教師培育一直是我國教育界十分重視的一環，民國 83 年頒布「師資培育法」，開放一般師範大學申請設立師資培育中心，自此我國師培教育進入多元開放時代。本研究旨在探討由傳統的師範體系、師範大學及師範學院所培育出的教師，其教學與一般大學師資培育體系出身教師的教學，對於學生的成績影響是否有顯著差異。本文之數據資料採用台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫 (TEPS)，彙整學生、家長以及老師問卷，分別討論國/高中以及追蹤樣本。本研究使用多元線性迴歸模型，分析教師所接受的師資培育類型與其教授學生之成就表現是否有顯著關係。本文研究結果發現，我們無法證明師範體系畢業的國中教師，會對其學生的學習成績造成影響。此結果與王明仁 (2005) 的結論相同。然而在高中樣本中，我們發現，若是高中導師及高中數學老師有受過傳統的師範體系教育培訓，將會提升高中學生的綜合學習成績以及數學分析成績，此結論則與 Kane et al. (2008) 相似。

Teacher education has been playing a vital role in the education of Taiwan. Teacher education in Taiwan has been diversified since the implementation of the Teacher Education Act in 1994, which has allowed normal schools to establish their own divisions of the teacher education center.This paper aims to find out whether teachers’ educational background will influence the academic performance of their students. The data in this paper is provided by Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS), which compiles the questionnaires of students, parents, and teachers from junior and senior high schools, and is organized in the form of panel data. This paper uses a multivariate linear regression model to analyze whether there exists significant relationship between the education background of the teachers and the academic performance of the students.
The result shows that in the sample of junior high schools, there is no evidence to support that teachers with a degree from normal schools will influence the academic performance of their students. This result is consistent with Wang (2005). However, in the sample of senior high schools, if students are taught by a homeroom teacher or math teacher with a degree from normal schools,then it is evident that their academic performance will be boosted, which is consistent with the finding in Kane et al. (2008).

目錄
誌謝 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
1 緒論 1
2 文獻回顧 3
3 資料說明與分析 6
3.1 資料來源 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.2 樣本資料結構 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.3 變數說明 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.4 敘述統計分析 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.4.1 學生的平均成績差異 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.4.2 國中樣本 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.4.3 高中樣本 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.4.4 追蹤樣本 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4 實證模型與變數選取依據 15
4.1 模型設定 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4.2 變數選取依據 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5 實證結果與討論 20
5.1 國中樣本 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
5.2 高中樣本 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
5.3 追蹤樣本 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
5.4 年資子樣本 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
6 結論與建議 25
參考文獻 45

[1] 陳舜芬, 丁志仁, and 洪儷瑜. 師資培育與教師進修制度的檢討. 教育研究集
刊 , (37):39–100, 1996.
[2] 王明仁. 教師養成背景與學生學業成績的關連性之研究: 以台東縣國小五年
級為例. NTTU EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 16(1):35–68, 2005.
[3] 張芳全. 學生因素、國家發展與數學成就之多層次研究. 教育政策論壇 ,
21(3):101–142, 08 2018.
[4] D. Aaronson, L. Barrow, and W. Sander. Teachers and student achievement in the
chicago public high schools. Journal of labor Economics, 25(1):95–135, 2007.
[5] G. Akyüz. The effects of student and school factors on mathematics achievement
in timss 2011. 2014.
[6] J. D. Angrist and J. Guryan. Does teacher testing raise teacher quality? evidence
from state certification requirements. Technical Report 9545, 2003.
[7] H. Antecol, O. Eren, and S. Ozbeklik. The effect of teacher gender on student
achievement in primary school. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(1):63–89, 2015.
[8] S. Banerjee. A study of relationship between socio-economic status and academic
achievement of sc and st students of secondary level in the district of bankura in
west bengal. International Journal of Applied Research, 1(10):521–522, 2015.
[9] D. Baumrind. Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child
development, pages 887–907, 1966.
[10] S. L. Beilock, E. A. Gunderson, G. Ramirez, and S. C. Levine. Female teachers’
mathanxietyaffectsgirls’mathachievement. ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademy
of Sciences, 107(5):1860–1863, 2010.
[11] J. R. Betts, A. Zau, and L. Rice. Determinants of student achievement: New evi-
dence from San Diego. Public Policy Institute of California San Francisco, 2003.
[12] D. Boyd, P. Grossman, H. Lankford, S. Loeb, and J. Wyckoff. How changes in en-
try requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement, 2006.
[13] D. Boyd, H. Lankford, S. Loeb, J. Rockoff, and J. Wyckoff. The narrowing gap in
new york city teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement
inhigh-povertyschools. Technicalreport,NationalBureauofEconomicResearch,
2008.
45
[14] G. L. Callan, G. J. Marchant, W. H. Finch, and L. Flegge. Student and school ses,
gender, strategy use, and achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 54(9):1106–
1122, 2017.
[15] M. M. Chingos and P. E. Peterson. It’s easier to pick a good teacher than to train
one: Familiarandnewresultsonthecorrelatesofteachereffectiveness. Economics
of Education Review, 30(3):449–465, 2011.
[16] C. T. Clotfelter, H. F. Ladd, and J. L. Vigdor. Teacher credentials and student
achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Ed-
ucation Review, 26(6):673–682, 2007.
[17] J. S. Coleman. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal
of sociology, 94:S95–S120, 1988.
[18] T. C. Collier. Teacher qualifications and student achievement: A panel data anal-
ysis. Review of Applied Economics, 9(1076-2017-2359):1–20, 2013.
[19] T. S. Dee and S. R. Cohodes. Out-of-field teachers and student achievement:
Evidence from matched-pairs comparisons. Public Finance Review, 36(1):7–32,
2008.
[20] D. Dossett and M. A. Munoz. Classroom accountability: A value-added method-
ology. 2003.
[21] D. Duncan, J. Cannon, and A. Kitchel. Teaching efficacy: A comparison of tra-
ditionally and alternatively certified cte teachers in idaho. Career and Technical
Education Research, 38(1):57–67, 2013.
[22] A. A. Eshetu. Parental socio-economic status as a determinant factor of academic
performance of students in regional examination: A case of dessie town, ethiopia.
African educational research journal, 3(4):221–229, 2015.
[23] X. Fan and M. Chen. Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement:
A meta-analysis. Educational psychology review, 13(1):1–22, 2001.
[24] R. D. Goddard, S. R. Sweetland, and W. K. Hoy. Academic emphasis of urban
elementary schools and student achievement in reading and mathematics: A mul-
tilevel analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5):683–702, 2000.
[25] D. D. Goldhaber and D. J. Brewer. Evaluating the effect of teacher degree level
on educational performance. 1997a.
[26] D.D.GoldhaberandD.J.Brewer. Whydon’tschoolsandteachersseemtomatter?
assessing the impact of unobservables on educational productivity. Journal of
Human Resources, pages 505–523, 1997b.
[27] D. D. Goldhaber and D. J. Brewer. Does teacher certification matter? high school
teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational evaluation and
policy analysis, 22(2):129–145, 2000.
[28] R. Greenwald, L. V. Hedges, and R. D. Laine. The effect of school resources on
student achievement. Review of educational research, 66(3):361–396, 1996.
46
[29] E. A. Hanushek. The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public
schools. Journal of economic literature, 24(3):1141–1177, 1986.
[30] D. N. Harris and T. R. Sass. Teacher training, teacher quality and student achieve-
ment. Journal of public economics, 95(7-8):798–812, 2011.
[31] R. M. Ingersoll. The problem of underqualified teachers in american secondary
schools. Educational researcher, 28(2):26–37, 1999.
[32] C. Jepsen. Teacher characteristics and student achievement: Evidence from
teacher surveys. Journal of Urban Economics, 57(2):302–319, 2005.
[33] C. Jepsen and S. G. Rivkin. Class size reduction, teacher quality, and academic
achievement in California public elementary schools. Public Policy Instit. of CA,
2002.
[34] W. H. Jeynes. A meta-analysis: The effects of parental involvement on minority
children’s academic achievement. Education and urban society, 35(2):202–218,
2003.
[35] T. J. Kane, J. E. Rockoff, and D. O. Staiger. What does certification tell us about
teacher effectiveness? evidence from new york city. Economics of Education
review, 27(6):615–631, 2008.
[36] C. R. Koedel. Three essays on teacher quality and educational production. PhD
thesis, UC San Diego, 2007.
[37] O. Köller, J. Baumert, and K. Schnabel. Does interest matter? the relationship
between academic interest and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research
in Mathematics Education, 32(5):448–470, 2001.
[38] L.Lewis, B.Parsad, N.Carey, N.Bartfai, E.Farris, andB.Smerdon. Teacherqual-
ity: A report on the preparation and qualifications. Education Statistics Quarterly,
1(1):1–79, 1999.
[39] S. Mueller. Teacher experience and the class size effect—experimental evidence.
Journal of Public Economics, 98:44–52, 2013.
[40] M. G. Nadenge Gabriel, I. Muasya, J. Mwangi, M. J. Mukhungulu, and
E. Lomeyan. The influence of parental socioeconomic status, involvement in
learning activities and its influence on children’s academic performance in ur-
ban informal settlements in westlands division-nairobi county. 2016.
[41] S. G. Rivkin, E. A. Hanushek, and J. F. Kain. Teachers, schools, and academic
achievement. Econometrica, 73(2):417–458, 2005.
[42] J.E.Rockoff. Theimpactofindividualteachersonstudentachievement: Evidence
from panel data. American economic review, 94(2):247–252, 2004.
[43] S. R. Sirin. Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic
review of research. Review of educational research, 75(3):417–453, 2005.
47
[44] A.J.WayneandP.Youngs. Teachercharacteristicsandstudentachievementgains:
A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1):89–122, 2003.
[45] H. Wenglinsky. Finance equalization and within-school equity: The relationship
between education spending and the social distribution of achievement. Educa-
tional Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(4):269–283, 1998.
[46] G. W. White, C. T. Stepney, D. R. Hatchimonji, D. C. Moceri, A. V. Linsky, J. A.
Reyes-Portillo, and M. J. Elias. The increasing impact of socioeconomics and race
on standardized academic test scores across elementary, middle, and high school.
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 86(1):10, 2016.
[47] M. A. Winters, R. C. Haight, T. T. Swaim, and K. A. Pickering. The effect of
same-gender teacher assignment on student achievement in the elementary and
secondary grades: Evidence from panel data. Economics of Education Review,
34:69–75, 2013.
[48] D. Zhang and T. Campbell. An examination of the impact of teacher quality and
“opportunity gap”on student science achievement in china. International Journal
of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(3):489–513, 2015.