|
中文文獻 1.大學入學考試中心(2017年11月)。108新課綱與素養導向命題精進方向。2020年7月24日,取自:https://www.ceec.edu.tw/xmdoc/cont?xsmsid=0J177009711460336585&sid=0J193581842777195097 2.王文科、王智弘(2020)。教育研究法。台北市:五南。 3.王如敏(2004)。國二學生解一元一次方程式錯誤類型分析研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。 4.王姿勻(2008)。國中生數學方程式文字題解題困難及迷思概念之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學,台北市。 5.王昭傑、陳美芳(2015)。圖像式情境脈絡數學教材對國小資優生學習成效與基模影響之實驗研究。特殊教育研究學刊,40(3),59-88。 6.王毓玲(2015)。大台中地區國中一年級學生一元一次方程式應用題的解題歷程分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中興大學,台中市。 7.王釋緯(2012)。七年級學生學習一元一次方程式之錯誤類型分析-以一所都會型學校為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。 8.左台益(主編)(2019)。國民中學數學課本第一冊。台南市:南一書局企業股份有限公司。 9.余佳倫(2010)。國小數學教科書小數教材表徵轉譯活動之內容分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台中教育大學,台中市。 10.吳怡璇(2014)。臺灣各時期國中數學教科書代數教材之內容分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東大學,屏東縣。 11.周珮儀(2015)。從認知心理學探究教科書插圖設計及其教學轉化。教科書研究,8(2),139-174。 12.周新富(2016)。教育研究法。台北:五南。 13.林雅柔(2016)。大台中地區國中三年級學生二次函數文字題的解題歷程分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中興大學,台中市。 14.邱美虹(2000)。概念改變研究的省思與啟示。科學教育學刊,8(1),1-34。 15.施慧君(2020)。不同類型加減法文字題對低年級解題表現之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立清華大學,新竹市。 16.洪有情(主編)(2019)。國中數學課本第一冊(1上)。新北市:康軒文教事業股份有限公司。 17.徐偉民、徐于婷(2009)。國小數學教科書代數教材之內容分析:台灣與香港之比較。教育實踐與研究,22(2),67-94。 18.徐偉民、曾于珏(2013)。臺灣、芬蘭、新加坡國小數學教科書代數教材之比較。教科書研究,6(2),69-103。 19.徐曉慧(2010)。台灣與中國小學數學教科書代數教材內容分析之比較研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台北教育大學,台北市。 20.涂金堂(2007)。國小學生數學文字題問題結構與數學解題表現之相關研究。屏東教育大學學報,26,101-136。 21.秦麗花、邱上真(2004)。數學文本閱讀理解相關因素探討及其模式建立之研究—以角度單元為例。特殊教育與復健學報,12,99-121。 22.袁媛(1993)。國中一年級學生的文字符號概念與代數文字題的解題研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。 23.張幼賢(主編)(2019)。國民中學數學課本第一冊一年級上學期。台南市:翰林出版事業股份有限公司。 24.張景媛(1994)。國中生數學學習歷程統整模式之研究.。教育心理學報,27,141-174。 25.張瓊云(2008)。運用圖像化教學於國小文言文學習成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台東大學,台東縣。 26.教育部(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學記普通型高級中等學校數學領域。台北市:教育部。 27.許慈芳(2003)。國中生濃度問題及其同構問題之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。 28.陳嘉皇、梁淑坤(2014)。表徵與國小學生代數思考之初探性研究。教育研究集刊,60(2),1-40。 29.陳毅峰(2013)。國一新生在暑期輔導之學習成效─從整數四則運算的錯誤類型去探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中興大學,台中市。 30.傅祖怡(2018年5月2日)。素養命題中的「生活情境」。選才電子報。2020年7月24日,取自:https://www.ceec.edu.tw/xcepaper/cont?xsmsid=0J066588036013658199&sid=0J134402611608125564 31.馮婉萍(2012)。國一學生一元一次方程式錯誤類型之分析研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。 32.黃永如(2020)。探討國小六年級學生數學解題策略與偏好之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立清華大學,新竹市。 33.黃淑惠(2013)。國小六年級學童小數文字題之解題表現(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義縣。 34.廖國志(2013)。圖像表徵式學習策略應用於城鄉國小四年級數學學習成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,台中市。 35.劉秋木(1996)。國小數學科教學研究。臺北市:五南。 36.劉家樟、楊凱琳、許慧玉(2012)。小六學生不同代數表徵的解題表現、教師布題順序與代數教學信念之研究。當代教育研究季刊,20(2),93-133。 37.劉祥通、黃國勳、蘇逸潔(2010)。視覺化表徵的解題策略─以部分-整體對照活動為例。科學教育月刊,329,2-7。 38.鄭雅文(2016)。利用圖示表徵協助學生解數學文字題之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東大學,屏東縣。 39.蕭宇欽(2006)。高雄地區七年級學生解一元一次方程式迷思概念之分析研究(為出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。 40.戴文賓、邱守榕(2000)。國一學生由算術領域轉入代數領域呈現的學習現象與特徵。科學教育,10,148-175。 41.謝宜庭(2015)。桃園市某國中七年級學生一元一次方程式錯誤類型與補教教學(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。 外文文獻 1.Booth, J. L., & Davenport, J. L. (2013). The role of problem representation and feature knowledge in algebraic equation solving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 415-423. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.04.003 2.Booth, J. L., & Koedinger, K. R. (2008). Key Misconceptions in Algebraic Problem Solving. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 30(30), 571-576. 3.Booth, J. L., McGinn, K. M., Barbieri, C., & Young, L. K. (2017). Misconceptions and learning algebra. In And the rest is just algebra (pp. 63-78). Springer, Cham. 4.Booth, L. R. (1986). Difficulties in algebra. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 42(3), 2-4. 5.Brown, G., & Quinn, R. J. (2006). Algebra students’ difficulty with fractions. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 62(4), 28-40. 6.Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. 7.Cangelosi, R., Madrid, S., Cooper, S., Olson, J., & Hartter, B. (2013). The negative sign and exponential expressions: Unveiling students’ persistent errors and misconceptions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(1), 69-82. 8.Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational psychology review, 3(3), 149-210. 9.Collis, K. F. (1975). The development of formal reasoning. Newcastle, Australia: University of Newcastle. 10.Crooks, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2013). Noticing relevant problem features: activating prior knowledge affects problem solving by guiding encoding. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00884 11.Egodawatte, G. (2011). Secondary school students’ misconceptions in algebra. (Doctoral thesis, Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning, Toronto, Canada). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1807/29712. 12.Garderen, D. V. (2007). Teaching students with LD to use diagrams to solve mathematical word problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(6), 540-553. 13.Gazzaniga, M. (2000). The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 14.Gérard, V. (1998). A comprehensive theory of representation for mathematics education. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 167-181. 15.Goldin, G. A. (2003). Representation in school mathematics: A unifying research perspectives. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A Research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 275-285). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 16.Goldin, G. A., & Kaput, J. J. (1996). A joint perspective on the idea of representation in learning and doing mathematics. Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 397-430). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 17.Hoogland, K., de Koning, J., Bakker, A., Pepin, B. E., & Gravemeijer, K. (2018). Changing representation in contextual mathematical problems from descriptive to depictive: The effect on students’ performance. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 122-131. 18.Janvier, C. (1987). Representation and understanding: The notion of function as an example. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 67-71). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 19.Kaput, J. J. (1987). Representation systems and mathematics. In Janvier, C. (Ed.), Problems of representation in teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 159-195). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 20.Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. A. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 390-419. New York: MacMillan. 21.Kilpatrick, J. (1985). A retrospective account of the past 25 years of research and learning mathematical problem solving. In E. Silver (ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. 22.Ku, H-Y., & Sullivan, H. J. (2002). Student performance and attitudes using personalized mathematics instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(1), 21-33. 23.Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive science, 11(1), 65-100. 24.Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier, (Ed.), Problems of representations in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 25.Lewis, A. B., & Mayer, R. E. (1987). Students' miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational psychology, 79(4), 363-371. 26.Mainali, B. (2021). Representation in Teaching and Learning Mathematics. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(1), 1-21. 27.Mantei, J., & Kervin, L. (2014). Interpreting the images in a picture book: Students make connections to themselves, their lives and experiences. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 13(2), 76-92. 28.Martinez, M. E. (1998). What is problem solving?. The Phi Delta Kappan, 79(8), 605-609. 29.Mayer, R. E. (1982). Different problem-solving strategies for algebra word and equation problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(5), 448. 30.Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. 31.Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 41, pp. 85-139). Academic Press. 32.Montague, M., Krawec, J., Enders, C., & Dietz, S. (2014). The effects of cognitive strategy instruction on math problem solving of middle-school students of varying ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 469. 33.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 34.Paiget, J. (1964). Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 176-186. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660020306 35.Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual-Coding Approach, Oxford University Press, New York. 36.Phillips, L. M., Norris, S. P., & Macnab, J. S. (2010). Visualization in mathematics, reading and science education (Vol. 5). Springer Science & Business Media. 37.Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 38.Pongsakdi, N., Kajamies, A., Veermans, K., Lertola, K., Vauras, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2020). What makes mathematical word problem solving challenging? Exploring the roles of word problem characteristics, text comprehension, and arithmetic skills. ZDM Mathematics Education , 52(1), 33–44. 39.Pungut, M. H. A., & Shahrill, M. (2014). Students’ English language abilities in solving mathematics word problems. Mathematics Education Trends and Research, 1-11. 40.Roubíček, F. (2006). Variety of representational environments in early geometry. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 321. 41.Schnotz, W., Picard, E., & Hron, A. (1993). How do successful and unsuccessful learners use texts and graphics?. Learning and Instruction, 3(3), 181-199. 42.Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. 43.Seifi, M., Haghverdi, M., & Azizmohamadi, F. (2012). Recognition of Students’ Difficulties in Solving Mathematical Word Problems from the Viewpoint of Teachers. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(3), 2923-2928. 44.Sfard, A., & Linchevski, L. (1994). The gains and the pitfalls of reification—the case of algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 191-228. 45.Sun, Y. (2006). The role of instructional representations on students' written representations and achievements (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University). 46.Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). When graphics improve liking but not learning from online lessons. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1618-1625. 47.Swastika, G., As’ari, A., Irawan, E. B., Nusantara, T., Subanji, & Irawati, S. (2018). Representation translation analysis of junior high school student in mathematics problem solving. International Journal of Insights for Mathematics Teaching, 1(2), 115-129. 48.Vergnaud, G. (1987). Conclusions. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 227-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 49.Wilson, T. D. (2015). Role of image and cognitive load in anatomical multimedia. In Teaching anatomy (pp. 237-246). Springer, Cham. |