國內教育界對於教學領導日益重視，而國外對教學領導已有豐碩的成果，本研究目的為了解國際教學領導領域之研究，文獻發展趨勢、知識結構以及知識交流情形，缺口與未來發展之趨勢，以供未來研究之參考。本研究採用系統性的文獻回顧，使用Web of Science核心資料庫收錄社會科學索引（Social Sciences Citation Index，SSCI）作為文獻資料庫，以instructional leadership為檢索詞，進行教學領導文獻之檢索，共納入926篇主題文獻，分別就期刊發表數、發表地區、關鍵詞，以及重要學者進行解析。透過文獻計量分析方法，進行文獻共被引、耦合與關鍵詞共現分析，並以VOSviewer 軟體作為研究工具，並繪製科學知識圖譜，窺探教學領導研究的知識基礎，研究熱點與研究前沿。本研究發現:教學領導之知識基礎為Robinson, Marks與Hallinger三位學者之文獻；研究熱點包含「校長領導」、「學校領導」、「分佈式領導」以及「轉型領導」；研究前沿為「工作滿意度」與「知覺」。本研究建議，未來的教學領導研究可探討心理層面之變項，並採用收錄中文文獻之電子資料庫與田野調查或個案研究進行更深廣的研究。

The domestic education community pays more and more attention to instructional leadership, and foreign countries have achieved fruitful results on instructional leadership. The purpose of this research is to understand the research in the field of international leadership, the development trend of literature, knowledge structure, knowledge exchange, research gaps, trends for future research. This study adopts a systematic literature review, uses the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) included in the Web of Science core database as the literature database, and uses instructional leadership as the keyword to search for instructional leadership literature. A total of 926 literatures are analyzed in terms of the number of journal publications, publication regions, keywords, and important scholars. Through the bibliometric analysis method, the co-citation, coupling and keyword co-occurrence analysis of the literature is carried out, and the VOSviewer software is used as a research tool, and the scientific knowledge map is drawn to explore the knowledge base, research hotspots and research fronts of instructional leadership research. This study found that: the knowledge base of instructional leadership is the literature of three scholars, Robinson, Marks and Hallinger; the research hotspots include "principal leadership", "school leadership", "distributed leadership" and "transformation leadership"; the research front is "Work Satisfaction" and "Perception". This study suggests that future research on instructional leadership explore the variables at the psychological topics, and conduct more extensive research using electronic databases containing Chinese literature and fieldwork or case studies for further research.

摘 要 I
致謝辭 III
目 次 IV
表 次 V
圖 次 VI
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題 3
第三節 名詞釋義 3
第四節 研究範圍與限制 6
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 教學領導之發展 9
第二節 教學領導之意涵 10
第三節 教學領導之相關研究 16
第四節 科學知識圖譜概述 28
第三章 研究設計與實施 43
第一節 研究步驟與架構 43
第二節 研究方法 45
第三節 資料來源與研究工具 45
第四節 資料處理與分析 49
第四章 研究結果與討論 51
第一節 教學領導研究文獻分佈情形 51
第二節　教學領導研究文獻共被引分析 60
第三節　教學領導研究文獻共詞分析 70
第四節 教學領導研究文獻耦合分析 80
第五節 討論 90
第五章 研究結論與建議 97
第一節 研究結論 97
第二節 研究建議 99
參考文獻 101

壹、中文部分
王元仁、李分明、張永富（2004）。學校行政主管衝突管理與情緒智慧關係之探討。學校行政雙月刊，34，70-84。
何光國(1994)。文獻計量學導論。三民。
吳冠儀(2003)。1999-2001 年海峽兩岸圖書館學核心期刊論文主題及引文之分析研究。淡江大學。
吳清山（2006）。教育概論。五南。
李安明（1999）。「為教學而行政」的校長教學領導：理論與實務。教育政策論壇，2（2），158-203 。
李安明（2006）。我國國小教學領導、教師文化與教師組織承諾之研究（Ι）。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（NSC93-2413-H-134-003）。新竹：國立新竹教育大學教育學系。
李安明（2010）。我國國小教學領導、專業發展與學生學習成果之研究（Ⅰ）。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（NSC97-2410-H-134-004）。新竹：國立新竹教育大學教育學系。
李安明(2011)。國民小學教學領導運作之責任探究：以新竹縣市3所國小為例。教育行政論壇，8(1) 1-33
李杰（2015）。安全科學知識圖譜導論。化學工業出版社。
李杰（2016）。CITESPACE-科技文本挖掘及可視化。北京經濟學院。
李杰（2017）。科學計量與知識網路分析：基于BibExcel等軟件的實踐。首都經濟貿易大學出版社。
李杰（2018）。科學知識圖譜原理及應用——VOSviewer于CitNetExplorer初學者指南。高等教育出版社。
李杰、陳超美（2017）。CiteSpace科技文本挖掘及可視化(第二版)。首都經濟貿易大學出版社。
李俊湖（2007）。教師專業成長，十年教改的回顧與展望。研習資訊，24(6)，97-102。
李俊毅（2018）。公立高中職校長正向領導、教師學術樂觀與教師專業發展相關之研究（未出版之博士論文）。
肖明（2017）。圖書館學情報學知識圖譜研究：理論、方法與應用。中國書籍。
周欣怡（2014）。國民小學教學領導之個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學，南投縣。
周麗修（2016）。高級中學校長學習領導、教師專業發展與教師創新教學關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
林新發、黃秋鑾(2014)。推動教學領導以提升教師專業學習社群互動之策略。臺灣教育評論月刊，3(1)，43-62。
林瑄敏（2009）。桃園縣國民小學教師知覺學校文化與教師專業發展關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
孫國華（2008）。UNESCO 對教師專業發展的啟示。師友，497，40-44。
秦夢群、楊詠翔2014）。校長知識領導、教師專業發展與學校智慧資本關係之研究。教育與心理研究，37(4)，1-30。
高博銓（2002）。析論校長的教學領導。中等教育，53 (6)，66-81。
張本文（2011）。教師領導與教師專業發展關係之研究。東海教育評論，6，62-82。
張德銳 (1995）。教育行政研究。五南。
張德銳（1996）。對「中小學學校之經營」之評論。教改通訊，19，9-12。
張慶勳（2011）。校長領導促進學校組織的變革與發展：以校長領導的反思與學習為切入點。香港中文大學。
梁文堂（2015）。教師專業發展成效輔助決策評估模型（未出版之碩士論文）。東方設計學院，高雄市。
梁金都、洪志成（2011）。從分散知覺觀點分析國小教學領導的知覺歷程。當代教育研究季刊, 19(2)，41-80。
許文華（2002）。醫學基因工程文獻之書目計量學研究。國立政治大學。
郭小蘋、吳勁甫（2016）。臺灣教學領導研究之分析與展望－以學位論文為例。學校行政，73， 2011。
陳政達（2005）。由標準制定之活動探討下世代網路關鍵技術的趨勢與發展（未出版之碩士在職專班碩士論文），國立中央大學。
陳悅、陳超美、劉則淵、胡志剛、王賢文（2015）。CiteSpace知識圖譜的方法論功能。科學學研究，33(2)，242-253。
陳慧敏（2003）。國民小學教師之教學領導知覺與自我效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東師範學院，屏東。
黃錫隆（2004）。台北縣國民小學教學領導策略之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，台北。
楊良斌(2012)。跨學科視角下研究領域的發展狀態分析。圖書情報工作，56(04)，41-46.
楊思洛（2018）。中外圖書情報學科知識圖譜比較研究。科學出版社。
楊振昇（1997）。教學領導理念之探討。載於高強華（主編），學校教育革新專輯（235-263頁）。國立臺灣師範大學。
楊振昇（2003）。教育領導與教師專業發展。教育資料集刊，28，287-318。
楊振昇（2004）。近十年來教育組織變革對教學領導之啟示。教育政策論壇，7（2），107-130。
劉明德（2005）。中小學教學領導核心技術關鍵之探討。學校行政（38），65-75。
劉則淵、陳悅、侯海燕（2008）。科學知識圖譜：方法與應用。人民出版社。
劉鎮寧（2014）。高屏地區國小教師專業發展學習動機與專業表現之研究。教育學刊，42，111-150。
歐曉玟（2001）。彰化縣國民小學教學領導之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中師範學院，臺中。
蔡明月（2003）。資訊計量學與文獻特性（頁62 – 65），國立編譯館。
蔡明月、吳嘉雯（2001）。半導體期刊共被引研究。資訊傳播與圖書館學，8(2)，9-21。
魯先華（1994）。國民中學教學領導之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所，台北市。
謝傳崇（2012）。校長正向領導：理念、研究與實踐，臺北市：高等教育。
謝傳崇、邱世方（2014）。國民小學校長策略領導對學校創新經營效能關係之研究：以學校創新氣氛為中介變項，教育政策論壇，17（2），105-137。
顏國樑（2014）。 我國中小學教師專業發展評鑑執行成效、挑戰與對策－教育政策運作過程的觀點。教育研究集刊，14，5-38。
饒見維（2003）。教師專業發展：理論與實務。五南。

貳、英文部分
Abramovitz, M. (2001). What’s your emotional IQ? Current Health 2, 28(4), 13-15.
Ahlgren, P., Jamneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 550-560.
Andrews, J. E. (2003). An author co-citation analysis of medical informatics. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 91(1), 47-56.
Bellibas, M. S., & Liu, Y. (2017). Multilevel analysis of the relationship between principals’ perceived practices of instructional leadership and teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(1), 49-69.
Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2000). Effective instructional leadership: Teachers’ perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 130–141.
Boissel, J. P., & Haugh, M. C. (1993). The iceberg phenomenon and publication bias: The editor's fault? Clinical Trials Meta-Analysis, 28(6), 309-315.
Borner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179-255.
Boyack, J. W., & Klavans, K. R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling,and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 6(12), 2389-2404.
Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. II: Dynamical aspects. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 42(4), 252-266.
Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191-235.
Camburn, E., Rowan, B., & Taylor, J. E. (2003). Distributed Leadership in Schools: The Case of Elementary Schools Adopting Comprehensive School Reform Models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 347–373.
Chen, C. (2004). Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 10/(suppl 1), 5303-5310.
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377.
Çoban Ö., Özdemir N., & Bellibaş M. Ş. (2020) Trust in principals, leaders’ focus on instruction, teacher collaboration, and teacher self-efficacy: Testing a multilevel mediation model. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85094195576&doi=10.1177%2f1741143220968170&partnerID=40&md5=04a7aa4830b3a4cf72390f499d38122b.
Desimone, L. M., Smith, T. M., & Ueno, K. (2006). Are Teachers Who Need Sustained, Content-Focused Professional Development Getting It? An Administrator’s Dilemma. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 179–215.
Dou, D., Devos, G., & Valcke, M. (2017). The relationships between school autonomy gap, principal leadership, teachers’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(6), 959–977.
Gentilucci, J. L., & Muto, C. C. (2007) Principals’ Influence on Academic Achievement: The Student Perspective. NASSP Bulletin, 91(3), 219-236.
Goddard, R., Goddard, Y., Kim, E. S., & Miller, R. (2015) A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501-530.
Gumus , E., & Bellibas, M. S. (2017). The ef fects of professional development activities on principals’ perceived instructional leadership practices : Multi-country data analysis using TALIS 2013. Educational Studies, 42(3), 287-301.
Gumus, S., Bellibas, M. S., Esen, M., & Gumus, E. (2018). A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 25-48.
Hallinger, P (2004). Meeting the challenges of cultural leadership: the changing role of principals in Thailand. Cultural Politics of Education, 25(1), 61-73.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behaviors of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217-247.
Hallinger, P. (1992). The evolving role of American principals: From managerial to instructional to transformational leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 30(3), 35-48.
Hallinger, P. (2008). Methodologies for studying school leadership: A review of 25 years of research using the principal instructional management rating scale. paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
Hallinger, P. (2010). Developing instructional leadership. Developing successful leadership, 61-76.
Hallinger, P. (2011). A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the principal instructional management rating scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 271-306.
Hallinger, P. (2020). Science mapping the knowledge base on educational leadership and management from the emerging regions of Asia, Africa and Latin America, 1965-2018. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 48(2), 209-230.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44.
Hallinger, P., & Kovacevic, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335-369.
Hallinger, P., & M. Lee. (2013). Exploring Principal Capacity to Lead Reform of Teaching and Learning Quality in Thailand. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(4), 305-315.
Hallinger, P. (2003). The Emergence of School Leadership Development in an Era of Globalization: 1980-2000. Reshaping the landscape of school leadership development: A global perspective(pp.3-22). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Hallinger, P., Adams, D., Harris, A., & Suzette Jones, M. (2018). Review of conceptual models and methodologies in research on principal instructional leadership in Malaysia: A case of knowledge construction in a developing society. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(1), 104-126.
Hallinger, P., Hosseingholizadeh, R., Hashemi, N., & Kouhsari, M. (2017). Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 46(5), 800-819.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980‐1995, School effectiveness and school improvement, 9(2), 157-191
Honig, M. I. (2012). District Central Office Leadership as Teaching: How Central Office Administrators Support Principals’ Development as Instructional Leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 733–774.
Jie, L., Shimin, G., & Zhijuan, Y. (2017). Visualization analysis on knowledge organization based on Web of Science. International Journal of Science, 4(4), 1-9.
Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2006). Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 251-263.
Krüger, M. L., Witziers, B., & Sleegers, P. (2007). The impact of school leadership on school level factors: Validation of a causal model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(1), 1-20.
Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30 (4), 498–515.
Leithwood, K. (2001). School leadership in the context of accountability policies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(3), 217-235.
Leithwood, K. A., Aitken, R., & Jantzi, D. (2001). Making schools smarter: A system for monitoring school and district progress (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Liu, S., & Hallinger P. (2018). Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 501-528.
Louis, K. S., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 315–336.
Marks, H. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370-397.
Marshakova, S. I. (1973). System of document connections based on references. Nauchno-Teknicheskaya Informatsiya, 2(6), 3-8.
May, H., Huff, J., & Goldring, E. (2012). A Longitudinal Study of Principals’ Activities and Student Performance.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 417-439
McEwan, E. K. (2003). Seven steps to effective instructional leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin press, Inc.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269.
Murphy, J. (1990). Principal instructional leadership. In R. S. Lotto & P. W. Thurston (Eds.), Advances in educational administration: Changing perspectives on the school (Vol. 1, Pt. B, pp. 163-200). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Murphy, J. (1992). The landscape of leadership preparation: Reframing the education of school administrators. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
Nerur, S. P., Rasheed, A. A., & Natarajan, V. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co‐citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29(3), 319-336.
O'donnell, R.J., & White, G. P. (2005). Within the Accountability Era: Principals' Instructional Leadership Behaviors and Student Achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 89(645), 56-71.
Ovando, M.N., & Ramirez Jr. A. (2007). Principals' instructional leadership within a teacher performance appraisal system: Enhancing students' academic success. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20(1-2), 85-110.
Park, J. H., & Ham S. H. (2016). Whose perception of principal instructional leadership? Principal-teacher perceptual (dis)agreement and its influence on teacher collaboration. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(3), 450-469.
Qian, H., Walker A., & Li, X. (2017). The west wind vs the east wind: instructional leadership model in China. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(2), 186-206.
Quinn, D. M. (2002). The impact of principal leadership behaviors on instructional practice and student engagement. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(5), 447-467.
Rigby, J. G., Larbi-Cherif, A., Rosenquist, B. A., Sharpe, C. J., Cobb, P., & Smith, T. (2017). Administrator observation and feedback: Does it lead toward improvement in inquiry-oriented math instruction? Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(3), 475-516.
Robinson, V. M. J.(2008). The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: An Analysis of the Differential Effects of Leadership Types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674.
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638-641.
Sebastian, J., Huang, H., & Allensworth, E. (2017). Examining integrated leadership systems in high schools: Connecting principal and teacher leadership to organizational processes and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(3), 463-488.
Shengnan, L., & Hallinger, P. (2020). Unpacking the effects of culture on school leadership and teacher learning in China. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85078116827&doi=10.1177%2f1741143219896042&partnerID=40&md5=8c0971293647f59c55c1c354a891cfb4.
Sheppard, L. B. (1996). Exploring the transformational nature of instructional leadership. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 325-344.
Small, H. G. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
Song, F., Eastwood, A. J., Gilbody, S., Duley, L., & Sutton, A. J. (2000). Publication and related biases. Health Technology Assessment, 4(10), 1-115.
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(1), 3-34.
Stein, M. K., & Nelson, B. S. (2003). Leadership content knowledge, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 423-448.
Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How Principals and Peers Influence Teaching and Learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31-56.
Thanuskodi, S., & Umamaheswari, P. (2013). Bibliometric analysis of electronic Journal of Knowledge Management. International Journal of Advanced Library and Information Science, 1(1), 23-32.
Thelwell, M. (2008). Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 605-621.
Tsay, M. Y., Xu, H., & Wu, C. W. (2003). Journal co-citation analysis of semiconductor literature. Scientometrics, 57(1), 7-25.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053-1070.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize co-occurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1635-1651.
Wang, Y., Bowers, A. J., & Fikis, D. J. (2017). Automated text data mining analysis of five decades of educational leadership research literature: Probabilistic topic modeling of EAQ articles from 1965 to 2014. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(2), 289-323.
White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author co-citation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171.
White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-356.
Whittaker, J., Courtial, J. P., & Law, J. (1989). Creativity and conformity in science: Titles, keywords and co-word analysis. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 473-496.
Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.