近年來，因交通與科技的發展，世界各國間的關聯性愈趨緊密。各國所面臨的問題已成為全球須共同面對、思考解決之道。永續發展與17項目標內容的誕生，正是統合世界各國最急迫需改善的事項。本研究以SDG5—性別平等來探討，從各國的重大時事與臺灣現況的討論中，歸納出家庭與職場、教育及文化、性少數群體、世代差異，四面向分析。以質性訪談的方式，訪問了桃園市10位不同世代的國小教師。研究結果發現：一、在家庭與職場方面，三個世代在家務分工與角色身分上的觀念已趨於性別平等，但在執行面上，XY世代仍會受傳統家庭分工價值觀影響。在職場方面，教師幾乎未遭遇性別不平等，但在其他行業，仍舊有著不平等的狀況；二、在教育與文化方面，XY世代與Z世代所受的性別平等教育內容已有明顯的差異，Z世代所學習到的內容更加多元。在傳統文化價值觀上，宗教與傳統約束力減低，但在婚前性行為議題上，X世代與YZ世代就有明顯的差異；三、在性少數群體方面，不論自身的想法為何，三個世代皆對他人表示尊重，但在立法上，就會根據個人想法，表達自身立場；四、在世代差異方面，Z世代相較於XY世代，更願意與他人溝通、討論性別平等上的議題。在政府作為上，三個世代在政策上皆無一致的關注點，也無世代上的差異。最後，本研究根據研究結果提出研究建議與為來研究方向。

In recent years, due to the development of transportation and technology, the relationship between countries in the world has become closer and closer. The problems faced by countries have become a solution that the whole world must face and think about together. Sustainable development and the birth of the 17 SDGs are the most urgent things that need to be improved in the countries of the world. This study explores the SDG5 - gender equality, and from the discussion of major current events in various countries and the current situation in Taiwan, it summarizes the family and workplace, education and culture, sexual minorities, and generational differences, and analyzes them in four aspects. In the form of qualitative interviews, we interviewed 10 primary school teachers of different generations in Taoyuan City. The results of the study found that: First, in terms of family and workplace, the concept of the division of labor and role status of the three generations has tended to be gender equality, but in terms of execution, the XY generation will still be affected by the traditional value of family division of labor. In the workplace, teachers experience little gender inequality, but in other industries, there is still inequality; In terms of education and culture, there are obvious differences in the gender equality education content received by generation XY and generation Z, and the content learned by generation Z is more diverse. In terms of traditional cultural values, the binding force of religion and tradition is reduced, but on the issue of premarital sex, there are obvious differences between generation X and generation YZ; In terms of sexual minorities, regardless of their own ideas, the three generations have shown respect for others, but in legislation, they will express their own positions according to their personal ideas; In terms of generational differences, generation Z is more willing to communicate and discuss issues of gender equality with others than generation XY. In terms of government, the three generations have no consistent policy concerns and no generational differences. Finally, based on the findings, this study proposes research recommendations and research directions.

第壹章 緒論...........................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機....................................1
一、 研究背景...........................................1
二、 研究動機...........................................1
第二節 研究目的與問題....................................2
一、 研究目的...........................................2
二、 研究問題...........................................2
第三節 研究範圍.........................................3
第貳章 文獻探討........................................5
第一節 永續發展是什麼....................................5
第二節 性別平等的概念與學術內涵...........................9
第三節 各國與臺灣的做法..................................13
一、 美國—Me Too........................................14
二、 南韓—從《82年生的金智英》到N號房事件..................16
三、 日本—前奧委會主席的性別歧視言論看日本社會的性別平等.....21
四、 臺灣—日常生活和世界矚目的改變.........................27
第參章 研究流程與方法...................................44
第一節 研究流程..........................................44
第二節 研究架構..........................................44
第三節 研究方法..........................................45
一、 質性研究............................................45
二、 半結構式的深度訪談...................................46
第四節 研究對象..........................................47
一、 XYZ世代.............................................47
二、 研究對象限制........................................48
三、 研究對象來源與招募方式...............................49
第五節 研究工具..........................................49
一、 研究參與同意書.......................................49
二、 訪談大綱............................................49
三、 錄音工具............................................50
四、 訪談筆記............................................50
第六節 研究的信度與效度...................................50
一、 可信賴性............................................50
二、 可遷移性............................................51
三、 可靠性..............................................51
四、 可驗證性............................................51
第肆章 訪談資料分析.....................................52
第一節 受訪者資料........................................52
第二節 家庭與職場的分析...................................54
一、 家務分工—從原生家庭到今日............................56
二、 角色身分—是自己所想還是他人期望.......................59
三、 重男輕女............................................63
四、 學校教育和教育以外的職場.............................65
第三節 教育及文化分析.....................................68
一、 求學階段所受的教育...................................70
二、 性別教育內容的想法...................................73
三、 宗教習俗與禁忌.......................................75
四、 傳統習俗與價值觀.....................................78
第四節 性少數群體分析.....................................83
一、 多元性別的看法.......................................86
二、 同性婚姻合法化.......................................88
三、 當多元性別者為親人時..................................89
第五節 世代差異...........................................92
一、 世代間的價值觀溝通...................................94
二、 自我意識與意識轉變歷程................................97
三、 政府作為............................................100
第伍章 結論與討論.......................................104
第一節 研究結論..........................................104
一、 家庭與職場..........................................104
二、 教育及文化..........................................104
三、 性少數群體..........................................105
四、 世代差異............................................105
第二節 研究建議..........................................106
一、 加強家庭內教育......................................106
二、 政府應提升相關政策的宣導力道.........................107
第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向.............................107
一、 研究限制............................................107
二、 未來研究方向........................................108
參考文獻................................................109
中文部分................................................109
英文部分................................................111
附錄....................................................115
附錄一　研究參與同意書....................................115
附錄二　訪談大綱.........................................117

王文科（2000）。〈質的研究的問題與趨勢〉。載於中正大學教育研究所（主編），《質的研究方法》（頁1-23）。高雄市：麗文文化事業股份有限公司。
王品涵（譯）（2020）。《善良的歧視主義者》（原作者：金知慧）。臺北市：東販出版。
松岡秀明（1989）。〈我が国における血盆経信仰についての一考察〉。《東京大学宗教学年報》，6，85-100。
林琪禎（譯）（2020）。《「色情就是不行！」這種想法真的不行》（原作者：白田秀彰）。臺北市：麥田出版。
周曉琪與羅耀宗（譯）（2015）。《永續發展新紀元》（原作者：D.Sachs, J.）。臺北市：遠見天下文化。
胡幼慧（2008）。〈轉型中的質性研究：演變、批判和女性主義研究觀點〉。載於胡幼慧（主編），《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》（頁3-19）。臺北市：巨流圖書股份有限公司。
姚美華與胡幼慧（2008）。〈一些質性方法上的思考：信度與效度？如何抽樣？如何蒐集資料、登入與分析？〉。載於胡幼慧（主編），《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》（頁117-132）。臺北市：巨流圖書股份有限公司。
高一中（譯）（2007）。《成長的極限：三十週年最新增訂版》（原作者：Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. H. ）。臺北市：臉譜出版。
張秀亞（譯）（2008）。《自己的房間》（原作者：Woolf, V.）。臺北市：天培文化。
陳秀峯（2006）。〈向性別平等社會邁進－日本「男女共同參與社會基本法」之啟示〉。《政大法學評論》，90，1-68。doi:10.6990/clr.200604_(90).0001
畢恒達（1996）。〈已婚婦女的住宅空間體驗〉。《本土心理學研究》，6，300-352。doi:10.6254/1996.6.300
曾育慧與江東亮（2014）。〈千禧年發展目標：背景、進度與挑戰〉。《臺灣公共衛生雜誌》33（3），221-237。doi:10.6288/TJPH201433103017
萬文隆（2004）。〈深度訪談在質性研究中的應用〉。《生活科技教育月刊》，37（4），17-23。
劉小妮（譯）（2018）。《媳婦的辭職信》（原作者：金英朱）。臺北市：采實文化。
劉仲冬（2008）。〈量與質社會研究的爭議及社會研究為來的走向及出路〉。載於胡幼慧（主編），《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》（頁101-116）。臺北市：巨流圖書股份有限公司。
鄭瑞隆（2000）。〈符號互動論及其在教育研究上之應用〉。載於中正大學教育研究所（主編），《質的研究方法》（頁135-153）。高雄市：麗文文化事業股份有限公司。
潘慧玲（2002）。〈性別平等教育的意涵與實踐〉。專題講演於教育部與杏林基金會主辦之「性別平等教育」研討會，臺北。
Balan, S., & Vreja, L. O. (2018). GENERATION Z: CHALLENGES FOR MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP. In I. Popa, C. Dobrin, & C. N. Ciocoiu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Management Conference: Management Perspectives in the Digital Era (pp. 879-888).
Bimpson, E., Parr, S., & Reeve, K. (2020). Governing homeless mothers: the unmaking of home and family. Housing Studies, 20. doi:10.1080/02673037.2020.1853069
Brown, L. (2017). "Nwuna's body is so sexy": Pop culture and the chronotopic formulations of kinship terms in Korean. Discourse Context & Media, 15, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2016.10.003
Chao, K. Y., & Cheng, W. (2021). An Effective Life-Sex-Emotions Course for Taiwanese Adolescents on Health Perceptions: A Cohort Study. Frontiers in Public Health, 9. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.660229
Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: University of California press.
Durukan, A., & Gul, A. (2019). Mindful eating: Differences of generations and relationship of mindful eating with BMI. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 18. doi:10.1016/j.ijgfs.2019.100172
Duzenli, T., Alpak, E. M., & Yilmaz, S. (2019). THE CORRELATION BETWEEN URBAN OPEN SPACE OCCUPATION DIFFERENCES AMONG GENERATIONS X, Y, AND Z AND OCCUPANT WELL-BEING. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(2), 3737-3751. doi:10.15666/aeer/1702_37373751
Folke, O., Rickne, J., Tanaka, S., & Tateishi, Y. (2020). Sexual Harassment of Women Leaders. Daedalus, 149(1), 180-197. doi:10.1162/daed_a_01781
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2016). From the Millennium Development Goals to the Sustainable Development Goals: shifts in purpose, concept, and politics of global goal setting for development. Gender & Development, 24(1), 43-52. doi:10.1080/13552074.2016.1145895
Guo, J. L. (2019). Women seafarers in Taiwan: survivors during the evolution of the special shipping relationship between China and Taiwan. Journal of gender studies, 28(6), 635-647. doi:10.1080/09589236.2018.1502077
Gusmão Caiado, R. G., Leal Filho, W., Quelhas, O. L. G., Luiz de Mattos Nascimento, D., & Ávila, L. V. (2018). A literature-based review on potentials and constraints in the implementation of the sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 1276-1288. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.102
Hasunuma, L., & Shin, K. Y. (2019). #MeToo in Japan and South Korea: #WeToo, #WithYou. Journal of Women Politics & Policy, 40(1), 97-111. doi:10.1080/1554477x.2019.1563416
Huen, Y. W. P. (2007). Workplace sexual harassment in Japan - A review of combating measures taken. Asian Survey, 47(5), 811-827. doi:10.1525/as.2007.47.5.811
Hulme, D. (2009). The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs): a short history of the world’s biggest promise.
Kawaguchi, A. (2015). Internal labor markets and gender inequality: Evidence from Japanese micro data, 1990-2009. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 38, 193-213. doi:10.1016/j.jjie.2015.04.004
Kawase, K., Nomura, K., Nomura, S., Akashi-Tanaka, S., Ogawa, T., Shibasaki, I., . . . Nakamura, S. (2021). How pregnancy and childbirth affect the working conditions and careers of women surgeons in Japan: findings of a nationwide survey conducted by the Japan Surgical Society. Surgery Today, 51(2), 309-321. doi:10.1007/s00595-020-02129-w
Keller, J., Mendes, K., & Ringrose, J. (2018). Speaking ‘unspeakable things’: Documenting digital feminist responses to rape culture. Journal of gender studies, 27(1), 22-36.
Kim, Y.-M. (2015). Complexity of gender inequality in the segmented labor market: Differences in gender disadvantage between regular and non-regular sectors. Economy and Society, 106, 205-237.
Klein, D. (1981). " Violence Against Wives: A Case Against Patriarchy" by R. Emerson Dobash and Russell Dobash (Book Review). Critical Sociology, 10(4), 114.
Kolnhofer-Derecskei, A., Reicher, R. Z., & Szeghegyi, A. (2017). The X and Y Generations' Characteristics Comparison. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 14(8), 107-125. Retrieved from ://WOS:000423415200006
Krumbein, F. (2021). Who will be Asia's Next Unicorn? Comparing Marriage Equality in Taiwan with Hong Kong, Japan and South Korea. Asian Studies Review. doi:10.1080/10357823.2021.1920886
Ku, E. K. (2020). 'Waiting for my red envelope': discourses of sameness in the linguistic landscape of a marriage equality demonstration in Taiwan. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(2), 156-174. doi:10.1080/17405904.2019.1656655
Lakatos, E. S., Cioca, L. I., Dan, V., Ciomos, A. O., Crisan, O. A., & Barsan, G. (2018). Studies and Investigation about the Attitude towards Sustainable Production, Consumption and Waste Generation in Line with Circular Economy in Romania. Sustainability, 10(3). doi:10.3390/su10030865
Lee, S. B. (2021). Translators, translations, and paratexts in South Korea's gender conflicts. Perspectives-Studies in Translation Theory and Practice, 29(1), 84-99. doi:10.1080/0907676x.2020.1712441
Lee, S. H. (2020). Beyond the Policy Rhetoric: The Limitations of Gender Mainstreaming in South Korea Relating to Women and Childcare. Social Policy and Society, 19(3), 379-395. doi:10.1017/s1474746419000484
Lee, S. S. Y., & Kim, Y. (2020). Female outsiders in South Korea's dual labour market: Challenges of equal pay for work of equal value. Journal of Industrial Relations, 62(4), 651-678. doi:10.1177/0022185620931138
Lee, Y. (2016). Effects of a universal childcare subsidy on mothers’ time allocation. KDI Journal of Economic Policy, 38(1), 1-22.
Lee, Y. I. (2021). Gender Matters in Tsai Ing-wen's First Term: The First Woman President, the Cabinet Appointments, and Same-Sex Marriage in Taiwan. Journal of Asian and African Studies. doi:10.1177/00219096211005509
Lee, Y. S. (2020). Weekend Couples as a Manifestation of Gender Equality? Household Labour and Subjective Well-being of Wives and Husbands among Korean Weekend Couples. Asian Journal of Social Science, 48(3-4), 294-318. doi:10.1163/15685314-04803006
Liu, X. Y., & Tang, W. F. (2020). Sexism in Mainland China and Taiwan: A Social Experimental Study. China-an International Journal, 18(3), 1-21. Retrieved from ://WOS:000563078900001
Mahmoud, A. B., Fuxman, L., Mohr, I., Reisel, W. D., & Grigoriou, N. (2021). "We aren't your reincarnation!" workplace motivation across X, Y and Z generations. International Journal of Manpower, 42(1), 193-209. doi:10.1108/ijm-09-2019-0448
Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2018). #MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Womens Studies, 25(2), 236-246. doi:10.1177/1350506818765318
Narasimhan, V. L., Bhargavi, G. V., & Ieee. (2019). The Changing Nature of Disciplinary Genders - A Position Paper. In 2019 11th International Conference on Advanced Computing (pp. 41-47).
Noguchi, M. G. (2020). The Shifting Sub-Text of Japanese Gendered Language. In A. H. Omar, S. Needham, & N. Hill (Eds.), Glocal Conference 2020 in Asia (pp. 369-375).
Omura, M. (2019). Why Can't I keep my Surname? The Fairness and Welfare of the Japanese Legal System. Feminist Economics, 25(3), 171-200. doi:10.1080/13545701.2019.1588467
Peng, Y. W., & Wu, W. N. (2021). Who would (not) use all-gender toilets horizontal ellipsis and why? A study on university students in Taiwan. Gender Place and Culture. doi:10.1080/0966369x.2021.1987198
Prins, E. (2017). Digital storytelling in adult education and family literacy: a case study from rural Ireland. Learning Media and Technology, 42(3), 308-323. doi:10.1080/17439884.2016.1154075
Rotondi, V., Kashyap, R., Pesando, L. M., Spinelli, S., & Billari, F. C. (2020). Leveraging mobile phones to attain sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(24), 13413-13420. doi:10.1073/pnas.1909326117
Sachs, J. D., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Woelm, F. (2021). SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2021: CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY.
Shin, J. H. (2013). Gendering places: residential technology and changing family relations in Korea. Gender Place and Culture, 20(3), 382-400. doi:10.1080/0966369x.2012.694356
Shinohara, S., Zhang, Y. H., & Riccucci, N. M. (2018). What prevents public and private workers in Japan from recognizing gender inequality? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(4), 711-728. doi:10.1177/0020852316660624
Stafford-Smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O., Ullah, F., Reyers, B., Kanie, N., . . . O’Connell, D. (2017). Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability Science, 12(6), 911-919.
Suezawa, N. (2018). A comparison of gender disparity in East Asian EFL textbooks. Leiden: Crc Press-Balkema.
Sugarman, D. B., & Straus, M. A. (1988). INDICATORS OF GENDER EQUALITY FOR AMERICAN-STATES AND REGIONS. Social Indicators Research, 20(3), 229-270. doi:10.1007/bf00302398
Tuerkheimer, D. (2019). BEYOND #METOO. New York University Law Review, 94(5), 1146-1208. Retrieved from ://WOS:000495894800003
UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals - Learning Objectives.
Yu, Y. L. (2018). Using "classic reading instruction' to raise students' gender awareness: Students' perceptions of their learning experiences at a Taiwanese university. Asian Journal of Womens Studies, 24(1), 88-105. doi:10.1080/12259276.2017.1421292