本研究以親密關係暴力的相對人作為研究對象，並且以Satir溝通姿態的概念，探討其與伴侶互動時的情況。基於相對人的性質不同，本研究以其肢體暴力的程度劃分為「輕微」、「嚴重」組別，以檢驗兩組相對人在溝通姿態上的差異情形，並且進一步探討其溝通姿態對於暴力的影響及關聯性，期望藉由對於相對人的了解，協助相關實務工作者作為處遇上的參考。
基於上述動機及目的，本研究以「Satir人際溝通量表」、「簡易衝突行為對應量表」作為評估工具，採「立意抽樣」招募20歲以上，過去一年曾發生親密關係暴力的相對人。總共回收168份有效樣本。分析過程中，發現社區、監獄樣本的相對人在人口學變項、填答反應皆有落差，因此，將兩者分開進行探討，分析結果發現：
一、 社區樣本相對人的「打岔型」溝通姿態與其肢體暴力程度有顯著正相關；監獄樣本相對人的「指責型」溝通姿態與其肢體暴力程度有顯著正相關。
二、 不論社區、監獄樣本，嚴重、輕微程度相對人在「討好型」、「指責型」、「打岔型」、「一致型」溝通姿態皆沒有顯著差異。
三、 不論社區、監獄樣本，相對人的「討好型」、「指責型」、「打岔型」、「一致型」溝通姿態，對於其施加肢體暴力與否皆沒有顯著的影響。
本研究在相關性部分，僅發現「打岔型」、「指責型」兩溝通姿態與過去研究推論相同，其它則與過去研究推論相異，反映其它溝通姿態可能不是肢體暴力相關的變項，待未來研究驗證；在檢驗相對人的差異性部分，與過去研究的結果相異，主要可能與所採用的測驗工具不同有關；最後，在影響性部分，則與過去研究相異，未來可能需要進一步控制潛在的影響變項。
本研究基於上述討論，建議未來研究可將伴侶的溝通姿態同步納進探討，並可能需要控制相對人的性格、依附關係或受家暴經驗等潛在影響變項，以利進一步了解親密關係暴力相對人回應衝突的背景及脈絡。最後，建議實務工作者，提供相關處遇計畫時，可以將相對人的溝通型態，如:「打岔型」及「指責型」，以及其不同溝通型態所反映的需求或想法，納入處遇計畫規劃之參考，以提高處遇方案之成效，降低暴力再犯之可能性。

This study focuses on the respondents of intimate partner violence (IPV), specifically utilizing the "communication stances" proposed by Satir. To examine the differences in communication stances between different types of respondents, they are categorized into "mild" and "severe" groups based on the degree of physical violence they inflicted. Also, to provide an understanding of respondents to assist practitioners in their interventions, the present study explores the effect and correlation of these communication stances with violence.
Motivated by the above objectives, the study applied the "Satir Interpersonal Communication Scale" and the "Brief Conflict Tactics Scales" as measurements. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling, comprising individuals over 20 who had experienced IPV within one year. A total of 168 valid samples were collected. During the analysis, differences in demographic variables and response patterns were observed between the community and prison samples. Consequently, two groups were analyzed separately, leading to the following findings:
A. In the community sample, "irrelevant stance" was positively correlated to the severity of physical violence. In the prison sample, the "blaming stance" was positively correlated to the severity of physical violence.
B. Regardless of the community or prison samples, there were no significant differences in "placating", "blaming", "irrelevant", and "congruent" stances between the "mild" and "severe" groups.
C. In both community and prison samples, respondents' "placating", "blaming", "irrelevant", and "congruent" stances had no significant effect on engaging in physical violence.
In correlation, this study only found that "irrelevant" and "blaming" stances align with previous research findings. Other differences may reflect those other stances are not variables related to physical violence, pending confirmation in future studies. In the examination of differences between respondents, the study differs from previous research, possibly due to discrepancies in assessment tools. Finally, to explore the effect, the result also differs from past research, suggesting that it may be necessary to further control potential variables in the future.
The study suggests that future research should consider the communication stances of partners simultaneously. Furthermore, to gain a deeper understanding of the context and background, it is suggested to control potential variables such as the personality of the partner, attachments, or experiences of domestic violence. Lastly, to enhance the effectiveness of intervention programs and reduce the likelihood of violence recurrence, practitioners are advised to consider the "irrelevant" and "blaming" stances of respondents, as well as the needs or thoughts reflected by the other 3 stances when developing intervention programs.

第一章、 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 3
壹、 研究目的 3
貳、 研究問題 3
第三節 名詞釋義 4
壹、 親密關係暴力 4
貳、 親密關係暴力相對人 4
參、 溝通姿態 5
第二章、 文獻探討 6
第一節 Satir溝通姿態之內涵及相關研究 6
壹、 Satir模式家族治療簡介 6
貳、 五大溝通姿態 7
參、 溝通姿態之相關研究 8
第二節 親密關係暴力之內涵、測量工具 9
壹、 親密關係暴力之內涵 9
貳、 親密關係暴力之測量工具 11
第三節 相對人之類型及相關研究 13
壹、 進行相對人分類之助益 13
貳、 相對人之類型 13
參、 輕微、嚴重暴力相對人之差異 16
肆、 輕微、嚴重程度相對人在溝通姿態上之差異 17
第四節 溝通姿態與親密關係暴力之相關研究 20
壹、 溝通姿態與親密關係暴力之相關性 20
貳、 溝通姿態對於肢體暴力發生與否之影響 21
第三章、 研究設計與實施 23
第一節 研究架構 23
第二節 研究假設 24
第三節 研究對象 25
第四節 研究工具 26
壹、 自編問卷 26
貳、 Satir人際溝通量表 26
參、 Brief CTS 26
第五節 研究程序 28
壹、 準備階段 28
貳、 預試階段 28
參、 正式實施階段 28
肆、 資料分析與撰寫階段 28
第六節 資料處理 29
壹、 描述統計 29
貳、 Spearman相關分析 29
參、 獨立樣本t檢定 29
肆、 Logistic迴歸分析 29
第四章、 研究結果與討論 30
第一節 參與者人口學變項、溝通姿態、肢體暴力之現況 30
壹、 全部樣本人口學變項之描述統計 30
貳、 社區、監獄樣本人口學變項之描述統計 33
參、 相對人溝通姿態之描述統計 36
肆、 相對人肢體暴力之描述統計 37
伍、 討論 39
第二節 相對人的溝通姿態與肢體暴力程度之相關 42
壹、 社區樣本之結果 42
貳、 監獄樣本之結果 42
參、 討論 43
第三節 不同暴力程度的相對人在溝通姿態上之差異情形 45
壹、 社區樣本之結果 45
貳、 監獄樣本之結果 46
參、 討論 46
第四節 相對人的溝通姿態對於是否施加肢體暴力之影響 52
壹、 社區樣本之結果 52
貳、 監獄樣本之結果 53
參、 討論 54
第五章、 結論 55
第一節 研究限制與建議 55
壹、 研究參與者 55
貳、 研究工具與設計 55
第二節 實務運用與建議 56
參考文獻 57
中文文獻 57
外文文獻 58
附錄 65
附錄一、 自編問卷（基本資料） 65
附錄二、 Satir人際溝通量表 67
附錄三、 Brief CTS 68
附錄四、 問卷授權證明 70
附錄五、 研究倫理審查核可證明、變更通知 71

中文文獻
王珮玲、沈慶鴻、韋愛梅 （2021）。親密關係暴力防治 : 理論、政策與實務。高雄市：巨流圖書。
王國仲（2008）。婚姻暴力相對人之心理歷程研究—以薩提爾模式之冰山理論觀點出發〔未出版之碩士論文〕。淡江大學。
吳雨靜（2023）。國中生及其父母正念、一致型溝通姿態與親子關係滿意度之對偶分析〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學。
吳亞嬙、梁文鴻 （2010）。男性家庭暴力加害者心態成因探討。輔導季刊，46（1）， 1-6。https://doi.org/10.29742/GQ.201003.0001
吳婷盈、鄧志平、王櫻芬（譯）（2012）。家族治療概觀（一版）（原作者：Irene Goldenberg, Herbert Goldenberg）。臺北市：雙葉書廊。（原著出版年：2007）
吳就君（譯）（2006a）。家庭如何塑造人（第二版）（原作者：Virginia Satir）。臺北市：張老師文化。（原著出版年：1988年）
吳就君（譯）（2006b）。聯合家族治療（原作者：Virginia Satir）。臺北市：張老師文化。（原著出版年：1983年）
林明傑、沈勝昂（2003）。我國婚姻暴力加害人之危險評估－DA量表在我國
適用之研究。犯罪學期刊，6(2)，177-215。
https://doi.org/10.29607/zhwhgx.200312.0004
林明傑、沈勝昂（2004）。婚姻暴力加害人分類之研究。中華心理衛生學刊，
17(2)，67-92。https://doi.org/10.30074/fjmh.200406_17(2).0003
周詩寧（譯）（2004）。預防家庭暴力（原作者：Kevin Browne、Martin Herbert）。臺北市：五南。（原著出版年：1997年）
易之新（譯）（2009）。心靈的淬鍊:薩提爾家庭重塑的藝術（原作者：Maria Gomori 、Eleanor Adaskin）。臺北市：張老師文化。（原著出版年：2008年）
南玉芬、羅幼瓊（2016）。與家庭暴力相對人並肩前行－關係初期會談技巧分析。社會發展研究學刊，（18），73-102。https://doi.org/10.6687/JSDS.2016.18.4
陳怡青、張紀薇、李美珍（2012）。婚姻暴力加害人處遇成效評估研究之初探
。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，8(2)，17-53。
https://doi.org/10.29804/AJDVSO.201212.0002
陳奕吟、卓紋君（2017）。夫妻原生家庭溝通姿態、婚姻溝通姿態、婚姻調適策略與婚姻滿意度之對偶分析。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，(31)，7-51。https://doi.org/10.6308/JCPRC.201711_(31).0001
曹馥年（2021）。都是莽夫的錯？加害vs.被害標籤對立下，被遮蓋的「家暴相對人」。存取日期：2023/06/12。取自
https://www.twreporter.org/a/domestic-violence-the-respondent
黃煜文（譯）（2004）。錯的是我們，不是我：家暴的動力關係（原作者：Linda Mills）。臺北市：商周出版。（原著出版年：2003）
劉冉（譯）（2018）。暴力：從常態到殘暴，以微觀角度探索個人、家庭和社會中超過30種暴力的形成和真相（原作者：Randall Collins）。臺北市：臉譜出版。（原著出版年：2008）
劉瓊瑛（譯）（2011）。家族治療（第九版）（原作者：Michael Nichols）。臺北市：洪葉文化。（原著出版年：2009）
潘淑滿（2021）。臺灣婦女遭受親密關係暴力統計調查計畫。衛生福利部報告
。（案號：M09C7266），未出版。
衛生福利部保護服務司（2021）。109年度「臺灣婦女遭受親密關係暴力統計
調查計畫」。存取日期：2022/12/21。取自
https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOPS/cp-1147-64194-105.html
顏欣怡、卓紋君（2013）。大學生情侶之愛情風格、溝通姿態、關係滿意度及關係承諾度之探討—對偶分析研究。中華心理衛生學刊，26（3），443-485。https://doi.org/10.30074/FJMH.201309_26(3).0005
外文文獻
Babcock, J. C., Waltz, J., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1993). Power and violence: the relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 61(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.40
Bendlin, M., & Sheridan, L. (2021). Risk Factors for Severe Violence in Intimate Partner Stalking Situations: An Analysis of Police Records. Journal of interpersonal violence, 36(17-18), 7895-7916.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519847776
Berns, S. B., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1999). Demand–withdraw interaction in couples with a violent husband. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 67(5), 666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.67.5.666
Bird, G. W., Stith, S. M., & Schladale, J. (1991). Psychological resources, coping strategies, and negotiation styles as discriminators of violence in dating relationships. Family Relations, 45-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/585657
Boyle, D. J., O’Leary, K. D., Rosenbaum, A., & Hassett-Walker, C. (2008). Differentiating Between Generally and Partner-Only Violent Subgroups: Lifetime Antisocial Behavior, Family of Origin Violence, and Impulsivity. Journal of family violence, 23(1), 47-55.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9133-8
Browne, A. (2008). When battered women kill. Simon and Schuster.
Christensen, A., & Sullaway, M. (1984). Communication patterns questionnaire. Journal of Marriage and the Family. https://doi.org/10.1037/t02529-000
Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and individual differences, 13(6), 653-665.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I
Cunha, O., & Gonçalves, R. A. (2013). Intimate partner violence offenders: Generating a data-based typology of batterers and implications for treatment. The European journal of psychology applied to legal context, 5(2), 131-139. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2013a2
Dutton, D. G. (2007). Rethinking domestic violence: University of British Columbia Press.
Feldman, C. M., & Ridley, C. A. (2000). The role of conflict-based communication responses and outcomes in male domestic violence toward female partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(4-5), 552-573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500174005
Felson, R. B., & Messner, S. F. (2000). The control motive in intimate partner violence. Social psychology quarterly, 86-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695883
Follingstad, D. R., & Dehart, D. D. (2000). Defining psychological abuse of husbands toward wives: Contexts, behaviors, and typologies. Journal of interpersonal violence, 15(9), 891-920. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626000015009001
Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. L., Berg, B. J., Hause, E. S., & Polek, D. S. (1990). The role of emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships. Journal of family violence, 5(2), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505277939
Gelles, R. J., & Straus, M. A. (1979). Determinants of violence in the family: Toward a theoretical interpretation. Contemporary Theories About the Family. Free Press.
Gelles, R. J. (1983). An exchange/social control theory. The dark side of families: Current family violence research, 151-165.
Graña, J. L., Redondo, N., Munoz-Rivas, M. J., & Cantos, A. L. (2014). Subtypes of batterers in treatment: Empirical support for a distinction between Type I, Type II and Type III. PloS one, 9(10), e110651. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110651
Graziano, W. G., & Eisenberg, N. (1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In Handbook of personality psychology(pp. 795-824). Academic Press.
Hague, G., & Malos, E. (1998). Domestic violence: Action for change(2nd Edition). New Clarion Press.
Hamberger, L. K., & Hastings, J. E. (1986). Personality correlates of men who abuse their partners: A cross-validation study. Journal of family violence, 1, 323-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00978276
Hardesty, J. L., Haselschwerdt, M. L., & Johnson, M. P. (2012). Domestic violence and child custody. Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family court, 442-478. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780199754021.003.0014
Hill, J. (2020). See what you made me do: Power, control and domestic abuse: Oxford University Press.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stuart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological bulletin, 116(3), 476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.476
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Smutzler, N., & Stuart, G. L. (1998). Demand and withdraw communication among couples experiencing husband violence. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 66(5), 731.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.66.5.731
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Smutzler, N., Jouriles, E. N., & Norwood, W. D. (1998). 9.20 - Victims of Domestic Violence. In A. S. Bellack & M. Hersen (Eds.), Comprehensive Clinical Psychology (pp. 325-339). Oxford: Pergamon.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., Rehman, U., & Stuart, G. L. (2000). Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 68(6), 1000-1019. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.6.1000
Hotton, T. (2001). Spousal violence after marital separation. Juristat: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, 21(7), 1.
Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal Terrorism and Common Couple Violence: Two Forms of Violence against Women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57(2), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.2307/353683
Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence. Northeastern University Press.
Johnson, R., Gilchrist, E., Beech, A. R., Weston, S., Takriti, R., & Freeman, R. (2006). A psychometric typology of UK domestic violence offenders. Journal of interpersonal violence, 21(10), 1270-1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506291655
Johnson, R. R., & Goodlin‐Fahncke, W. (2015). Exploring the effect of arrest across a domestic batterer typology. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 66(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12024
Johnston, J. R., & Campbell, L. E. (1993). A clinical typology of interparental violence in disputed‐custody divorces. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 63(2), 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079425
Kamimura, A., Nourian, M. M., Assasnik, N., & Franchek-Roa, K. (2016). Factors associated with perpetration of intimate partner violence among college students in China. Injury prevention, 22(5), 352. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041890
Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: Research update and implications for interventions. Family court review, 46(3), 476-499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00215.x
Lawson, D. M., Weber, D., Beckner, H. M., Robinson, L., Marsh, N., & Cool, A. (2003). Men Who Use Violence: Intimate Violence Versus Non-Intimate Violence Profiles. Violence and victims, 18(3), 259-277. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.2003.18.3.259
Love, H. A., Spencer, C. M., May, S. A., Mendez, M., & Stith, S. M. (2020). Perpetrator risk markers for intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(5), 922-931. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018801331
Marshall, A. D., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2010). Recognition of wives’ emotional expressions: A mechanism in the relationship between psychopathology and intimate partner violence perpetration. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017952
Messinger, A. M., Rickert, V. I., Fry, D. A., Lessel, H., & Davidson, L. L. (2012). Revisiting the Role of Communication in Adolescent Intimate Partner Violence. Journal of interpersonal violence, 27(14), 2920-2935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512438276
Mitchell, J. W., & Gamarel, K. E. (2018). Constructive communication patterns and associated factors among male couples. J Couple Relatsh Ther, 17(2), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2017.1302378
Papp, L. M., Kouros, C. D., & Cummings, E. M. (2009). Demand‐withdraw patterns in marital conflict in the home. Personal Relationships, 16(2), 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01223.x
Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. Springer Publishing Company.
Petersson, J., Strand, S., & Selenius, H. (2019). Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence: A Comparison of Antisocial and Family-Only Perpetrators. Journal of interpersonal violence, 34(2), 219-239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516640547
Petersson, J., & Strand, S. J. M. (2020). Family-Only Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(2), 367-381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018770410
Pickover, A. M., Lipinski, A. J., Dodson, T. S., Tran, H. N., Woodward, M. J., & Beck, J. G. (2017). Demand/withdraw communication in the context of intimate partner violence: Implications for psychological outcomes. Journal of anxiety disorders, 52, 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.07.002
Ridley, C. A., & Feldman, C. M. (2003). Female domestic violence toward male partners: Exploring conflict responses and outcomes. Journal of family violence, 18(3), 157-170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023516521612
Roberts, N., & Noller, P. (1998). The associations between adult attachment and couple violence: The role of communication patterns and relationship satisfaction . In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 317–350). The Guilford Press.
Ronan, G. F., Dreer, L. E., Dollard, K. M., & Ronan, D. W. (2004). Violent couples: coping and communication skills. Journal of family violence, 19(2), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOFV.0000019843.26331.cf
Ruiz, R. A., & González-Calderón, M. J. (2020). Predictors of severe intimate partner violence among antisocial and family-only perpetrators: Victims’ and offenders’ characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520943714
Rusbult, C. E., Bissonnette, V. L., Arriaga, X. B., & Cox, C. L. (1998). Accommodation processes during the early years of marriage. The developmental course of marital dysfunction (pp. 74–113). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527814.005
Schumacher, J. A., Slep, A. M. S., & Heyman, R. E. (2001). Risk factors for male-to-female partner psychological abuse. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6(2-3), 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00025-2
Smith, S. G., Zhang, X., Basile, K. C., Merrick, M. T., Wang, J., Kresnow, M.-j., & Chen, J. (2018). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2015 data brief–updated release. Retrieved from: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/60893
St-Pierre Bouchard, J., Brassard, A., Lefebvre, A.-A., Dugal, C., Lafontaine, M.-F., Savard, C., Daspe, M.-È., Péloquin, K., & Godbout, N. (2023). Cumulative Childhood Trauma, Communication Patterns, and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrated by Men Seeking Help. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(9-10), 6843-6864. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221138651
Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in everyday life. Oxford University Press.
Straus, M. A. (1974). Leveling, civility, and violence in the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 13-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/350990
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring Intrafamily Conflict and Violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 75-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/351733
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind the closed doors: Violence in the American family. Doubleday.
Straus, M. A. (1993). Identifying offenders in criminal justice research on domestic assault. American Behavioral Scientist, 36(5), 587-600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764293036005004
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of family Issues, 17(3), 283-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251396017003001
Straus, M. A. (2004). Cross-cultural reliability and validity of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales: A study of university student dating couples in 17 nations. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(4), 407-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397104269543
Straus, M. A. (2005). Conflict Theory, Feminist Theory, and the CTS. Violence Against Women: Classic Papers, 195.
Straus, M. A. (2017). The Conflict Tactics Scales and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability: Routledge.
Taquette, S. R., & Monteiro, D. L. M. (2019). Causes and consequences of adolescent dating violence: a systematic review. Journal of injury and violence research, 11(2), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1061
Tolman, R. M. (1989). The Development of a Measure of Psychological Maltreatment of Women by Their Male Partners. Violence and victims, 4(3), 159-177. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.4.3.159
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2019). Global study on homicide.
Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-
analysis/gsh/Booklet_5.pdf
United Nations. (2022). What is domestic abuse?. Retrieved from
https://www.un.org/en/coronavirus/what-is-domestic-abuse
Vissing, Y. M., Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Harrop, J. W. (1991). Verbal aggression by parents and psychosocial problems of children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 15(3), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(91)90067-N
Walsh, Z., Swogger, M. T., O'Connor, B. P., Chatav Schonbrun, Y., Shea, M. T., & Stuart, G. L. (2010). Subtypes of partner violence perpetrators among male and female psychiatric patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119(3), 563. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019858
Wangmann, J. M. (2011). Different types of intimate partner violence-an exploration of the literature. Australian Domestic & Family Violence Clearinghouse, Issues Paper, 22.
World Health Organization. (2012). Understanding and addressing violence against women: Intimate partner violence. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/77432.
World Health Organization. (2022) Intimate partner violence. Retrieved from
https://apps.who.int/violence-info/intimate-partner-violence/
Yakubovich, A. R., Stöckl, H., Murray, J., Melendez-Torres, G., Steinert, J. I., Glavin, C. E., & Humphreys, D. K. (2018). Risk and protective factors for intimate partner violence against women: Systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective–longitudinal studies. American journal of public health, 108(7), e1-e11. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304428
Zakar, R., Zakar, M. Z., & Krämer, A. (2012). Voices of strength and struggle: Women’s coping strategies against spousal violence in Pakistan. Journal of interpersonal violence, 27(16), 3268-3298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512441257