帳號:guest(18.217.182.134)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):王玟雅
作者(外文):Wang, Wen-Ya
論文名稱(中文):台灣非婚生育女性的母職實踐經驗
論文名稱(外文):Out-of-wedlock Motherhood Practices in Taiwan
指導教授(中文):林旖旎
指導教授(外文):Lin, Yi-Nii
口試委員(中文):吳怡珍
邱怡欣
口試委員(外文):Wu, Yi-Chen
Chiu, Yi-Hsing
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:教育心理與諮商學系
學號:107096525
出版年(民國):112
畢業學年度:111
語文別:中文
論文頁數:102
中文關鍵詞:非婚生育女性母職實踐
外文關鍵詞:out-of-wedlock birthwomanmotherhood practice
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:19
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
本研究目的為探討台灣非婚生育女性的母職實踐,五位非婚生育女性為參與者,採用半結構深度訪談蒐集資料,以反思性主題分析法分析資料。資料分析浮現非婚生育女性的日常母職實踐及母職思考,及母職實踐與社會文化特色的互動關係。研究結果呈現以下主題和次主題:(1)主題一為「對家庭與母職的認同」,包含兩個次主題。(a) 對婚育的想像與觀念:相當渴望孩子或從未想過有孩子、認為不一定要先結婚再生子、非婚生育的決定,及(b) 對家庭型態及母職的認同:對家庭的認同、對母親角色的認同、內心的補償及信心的建立。(2)主題二為「母職實踐的日常經驗」,包含四個次主題。(a)日常的母職實踐內涵:平日匆忙的行程與假日的休閒安排、育兒難題與壓力、育兒帶來的自我療癒、發現並陪伴孩子早療的過程,(b)懷孕前到產後的經歷:辛苦的生子歷程、產後憂鬱及產後的復原歷程,(c)母職實踐的策略與行動:獨自帶孩子的辛苦、視照顧孩子為現階段的重心,(d)非婚生育或單親帶來的影響:感到虧欠孩子而試圖彌補、向孩子交代生父時矛盾的態度。(3)主題三為「母職實踐的信念」,包含兩個次主題。(a)教養觀念:避免採用和上一輩一樣的教養方式、鼓勵孩子發展正向態度與品德、學習教導孩子的策略,(b)與他人共同合作的母職實踐:保有自己的空間、與專家及機構合作的母職實踐模式。(4) 主題四為「社會氛圍和其他外部因素的影響」,包含兩個次主題。(a)社會氛圍的影響:社會對單親家庭的接納程度、被社會文化檢視的母親、性與性別的歧視,(b)職場與親朋好友的支持和影響:職場權利與福利、與原生家庭的互動關係、單親/媽媽群組的支持。最後,提供建議予諮商與其他助人專業工作者、政策制定者及教育專業者,也提出未來的研究方向。

The purpose of this study is to explore the motherhood practices of women who give birth out of wedlock in Taiwan. Five women who gave birth out of wedlock participated in this study. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were used to collect data, and the data were analyzed by reflective thematic analysis. The analysis of the data revealed the daily motherhood practice and thinking of motherhood in terms of out-of-wedlock births, as well as the interaction between motherhood practice and sociocultural characteristics. The research results present the following themes and subthemes: (1) Theme 1 is " identification of family and motherhood", which contains two subthemes. (a) Imagination and conception of marriage and childbearing: longing for children or has never thought of having children, viewing unnecessary to get married first to have a child, and deciding to give birth out of wedlock, (b) Recognition of family type and motherhood: recognition of family, recognition of mother's role, inner compensation and confidence building. (2) Theme 2 is "daily experience of motherhood practices", which includes four sub-themes. (a) The connotation of daily motherhood practices: busy schedules on weekdays and leisure arrangements on holidays, parenting difficulties and pressure, self-healing brought by parenting, and discovering and accompanying children in the process of early treatment, (b) Pre-pregnancy to postpartum experience: difficult childbirth process, postpartum depression and postpartum recovery process, (c) Strategies and actions of motherhood practices: the hardship of raising the child alone, and taking care of the child as the focus at this stage, (d) The impact of out-of-wedlock birth or single parenting: feeling beholden to and attempting to compensate to the child, and being frank and contradictory when explaining the biological father to the child. (3) The third theme is "belief in motherhood practices," which contains two sub-themes. (a) Parenting concepts: avoiding the same parenting style as the previous generation, and encouraging children to develop attitudes and characters, and learning teaching strategies for children, (b) Mothering practices in cooperation with others: maintaining personal space, and creating a model of conducting motherhood practices working with professionals at institutions. (4) The fourth theme is "the impact of social atmosphere and other external factors," which contains two sub-themes. (a) The impact of the social atmosphere: social acceptance of single-parent families, mothers who are viewed by society and culture, and discrimination against sex and gender, (b) The support and influence of the colleagues at workplace, relatives, and friends: childbearing norms and benefits at the workplace, the interaction with the family of origin, and the support of the single parent/mother group. Finally, recommendations are provided to counselors and other helping professionals, policy makers, and education professionals, as well as directions for future research.
中文摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
致謝辭 IV
目錄 V
表次 VII
圖次 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節、 研究緣起 1
第二節、 研究背景 3
第三節、 研究目的與問題 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節、 非婚生育族群 7
第二節、 台灣的性別環境 9
第三節、 母職的意涵 14
第三章 研究方法 20
第一節、 研究方法 20
第二節、 研究參與者 20
第三節、 研究工具 22
第四節、 資料分析 24
第五節、 研究倫理議題之處理 28
第四章 研究結果 29
第一節、 對家庭與母職的認同 29
第二節、 母職實踐的日常經驗 39
第三節、 母職實踐的信念 60
第四節、 社會氛圍與外部因素的影響 66
第五章 討論 79
第一節、 研究結果討論 79
第二節、 研究建議與限制 84
第三節、 結論 86
後記 87
參考文獻 88
附錄一 101
附錄二 102

Arlie Hochschild(2017)第二輪班:那些性別革命尚未完成的事。(張正霖譯;一版)。 群學。(原著出版於1989)。
Johnson, A. G. (2008)。 性別打結: 拆除父權違建。(成令方等譯)。 群學。(原著出版於1997)。
Rachel Simmons(2021)女孩,妳真的夠好了!:解開「好女孩」枷鎖 X 擺脫「角色超載」,帶著正念和信心探索新機會。(陳玫妏譯)(原著出版於2018)
World Population Review (2022). Birth Rate by Country 2022. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/birth-rate-by-country
內政部(2020a)。育齡婦女生育率及繁殖率(按發生)。https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346
內政部(2020b)。中華民國109 年內政性別統計分析專輯。取自:https://ws.moi.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvNDAwL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xNTEyMS8zZjAwZTgwMi03MjliLTRkOTUtOGQ0Ni03OGY5YjE1ZTk5N2QucGRm&n=MTA55bm05YWn5pS%2f5oCn5Yil57Wx6KiI5YiG5p6Q5bCI6LyvLnBkZg%3d%3d
內政部(2021)。歷年全國人口資料。取自https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346
內政部內政統計年報電子書(更新至2020年)。取自https://www.moi.gov.tw/cl.aspx?n=4406
內政部戶政司(2011)。育齡婦女一般生育率、年齡別生育率、總生育率、毛繁殖率及淨繁殖率。取自:https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjo9u2vsM__AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ris.gov.tw%2Finfo-popudata%2Fapp%2FawFastDownload%2Ffile%2Fy0sd-00000.xls%2Fy0sd%2F00000%2F&psig=AOvVaw2PJXTsMVJix3VbZbOtA__q&ust=1687265617370368&opi=89978449
內政部戶政司(2022)。現住人口出生、死亡、結婚、離婚登記。取自:https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/OldFile/site_stuff/321/1/month/month.html
內政部戶政司(2023)。結婚年齡中位數及平均數。取自:https://www.gender.ey.gov.tw/gecdb/Stat_Statistics_DetailData.aspx?sn=aeFG0R2tHwmrDtITC%24JSaA%40%40
王大維(2019)。從517同性婚姻合法反思台灣諮商輔導專業在同志平權的位置。台灣輔導與諮商學會電子報,4,8-13。http://www.guidance.org.tw/epaper/guidance_epaper_4.pdf
王叢桂 (2000)。促進參與父職因素的探討。應用心理研究: 父母親的面貌 (臺灣),(6),131-172。http://myweb.scu.edu.tw/~wangresearch/topic/topic4/2000father%20work.pdf
伊慶春(2019)。臺灣的家庭變遷:家庭社會學者的研究關懷。近代中國婦女史研究,34,219-254。http://dx.doi.org/10.6350/JSSP.201209.0331
行政院主計總處(2021)。110年人力資源調查統計。https://www.stat.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=4001&s=207903
行政院性別平等會(2022)。111年我國兩性薪資差距。取自https://www.gender.ey.gov.tw/gecdb/Stat_Statistics_DetailData.aspx?sn=EysMabrhMoWtwK3e0N8hQ%40%40
行政院性別平等會(2023a)。2023年性別圖像。取自:https://gec.ey.gov.tw/Page/8996A23EDB9871BE
行政院性別平等會(2023b)。臺灣地區15歲以上有偶女性與其丈夫之平均每日無酬照顧時間。取自:https://www.gender.ey.gov.tw/gecdb/Stat_Statistics_DetailData.aspx?sn=9H5JM59Swi6YhdicthksZg%40%40
吳啟誠、張瓊云(2020)。主題分析在教育研究上的應用。特殊教育發展期刊,69,29-42。https://doi.org/10.7034/DSE.202006_(69).0003
李玉嬋(2011)。我國孕產婦心理狀況評估、影響因素及介入模式整合計畫。行政院衛生署國民健康局委託計劃,計畫編號D C H100- H P -1207。台北:行政院衛生署,2011。
性別指標資訊平台(2019)。性別不平等指數。取自:http://www.gender-indicators.org.tw/zh-tw/equal/index
林明仁(2020)。「影響女性勞動力退出職場原因分析–以長照負擔為例」資料分析及政策模型建置案。https://gec.ey.gov.tw/Page/C0A6CC38F299B3B7?page=1&K=長照負擔&M=S
邱敏芝 (2009)。母職 家/枷/佳鎖? 高學歷職業婦女的母職圖像。國立花蓮教育大學多元文化教育碩士論文, 花蓮。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/55u35d
俞彥娟(2005)。女性主義對母親角色研究的影響:以美國婦女史為例。女學學誌,20,1-40。http://dx.doi.org/10.6255/JWGS.2005.20.1
俞彦娟(2008)。托育:美國第二波婦女運動女性主義者的理念與實踐。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,(25),1-42。https://doi.org/10.6255/JWGS.2008.25.1
姜漢儀(2004)。游移在飛翔與駐足之間:現代未婚女性的母職觀。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/qkg46m
施麗雯(2019)。孕產照護邏輯: 台灣女性的新生育選擇與共同修補. 女學學誌: 婦女與性別研究,(44), 1-46。
洪蕙芬(2015)。新世代臺灣母親的處境與挑戰:就業母親在照顧與工作之間的文化矛盾。臺灣社會福利學刊,13(1),87-149。http://dx.doi.org/10.6265/TJSW.2015.13(1)3
胡馨之(2021)。隱形的非婚父母:戰後臺灣親子關係認定的女性主義法律史考察〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202100520
范代希(2017)。另類科學母職與順勢療法。女學學誌: 婦女與性別研究,41,51-104。http://dx.doi.org/10.6255/JWGS.2017.41.51
唐文慧(2011)。為何職業婦女決定離職?結構限制下的母職認同與實踐。台灣社會研究季刊,85,201-265。http://dx.doi.org/10.29816/TARQSS.201112.0006
唐文慧、楊佳羚(2006)。瑞典育嬰休假制度之研究:共同照顧的價值。政大勞動學報,(19),75-117。https://doi.org/10.30388/BLR.200601_(19).0003
袁詠蓁、孔祥明。 (2022)。結婚不結婚: 臺灣適婚年齡者進入婚姻與否的考量因素. Journal of Population Studies, (64), 1-49。http://dx.doi.org/10.6191/JPS.202206_(64).0001
馬曉蘭(2010)。「我們」打從眷村來:眷村生活史的考察。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/999cad
高淑清(2001)。在美華人留學生太太的生活世界:詮釋與反思。本土心理學研究,16,225-285。http://dx.doi.org/10.6254/2001.16.225
高淑清(2008)。質性研究的18堂課─首航初探之旅。麗文文化。
國勢普查處(2020)。歷年年齡組別勞動力參與率。取自:https://www.stat.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=4001&s=207903
婦女新知(2020)。【聯合聲明】我們共同呼籲台灣第一位女總統蔡英文,第二任應致力完成性別平等的政治改革。https://www.awakening.org.tw/news/5446?fbclid=IwAR1a2yX8S2yO-vrZYP1B3RjPKRrBAhEs1yEbk3bhn-sJir18IUlkmfbhoRw
婦女新知(2020)。台灣政府歷年之內閣性別比例。https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjI8J6kqc__AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.awakening.org.tw%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fupload%2Fnode%2Ffield_files%2F%25E5%258F%25B0%25E7%2581%25A3%25E6%2594%25BF%25E5%25BA%259C%25E6%25AD%25B7%25E5%25B9%25B4%25E4%25B9%258B%25E5%2585%25A7%25E9%2596%25A3%25E6%2580%25A7%25E5%2588%25A5%25E6%25AF%2594%25E4%25BE%258B_0.doc&psig=AOvVaw0PL0JQc3TNdPCbTr4zdO_9&ust=1687263713915930&opi=89978449
婦女新知(2020)。歷屆內閣性別比例。https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiLkNqt4LL7AhUYC94KHVnIA9cQFnoECBsQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.awakening.org.tw%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fupload%2Fnode%2Ffield_files%2F%25E5%258F%25B0%25E7%2581%25A3%25E6%2594%25BF%25E5%25BA%259C%25E6%25AD%25B7%25E5%25B9%25B4%25E4%25B9%258B%25E5%2585%25A7%25E9%2596%25A3%25E6%2580%25A7%25E5%2588%25A5%25E6%25AF%2594%25E4%25BE%258B_0.doc&usg=AOvVaw3WcYkwf0bl2oK_1qmevbcq
教育部統計處(2019)。主要國家各級教育女性學生比率。https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/cp.aspx?n=6254AA08080E8E3A
梁莉芳(2018)。養育無污染的孩子:有機食品論述、風險管理與母職實作。女學學誌: 婦女與性別研究, 42, 73-125。http://dx.doi.org/10.6255/JWGS.201806_(42).03
現住人口出生、死亡、結婚、離婚登記 Number and Rates of Birth, Death, Marriage and Divorce(內政部)
許碧純(2020)。東亞已開發國家的性別平等、家庭政策對生育之影響:對台灣的啟示。台灣公共衛生雜誌,39(2),129-142。https://doi.org/10.6288/TJPH.202004_39(2).108085
郭玲妃、馬小萍(2002)。雙重家鎖:受虐婦女的母職經驗。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,13,47-90。http://dx.doi.org/10.6255/JWGS.2002.13.47
郭祐誠、林佳慧(2012)。勞動市場條件對結婚率下降之影響。 人口學刊, (44), 87-124。http://dx.doi.org/10.6191/jps.2012.3
陳婷玉(2010)。當媽媽真好?流行婦幼雜誌的母職再現。女學學誌: 婦女與性別研究,26,33-86。http://dx.doi.org/10.6255/JWGS.2010.26.33
陳惠娟、郭丁熒(1998)。「母職」概念的內涵之探討—女性主義觀點。教育研究集刊,41,73-101。http://dx.doi.org/10.6910/BER.199807_(41).0004
彭莉惠(2002)。從生育做為一個母職的實踐來探討女性的生育自主性。台北:東吳大學社會所。
楊靜利(2004)。同居的生育意涵與台灣同居人數估計。台灣社會學刊,32, 189-213。http://lawdata.com.tw/tw/detail.aspx?no=206173
劉佩詩(2006)。「家庭版?沿革及女性角色轉變—以《中國時報》為例(1959-2004)。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/q2c76p
劉毓秀(1997)。女性・國家・照顧工作。 女書文化事業有限公司。
潘淑滿(2005)。臺灣母職圖像。女學學誌: 婦女與性別研究,20,41-91。http://dx.doi.org/10.6255/JWGS.2005.20.41
衛生福利部(2020)。中華民國 108 年15-64 歲婦女生活狀況調查報告。取自:https://www.taoyuanwdc.org/PublicFiles/Attachs/2021/24-41D7D0741FB548B.pdf
衛生福利部統計處(2022)。孕產婦死亡率。取自:https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-5113-45169-113.html
總統府新聞(2022)。出席女力之夜外交酒會 總統期盼更多女性參與公共事務 為打造一個永續公平的社會而努力。取自:https://www.president.gov.tw/NEWS/26587
謝美娥(2009)。就業母親之母職經驗與就業策略初探。中華心理衛生學刊,22(3),299-333。http://dx.doi.org/10.30074/FJMH.200909_22(3).0004
藍佩嘉(2009)。照護工作: 文化觀點的考察。社會科學論叢,3(2),1-27。http://dx.doi.org/10.30401/RSS.200910_3(2).0001
藍佩嘉(2019)。 拚教養: 全球化, 親職焦慮與不平等童年 (一版)。 春山出版.
蘇芊玲(1998)。我的母職實踐。女書文化事業有限公司。
顧燕翎(2020)。台灣婦女運動: 爭取性別平等的漫漫長路: 1970s-2010s。貓頭鷹。

英文文獻

Acebo, C., Sadeh, A., Seifer, R., Tzischinsky, O., Hafer, A., & Carskadon, M. A. (2005). Sleep/wake patterns derived from activity monitoring and maternal report for healthy 1-to 5-year-old children. Sleep, 28(12), 1568-1577. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/28.12.1568
Apple, D. Rima (1997) Constructing mothers: Scientific motherhood in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Social History of Medicine, 8(2):161-178. https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/8.2.161
Apple, R. D. (2006). Perfect motherhood: Science and childrearing in America. Rutgers University Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/176/monograph/book/15922
Barlow, C. A., & Cairns, K. V. (1997). Mothering as a Psychological Experience: A Grounded Theory Exploration. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 31(3), 232-47. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ555253
Barlow, K., & Chapin, B. L. (2010). The practice of mothering: An introduction. Ethos, 38(4), 324-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2010.01153.x
Barthe, B., Messing, K., & Abbas, L. (2011). Strategies used by women workers to reconcile family responsibilities with atypical work schedules in the service sector. Work, 40(Supplement 1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-2011-1267
Bateson, M. C. (1996). Enfolded activity and the concept of occupation. Occupational science: The evolving discipline, 5-12.
Beatson, E. (2013). Engaging empowered mothering: Black Caribbean diasporic (M) othering under patriarchal motherhood. Journal of the Motherhood Initiative for Research and Community Involvement. https://jarm.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/jarm/article/view/37830
Bellows-Riecken, K. H., & Rhodes, R. E. (2008). A birth of inactivity? A review of physical activity and parenthood. Preventive medicine, 46(2), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.08.003
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Central Intelligence Agency. (2023) The World Fact Book. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/birth-rate/country-comparison/
Chao, F., Gerland, P., Cook, A. R., & Alkema, L. (2019). Systematic assessment of the sex ratio at birth for all countries and estimation of national imbalances and regional reference levels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(19), 9303-9311. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812593116
Cheng, Y. H. A. (2020). Ultra-low fertility in East Asia. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 18, 83-120. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2020.rev01
Cheng, Yh.A., Yang, Cl.W. (2021)Continuity and changes in attitudes toward marriage in contemporary Taiwan. J Pop Research 38, 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-021-09259-z
Chodorow, N. (1999). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Univ of California Press.
Chodorow, N., & Contratto, S. (1992). Fantasy of the perfect mother.
Connell, R. (2013). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. John Wiley & Sons.
Crosby, F. J., Williams, J. C., & Biernat, M. (2004). The maternal wall. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 675-682.
Douglas, S., & Michaels, M. (2004). The mommy myth: The idealization of motherhood and how it has undermined women. Free Press.
Esteve, A., Kashyap, R., Roman, J. G., Cheng, Y. H. A., Fukuda, S., Nie, W., & Lee, H. O. (2020). Demographic change and increasing late singlehood in East Asia, 2010–2050. Demographic Research, 43, 1367-1398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/shm/8.2.161
Garwood, E. (2014). Regulating motherhood: A Foucauldian analysis of the social construction of the mother. The New Birmingham Review, 1(1), 19-28. https://www.academia.edu/9483795/Regulating_motherhood_a_Foucauldian_analysis_of_the_social_construction_of_the_mother
Gavin W. J., Delayed Marriage and Very Low Fertility in Pacific Asia, Population and Development Review Sep., 2007, Vol. 33, No. 3 (Sep., 2007), 453-478. Published by: Population Council https://www.jstor.org/stable/25434630
Grol-Prokopczyk, H. (2018). Celebrity culture and demographic change: The case of celebrity nonmarital fertility, 1974–2014. Demographic Research, 39, 251-284. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2018.39.8
Gross, E. (1998). Motherhood in feminist theory. Affilia, 13(3), 269-272. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/088610999801300301
Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., & Osterman, M. J. (2023). Births: Provisional data for 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsrr/vsrr028.pdf
Hamilton, K., & White, K. M. (2012). Social influences and the physical activity intentions of parents of young-children families: An extended theory of planned behavior approach. Journal of family issues, 33(10), 1351-1372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X12437151
Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.
Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (2012). The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. Penguin.
Högnäs, R. S., & Carlson, M. J. (2012). “Like parent, like child?”: The intergenerational transmission of nonmarital childbearing. Social Science Research, 41(6), 1480-1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.05.012
Horwitz, E. (2004). Resistance as a site of empowerment: The journey away from maternal sacrifice. Mother outlaws: Theories and practices of empowered mothering, 43-57.
Huang, Y. C., & Mathers, N. (2001). Postnatal depression–biological or cultural? A comparative study of postnatal women in the UK and Taiwan. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(3), 279-287. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01664.x
Johnston, D. D., & Swanson, D. H. (2007). Cognitive acrobatics in the construction of worker–mother identity. Sex roles, 57(5), 447-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9267-4
Kan, M. Y., & Hertog, E. (2017). Domestic division of labour and fertility preference in China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Demographic Research, 36, 557-588. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.18
Kearney, M. S., & Levine, P. B. (2014). Income inequality and early nonmarital childbearing. Journal of Human Resources, 49(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2014.0001
Kerber, L. K. (1988). Separate spheres, female worlds, woman's place: The rhetoric of women's history. The journal of american history, 75(1), 9-39. https://doi.org/10.2307/1889653
Klüsener, S. (2015). Spatial variation in non-marital fertility across Europe in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries: recent trends, persistence of the past, and potential future pathways. The History of the Family, 20(4), 593-628. https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2015.1099112
Koniak-Griffin D, Logsdon MC, Hines-Martin V, Turner CC. Contemporary mothering in a diverse society. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006 Sep-Oct;35(5):671-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00089.x.
Li-Ling Yang (2008)The Life Stories of Motherhood Among Divorced Women in Taiwan. Journal of Nursing Research , 16(3). 220-230. https://10.1097/01.jnr.0000387309.19493.b0
Luccisano, L., & Wall, G. (2009). The shaping of motherhood through social investment in children: Examples from Canada and Mexico. In Post-neoliberalism in the Americas (pp. 199-214). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230232822_13
Medina, S., & Magnuson, S. (2009). Motherhood in the 21st century: Implications for counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 87(1), 90-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2009.tb00553.x
Mercer, R. T. (1985). The process of maternal role attainment over the first year. Nursing research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198507000-00002
Moore, S. B. (2017). Motherhood. The Wiley‐Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118430873.est0494
Myrskylä, M., Kohler, H. P., & Billari, F. (2011). High development and fertility: fertility at older reproductive ages and gender equality explain the positive link. https://doi.org/10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2011-017
O'Reilly, A. (2009). I Envision a Future in Which Maternal Thinkers Are Respected and Self-Respecting": The Legacy of Sara Ruddick's" Maternal Thinking. Women's Studies Quarterly, 37(3/4), 295-298. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27740597
O'reilly, A. (2010). Outlaw (ing) motherhood: a theory and politic of maternal empowerment for the twenty-first century [Paper in: Focus on Mothering.]. Hecate, 36(1/2), 17-29. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/ielapa.201102301
O'Reilly, A. (Ed.). (2004). Mother outlaws: Theories and practices of empowered mothering. Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Pascoe, C. M. (1998). Screening Mothers: Representations of motherhood in Australian films from 1900 to 1988. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/385
Reger, J. (2001). Motherhood and the construction of feminist identities: Variations in a women's movement organization. Sociological Inquiry, 71(1), 85-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2001.tb00929.x
Retherford RD, Ogawa N.(2006) Japan’s baby bust: causes, implications, and policy responses. In: Harris DR ed. The Baby Bust: Who Will Do the Work? Who Will Pay the Taxes? Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 5-48. https://books.google.com.tw/books?hl=zh-TW&lr=&id=75alsu8U9QAC&oi=fnd&pg=PP9&dq=TheBabyBust:WhoWillDotheWork%3FWhoWillPaytheTaxes%3F&ots=C2GjA6uZh-&sig=fKCitjdpVXUCWyhtPvtkFbs7Mnw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=The%20Baby%20Bust%3A%20Who%20Will%20Do%20the%20Work%3F%20Who%20Will%20Pay%20the%20Taxes%3F&f=false
Rich, A. (2021). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. WW Norton & Company.
Rogan, F., Shimed, V., Barclay, L., Everitt, L., & Wylli, A. (1997). ‘Becoming a mother’—developing a new theory of early motherhood. Journal of advanced nursing, 25(5), 877-885. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025877.x
Rubin, R. (1967). Attainment of the maternal role: Part I. Processes. Nursing Research, 16(3), 237-245. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196701630-00006
Ruddick, S. (1983). Thinking about mothering-and putting maternal thinking to use. Women's Studies Quarterly, 11(4), 4. https://idm.nthu.ust.edu.tw/sso/886UST_NTHU/saml2/login/?next=/saml2/idp/login/process/?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/thinking-about-mothering-putting-maternal-use/docview/1292058099/se-2
Sara, R. (1980). Maternal thinking. Feminist studies, 6(2), 342.
Sobo, E. J. (2015). Social cultivation of vaccine refusal and delay among Waldorf (Steiner) school parents. Medical anthropology quarterly, 29(3), 381-399. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12214
Spotswood, F., Nobles, J., & Armstrong, M. (2021). “We’re just stuck in a daily routine”: Implications of the temporal dimensions, demands and dispositions of mothering for leisure time physical activity. Sociology of Health & Illness, 43(5), 1254-1269.
Tai, T. O., Yi, C. C., & Liu, C. H. (2019). Early marriage in Taiwan: Evidence from panel data. Journal of Family Issues, 40(14), 1989-2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19863211
Tebeka, S., Le Strat, Y., & Dubertret, C. (2016). Developmental trajectories of pregnant and postpartum depression in an epidemiologic survey. Journal of affective disorders, 203, 62-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.058
Thurer, S. L., & Thurer, S. L. (1994). The myths of motherhood: How culture reinvents the good mother. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Tong, R. (2018). Feminist thought, student economy edition: A More Comprehensive Introduction. Routledge.
Tsao, Y., Creedy, D. K., & Gamble, J. (2015). Prevalence and psychological correlates of postnatal depression in rural Taiwanese women. Health Care for Women International, 36(4), 457-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2014.946510
Upchurch, D. M., Lillard, L. A., & Panis, C. W. (2002). Nonmarital childbearing: Influences of education, marriage, and fertility. Demography, 39(2), 311-329. https://idm.nthu.ust.edu.tw/sso/886UST_NTHU/saml2/login/?next=/saml2/idp/login/process/?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/nonmarital-childbearing-influences-education/docview/222945249/se-2
Upchurch, D. M., Lillard, L. A., & Panis, C. W. (2002). Nonmarital childbearing: Influences of education, marriage, and fertility. Demography, 39(2), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2002.0020
Ventura, S. J. (2009). Changing patterns of nonmarital childbearing in the United States. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/5441
Viguera, A. (2018). Postpartum unipolar major depression: Epidemiology, clinical features, assessment, and diagnosis. Young, 32(34), 46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00379.x
Weaver, J. J., & Ussher, J. M. (1997). How motherhood changes life a discourse analytic study with mothers of young children. Journal of reproductive and infant psychology, 15(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646839708404533
Williams, J. C. (2004). Hitting the Maternal Wall-Before They Reach a" Glass Ceiling" in Their Careers, Women Faculty May Hit a" Maternal Wall". Academe Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors, 90, 16. https://repository.uclawsf.edu/faculty_scholarship/1202
Williams, K., Sassler, S., Frech, A., Addo, F., & Cooksey, E. (2011). Nonmarital childbearing, union history, and women’s health at midlife. American sociological review, 76(3), 465-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003122411409705
Yopo Díaz M. (2021) "It's hard to become mothers": The moral economy of postponing motherhood in neoliberal Chile. Br J Sociol, 72(5), 1214-1228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12901
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *