|
參考文獻 中文文獻 王生銘(2018)。資訊教育融入學前教育課程之理念與思考。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(10),144-148。 王思又(2016)。Cool English線上學習平台融入英語教學對國中生英語學習動機與學習成就之影響。(未出版之碩士論文)樹德科技大學,高雄市。 王靖雯(2019)。故事創作引導成語學習: 一個「課立優」的教學示例。臺灣華語教學研究,(18),53-84。 行政院(2003)。挑戰2008:國家發展重點計畫(2002-2007)。 行政院(2009)。提升國人英語力建設計畫。 吳佩容(2018)。Dash機器人課程對國小中低年級學童程式語言學習態度之影響。(未出版之碩士論文)國立清華大學,新竹市。 李振清(2012)。台灣英語教育的演進與前瞻思維。台灣教育雙月刊,4(5),31-40。 周惠柔&林弘昌(2018)。應用虛擬實境技術與6E教學模式於高中生活科技課程之結構教學單元設計。科技與人力教育季刊,4(3),67-89。 林素菁(2019)。內容與語言整合學習模式之古典文學教學示例:以《詩經・子衿》為例。臺灣華語教學研究,(18),85-104。 侯美妃(2010)。資訊科技融入國小五年級英語音韻覺識與字母拼讀法補救教學之行動研究。(未出版之碩士論文)國立臺北教育大學,台北市。 施又瑀(2018)。臺灣程式教育的困境與展望。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(9),1-8。 范莎惠(2020)。再思雙語教育。臺灣教育評論月刊,9(10),88-91。 格林文化編輯部(2017)。全球最佳程式學習玩具Dash& Dot機器人玩出程式力。 張武昌(2006)。台灣的英語教育: 現況與省思。教育資料與研究雙月刊,69,129-144。 張武昌(2014)。臺灣英語教育的「變」與「不變」:面對挑戰,提升英語力。中等教育,65(3),6-17。 張春興(1996)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市:台灣東華。 張學謙(2016)。從單語到雙語教學:語碼轉換在語言教育的運用。臺灣語文研究,11(1),1-25。 教育部(2012)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要(重大議題型別平等教育、環境教育、資訊教育、人權教育、生涯發展教育、海洋教育)。 教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。 教育部(2014)。十二年國民教育基本綱要。 教育部(2018)。十二年國民基本教育國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校語文領域(英語文)課程綱要。 許家菁(2019)。從十二年國教英語領綱淺談雙語教育的可能性。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(9),76-81。 陳孟君、湯維玲(2020)。缺了一角的圓: 論國小資訊科技課程。 臺灣教育評論月刊,9(4),196-206。 陳郁婷(2018)。資訊科技融入英語補救教學對國小五年級低成就學童英語學習成效及態度之影響。(未出版之碩士論文)國立臺中教育大學,台中市。 陳莉雯(2019)。探究AR學單字系統(EnglishInAR)融入合作學習策略對於英語字彙學習—字音與字義之學習成效。(未出版之碩士論文)國立中央大學,桃園市。 曾俊雄,陳永輝,賴信志,&林嘉柔(2018)。針對幼兒程式教育開發的數位遊戲編輯器。TANET2018臺灣網際網路研討會,2195-2198。 馮莉雅(2019)。國小英語課程提早實施的問題分析。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(8), 119-126。 黃鈺涵(2017)。中小學國際教育施行的困境: 國際教育不等於英語教育。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(5),105-107。 楊珊珊(2016)。運用資訊科技融入合作學習於英語教學對國中生英語學習態度及成效之研究-以高雄市某國中八年級學生為例。(未出版之碩士論文)義守大學,高雄市。 鄒文莉、高實玫(2018)。CLIL教學資源書:探索學科內容與語言整合教學。書林出版有限公司。 廖芳榆(2018)。電子教科書融入國小英語教學對學生的學習成效與學習動機之影響-以小校二年級學生為例。(未出版之碩士論文)樹德科技大學,高雄市。 廖偉民(2020)。2020年臺灣公立國小推展雙語教育之探討。臺灣教育評論月刊,9(9),90-96。 翟嘉莉(2021)。科技輔助與自律學習策略融入國小英語單字教學之行動研究。(未出版之碩士論文)國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。 蒲逸悧、吳國誠(2020)。學科內容及語言整合學習在健康與體育領域應用研究。教育研究與實踐學刊,67(1),65-86。 劉守惠(2019)。PaGamO遊戲學習平臺融入國中九年級學生英語學習之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)臺灣師範大學,臺北市。 劉君珮(2018)。資訊融入教學影響師生教與學之行動研究~以國中英語科教學為例。(未出版之碩士論文)義守大學,高雄市。 蔡育真(2017)。國小教師對於資訊與通訊科技融入英語教學之態度。(未出版之碩士論文)國立屏東大學,屏東縣。 課程及教學研究中心(2016)。新課綱「程式設計」,學邏輯解問題。國家教育研究院電子報,(134)。取自:https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?grp_no=2&edm_no=134 &content_no=2672 諶亦聰(2021)。臺北市推動雙語實驗課程之歷程反思與展望。教育研究與實踐學刊,68(1), 35-45。 戴玉舟(2020)。一位公幼教師探尋英語融入課程之徑。幼兒教育,(330),18-28。 英文文獻 Akbarov, A., Gönen, K., & Aydogan, H. (2018). Content and (English) Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Applied to Math Lessons. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 11(2), 1-10. Alano, J., Babb, D., Bell, J., Booker-Dwyer, T., DeLyser, L. A., McMunn Dooley, C., & Phillips, R. (2016). K–12 computer science framework. K12 Computer Science. Baker, C., & Jones, S. P. (1998). Encyclopedia of bilingualism and bilingual education. Multilingual Matters. Ball, P., & Lindsay, D. (2010). Teacher training for CLIL in the Basque country: The case of the Ikastolas–in search of parameters. CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 162-187. Björklund, S., Mård-Miettinen, K., Bergström, M., & Södergård, M. (2006). Exploring dual-focussed education. Integrating language and content for individual and societal needs, 85-109. Blom, J., & Gumperz, J. (1972). social meaning in Linguistic: code-switching in Norway Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bloom, B. S.(1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. New Canz, T., Piesche, N., Dallinger, S., & Jonkmann, K. (2021). Test-language effects in bilingual education: Evidence from CLIL classes in Germany. Learning and Instruction, 75, 101499. Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied linguistics, 35(3), 243-262. Cinganotto, L.(2016). CLIL in Italy: A general overview. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integra-ted Learning, 9(2), 374-400. https:// doi:10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2. Cinganotto, L., & Cuccurullo, D. (2016). Open Educational Resources, ICT and Virtual Communities for Content and Language Integrated Learning. Teaching English with Technology, 16(4), 3-11. Coyle, D. (2005). CLIL: Planning tools for teachers. Nottingham: University of Nottingham. Coyle, D.(2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543-562. Coyle, D., Hood, P., Marsh, D., (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Czura, A., Papaja, K., & Urbaniak, M. (2009). Bilingual education and the emergence of CLIL in Poland. CLIL practice: Perspectives from the field, 172-178. Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms (Vol. 20). John Benjamins Pub. Dalton-Puffer, C. (2008). Outcomes and processes in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Current research from Europe’ in W. Delanoy and L. Volkmann (eds): Future Perspectives for English Language Teaching. Carl Winter, pp. 139–57. De Smet, A., Mettewie, L., Hiligsmann, P., Galand, B., & Van Mensel, L. (2019). Does CLIL shape language attitudes and motivation? Interactions with target languages and instruction levels. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1-20. De Zarobe, Y. R., & Lasagabaster, D. (Eds.). (2010). CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Delanoy, W., & Volkmann, L. (Eds.). (2008). Future perspectives for English language teaching (No. 388). Universitatsverlag C. Winter Programm" Heidelberger Verla An. Education Information Network in the European Union. (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Eurydice. Fazzi, F., & Lasagabaster, D. (2021). Learning beyond the classroom: students’ attitudes towards the integration of CLIL and museum-based pedagogies. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(2), 156-168. García, O. (2011). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. John Wiley & Sons. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). A student's contributions to second-language learning. Part II: Affective variables. Language teaching, 26(1), 1-11. Gardner, R. C., Lalonde, R. N., & Moorcroft, R. (1985). The role of attitudes and motivation in second language learning: Correlational and experimental considerations. Language learning, 35(2), 207-227. Garrett, P., Coupland, N., & Williams, A. (2003). Investigating language attitudes: Social meanings of dialect, ethnicity and performance. University of Wales Press. Heintz, F., & Mannila, L. (2018). Computational thinking for all: an experience report on scaling up teaching computational thinking to all students in a major city in Sweden. ACM Inroads, 9(2), 65-71. Heintz, F., Mannila, L., Nordén, L. Å., Parnes, P., & Regnell, B. (2017, November). Introducing programming and digital competence in Swedish K-9 education. In International Conference on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution, and Perspectives (pp. 117-128). Springer, Cham. Ikeda, M., Pinner, R., Mehisto, P., & Marsh, D. (2013). Editorial. International CLIL Research Journal, 2 (1), 1-3. Ioannou-Georgiou, S., & Pavlou, P. (2011). Guidelines for CLIL implementation in primary and pre-primary education. Cyprus: Cyprus Pedagogical Institute. Kanbul, S., & Uzunboylu, H. (2017). Importance of Coding Education and Robotic Applications for Achieving 21st-Century Skills in North Cyprus. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(1), 130-140. Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2009). Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional EFL classes. International CLIL research journal, 1(2), 4-17. learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury house. Lindberg, R. S., Laine, T. H., & Haaranen, L. (2019). Gamifying programming education in K‐12: A review of programming curricula in seven countries and programming games. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1979-1995. Lindholm-Leary, K. (2006). What are the most effective kinds of programs for English language learners. English language learners at school, 64-85. Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE-The European dimension: Actions, trends and foresight potential. Strasbourg: European Commission. Marsh, D. (2007). Diverse contexts, converging goals: CLIL in Europe (p. 32). D. Wolff (Ed.). Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Marsh, D. (2008). Language awareness and CLIL. Encyclopedia of language and education, 6, 233-246. Marsh, D.(1994). Bilingual Education & Content and Language Integrated Learning. International Association for Cross-cultural Communication, Language Teaching in the Member States of the European Union (Lingua), University of Sorbonne. Paris. Mifsud, C. L., & Vella, L. A. (2018). To mix languages or not? Preschool bilingual education in Malta. In Preschool Bilingual Education (pp. 57-98). Springer, Cham. Milošević, I., Živković, D., Manasijević, D., & Nikolić, D. (2015). The effects of the intended behavior of students in the use of M-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 207-215. Montalto, S. A., Walter, L., Theodorou, M., & Chrysanthou, K. (2016). The CLIL guidebook. Lifelong Learning Program. Navarro-Pablo, M., & Jiménez, E. G. (2018). Are CLIL students more motivated? An analysis of affective factors and their relation to language attainment. Porta Linguarum, 29, 71–90. Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315-341. Pladevall-Ballester, E. (2019). A longitudinal study of primary school EFL learning motivation in CLIL and non-CLIL settings. Language Teaching Research, 23(6), 765-786. Pruet, P., Ang, C. S., & Farzin, D.(2016). Understanding tablet computer usage among primary school students in underdeveloped areas: Students’ technology experience, learning styles and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1131-1144. Sabitzer, B., Antonitsch, P. K., & Pasterk, S. (2014, November). Informatics concepts for primary education: preparing children for computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 9th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 108-111) San Isidro, X., & Lasagabaster, D. (2020). Students’ and families’ attitudes and motivations to language learning and CLIL: a longitudinal study. The Language Learning Journal, 1-16. Seikkula-Leino, J. (2007). CLIL learning: Achievement levels and affective factors. Language and Education, 21(4), 328-341. Shim, J., Kwon, D., & Lee, W. (2016). The effects of a robot game environment on computer programming education for elementary school students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(2), 164-172. Ting, Y. L. T. (2010). CLIL appeals to how the brain likes its information: examples from CLIL-(neuro) science. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(3), 3-18. Vahldick, A., Mendes, A. J., & Marcelino, M. J. (2014, October). A review of games designed to improve introductory computer programming competencies. In 2014 IEEE frontiers in education conference (FIE) proceedings (pp. 1-7). IEEE. Verdugo, M. D. R. (2011). CLIL varieties across Europe. Guidelines for CLIL implementation in primary and pre-primary education, 13. Whittaker, R., Llinares, A., & McCabe, A. (2011). Written discourse development in CLIL at secondary school. Language teaching research, 15(3), 343-362. Zur Bargury, I., Haberman, B., Cohen, A., Muller, O., Zohar, D., Levy, D., & Hotoveli, R. (2012, October). Implementing a new computer science curriculum for middle school in Israel. In 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-6). IEEE
|