COVID-19大流行情況下的在線學習。2019年COVID-19疫情大流行，造成教育系統上極大的改變，原本在教室進行的教學行為全部轉為遠距教學。因此，本研究將建置一份具有信度與效度之「新竹市國民小學教師應對COVID-19之科技接受度與遠距技術支援需求問卷量表」，並分析國民小學教師對於各項科技教學工具的專業知能、認同程度和接受度。本研究採調查研究法之抽樣設計，研究對象為COVID-19疫情大流行期間於國民小學任教之教師，自編問卷經過學者、專家評鑑題項的有效度後建立內容效度指標，接著形成問卷初稿。問卷發放方式採用線上表單進行調查，將收集到的資料進行描述性統計、項目分析、信度分析；建立問卷之信度與效度，即完成正式版「新竹市國民小學教師應對COVID-19之科技接受度與遠距技術支援需求問卷量表」。結果顯示正式版檢核表共有四個向度共35題，全問卷量表及各分項向度之內部一致性之α值介於.813至.898間，內容效度經六位專家評鑑審題CVI值均為1.0，顯示本檢核表具有良好信度與效度。正式版「新竹市國民小學教師應對COVID-19之科技接受度與遠距技術支援需求問卷量表」是一份具有信度及效度的問卷量表，能應用在現下及未來將要進入校園的教師上，此問卷量表能讓教師們了解自身專業知能的情況，也能讓學校行政單位、政府單位作為政策推動的參考依據。

Online learning in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic in 2019 has caused great changes in the education system, and all the teaching behaviors originally carried out in classrooms have been converted to distance teaching. Therefore, this research established a reliable and valid questionnaire of "Compilation of the Questionnaire about the Technology Adaption and Remote Technical Support Needs of the Elementary-School Teachers in Hsinchu City in Response to Covid-19", and analyzed the professional knowledge, recognition and acceptance of various technology teaching tools among national elementary school teachers. This study was conducted using a survey research method sampling design. The research objects were teachers who taught in national primary schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. The questionnaire was evaluated by scholars and experts to assess the validity of the questions, created Content Validity Indicators, followed by the first draft of the questionnaire. The questionnaires were distributed by online survey. The data collected were analyzed by descriptive statistics, item analysis, and reliability analysis; to establish the reliability of the questionnaire, the official version of the "Compilation of the Questionnaire about the Technology Adaption and Remote Technical Support Needs of the Elementary-School Teachers in Hsinchu City in Response to Covid-19" was completed. The results showed that the official version of the questionnaire had four dimensions and a total of 35 questions. The internal consistency of the whole questionnaire and each sub-dimension ranged from .813 to .898. The content validity was evaluated by six experts. The CVI values of the examination questions are all 1.0, indicating that the checklist has good reliability and validity, Which means that the inspection items in each dimension are important. The official version of " Compilation of the Questionnaire about the Technology Adaption and Remote Technical Support Needs of the Elementary-School Teachers in Hsinchu City in Response to Covid-19" was a reliable and valid questionnaire that could be applied to current and future teachers entering schools. This questionnaire will help teachers understand their own professional knowledge, and will also be used by school administrators and government agencies as a reference for policy promotion.

第一章　緒論............. 2
第一節　研究背景與動機.... 2
第二節　研究目的與研究問題.... 7
第三節　名詞釋義......... 8
第四節　研究範圍與限制.... 12
第二章　文獻探討......... 15
第一節　在COVID-19大流行轉換的教學模式.... 15
第二節　平板電腦運用於教學之相關研究...... 19
第三節　互動式電子白板運用於教學之相關研究.... 22
第四節 科技接受度....................... 27
第三章　研究設計與實施.................... 31
第一節　研究架構......................... 31
第二節　研究對象........................ 33
第三節 調查問卷之編製................. 34
第四節 研究執行程序.................... 47
第五節 資料處理與分析................. 52
第四章 研究結果與分析.................. 54
第一節 描述性統計分析................. 54
第二節 項目分析（ITEM ANALYSIS）....... 56
第三節 開放式題項與其他歸納與整理....... 60
第五章 研究結論與建議................ 61
第一節 研究結論...................... 61
第二節 研究建議...................... 63
參考文獻................................. 64
中文部分................................. 64
西文部分................................. 67
附錄.................................... 78
附錄一 專家效度問卷...................... 78
附錄二 專家審查意見原稿.................. 93
附錄三 正式「新竹市國民小學教師應對COVID-19之科技接受度與遠距技術支援需求問卷」................................... 109

中文部分
中華民國成人教育學會（1995）。成人教育辭典。371。
今周刊，(2013)。「賈伯斯學校」 讓孩子用 iPad 上課。https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80394/post/201307050006/
王保進（2015）中文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究（二版）。心理出版社。
艾琳·黑爾（2022年3月8日）。新冠疫情：台灣對抗Covid-19的「低技術」方式。BBC NEWS中文。https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/science-60510605
朱志明（2021）。數位學伴同步遠距教學之實施，問題與對策—以國立宜蘭大學為例。臺灣教育評論月刊，10(6)，49-54。
https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=P20130114001-202106-202106030012-202106030012-49-54
行政院（2021年11月25日）。班班有網路 生生用平板-全面推動中小學數位學習精進方案。即時新聞稿。https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=9F7133D453CC16F2
吳振賢（2002）。教師網路融入教學態度、網路融入教學行為及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文。
吳孟純（2012）。平板電腦上之互動教材介面設計研究—以國小三年級英文學習為例[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺北科技大學，臺北市。
吳清山（1997）。學校效能研究。五南。
邱皓政（2019）。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS與R資料分析範例解析（六版）。五南。
邱紹雯 (2022年6月1日)。教育史上最大規模數位轉型計畫上路｜生生有平板後教學3大挑戰正開始。親子天下媒體中心，親子天下雜誌123期。
周秩年、邱士榮、李家如、黃怡姍（2021）。第三級警戒下防疫新生活調查工作學習及親子篇。臺灣趨勢研究。https://www.twtrend.com/trend-detail/COVID-19-L3-life-survey02/
林月琴（1999）。從遠距教學之發展現況看其未來。臺北市終身學習通訊，第六期。
林珮甄（2015）。不同電子白板互動模式之教學順序對學生英語學習成效及學習態度之影響-以國小六年級為例。國立臺灣師範大學系碩士論文。
林志隆、周士雄（2010）。屏東縣e化示範點學校教師應用互動式電子白板教學之創新接受度與科技接受度。教學科技與媒體，(93)，77-94。
http://doi.org/10196943-201009-201010260014-201010260014-77-94
科技產業資訊室 (2020年8月30日)。COVID-19讓手機銷售下滑、平板電腦上升，新行動時代來臨。https://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/post/Read.aspx?PostID=16873
教育部（2012）。資訊與網路教育-ICT Education。教育部新聞稿。
教育部（2021年6月7日）。全國各級學校因應疫情延長停止到校上課至學期結束。教育部新聞稿。
https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=210015AEE5D67F5E
陳昭珍、徐芝君、洪嘉馡、胡衍南（2021）。COVID-19下臺師大的遠距教學經驗與省思。當代教育研究季刊，29(1)，1-23。
http://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202103_29(1).0001
張瑞賓、李建華（2021）。遠距教學常態化問題之探討與建議。臺灣教育評論月刊，10(6)，27-34。
教育部（2006）。建構E 化學習環境方案。臺北：教育部。
https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.201912_27(4).0006
教師教育科技能力之初探 (2011年10月15日)。數位典藏學習電子報，10(10)。
曾鈺琪（2019）。臺灣國中青少年之自然連結量表編製與信效度分析。科學教育學刊，27(4)，323-345。
黃國將（2021）。偏鄉小學 COVID-19 疫情期間透過遠距教學實踐SDG 4 的挑戰與因應。臺灣教育評論月刊, 10(9), 153-158。
https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=P20130114001-202109-202109020017-202109020017-153-158
黃加明（2022）。COVID-19 後疫情時期中等學校線上及混成教學的挑戰與實踐。中等教育,73(1), 96-113。
http://doi.org/ 10.6249/SE.202203_73(1).0006
新竹市市政新聞 (2021年5月19日)。線上教學首日竹市教學平臺自由選擇師生異地教學體育課也可上。
https://www.hccg.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=48&parentpath=&mcustomize=municipalnews_view.jsp&toolsflag=Y&dataserno=202105190010
楊凱悌、王子華、邱美虹。（2011）。互動式電子白板教室環境感受量表之發展。數位學習科技期刊，3(4)，1-18。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=P20170615002-201110-201706220020-201706220020-1-18
嘉義縣教育處（2008）。嘉義縣政府97年度施政目標與重點。嘉義：教育處。
http://www.cyc.edu.tw
數位典藏與學習電子報(2011年10月15日)。教師教育科技能力之初探。
https://newsletter.teldap.tw/news/InsightReportContent.php?nid=5067&lid=583
蕭英勵（2013）。互動式電子白板的教學效益。師友月刊，548期，62-66。
蕭英勵（2007）。教學新寵兒—互動式電子白板。師友月刊，(477)，56-59。
蕭文龍（2020）。統計分析入門與應用：SPSS中文版+SmartPLS 3(PLS-SEM)(三版)。碁峰。
戴嘉芬(2022年4月19日)。停課不停學！疫情升溫帶動「線上教學」需求 家用平板電腦滲透率大增。Yahoo!新聞。https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%81%9C%E8%AA%B2%E4%B8%8D%E5%81%9C%E5%AD%B8-%E7%96%AB%E6%83%85%E5%8D%87%E6%BA%AB%E5%B8%B6%E5%8B%95-%E7%B7%9A%E4%B8%8A%E6%95%99%E5%AD%B8-%E9%9C%80%E6%B1%82-%E5%AE%B6%E7%94%A8%E5%B9%B3%E6%9D%BF%E9%9B%BB%E8%85%A6%E6%BB%B2%E9%80%8F%E7%8E%87%E5%A4%A7%E5%A2%9E-090900799.html
魏子傑（2022）。互動式電子白板融入數學領域教學對國小四年級學生數學學習成就、數學學習態度影響之研究。國立臺中教育大學教育學系。霍淑湄（2008）。平板電腦在臺灣國中英語單字教學的應用[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
顏春煌（2015）。數位學習：觀念、方法、實務、設計與實作(三版)。碁峰。

貳、西文部分
Arif, Istyadji, M., & Syahmani. (2018). Implementasi Problem Based LearningBerbantuan Diskusi Daring terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan LarutanPenyangga. JCAE, Journal of Chemistry And Education, 1(3), 237–244.Google Scholar
Astini, NKS (2020). Challenges and Opportunities for Utilizing InformationTechnology in Online Learning during the COVID-19 Period. Cetta: Journal ofEducational Sciences, 3(2), 241–255.
Anatürk Tombak, C., & Ateşkan, A. (2019). Science teachers’ beliefs and attitudes towards the use of interactive whiteboards in education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(3), 394-414.
Al-Fudail, M., & Mellar, H. (2008). Investigating teacher stress when using technology. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1103–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Anatürk Tombak, C., & Ateşkan, A (2019) 「Science teachers’ beliefs and attitudes towards the use of interactive whiteboards in education」.
Beauchamp, G. (2004). Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard in primary schools: Towards an effective transition framework. Technology, pedagogy and education, 13(3), 327-348.
Beach, P. (2018). Examining Elementary Teachers’ Use of Online LearningEnvironments: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Research on Technology inEducation, 50(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1383216
Bruder, I. (1989). Distance Learning: What's Holding Back This Boundless Delivery System?. Electronic learning, 8(6), 30-35.
Birnbaum, B. (2001). Foundations and practices in the use of distance education. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
Ben Lovejoy (2020, February 4) Coronavirus gives boost to iPad sales even as production capacity is down, 9TO5 Google. https://9to5mac.com/2020/02/24/boost-to-ipad-sales/
Chou, C. (2003). Incidences and correlates of internet anxiety among high school teachers in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 731–749. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0747-5632
Clipa, O., & Greciuc, M. A. (2018). Relations of Style of Leadership and Achievement Motivation for Teacher. Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala, 10(4), 55-64.
Chou, H. L., & Chou, C. (2021). A multigroup analysis of factors underlying teachers’ technostress and their continuance intention toward online teaching. Computers & Education, 175, 104335.
Clipa, O., Oliĭnyk, M. I., & Stawiak-Ososińska, M. (Eds.). (2014). The actual problems of the theory and practice of modern pre-school education in Poland, Romania and Ukraine. Lumen Media Publishing.

Dewi, L. (2017). Designing Online Learning in Higher Education Institution:Case Study in Curriculum and Instruction Course at IndonesiaUniversity of Education. Edutech, 16(2), 205–221.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/e.v16i2.7616
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319‒340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptancemodel: Four longitudinal field studies. Information Systems Research, 46(2), 186-204.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Enriquez, A. G. (2010). Enhancing student performance using tablet computers. College teaching, 58(3), 77-84.
El-Gayar, O. F., Moran, M., & Hawkes, M. (2011). Students' acceptance of tablet PCs and implications for educational institutions. Educational Technology & Society, 14, 58– 70.
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sundurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). „Teacher Beliefs and Technology Integration Practices: Examining the Alignment Be-Tween Espoused and Enacted Beliefs.“. König, Johannes (Hg.), Teachers’ Pedagogical Beliefs: Definition and Operationalisation-Connections to Knowledge and Performance-Development and Change. Münster: Waxmann, 59(2), 149-70. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
Fister, K. R., & McCarthy, M. L. (2008). Mathematics instruction and the tablet PC. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(3), 285-292.

Frohberg, D., Göth, C., & Schwabe, G. (2009). Mobile learning projects – A critical analysis of the state of the art. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 307– 331.
Fauzi, I., & Khusuma, I. H. S. (2020). Teachers’ elementary school in online learning of COVID-19 pandemic conditions. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 58-70.
Greiffenhagen, C. (2002). Out of the office into the school: electronic whiteboards for education. produced by Oxford University Computing Laboratory, http://users. comlab. ox. ac. uk/christian. greiffenhagen/papers/boards/BOARDS. pdf.
Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2005). The interactive whiteboard: a literature survey. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(2), 155-170.
Gursul, F., & Tozmaz, G. B. (2010). Which one is smarter? Teacher or board. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5731-5737.
Hanson, D., Maushak, N. J., Schlosser, C. A., Anderson, M. L., Sorenson, C., & Simonson, M. (1997). Distance education: Review of the literature (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
Haßler, B., Major, L., & Hennessy, S. (2016). Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2), 139-156.
Hwang, G.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, E65– E70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01183.x

Iqbal, M., Latifah, S., & Irwandani. (2019). Pengembangan Video Blog (Vlog)Channel Youtube dengan Pendekatan STEM sebagai Media AlternatifPembelajaran Daring. Inovasi Pembangunan – Jurnal Kelitbangan, 7(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35450/jip.v7i2.140
Indrawati, B. (2020). Challenges and Opportunities for Higher Education in the Period and Post-COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Scientific Studies, 1(1), 39–48.
Keegan, D. (1993). Reintegration of the teaching acts. Theoretical principles of distance education, 113.
Keegan, D. J. (1980). On defining distance education. Distance education, 1(1), 13-36. Mnyanyi, C. B. F., & Mbwette, T. S. A. (2009). Open and distance learning in developing countries: The pas, the present and the future. Open University of Tanzania: Dares salaam.
Keegan,D.(1996).Foundations of distance education(3rd ed). Routledge.
Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20(1).
Keegan. D. (1993).Theoretical principles of distance education. London: Routledge.
Kennewell, S., & Morgan, A. (2003, July). Student teachers' experiences and attitudes towards using interactive whiteboards in the teaching and learning of young children. In Proceedings of the international federation for information processing working group 3.5 open conference on Young children and learning technologies-Volume 34 ,65-69.
Kitchen, S., Finch, S., & Sinclair, R. (2007). Harnessing technology schools survey 2007. Coventry: Becta. Retrieved July, 16, 2008.
Kalayou, M.H., Endehabtu, B.F., Tilahun, B. (2020). The Applicability of the Modified Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) on the SustainableAdoption of eHealth Systems in Resource-Limited Settings. J Multidiscip Healthc. 13, 1827-1837. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S284973
Liang, T. H., Huang, Y. M., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). An investigation of teaching and learning interaction factors for the use of the interactive whiteboard technology. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 356-367.
Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2011). Exploring learners’ acceptance toward mobile learning. In Technology acceptance in education, 145-157.
Lederman, D. (2020). Faculty Confidence in Online Learning Grows. InsideHigher Education. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2020/10/06/covid-era-experience-strengthens-faculty-belief-value-online
LAULY LI & CHENG TING-FANG & COCO LIU (2020, March 11) China demand for e-learning bites into Apple’s iPad supply. Nikkei staff Asian Review, https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Coronavirus/China-demand-for-e-learning-bites-into-Apple-s-iPad-supply.
Marinoni, G., van’t Land, H. & Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on higher education around the world: IAU global survey report. International Association of Universities.
Marinoni, G., Van’t Land, H., & Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on higher education around the world. IAU global survey report, 23.
Mehrotra, C., Hollister, C.D., & McGahey, L. (2001). Distance learning: Principles for effective design, delivery, and evaluation. Sage Publications.
Meyer, K. A.(2002).Quality in Distance Education:Focus on On-Line Learning.ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report.Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass,989Market Street, San Francisco,CA 94103-1741.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7.
McFarlane, A., Triggs, P., & Yee, W. (2008). Researching mobile learning – Interim report to Becta. UK: Becta.
Murcia, K. (2014). Interactive and multimodal pedagogy: A case study of how teachers and students use interactive whiteboard technology in primary science. Australian Journal of Education, 58(1), 74-88.
Murcia, K., & Sheffield, R. (2010). Talking about science in interactive whiteboard classrooms. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4).
Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Computers & Education, 68, 76– 85.
Mâță, L., Clipa, O., & Tzafilkou, K. (2020). The Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure University Teachers’ Attitude towards Ethical Use of Information. Technology for a Sustainable Education. Sustainability, 12(15), 1-20.
Naismith, L., Sharples, M., Vavoula, G., & Lonsdale, P. (2004). Literature review in mobile technologies and learning. http://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/19/01/43/PDF/Naismith_2004.pdf
Nikolopoulou, K., Gialamas, V., & Lavidas, K. (2021). Habit, hedonic motivation, performance expectancy and technological pedagogical knowledge affect teachers’ intention to use mobile internet. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100041.
Ozok, A. A., Benson, D., Chakraborty, J., & Norcio, A. F. (2008). A comparative study between tablet and laptop PCs: User satisfaction and preferences. Intl. Journal of Human–computer Interaction, 24, 329– 352.
O'malley, P., Lewis, M. E. B., & Donehower, C. (2013). Using tablet computers as instructional tools to increase task completion by students with autism. Online submission.
Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91-101.
Somyürek, S., Atasoy, B., & Özdemir, S. (2009). Board’s IQ: What makes a board smart?. Computers & Education, 53(2), 368-374.
Shambour, M. K. Y., & Abu-Hashem, M. A. (2022). Analysing lecturers’ perceptions on traditional vs. distance learning: A conceptual study of emergency transferring to distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3225-3245.
Sumak, B, Hericko, M., & Pusnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2067-2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005
Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2010). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In Medienbildung in neuen Kulturräumen ,87– 99. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Staff reporter, Shanghai; Willis Ke (2020, February 21) Tablet demand in China gaining momentum from epidemic, DIGITIMES Asia. https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20200221PD204.html
Samsonova, O. (2018). Elementary Teachers’ Uses and Perceptions of Interactive Whiteboards for Instruction. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(8), 17-35.
Şad, S. N., & Özhan, U. (2012). Honeymoon with IWBs: A qualitative insight in primary students' views on instruction with interactive whiteboard. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1184-1191.
Samsonova, O. (2017). Understanding elementary teachers' experiences and views using interactive whiteboards for pedagogical practices (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
Slay, H., Siebörger, I., & Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2008). Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just “lipstick”?. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1321-1341.
Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91-101.
Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91-101.
Traxler, J., & Wishart, J. (2011). Making mobile learning work: Case studies of practice. Bristol: ESCalate, HEA Subject Centre for Education, University of Bristol.
Traxler, J. (2010). Students and mobile devices. Research in Learning Technology, 18. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v18i2.10759.
ur Rahman, M. M. (2020). EFL Learners’ Perceptions about the use of mobile learning during COVID-19. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 55(5).
Vockley, M. (2007). Maximizing the Impact: The Pivotal Role of Technology in a 21st Century Education System. Partnership for 21st century skills.
Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T. and Owen, S.V. (2007) Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30, 459-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
Yanti, M. T., Kuntarto, E., & Kurniawan, A. R. (2020). Pemanfaatan PortalRumah Belajar Kemendikbud sebagai Model Pembelajaran Daring diSekolah Dasar. ADI WIDYA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 5(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25078/aw.v5i1.1306
Zahwa, I., Saptono, S., Dewi, P. (2020). The interrelation among course mastery, technology integration self efficacy, and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of prospective science teachers. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 10(1), 109-116.