2019年2月香港政府提案《逃犯及刑事事宜相互法律協助法例（修訂）條例草案》（簡稱《逃犯條例》），引發上萬名香港民眾在2019年至2020年間進行了數次示威遊行。中國官方媒體在微博上的態度從運動初期幾乎不對此評論或報導，直到2019年6月中國外交部回應香港遊行，輿論與報導才更多地在社交平台上出現。隨著運動中期衝突激化，「拯救香港」、「止暴制亂」或「反對外部勢力干預」等熱搜趨勢越來越頻繁地在社群上傳播，中國政府在運動期間通過不同的策略介入了反送中運動在社交媒體上呈現的方式。本文整理了反送中運動期間至國安法通過的微博熱搜貼文與報導，觀察在運動開始至國安法發布期間的變化，並從這些改變分析中國政府如何使用不同的媒體框架，動員媒體回應議題或者去調控、擴散對中央政府有利的訊息。本研究試圖以中國社交媒體平台微博的熱搜關鍵字模型來呈現香港反送中運動持續下，中國政府控制媒體的多種策略。

In February 2019, the Hong Kong government proposed the Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation (Amendment) Bill (referred to as the "Fugitive Offenders Ordinance"), which triggered tens of thousands of Hong Kong people to hold several demonstrations between 2019 and 2020. The attitude of Chinese official media on Weibo has hardly commented or reported on the movement since the early days. It was not until June 2019 when the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded to the Hong Kong protests that more public opinion and reports surfaced on social platforms. With the intensification of conflicts in the middle of the movement, hot search trends such as "Save Hong Kong", "Stop Violence and Chaos" or "Oppose External Forces Intervention" is spreading in the community more and more frequently. Compared with remaining silent on the democracy movement, China During the campaign, the media had a different strategy than before to prevent the spread of democracy. This article sorts out the popular Weibo posts and reports from the anti-extradition movement to the passage of the National Security Law observes the changes from the beginning of the movement to the promulgation of the National Security Law, and from these changes gives a glimpse of how the Chinese government uses different media frameworks to mobilize the media To respond to issues or to regulate and spread information that is beneficial to the central government. This study attempts to use the popular keywords on Weibo, a Chinese social media platform, to show how the Chinese government responds and expresses its stance when the anti-extradition movement in Hong Kong continues to rage.

第一章、 緒論 8
一、 研究背景 8
二、 研究現象與問題 12
（一）、 不予報導事件或屏蔽相關條目 12
（二）、 批評示威者或是強調反運動 13
（三）、 擁護國家、支持香港警察 15
（四）、 運動期間的虛假訊息 17
（五）、 研究問題 18
第二章、 宣傳策略轉變理論與社交媒體的動員（mobilization） 20
一、 研究架構 20
二、 防止民主跨境傳播 20
三、 分化（demobilizing）群眾 30
四、 凝聚與支持政權 32
五、 微博平台上的虛假訊息 35
六、 主要研究假設 40
第三章、 研究設計與資料來源 44
一、 資料來源與取得 44
第四章、 研究方法與統計結果 46
一、 依變量 46
（一）、 屏蔽（censorship）策略 46
（二）、 分化（demobilize）策略 46
（三）、 氾濫（flooding）策略 46
（四）、 激勵士氣（rally）策略 49
二、 自變量 50
（一）、 參與人數 50
（二）、 示威期間日數的對數 50
（三）、 示威是否發生在週末 51
（四）、 逮捕人數（detention） 51
（五）、 使用武力鎮壓 51
（六）、 事件是否被屏蔽 53
（七）、 發布媒體層級 53
三、 走勢圖變化 56
四、 研究方法與統計結果 70
（一）、 屏蔽（Censorship）策略 72
（二）、 分化（Demobilize）策略 76
（三）、 激勵士氣（Rally）策略 78
（四）、 氾濫（Flooding）策略 80
五、 研究限制 82
六、 小結 82
第五章、 結論 84
參考文獻 87
附錄 92
(一) 黨國媒體對應表（依序排列）： 92
(二) 香港集體運動時間軸與對應之微博熱搜： 93
(三) 反送中運動開始至國安法通過期間的集會運動： 98
(四) 示威規模走勢圖： 116

一、中文部分
Harsh Taneja, Angela Xiao Wu著，蘇超、甘晨譯，2016，〈防火牆真的讓中國與世隔絕了嗎？從整合網路屏蔽和文化因素的角度來解釋網絡用戶的使用習慣〉。《傳播與社會學刊》35: 27-55。
James Griffiths著、李屹譯，2020，《牆國誌：中國如何控制網路》。臺北：游擊文化。
吳邦國，2011，〈形成中國特色社會主義法律體系的重大意義和基本經驗〉。《求是》3: 3-10。
汪宏倫，2014，〈理解當代中國民族主義：制度、情感結構與認識框架〉。《文化研究》19: 189-250。
周雪光，2020，〈社會學家周雪光談肺炎危機（上）：中國官僚如何失去了主見和能動性？〉。《端傳媒》，2020年2月18日，https://theinitium.com/article/20200218-opinion-zhouxueguang-epidemics-and-chinese-bureaucracy/。
周雪光，2020，〈社會學家周雪光談肺炎危機（下）：當務之急不是社會適應政府，而是政府適應社會〉。《端傳媒》，2020年2月19日，https://theinitium.com/article/20200219-opinion-zhouxueguang-epidemics-state-and-society/。

二、英文部分
Åberg, J., & Denk, T. (2020). Diffusion and the Choice of Democratic Government System at the Time of Democratisation. Z Vgl Polit Wiss, 14, 75–98.
Ambrosio, T., & Weiss, J. C. (2012). The Rise of the ‘China Model’ and ‘Beijing Consensus’: Evidence of Authoritarian Diffusion? Contemporary Politics, 18(4), 381–399.
Breuer, A., Landman, T., & Farquhar, D. (2015). Social Media and Protest Mobilization: Evidence From the Tunisian Revolution. Volume 80 Democratization, 22(4), 764–792.
Brinks, D., & Coppedge, M. (2006). Diffusion Is No Illusion: Neighbor Emulation in the Third Wave of Democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 39(4), 463–489.
Bunce, V. J., & Wolchik, S. L. (2006). International Diffusion and Postcommunist Electoral Revolutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39(3), 283–304.
Chen, H., Chan, M., & Lee, F. L. f. (2016). Social Media Use and Democratic Engagement: A Comparative Study of Hong Kong, Taiwan, and China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 9(4), 348–366.
Creemers, R. (2017). Cyber China: Upgrading Propaganda, Public Opinion Work and Social Management for the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Contemporary China, 26(103), 85–100.
Dickson, B. J. (2011). Updating the China Model. The Washington Quarterly, 34(4), 39–58.
Dickson, B. J. (2021). The Party and The People: Chinese Politics in the 21st Century. Princeton: Princeton University.
Dickson, B. J., Landry, P. F., Shen, M., & Yan, J. (2016). Public Goods and Regime Support in Urban China. The China Quarterly, 228, 859–880.
Doorenspleet, R., & Mudde, C. (2008). Upping the Odds: Deviant Democracies and Theories of Democratization. Democratization, 15(4), 815–832.
Esarey, A. (2021). Propaganda as a Lens for Assessing Xi Jinping’s Leadership. Journal Of Contemporary China, 30(132), 888–901.
Fingar, T., & Oi, J. C. (2020). Fateful Decisions: Choices That Will Shape China’s Future. Stanford University Press.
Finkel, E., & Brudny, Y. M. (2012). No More Colour! Authoritarian Regimes and Colour Revolutions in Eurasia. Democratization, 19(1), 1–14.
Gallagher, M., & Miller, B. (2021). Who Not What: The Logic of China’s Information Control Strategy. The China Quarterly, 1–26.
Grammaticas, D. (2013, March 14). China’s New President Xi Jinping: A Man with a Dream. BBC. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-21790384
Han, R. (2015). Defending the Authoritarian Regime Online: China’s ‘Voluntary Fifty-Cent Army’. The China Quarterly, 224, 1006–1025.
Han, R. (2018). Contesting Cyberspace in China : Online Expression and Authoritarian Resilience. New York: Columbia University.
Holbig, H. (2013). Ideology After the End of Ideology: China and the Quest for Autocratic Legitimation. Democratization, 20(1), 61–81.
Holbig, H., & Gilley, B. (2010). In Search of Legitimacy in Post-Revolutionary China: Bringing Ideology and Governance Back In. German Institute of Global and Area Studies, WP(127), 5–35.
Huang, H. (2018). The Pathology of Hard Propaganda. Volume 80, 1036–1038.
Jingrong, T. (2010). The Ccrisis of the Centralized Media Control Theory: How Local Power Controls Media in China. Media, Culture & Society, 32(6), 925–942.
Jungherr, A., Schroeder, R., & Stier, S. (2019). Digital Media and the Surge of Political Outsiders: Explaining the Success of Political Challengers in the United States, Germany, and China. Social Media + Society, 5, 1–12.
Kalathil, S., & Boas, T. C. (2003). Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression. American Political Science Review, 326–343.
Koesel, K. J., & Bunce, V. J. (2013). Diffusion-Proofing: Russian and Chinese Responses to Waves of Popular Mobilizations Against Authoritarian Rulers. Perspectives on Politics, 11(3), 753–768.
Lagerkvist, J. (2010). After the Internet, Before Democracy: Competing Norms in Chinese Media and Society. Peter Lang AG, Internationaler Verlag Der Wissenschaften.
Lei, Y. (2011). The Political Consequences of the Rise of the Internet: Political Beliefs and Practices of Chinese Netizens. Political Communication, 28, 291–322.
Lu, Y., Pan, J., & Xu, Y. (2021). Public Sentiment on Chinese Social Media during the Emergence of COVID­19. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media, 1–47.
Ma, S., & Weiss, J. C. (2022). Strong State or Vulnerable Homeland: How Chinese State Media Sought to Combat Democratic Diffusion During the 2019 Hong Kong Protests. Journal of Contemporary China, 1–17.
Minard, P. (2015). Does ICT Diffusion Increase Government Responsiveness in Autocracies? An Empirical Assessment of the Political Implications of China’s Internet. Journal of Contemporary China, 24(96), 1048–1069.
Nip, J. Y. m., & Fu, K. (2015). Networked Framing Between Source Posts and Their Reposts: An Analysis of Public Opinion on China’s Microblogs. Information, Communication & Society, 19(8), 1127–1149.
Nip, J. Y. m., & Fu, K. (2016). Challenging Official Propaganda? Public Opinion Leaders on Sina Weibo. The China Quarterly, 225, 122–144.
Rainie, L., Smith, A., Schlozman, K. lehman, Brady, H., & Verba, S. (2014). Social Media and Political Engagement. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, 1–13.
Rauchfleisch, A., & Schäfer, M. S. (2015). Multiple Public Spheres of Weibo: A Typology of Forms and Potentials of Online Public Spheres in China. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 139–155.
Repnikova, M. (2017). Media Openings and Political Transitions: Glasnost versus Yulun Jiandu. Problems of Post-Communism, 64, 141–151.
Rhue, L., & Sundararajan, A. (2011). Digital Access, Political Networks and the Diffusion of Democracy. Social Networks, 36, 40–53.
Schneider, F. (2018). China’s Digital Nationalism. Oxford University: Oxford Scholarship Online.
Silitski, V. (2010). ‘Survival of the Fittest’: Domestic and International Dimensions of the Authoritarian Reaction in the Former Soviet Union Following the Colored Revolutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 43(4), 339–350.
Starr, H., & Lindborg, C. (2003). Democratic Dominoes Revisited: The Hazards of Governmental Transitions, 1974-1996. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47(4), 490–519.
Stella, M., Ferrara, E., & Domenico, M. D. (2018). Bots Increase Exposure to Negative and Inflammatory Content in Online Social Systems. PNAS, 115(49), 12435–12440.
Su, Y., & Xiao, X. (2021). Interacting Effects of Political Social Media Use, Political Discussion and Political Trust on Civic Engagement: Extending the Differential Gains Model. The International Communication Gazette, 1–21.
Sundqvist, G. (2019). Trickle Through Democracy: Studies on Democratic Diffusion in China. Åbo Akademi University.
Vanderhill, R. (2017). Active Resistance to Democratic Diffusion. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 50(1), 41–51.
Wu, F., & Yang, S. (2019). Web 2.0 and Political Engagement in China. Voluntas, 27(0), 2055–2076.
Xin, L. (2022). One News Event, Three Media Frames. Graduate Theses and Dissertations, 1–55.
Yang, G. (2009). China Since Tiananmen: Online Activism. Journal of Democracy, 20(3), 33–36.
Yuen, S. (2015). Becoming a Cyber Power China’s Cybersecurity Upgrade and Its Consequences. China Perspectives, 2, 53–58.
Zhao, S., & Weiss, J. C. (2016). The Ideological Campaignin Xi’s China: Rebuilding Regime Legitimacy. Asian Survey, 56(6), 1168–1193.

二、外文部分
川村範行（2012）、「現代中国の社会変動とメディア政策に関する分析及び考察：群体性事件とネット世論の影響力」『名古屋外国語大学外国語学部紀要』、25-48ページ。
土井正（2009）、「成長する中国のインターネット」『麗澤大学紀要』第89巻、179-196ページ。
王氷（2013）、「中国メディアの「世論監督」機能をめぐる権力関係」筑波大学2013年度博士学位論文。