anatomical sciences education, 12(6), 664-672.
Motiwalla, L. F. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers & education, 49(3), 581-596.
Naka, M. (1998). Repeated writing facilitates children’s memory for pseudocharacters and foreign letters. Memory and Cognition, 26, 804-809.
Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (2003). Exploring technology-mediated learning from a pedagogical perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 11(2), 111-126.
Ozdamli, F., & Cavus, N. (2011). Basic elements and characteristics of mobile learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 937-942.
Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Keeping the metaphor of scaffolding fresh—a response to C. Addison Stone's “The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities”. Journal of learning disabilities, 31(4), 370-373.
Parsazadeh, N., Ali, R., & Rezaei, M. (2018). A framework for cooperative and interactive mobile learning to improve online information evaluation skills. Computers & Education, 120, 75-89.
Patchan, M. M., & Puranik, C. S. (2016). Using tablet computers to teach preschool children to write letters: Exploring the impact of extrinsic and intrinsic feedback. Computers & education, 102, 128-137.
Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The journal of the learning sciences, 13(3), 423-451.
Puranik, C. S., & AlOtaiba, S. (2012). Examining the contribution of handwriting and spelling to written expression in kindergarten children. Reading and writing, 25(7), 1523-1546.
Purcell, K., Buchanan, J., & Friedrich, L. (2013). The impact of digital tools on student writing and how writing is taught in schools. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
Qian, K., Owen, N., & Bax, S. (2018). Researching mobile-assisted Chinese-character learning strategies among adult distance learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 56-71.
Quintana, C., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2002). Scaffolding Design Guidelines for Learner-Centered Software Environments. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Qureshi, M. I., Khan, N., Hassan Gillani, S. M. A., & Raza, H. (2020). A Systematic Review of Past Decade of Mobile Learning: What we Learned and Where to Go. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(6).
Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2017). State of the app: A taxonomy and framework for evaluating language learning mobile applications. CALICO journal, 34(2), 243-258.
Siebner, H. R., Limmer, C., Peinemann, A., Bartenstein, P., Drzezga, A., & Conrad, B. (2001). Brain correlates of fast and slow handwriting in humans: A PET–performance correlation analysis. European Journal of Neuroscience, 14(4), 726-736.
Siok, W. T., Niu, Z., Jin, Z., Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (2008). A structural–functional basis for dyslexia in the cortex of Chinese readers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(14), 5561-5566.
Shin, S., Brush, T. A., & Glazewski, K. D. (2020). Patterns of peer scaffolding in technology-enhanced inquiry classrooms: application of social network analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2321-2350.
Suartama, I. K., Setyosari, P., & Ulfa, S. (2019). Development of an Instructional Design Model for Mobile Blended Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(16).
Sulzby, E., Buhl, R., & Kaiser, E. (1999). Kindergarten literature program (KLP): Supporting staff development [Videotape and print series]. Madison, WI: Comprehensive Regional Assistance Center, Region VI.
Sung, Y. T., Lee, H. Y., Yang, J. M., & Chang, K. E. (2019). The quality of experimental designs in mobile learning research: A systemic review and self-improvement tool. Educational Research Review, 28, 100279.
Ta’amneh, M. A. A. A. (2017). The effect of using WhatsApp messenger in learning English language among university students. International Research in Education, 5(1), 143-151.
Tan, L. H., Hoosain, R., & Siok, W. W. (1996). Activation of phonological codes before access to character meaning in written Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(4), 865-882.
Tan, L. H., Spinks, J. A., Eden, G. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Siok, W. T. (2005). Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(24), 8781-8785.
Teale, W. H., & Sulzby, E. (1986). Emergent Literacy: Writing and Reading. Writing Research: Multidisciplinary Inquiries into the Nature of Writing Series. Ablex Publishing Corporation, 355 Chestnut St., Norwood, NJ 07648.
Traxler, J., & Wishart, J. (2011). Making mobile learning work: Case studies of practice. Bristol: ESCalate, HEA Subject Centre for Education, University of Bristol. Retrieved from http://escalate.ac.uk/8250
Tse, L. F. L., Siu, A. M. H., & Li-Tsang, C. W. P. (2019). Assessment of early handwriting skill in kindergarten children using a Chinese name writing test. Reading and Writing, 32(2), 265-284.
Tseng, M. H. (1993). Factorial validity of the Tseng handwriting problem checklist. Journal of the Occupational Therapy Association of the Republic of China, 11, 13-26.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and word.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
Weekes, B. S., Yin, W., Su, I. F., & Chen, M. J. (2006). The cognitive neuropsychology of reading and writing in Chinese. Language and Linguistic, 7(3), 595-617.
Winters, N. (2007). What is mobile learning. Big issues in mobile learning, 7-11.
Wong, L. H., & Hsu, C. K. (2016). Effects of learning styles on learners’ collaborative patterns in a mobile-assisted, Chinese character-forming game based on a flexible grouping approach. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(1), 61-77.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.
Xu, Q., & Peng, H. (2017). Investigating mobile-assisted oral feedback in teaching Chinese as a second language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3-4), 173-182.
Yeh, S. L. (2000). Structure detection of Chinese characters: Visual search slope as an index of similarity between different-structured characters. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 191-216.
Yoon, S. A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Van Schooneveld, J. B., & Anderson, E. (2013). Scaffolding informal learning in science museums: How much is too much? Science Education, 97(6), 848-877.
王韋鈞,唐榮昌(2015)。意義化識字教學法對國小學習障礙學生識字成效探討。雲嘉特教期刊,(21),45-52。
王淑靜(2018)。語音提示系統對高職階段智能障礙學生功能性詞彙學習成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,1-96。
王雪紛(2019)。語詞對對碰─中年級識字桌遊教學。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(4),69-78。
古巧君(2018)。多媒體電腦輔助部首色塊聲音識字教學法對八年級讀寫困難學生識字成效之探討。國立臺灣科技大學數位學習與教育研究所碩士論文,1-97。
白芬如(2017)。行動載具運用於漢字教學的學習成效之探討-以智慧型手機結合即時通訊軟體LINE為例。國立台灣師範大學應用華語文學系碩士論文,1-105。
丘慶鈴(2003)。避免小學生寫錯別字之教學策略。國立新竹師範學院臺灣語言與語文教育研究所碩士論文,1-179。
何芮瑶(2019)。先讀後寫?西方近百年幼兒書寫研究回顧及其對臺灣幼兒書寫教育政策的檢討。當代教育研究季刊,27(4)。
李怡靜(2013)。淺談資源班書寫障礙學生教學與個案實例分享。國小特殊教育,(55),55-64。
李瑩玓(2000)。國小寫字困難學童與普通學童寫字相關認知能力之分析研究。臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系學位論文,1-183。
李瑩玓(2004)。寫字困難學生寫字特徵之分析。師大學報:教育類。
孟瑛如,黃姿慎,鍾曉芬,楊佩蓁,周文聿(2015)。國民小學一至三年級書寫表達診斷測驗。台北:心理出版社。
林千惠(2001)。重視國小學童的書寫問題。國小特殊教育,(31),30-35。
林欣儀(2006)。以認知神經心理學的觀點探討寫字困難學童之寫字歷程缺損—個案研究分析。中原大學心理學研究所學位論文,1-122。
林益璟(2020)。線上手寫中文字錯誤偵測及回饋之遊戲化教育系統。臺灣大學電機工程學研究所學位論文,1-81。
林雅萍(2016)。運用行動學習於中文錯別字教學之研究。華梵大學資訊管理學系碩士論文,1-59。
林瑞娟(2020)。多元策略識字教學對提升偏鄉一年級學童識字能力之行動研究。國立臺東大學進修部暑期國語文補救教學碩士論文,1-105。
洪源泰(2010)。部件教學法融入華語文識字教學網站之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育傳播與科技研究所學位論文,1-152。
洪儷瑜,張郁雯,陳秀芬,陳慶順,李瑩玓(2003)。基本讀寫字綜合測驗。台北:心理出版社。
紀李美瑛(1990)。中國兒童早期的讀寫發展。第二屆世界華語文教學研討會論文集一理論與分析(下冊),243-252。
特殊教育法(2019)。中華民國一百零八年四月二十四日總統華總一義字第 10800039361號令修正公布。
國家發展委員會(2019)。108年個人家戶數位機會調查報告。引用自:https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL2NrZmlsZS85MzczMTljNi05NzAxLTRjZDUtOTZlOC0yNmE3OTIyNGRmMzEucGRm&n=MTA45bm05YCL5Lq65a625oi25pW45L2N5qmf5pyD6Kq%2f5p%2bl5aCx5ZGKKOWFrOWRiueJiDAzMTIpLnBkZg%3d%3d&icon=.pdf
孫宛芝,楊宗仁,梁直青(2007)。基本字帶字電腦教學對學習困難學童教學成效之個案探究。特教論壇,(2)。
張韶霞(2002)。發展性協調障礙學童寫字困難問題之研究---以高雄縣市為例。彰化師範大學特殊教育系博士論文(未出版)。
張麗蓮(2017)。臺灣寫字研究文獻探究。教育理論與實踐學刊,36。127-148。
教育部(1972)。常用國字標準字體表。
教育部(2011)。國民小學國語文科補救教學基本學習內容。中華民國教育部國民及學前教育署。引用自:https://priori.moe.gov.tw/download/basic/01-國小國語文試行版.pdf。
教育部(2017)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要語文領域-國語文。中華民國教育部國民及學前教育署。引用自:https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/25933/72247.pdf。
教育部(2020)。109特殊教育年報。
莊德明,鄧賢瑛(2009)。漢字構形資料庫的研發與應用。中研院資訊所文獻處理實驗室。
許琬宜(2020)。意義化識字教學結合平板電腦對國小低年級識字困難學生識字成效之研究。國立臺北教育大學特殊教育學系學位論文,1-102。
余泰魁(2007)。科技媒介學習環境之學習成效比較研究。教育心理學報,39(1),69-90。
陳亭君,陳姵希,劉匽汝,蔡孟學(2019)。合作式部件識字學習系統對國小高年級學習障礙學生識字成效之評估。TANET2019 臺灣網際網路研討會,935-940。
陳惠茹(2015)。幼兒部件概念發展與認字。教育心理學報,47(1)。
陳景蔚(2006)。無所不在的運算環境與進化中的行動學習。嘉義大學通識學報,(4),17-45。
陳弘昌(1999)。國小語文科教學研究。五南圖書。
陳名莉(2019)。閱讀策略APP對學生閱讀能力與認知負荷之影響。臺北市立大學教育學系碩士學位論文,1-146。
陳詠晴(2018)。多媒體結合字族文對提升國小資源班學生識字學習成效之行動研究。國立臺中教育大學教師專業碩士學位學程論文,1-102。
陳學志,張瓅勻,邱郁秀,宋曜廷,張國恩(2011)。中文部件組字與形構資料庫之建立及其在識字教學的應用。教育心理學報,43。
彭思蓉(2020)。字族文識字策略結合電腦輔助教學對國中中重度智能障礙學生識字學習成效之研究。國立臺東大學特殊教育學系碩士學位論文,1-100。
黃韻潔(2020)。字族文識字與分散識字教學法對國中智能障礙學生識字學習成效之研究。臺北市立大學身心障礙者轉銜及休閒教育研究所學位論文,1-179。
楊永欣(2020)。應用鷹架教學策略於智能障礙兒童口述照樣造句之研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系學位論文,1-126。
楊采熹(2017)。國字筆順即時回饋系統融入國小教學之研究。國立臺中教育大學教育資訊與測驗統計研究所碩士論文,1-152。
葉德明(1990)。漢字認知基礎。臺北:師大書苑。
詹雯茜(2019)。擴增實境對國小智能障礙學生功能性詞彙識字成效研究。國立臺北教育大學特殊教育學系碩士學位論文,1-122。
鄭淑玲(2019)。行動學習之即時回饋融入國中國文教學之行動研究-以國中七年級為例。臺北市立大學學習與媒材設計學系課程與教學碩士學位在職專班學位論文,1-185。
鮑盈方(2010)。不同識字教學法對國小學習障礙學生寫字教學成效之比較研究。國立屏東大學特殊教育碩士班學位論文,1-190。
謝州恩(2013)。鷹架理論的發展、類型、模式與對科學教學的啟示。科學教育月刊,364,2-16。
簡錦鳳(2007)。文字鷹架對七年級學生科學解釋能力的影響。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所在職進修碩士班學位論文,1-128。
顏國雄(2013)。雄-筆順練習。https://kids-3c18c.firebaseapp.com/html5/stroke/html5_stroke.html。
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *