自1972年人類環境大會宣言提出的斯德哥爾摩宣言提出之後，隨著世界各國都市化的趨勢，且人口、生產與消費活動多集中在都市地區，因此永續及環境規劃的議題已成為全球的浪潮，而根據聯合國於2015年訂定之永續發展目標(Sustainable Development Goals,簡稱SDGs)SDG11「建構具包容、安全、韌性及永續特質的城市與鄉村」，永續發展的概念也由最初的全球性逐步轉為地方性的層次，且永續性都市已成為地方在因應全球永續發展與全球環境變遷時，制定都市發展策略的最終目標(蔡美戀,2003)。
對於人口激增的都市化現象，密集的製造、生產、消費的行為模式促使環境破壞的現象日益嚴重，使得居住品質惡化，如何在考量環境與經濟發展的同時，保有住戶的空間需求與居住品質便成為區域永續發展的一個課題，使環境治理落實在地方時需扣合地方發展之急迫性。現今某些地方政府選擇性地導入某些永續策略與實作於都市治理中，以兼顧當地社會、經濟發展與環境保護目標間之衝突與兩難性，實際上是透過永續性之創造來達到生產與積累目的(邱啟新,2017)。
為促進土地之合理利用及維護計畫區內之生活環境品質，本研究利用MARXAN系統化地分析新竹市內的都市的土地利用形式、空間發展型態及環境敏感度，並根據各計劃單位提供之價值所集合的成本以及未達到保護要求的罰款等方法，篩選出未來適合變更之土地，以利未來土地使用分區管制利用。

Since the Stockholm Declaration proposed by the Declaration of the Human Environment Conference in 1972, with the trend of urbanization in all countries in the world, and the population, production, and consumption activities are mostly concentrated in urban areas, the issue of sustainability and environmental planning has become a global wave. According to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) SDG11 set by the United Nations in 2015 to “build cities and villages that are inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable”, the concept of sustainable development has also evolved from the initial global It has gradually shifted to a local level, and sustainable cities have become the ultimate goal of local development strategies in response to global sustainable development and global environmental changes (Cai Meilian, 2003).
For the phenomenon of urbanization with a surge in population, the intensive manufacturing, production, and consumption behavior patterns have led to increasingly serious environmental damage, resulting in the deterioration of living quality. It has become a topic of regional sustainable development, and the implementation of environmental governance at the local level needs to be in line with the urgency of local development. Today, some local governments selectively introduce certain sustainable strategies and implement them into urban governance to take into account the conflicts and dilemmas between local social, economic development, and environmental protection goals. In fact, it is through the creation of sustainability. To achieve the purpose of production and accumulation.
In order to promote the rational use of land and maintain the quality of the living environment in the planned area, this research uses Marxan to systematically analyze the urban land use forms, spatial development patterns, and environmental sensitivity in Hsinchu City, and provide information according to the planning units. The cost of collecting the value of the land and the fines for failing to meet the protection requirements are used to screen out the land suitable for change in the future, so as to facilitate future land use zoning control and utilization.

目錄
摘要.............................................I
目錄............................................IV
圖目錄...........................................V
表目錄..........................................VI
第一章　緒論......................................1
第一節　研究動機與目的.............................1
一、研究動機......................................1
二、研究目的......................................3
第二章　文獻回顧..................................4
第一節　都市永續與環境營造.........................4
一、永續發展之意涵................................4
二、永續發展指標..................................6
三、都市永續發展..................................9
四、全球化對都市發展之影響........................14
第二節　空間優選決策規劃..........................14
一、空間優選決策方法..............................18
二、空間優選決策工具-Marxan.......................18
第三章、研究設計與流程............................26
第一節 資料選取與處理.............................26
第二節 規劃單元設置...............................34
第三節 MARXAN運算................................36
第四章、實證分析..................................39
第一節 研究地區現況...............................39
第二節 資料選取與處裡.............................45
第五章、結論與建議................................63
第一節 結論......................................63
第二節 建議......................................68
第六章、參考文獻..................................65
第一節 最佳解決辦法與土地使用分區疊圖細部圖........70
第二節 最佳解決辦法與土地使用現況疊圖細部圖........75

國內文獻
1. 于子奇(2020)。基於Three E’s原則對都市永續規劃發展之研究—以南京市和大臺北地區為例。國立臺北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系碩士論文。
2. 內政部(2017)。修正全國區域計畫。
3. 內政部(2107)。全國國土計畫草案。
4. 行政院國家永續發展委員會。108年國家永續發展年報(2019)。取自https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Kho9ZHedY8RS3vUQJvBi4C_9i_KqiX1X/view
5. 李永展(2005)。永續鄉村營造之初探。中華水土保持學報,36(4):339-354。
6. 李永展(2007)。都市型永續社區之準則：國土永續發展之新趨勢應用倫理研究通訊 第41期 p.48-57。
7. 李觀宏(2014)。以空間模擬分析台灣北部沿海劃設海洋保護區之建議。國立台灣大學理學院海洋研究所碩士論文。
8. 林子倫、張淑玫、許景斐、李育豪(2007)。全球永續都市專案調查計畫。
9. 林裕彬、蕭維德、王筠絜、蕭戎雯、蕭惠如、洪甄蔚、吳岱蓉、陳姿妤、楊宗翰、林慧 庭、陳彥涵、林子平、陳珮琦、褚柏廷、陳麒如、陳冠維、詹婕妤、張文豪、黃浚瑋、安子傑、林韋志 (2017) 。土地利用之系統性保育規劃策略及模式研究—集水區生態系統服務面向(第3年) 期末報告。科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告。
10. 周素卿(2015)。永續性與都市新政治計畫：文獻回顧與研究芻議。人文與社會科學簡訊。2015年3月6卷2期。
11. 吳雅萱(2013)。捷運站周邊土地混合使用型態之研究。國立成功大學碩士論文。
12. 吳宇荷(2019)。台北市捷運站周邊土地混合使用型態對影響搭捷運意願之研究。國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
13. 柳雅婷(2008)。以永續環境觀點檢證社區總體營造對應之評估內容與參與模式。國立屏東商業技術學院不動產經營系碩士論文。
14. 徐德琳、鄒長新、王燕、田美榮、王玥、高吉喜、喬青 (2020) 。自然生態空間格局構建與規劃理論研究。生態學報。40 (3) - 。
15. 徐惠群 (2017) 。苗栗地區石虎棲地之裡山生態環境效益評估-從非市場財到市場財。國立清華大學環境與資源學系社區與社會學習領域碩士在職專班。
16. 陳錦賜(2003)。四生環境共生規劃法建立與應用模擬研究-以城鄉規劃為例。第七屆國土規劃論壇，國立成功大學都市計畫研究所。
17. 陳思敏、葉如萍、徐韶良 (2020) 。決策支援應用於台灣海域空間規劃之
探討—以東沙環礁國家公園為例。第二十四屆國土規劃論壇。
18. 陳芳毓、許鈺屏、李鈺淇(2020)。SDGs 目標11｜建構具包容、安全、韌性及永續特質的城市與鄉村。取自未來城市https://futurecity.cw.com.tw/article/1294
19. 郭馨蘭(2005)。全球化對台灣都市永續發展影響之研究—以感受性系統模型為例。國立臺北大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
20. 黃書禮、翁瑞豪、陳子淳 (1997)。台北市永續發展指標系統之建立與評估。都市與計劃(24:1期) p.23-42。
21. 黃書偉(2008)。土地混合混合使用空間型態量測與其影響因素之因素。國立成功大學都市計畫研究所博士論文。
22. 新竹市政府(2017)。新竹市區域計畫規劃草案。
23. 廖偉翔 (2015)。從永續發展檢視生物多樣性公約之保護機制。東吳大學法學院法律學系碩士班碩士論文。
24. 蔡美戀(2003)。鄉鎮層級都市永續發展指標系統架構之研究。國立中山大學公共及事務管理研究所碩士論文。
25. 劉文宏、顏秀陵、劉書豪、關加珝、廖曼雅、梁淑婷、林怡君、廖冠翔、詹昊棠、丁國桓、陳麗淑、林堉琪(2016)。系統保育規劃法於澎湖南方四島海洋保護區應用之研究(第2年)。科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告。
26. 蕭維德(2013)。農場尺度生物多樣性保育系統性優化規劃方法－以梅峰農場為例。國立台灣大學農學院生物環境系統工程學研究所碩士論文。
27. 蕭景云(2019)。以聯合國永續發展目標SDG-11為基底之都市永續性分析架構。國立台北大學公共事務學院自然資源與環境管理研究所。
國外文獻
1. Adrian, S.M.R(2019). Cost-effective priority areas for the conservation of the Maulino coastal forest and Cost-effectiveness gains by considering climate change effects in reserve network planning of Nothofagus alessandrii (Ruil).
2. Amber, L. (2006).Exploration of Marxan for Utility in Marine Protected Area Zoning Marxan.
3. Ardron, JA, Possingham, HP, Klein, CJ (2008). Marxan good practiceshandbook. Victoria, BC .
4. Ball, IR, and Possingham, HP. (2000). Marxan (V1. 8.2). Marine Reserve Design Using Spatially Explicit Annealing, a Manual.
5. Ball, IR, Possingham, HP., and Watts,ME.(2011). Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation. ResearhGate. CH14.
6. Ban,N.C and Klein C.J., (2009).Spatial socioeconomic data as a cost in systematic marine conservation planning. Conservation Letters.2(5),206-215.
7. Beyer HL, Dujardin Y, Watts ME, Possingham HP. 2016. Solving conservation planning problems with integer linear programming. Ecological Modelling 328:
14–22.
8. Braat, L. (1991). “The predictive meaning of sustainability indicator In:Search of Indicator of Sustainable Development”. Academic Publishers,Boston,pp57-70.
9. Cassandra M. R (2016) . Prioritizing areas for habitat conservation in the face of climate and land-use change.
10. Ceballos, G ; Ehrlich, PR.(2006). Global mammal distributions, biodiversity hotspots, and conservation.PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 103( 51) p.19374-19379.
11. Cimon-Morin,J.,Poulin, M (2018) Setting conservation priorities in cities: approaches, targets and planning units adapted to wetland biodiversity and ecosystem services. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY. 33 (11) p.1975-1995.
12. Daigle,Remi M.,Metaxax,A., Balbar,AC.,Gowan,JM.,Treml EA.,Kuempel,CD., Possingham,HP.,Beger,M(2020). Operationalizing ecological connectivity in spatial conservation planning with Marxan Connect. British Ecologycal Society. p570-578.
13. Edward T. Game and Hedley S. Grantham (2008).Marxan User Manual(For Marxan version 1.8.10).
14. Game ,E.T. and Hedley S. Grantham(2008).Marxan User Manual.
15. Groves, C. R., and Game, E. T. (2015). Conservation Planning: Informed Decisions for a Healthier Planet, p. 608.
16. Hale, PT and Lamb, D. (1997). Conservation outside nature reserves : Centre forConservation Biology, University of Queensland Brisbane.
17. Hermoso, V., Alejandra M.O., Brotons, L.(2020).Designing a network of green infrastructure for the EU.Landscape and Urban Planning.196.103732.
18. Hoppenbrouwer, E., Louw, E. (2005). Mixed-use Development: Theory and Practice in Amsterdam's Eastern Docklands. European Planning Studies, 13(7):967-983.
19. Horn,Hannah L.(2011).Strategic conservation planning for terrestrial animal species in the Central Interior of British Columbia. Journal of Ecosystems and Management.12(1).
20. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Vintage Books,New York.
21. Jalkanen,J., Fabritius,H., Vierikko,K., Atte Moilanen, Tuuli Toivonen (2020) .Analyzing fair access to urban green areas using multimodal accessibility measures and spatial prioritization Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Geography,124,102320.
22. Jesus G-Ga.M., Christien, L, García-E, E.,Concepción (2020). Sensitivity of green spaces to the process of urban planning. Three case studies of Madrid
(Spain) . Cities(100),102655
23. Justus, J and Sarkar, S.(2002).The principle of complementarity in the design of reserve networks to conserve biodiversity: a preliminary history.
24. Kirkpatrick S., Jr, D. G., Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220(4598), 671-680.
25. Kukkala, AS ; Moilanen, A .(2017).Ecosystem services and connectivity in spatial conservation prioritization.LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY. 32(1),p5-14.
26. Loos ,SA.(2006). Exploration of Marxan for Utility in Marine Protected Area Zoning Marxan.
27. Mace, GM, Possingham, HP, Leader-Williams, N., Mcdonald, DW, Service, K.(2007). Prioritizing choices in conservation. Key topics in conservation biology ,17-34.
28. Margules CR and Pressey RL.(2000). Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243–253.
29. Marcotullio,PJ.(2001).Asian urban sustainability in the era of globalization. Habititat International 25(4):577-598.
30. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., Teller, E(1953). Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. The jounal ofchemical physics. 21, 1087.
31. Mlls, M, Pressey, R. L., Weeks, R, Foale, S., and Ban, N. C., (2010). A mismatch of scales: Challenges in planning for implementation of marine protected areas in the Coral Triangle. Conservation Letters. 3 (5), 291-303.
32. Moilance, Atte, Wilson, Kerrie A, and Possingham, Hugh Philip.(2009).Spatial cconservation prioritization:quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press Oxford, UK.
33. Muñoz,RA.S. (2019). Cost-effective priority areas for the conservation of the Maulino coastal forest and Cost-effectiveness gains by considering climate change effects in reserve network planning of Nothofagus alessandrii (Ruil).
34. Naidoo,R., Balmford,A., Ferraro,P.J.,Polasky, S., Ricketts,T.H., and Rouget, M.,(2006).Intergrating economic cost into conservation planning. Trends in EcologyandEvolution.21(12),681-687.
35. Nijkamp, P. and Perrels, A. (1990). Sustainable Cities in Europe.London: Earthscan Publications.
36. Pasnin, O., Attwood, C., and Klaus, R. (2016). Marine systematic conservation planning for Rodrigues Island, western Indian Ocean. Ocean and coastal management, 130, 213-220.
37. Pauline C.W.A.,‏(2012).Understanding fishers’ spatial behaviour to estimate social costs in local conservation planning.IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON Centre for
Environmental Policy.
38. Sachs, J.D.,(2015) The Age of Sustainable Development. New Yorh:columbia.
39. Schröter,M. (2015). Conceptual basis and spatial modelling to account for and conserve multiple ecosystem services in Telemark County, Norway.
40. Stewart, R. R., and Possingham, H. P. (2005). Efficiency, costs and trade-offs in marine reserve system design. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 10(3), 203-213.
41. Stoms,D.M, Davis,F.W., Fenner, M.W.,Nogeire,T.M., Kaffka.S.R. (2012). Modeling wildlife and other trade-offs with biofuel crop production.GCB Bioenergy.4(3),330-341.
42. Smith, JL, Lewis, K., Laughren, J. (2006). A policy and planning framework formarine protected area networks in Canada's Oceans : WWF-Canada. AtlanticRegion Office.
43. Strimas-M.M .(2016).Accounting for Long-term Persistence of Multiple Species in Systematic Conservation Planning.
44. Thomas J. N and Randall P.W (2004) Urban Sprawl. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18( 4),Fall 2004,177-200.
45. Tyson,W. (2015).Assessing the Cumulative Effects of Environmental Change on Wildlife Harvesting Areas in the Inuvialuit Settlement Region through Spatial Analysis and Community-based Research.
46. United Nations. (2018).The World’s Cities in 2018-Data Booklet.
47. Wallace ,AP.(2012).Understanding fishers’ spatial behaviour to estimate social costs in local conservation planning.