帳號:guest(216.73.216.146)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):甘亞許
作者(外文):Ashish Ghimire
論文名稱(中文):天然防護組織和仿生3D列印複合材料之多階層結構、機械性質及強化機制
論文名稱(外文):Hierarchical structure, mechanical properties, and strengthening mechanisms of natural protective tissues and bio-inspired 3D-printed composites
指導教授(中文):陳柏宇
指導教授(外文):Chen, Po-Yu
口試委員(中文):張守一
陳俊杉
張書瑋
楊佩良
陳柏宇
口試委員(外文):Chang, Shou-Yi
Chen, Chuin-Shan
Chang, Shu-Wei
Yang, Patricia
Chen, Po-Yu
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:材料科學工程學系
學號:107031891
出版年(民國):112
畢業學年度:111
語文別:英文
論文頁數:146
中文關鍵詞:硬組織仿生複合材料機械性質3D列印
外文關鍵詞:hard tissuesbio-inspired compositesmechanical properties3D-printing
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:365
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
本研究結合仿生設計原理和積層製造技術,系統性地設計多種仿生複合材料,旨在透過優化生物材料的結構以提升機械性能,並找到其中的關連性。因傳統複合材料在製程上存在限制的設計自由度,難以製造較為複雜的幾何形狀,並且在複合材料的製造上存在相對脆弱的界面,易導致材料整體的失效。因此,受自然界中生物保護組織結構的啟發,我們從中獲取設計靈感,並利用先進的多材料3D列印技術改善原有問題。
這項研究的一個主要目標是探索植物和動物保護組織的結構與性能之間的關係,以利用自然結構的複雜性和多功能性來克服傳統複合材料所面臨的限制。論文中介紹了對Elaeocarpus ganitrus果核的研究結果,揭示了其優越的抗斷裂性和功能梯度材料特性。儘管密度僅為1 g/cm3,這些直徑20毫米的果核能夠承受高壓縮載荷。透過micro-CT進行的三維結構定量分析顯示,果核具有梯度微觀結構,其中包含硬度和剛性的梯度,由於其分層細胞結構所產生的增韌機制,果核能夠承受高達5000 N的載荷, 此種梯度設計策略在開發功能性梯度和分級材料的設計上具有應有潛力。
本研究亦調查了鯊魚皮齒的機械性能,並深入探討其功能適應及增強保護機制。在類琺瑯質外層中進行的奈米壓痕測試顯示,側面區域表現出最低的硬度(分別為3.9 GPa和4.2 GPa)和較低的彈性模量(分別為49 GPa和69 GPa)。而與底棲環境密切接觸的區域,如吻部、腹部和胸鰭,則具備較高的硬度和較低的彈性模量。吻部、腹部和胸鰭區域的硬度值分別為4.8 GPa、4.7 GPa和4.7 GPa。透過以上研究結果可歸結出,鯊魚皮齒類琺瑯質外層區域中,單向氟磷灰石晶體導致了機械性能的增強。這些結果說明White-spotted bamboo shark皮齒具有功能適應,其優化設計可提供增強的保護,透過三維重建可生成具有不同重疊機制和錐角的模型,藉由多材料3D列印技術進行製造,模仿嵌入在柔軟皮膚中的堅硬皮齒。這些以3D列印製成的皮齒模型可應用於流體流動模擬,並研究不同皮齒表面圖案的防污性能,以探究不同皮齒形狀和圖案對減少阻力的效果。此研究對於改進管道流體的運輸效率以及建立有效的防污策略具有重要意義。
這項研究涵蓋3D列印界面上的優化,以實現具備複雜界面仿生結構的複合材料的3D列印。其中包含多材料界面在拉伸、剪切和奈米尺度上的機械性能,以及界面材料厚度和列印方向對機械性質之影響,提供如何調節複合材料的剛度、強度和斷裂伸長率等性能特點的模型設計策略。
本研究介紹了由珠母層啟發之交錯複合材料的設計和受力變形行為。透過3D列印、多項機械性質試驗和分析計算,系統性地調查了tablet長寬比和交錯設計對複合材料硬化現象的影響。研究發現,複合材料中的硬化現象是可調節的,並且能夠增強複合材料的韌性和強度。總結來說,這項研究為生物材料結構與性能間的關係提供了更多發展性,同時為開發擁有更高機械性能的先進複合材料提供了重要的基礎和依據。
This thesis aims to contribute to the field of composite materials by incorporating bio-inspired design principles and additive manufacturing technique. The motivation behind this research lies in the limitations of conventional composites, which struggle to achieve complex geometries restricting design freedom, and exhibit weak interfaces between mechanically mismatched materials. Here we draw design inspiration from biological protective tissues found in nature and utilize state-of-the-art multimaterial 3D printing technology to overcome these challenges.
One of the key objectives is to explore the structure-property relationship of protective tissues in plants and animals that can address the limitations of conventional composites by leveraging the complexity and multifunctionality of natural structures. We present findings on the Elaeocarpus ganitrus endocarp, revealing its outstanding fracture tolerance and functionally graded material properties. Despite possessing a low density of 1 g/cm³, the 20 mm-sized endocarps showcase remarkable resilience against substantial compression forces. Micro-CT-based 3D structural analyses unveil a gradient microarchitecture inherent to the endocarp. Moreover, the endocarp's hardness and stiffness display a gradient profile. Leveraging the toughening mechanisms arising from its layered cellular structure, these endocarps demonstrate an impressive capacity to endure elevated loads of up to 5000 N. The gradient design principles established through this investigation offer valuable insights for the creation of functionally gradient and graded materials. Similarly, the mechanical properties of shark-skin denticles are investigated, uncovering their functional adaptations and enhanced protection. The nanoindentation tests on the denticle enameloid region showed that the flank regions exhibit the lowest hardness (3.9 GPa, and 4.2 GPa) and reduced elastic modulus (49 GPa, and 69 GPa). Whereas the regions likely to be in close contact with the benthic environment, like the snout, belly, and pectoral fins, showed higher values of hardness and reduced elastic modulus. The hardness values in the snout, belly, and pectoral fin regions were 4.8 GPa, 4.7 GPa, and 4.7 GPa, respectively. The enhanced mechanical properties concur with the unidirectional fluoroapatite crystals in the enameloid region. These results reveal functional adaptations of the denticles in white-spotted bamboo sharks that are optimized to provide enhanced protection. In addition, the three-dimensional reconstruction of the denticles of several shark species can be used to generate desired patterns with various overlapping and crown angles and 3D-print with multimaterial 3D-printing technique mimicking stiff denticle embedded in the soft skin. The 3D-printed denticle patterns can be used to study the fluid flow in tunnel experiments and study the antifouling of various denticle surface patterns. Importantly, the denticle 3D-models can be utilized to carry on fluid flow simulations and study the drag reduction of various denticle shapes and patterns. Furthermore, the thesis delves into optimizing polyjet printed interfaces for 3D printing complex interface composites capable of mimicking biological architectures. The study investigates the tensile, shear, and nano-mechanical properties of multimaterial stiff-soft interfaces. The thickness of the interfacial material and the orientation of the printed composites are examined, providing insights into tuning the stiffness, strength, and elongation at break of the composites.
Finally, the design and deformation behavior of nacre-inspired staggered composites are explored. Utilizing 3D printing, testing, and computation, the study investigates the impact of tablet aspect ratio and interlocking designs on the hardening phenomena observed in these composites. The hardening phenomena discovered here is tunable and is capable of enhancing the toughness and strength of the composites. Overall, the findings provide valuable insights into the structure-property relationships of biological materials and offer guidance for the development of advanced composite designs with enhanced mechanical performance.


Abstract (Chinese) i
Abstract (English) iii
Acknowledgements v
Table of Contents vi
List of Figures ix
List of Tables xvi
CHAPTER ONE 1
Introduction 1
1.1 Composites and their limitations 1
1.2 Biological Protective tissues 3
1.3 Thesis approach and organization 4
CHAPTER TWO 8
Literature Review 8
2.1 Protective tissues in nature 8
2.1.1 Nacre 8
2.1.2 Teeth and denticles 10
2.1.3 Hard plant shells 13
2.2 Additive Manufacturing 17
CHAPTER THREE 18
Methodology 18
3.1 Biological structure reconstruction 18
3.2 Additive manufacturing 21
3.2.1 Stereolithography printing technique 22
3.2.2 PolyJet 3D printing 25
3.3 Mechanical Testing 30
3.3.1 Universal testing machine 30
3.3.2 Nanoindentation 32
CHAPTER FOUR 34
Structure and property investigation of protective tissues in nature 34
4.1 Elaeocarpus ganitrus endocarp 34
4.1.1 Materials and methods 35
4.1.2 Microscopic and tomographic structural analysis 37
4.1.3 Mechanical properties of Elaeocarpus ganitrus endocarp 40
4.1.4 Fracture morphologies and mechanisms 44
4.1.5 Conclusions 47
4.2 Shark-skin denticles 57
4.2.1 Introduction of shark-skin denticles 57
4.2.2 Materials and methods 57
4.2.3 Microstructure of white-spotted bamboo shark denticle 58
4.2.4 Elemental composition of white-spotted bamboo shark denticle 59
4.2.5 Mechanical properties of white-spotted bamboo shark denticle 59
4.2.6 Three-dimensional structure reconstruction 65
4.3 Structure-property-mechanisms of nacre 79
CHAPTER FIVE 80
Mechanical properties of polyjet 3D- printed stiff-soft interface composites 80
5.1 Introduction to polyjet 3D- printed stiff-soft interface composites 80
5.1.1 Literature review 81
5.2 Composite design and manufacturing 84
5.2.1 Design and manufacturing of tensile and shear interface composites 84
5.2.2 Composite characterization 85
5.3 Microstructure, mechanical properties and fracture mechanisms 86
5.3.1 Microstructure of the interface 86
5.3.2 Tensile interface composites 86
5.3.3 Shear interface composites 88
5.3.4 Tensile - Shear interface Composites 90
5.3.5 Fracture morphologies and mechanisms of TSICs 94
5.3.6 Nanoindentation on the stiff-soft interface 96
5.4 Conclusions 97
CHAPTER SIX 109
Nacre-inspired composites with Tunable Mechanical Properties 109
6.1 Introduction to nacre and nacre-inspired 3D-printed composites 109
6.1.1 Nacre inspired brick-and-mortar composites 109
6.2 Composite designs and manufacturing 111
6.2.1 Design and specification 111
6.2.2 3D-printing and tensile testing 112
6.2.3 Simulation procedures using 2D-LSM (lattice spring model) 113
6.3 Mechanical properties of RT and IT composites 115
6.3.1 Experimental tensile test response of RT and IT composites 115
6.3.2 Softening stages of RT and IT composite 115
6.3.3 Tunable Interface hardening in RT and IT composite 116
6.4 Fracture mechanisms and morphologies 119
6.5 LSM (Lattice spring model) simulation results 121
6.5.1 Comparison between simulation and experimental tensile response 121
6.5.2 Stress distribution at various fracture stages 122
6.6 Conclusions 124
CHAPTER SEVEN 138
Conclusions and Outlook 138
7.1 Summary and Conclusions 138
References 140


[1] M.A. Meyers, P.-Y. Chen, A.Y.-M. Lin, Y. Seki, Progress in Materials Science 53(1) (2008) 1-206.
[2] J. Currey, J. Taylor, J Zool 173 (1974) 395-406.
[3] P. Fratzl, H.S. Gupta, E.P. Paschalis, P. Roschger, J Mater Chem 14(14) (2004) 2115-2123.
[4] H.D. Espinosa, J.E. Rim, F. Barthelat, M.J. Buehler, Prog Mater Sci 54(8) (2009) 1059-1100.
[5] J. Sun, B. Bhushan, RSC Advances 2(20) (2012) 7617-7632.
[6] A.Y.-M. Lin, P.-Y. Chen, M.A. Meyers, Acta Biomaterialia 4(1) (2008) 131-138.
[7] M.A. Meyers, A.Y.-M. Lin, P.-Y. Chen, J. Muyco, J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 1(1) (2008) 76-85.
[8] M. Mirkhalaf, A.K. Dastjerdi, F. Barthelat, Nat Commun 5(1) (2014) 3166.
[9] E. Munch, M.E. Launey, D.H. Alsem, E. Saiz, A.P. Tomsia, R.O. Ritchie, Science 322(5907) (2008) 1516.
[10] A. Wat, J.I. Lee, C.W. Ryu, B. Gludovatz, J. Kim, A.P. Tomsia, T. Ishikawa, J. Schmitz, A. Meyer, M. Alfreider, D. Kiener, E.S. Park, R.O. Ritchie, Nat Commun 10(1) (2019) 961.
[11] X. Yan, F. Li, K.-D. Hu, J. Xue, X.-F. Pan, T. He, L. Dong, X.-Y. Wang, Y.-D. Wu, Y.-H. Song, W.-P. Xu, Y. Lu, Sci Rep-UK 7(1) (2017) 13851.
[12] Z. Yin, F. Hannard, F. Barthelat, Science 364(6447) (2019) 1260.
[13] J.D. Currey, P.M. Sheppard, Proc R Soc B 196(1125) (1977) 443-463.
[14] A.P. Jackson, J.F.V. Vincent, R.M. Turner, R.M. Alexander, Proc R Soc B 234(1277) (1988) 415-440.
[15] R.Z. Wang, H.B. Wen, F.Z. Cui, H.B. Zhang, H.D. Li, J Mater Sci 30(9) (1995) 2299-2304.
[16] B.L. Smith, T.E. Schäffer, M. Viani, J.B. Thompson, N.A. Frederick, J. Kindt, A. Belcher, G.D. Stucky, D.E. Morse, P.K. Hansma, Nature 399(6738) (1999) 761-763.
[17] T.E. Schäffer, C. Ionescu-Zanetti, R. Proksch, M. Fritz, D.A. Walters, N. Almqvist, C.M. Zaremba, A.M. Belcher, B.L. Smith, G.D. Stucky, D.E. Morse, P.K. Hansma, Chem Mater 9(8) (1997) 1731-1740.
[18] R. Wang, Z. Suo, A. Evans, N. Yao, I.A. Aksay, J Mater Res 16(9) (2001) 2485-2493.
[19] K.S. Katti, D.R. Katti, S.M. Pradhan, A. Bhosle, J Mater Res 20(5) (2011) 1097-1100.
[20] F. Barthelat, H. Tang, P.D. Zavattieri, C.M. Li, H.D. Espinosa, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 55(2) (2007) 306-337.
[21] M. Mirkhalaf, H. Zreiqat, JOM 72(4) (2020) 1458-1476.
[22] U.G.K. Wegst, H. Bai, E. Saiz, A.P. Tomsia, R.O. Ritchie, Nature Materials 14(1) (2015) 23-36.
[23] S. Amini, H. Razi, R. Seidel, D. Werner, W.T. White, J.C. Weaver, M.N. Dean, P. Fratzl, Nature Communications 11(1) (2020) 5971.
[24] J. Enax, A.M. Janus, D. Raabe, M. Epple, H.-O. Fabritius, Acta Biomaterialia 10(9) (2014) 3959-3968.
[25] J. Enax, O. Prymak, D. Raabe, M. Epple, Journal of Structural Biology 178(3) (2012) 290-299.
[26] G. Willems, J.P. Celis, P. Lambrechts, M. Braem, G. Vanherle, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 27(6) (1993) 747-755.
[27] T. Miyake, J.L. Vaglia, L.H. Taylor, B.K. Hall, Journal of Morphology 241(1) (1999) 61-81.
[28] T.D. Cook, J. Prothero, M. Brudy, J.A. Magraw, Journal of Anatomy 241(3) (2022) 616-627.
[29] S. Kumar, K.M. Pandey, K.K. Sharma, Materials Today: Proceedings 45 (2021) 6694-6701.
[30] G. Tian, Y. Zhang, X. Feng, Y. Hu, Advanced Engineering Materials 24(1) (2022) 2100696.
[31] Y.L. Peng, C.G. Lin, L. Wang, Advanced Materials Research 79-82 (2009) 977-980.
[32] V.B. Damodaran, N.S. Murthy, Biomaterials Research 20(1) (2016) 18.
[33] C.M. Kirschner, A.B. Brennan, Annual Review of Materials Research 42(1) (2012) 211-229.
[34] S. Nir, M. Reches, Current Opinion in Biotechnology 39 (2016) 48-55.
[35] T. Tomita, K. Murakumo, S. Komoto, A. Dove, M. Kino, K. Miyamoto, M. Toda, PLOS ONE 15(6) (2020) e0235342.
[36] A. Palecek, Journal of Experimental Biology 225(7) (2022) jeb243448.
[37] A. Lourtie, L. Duchatelet, N. Straube, N. Puozzo, M.A. Grace, G.J.P. Naylor, J. Delroisse, Frontiers in Marine Science 9 (2022).
[38] J. Jennings, N. Macmillan, Journal of Materials Science 21 (1986) 1517-1524.
[39] G. Kaupp, M.R. Naimi-Jamal, Journal of Materials Chemistry 21(23) (2011) 8389-8400.
[40] P. Schüler, T. Speck, A. Bührig-Polaczek, C. Fleck, PloS one 9(8) (2014) e102913.
[41] M.E. Hartung, W.B. Storey, The development of the fruit of macadamia ternifolia, US Government Printing Office1939.
[42] B. Strohschen, (1985).
[43] C.-H. Wang, L. Zhang, Y.-W. Mai, International Journal of Fracture 69 (1994) 51-65.
[44] M. Naimi-Jamal, G. Kaupp, International journal of materials research 98(5) (2007) 438-445.
[45] E. Flores-Johnson, J. Carrillo, C. Zhai, R. Gamboa, Y. Gan, L. Shen, Scientific reports 8(1) (2018) 9668.
[46] M. Sonego, C. Fleck, L. Pessan, Bioinspiration & biomimetics 14(5) (2019) 056002.
[47] M. Sonego, C. Fleck, L.A. Pessan, Scientific Reports 10(1) (2020) 6786.
[48] S.J. Antreich, N. Xiao, J.C. Huss, N. Horbelt, M. Eder, R. Weinkamer, N. Gierlinger, Advanced Science 6(16) (2019) 1900644.
[49] J.C. Huss, S.J. Antreich, J. Bachmayr, N. Xiao, M. Eder, J. Konnerth, N. Gierlinger, Advanced Materials 32(48) (2020) 2004519.
[50] K. Ko, S. Jin, S.E. Lee, I. Lee, J.-W. Hong, Compos B ENG 165 (2019) 594-603.
[51] P. Tran, T.D. Ngo, A. Ghazlan, D. Hui, Compos B ENG 108 (2017) 210-223.
[52] J. Greenhall, B. Raeymaekers, Advanced Materials Technologies 2(9) (2017) 1700122.
[53] J.R. Raney, B.G. Compton, J. Mueller, T.J. Ober, K. Shea, J.A. Lewis, P Natl Acad Sci USA 115(6) (2018) 1198.
[54] Z. Jia, Y. Yu, S. Hou, L. Wang, J Mech Phys Solids 125 (2019) 178-197.
[55] M.A. Caminero, J.M. Chacón, I. García-Moreno, G.P. Rodríguez, Compos B ENG 148 (2018) 93-103.
[56] P. Wadsworth, I. Nelson, D.L. Porter, B. Raeymaekers, S.E. Naleway, Mater Des 185 (2020) 108243.
[57] D.W. Lee, Nature 349(6306) (1991) 260-262.
[58] P. Lal, Research Journal of Medicinal Plant 7(1) (2013) 23-31.
[59] H. Swati, C. Bankim, K. Krishan, J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res 34(1) (2015) 55-64.
[60] C.-H. Wang, Y.-W. Mai, International Journal of Fracture 69 (1994) 67-85.
[61] T. Xue, J. Liu, Y. Shen, G. Liu, The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 93(4) (2018) 441-448.
[62] M.K. Habibi, A.T. Samaei, B. Gheshlaghi, J. Lu, Y. Lu, Acta biomaterialia 16 (2015) 178-186.
[63] F. Iacoviello, A.C. Kirby, Y. Javanmardi, E. Moeendarbary, M. Shabanli, E. Tsolaki, A.C. Sharp, M.J. Hayes, K. Keevend, J.-H. Li, Acta biomaterialia 107 (2020) 194-203.
[64] N. Reznikov, R. Shahar, S. Weiner, Acta biomaterialia 10(9) (2014) 3815-3826.
[65] T. Tan, N. Rahbar, S. Allameh, S. Kwofie, D. Dissmore, K. Ghavami, W. Soboyejo, Acta biomaterialia 7(10) (2011) 3796-3803.
[66] R. Foster, Australian journal of botany 15(1) (1967) 25-34.
[67] R. Meyer, Forest products journal 17(12) (1967) 50-56.
[68] L. Murmanis, Wood Science and Technology 9(1) (1975) 3-14.
[69] E. Sabella, A. Aprile, A. Genga, T. Siciliano, E. Nutricati, F. Nicolì, M. Vergine, C. Negro, L. De Bellis, A. Luvisi, Scientific Reports 9(1) (2019) 1-11.
[70] B. Gludovatz, F. Walsh, E. Zimmermann, S. Naleway, R. Ritchie, J. Kruzic, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 76 (2017) 76-84.
[71] W. Gindl, H. Gupta, C. Grünwald, Canadian Journal of Botany 80(10) (2002) 1029-1033.
[72] S. Schmier, N. Hosoda, T. Speck, Molecules 25(1) (2020) 223.
[73] C. Fleck, P. Schüler, D. Meinel, P. Zaslansky, J. Currey, Bioinspired, Biomimetic and Nanobiomaterials 1(2) (2012) 67-75.
[74] R. Loprang, C. Fleck, Geometrical and loading influence on compression strength of macadamia nut, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, 2010, pp. 1586-1591.
[75] S. Schmier, M. Jentzsch, T. Speck, M. Thielen, Materials & Design 195 (2020) 108944.
[76] B. Ogunsina, A. Bamgboye, International Journal of Food Properties 16(7) (2013) 1452-1459.
[77] R. Seidel, A. Bührig-Polaczek, C. Fleck, T. Speck, Impact resistance of hierarchically structured fruit walls and nut shells in view of biomimetic applications, Proceedings of the 6th Plant Biomechanics Conference. French Guyana, France: ECOFOG, Cayenne, 2009, pp. 406-11.
[78] D. Ibrahim, T.L. Broilo, C. Heitz, M.G. de Oliveira, H.W. de Oliveira, S.M.W. Nobre, J.H.G. dos Santos Filho, D.N. Silva, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 37(3) (2009) 167-173.
[79] G.D. Goh, S.L. Sing, Y.F. Lim, J.L.J. Thong, Z.K. Peh, S.R. Mogali, W.Y. Yeong, Materials & Design 211 (2021) 110125.
[80] D. Hong, H. Kim, T. Kim, Y.-H. Kim, N. Kim, Scientific Reports 11(1) (2021) 6191.
[81] C. Culmone, G. Smit, P. Breedveld, Additive Manufacturing 27 (2019) 461-473.
[82] M. Kajtaz, A. Subic, M. Brandt, M. Leary, Chapter 5 - three-dimensional printing of sports equipment, in: A. Subic (Ed.), Materials in sports equipment (second edition), Woodhead Publishing2019, pp. 161-198.
[83] O. Weeger, N. Boddeti, S.K. Yeung, S. Kaijima, M.L. Dunn, Additive Manufacturing 25 (2019) 39-49.
[84] J. Mueller, K. Shea, C. Daraio, Materials & Design 86 (2015) 902-912.
[85] A. Pugalendhi, R. Ranganathan, M. Chandrasekaran, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 108(4) (2020) 1049-1059.
[86] A. Ghimire, P.-Y. Chen, Acta Biomaterialia 138 (2022) 430-442.
[87] M.J. Harrington, J.H. Waite, Advanced Materials 21(4) (2009) 440-444.
[88] N.A. Yaraghi, N. Guarín-Zapata, L.K. Grunenfelder, E. Hintsala, S. Bhowmick, J.M. Hiller, M. Betts, E.L. Principe, J.-Y. Jung, L. Sheppard, R. Wuhrer, J. McKittrick, P.D. Zavattieri, D. Kisailus, Advanced Materials 28(32) (2016) 6835-6844.
[89] A.Y.M. Lin, M.A. Meyers, K.S. Vecchio, Materials Science and Engineering: C 26(8) (2006) 1380-1389.
[90] G. Hunter, L. Djumas, L. Brassart, A. Molotnikov, Extreme Mechanics Letters 51 (2022) 101596.
[91] Y. Kim, Y. Kim, F. Libonati, S. Ryu, Composites Part B: Engineering 167 (2019) 736-745.
[92] G. Hunter, L. Djumas, L. Brassart, A. Molotnikov, Materials & Design 218 (2022) 110680.
[93] F. Liu, T. Li, Z. Jia, L. Wang, Extreme Mechanics Letters 35 (2020) 100621.
[94] J. Ubaid, B.L. Wardle, S. Kumar, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 12(29) (2020) 33256-33266.
[95] L.S. Dimas, G.H. Bratzel, I. Eylon, M.J. Buehler, Advanced Functional Materials 23(36) (2013) 4629-4638.
[96] M. Wan, D. Hu, B. Pei, Performance of 3d-printed bionic conch-like composite plate under low-velocity impact, Materials, 2022.
[97] J. Wang, D. Hu, Z. Zhang, B. Pei, R. Xu, X. Wu, Composite Structures 303 (2023) 116315.
[98] X. Zhang, L. Jiang, X. Yan, Z. Wang, X. Li, G. Fang, Materials & Design 226 (2023) 111564.
[99] A. Ghimire, Y.-Y. Tsai, P.-Y. Chen, S.-W. Chang, Composites Part B: Engineering 215 (2021) 108754.
[100] L. Djumas, A. Molotnikov, G.P. Simon, Y. Estrin, Scientific Reports 6(1) (2016) 26706.
[101] V. Carollo, J. Reinoso, M. Paggi, Composite Structures 182 (2017) 636-651.
[102] L.S. Dimas, M.J. Buehler, Soft Matter 10(25) (2014) 4436-4442.
[103] T.-H. Huang, C.-S. Chen, S.-W. Chang, Materials & Design 140 (2018) 505-515.
[104] R. Mirzaeifar, L.S. Dimas, Z. Qin, M.J. Buehler, ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering 1(5) (2015) 295-304.
[105] D. Sen, M.J. Buehler, Scientific Reports 1(1) (2011) 35.
[106] S. Askarinejad, H.A. Choshali, C. Flavin, N. Rahbar, Composite Structures 195 (2018) 118-125.
[107] C. Gao, B.P.J. Hasseldine, L. Li, J.C. Weaver, Y. Li, Advanced Materials 30(36) (2018) 1800579.
[108] L. Zorzetto, L. Andena, F. Briatico-Vangosa, L. De Noni, J.-M. Thomassin, C. Jérôme, Q. Grossman, A. Mertens, R. Weinkamer, M. Rink, D. Ruffoni, Scientific Reports 10(1) (2020) 22285.
[109] F. Liu, T. Li, X. Jiang, Z. Jia, Z. Xu, L. Wang, Additive Manufacturing 36 (2020) 101502.
[110] S. Li, P. Liu, W. Lin, J. Tian, C. Miao, X. Zhang, R. Zhang, J. Peng, H. Zhang, P. Gu, Z. Zhang, Z. Wang, T. Luo, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13(15) (2021) 17380-17391.
[111] Y.L. Tee, C. Peng, P. Pille, M. Leary, P. Tran, JOM 72(3) (2020) 1105-1117.
[112] P. Patpatiya, K. Chaudhary, A. Shastri, S. Sharma, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 236(14) (2022) 7899-7926.
[113] G.X. Gu, F. Libonati, S.D. Wettermark, M.J. Buehler, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 76 (2017) 135-144.
[114] P. Sudharshan Phani, W.C. Oliver, Materials & Design 164 (2019) 107563.
[115] Y. Cao, W. Wang, J. Wang, C. Zhang, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 92 (2019) 40-49.
[116] I.A. Malik, F. Barthelat, International Journal of Solids and Structures 138 (2018) 118-133.
[117] H.D. Espinosa, A.L. Juster, F.J. Latourte, O.Y. Loh, D. Gregoire, P.D. Zavattieri, Nature Communications 2(1) (2011) 173.
[118] V. Slesarenko, N. Kazarinov, S. Rudykh, Smart Mater Struct 26(3) (2017) 035053.
[119] P.D. Zavattieri, H.D. Espinosa, Acta Mater 49(20) (2001) 4291-4311.
[120] P.D. Zavattieri, H.D. Espinosa, J Mech Phys Solids 51(4) (2003) 607-635.
[121] M. Paggi, J. Reinoso, Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 321 (2017) 145-172.
[122] S. Cui, Z. Yang, Z. Lu, Compos Sci Technol 193 (2020) 108131.
[123] A. Singh, T.S. Sandhu, S. Pal, Mech Mater 139 (2019) 103215.
[124] A. Khandelwal, A. Kumar, R. Ahluwalia, P. Murali, Comput Mater Sci 126 (2017) 238-243.
[125] L.S. Dimas, M.J. Buehler, J Mater Res 28(10) (2013) 1295-1303.
[126] L. Brely, F. Bosia, N.M. Pugno, Frontiers in Materials 2 (2015) 51.
[127] F. Libonati, V. Cipriano, L. Vergani, M.J. Buehler, ACS Biomater Sci Eng 3(12) (2017) 3236-3243.
[128] F. Wang, K. Liu, D. Li, B. Ji, Journal of Applied Mechanics 87(7) (2020).
[129] E. Lin, Y. Li, C. Ortiz, M.C. Boyce, J Mech Phys Solids 73 (2014) 166-182.
[130] M.P. Loren Bahls, Marie-Andrée Fallu, Reinhard Pienitz, J. Cramer in der Gebrüder Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung (135) (2009) 167–184.
[131] G. Buxton, C.M. Care, D. Cleaver, Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 9 (2001) 485-497.
[132] H. Chen, E. Lin, Y. Liu, Int J Solids Struct 51(9) (2014) 1819-1833.
[133] L.S. Dimas, M. Buehler, Bioinspiration & biomimetics 7 3 (2012) 036024.
[134] S. Plimpton, P. Crozier, A. Thompson, Sandia Natl Lab 18 (2007) 43.
[135] A. Stukowski, Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 18(1) (2009) 015012.
[136] R. Rabiei, S. Bekah, F. Barthelat, Acta Biomater 6(10) (2010) 4081-4089.

[137] C-C. Tung, Ph.D.Thesis, 2023, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan

[138] Stratasys 3D Printer website: www.stratasys.com

[139] Illinois Tool Works Inc., 2009.

[140] Bruker hysitron nanoindenters: www.bruker.com

(此全文20280822後開放外部瀏覽)
Full-text
Abstract
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top

相關論文

1. 鱷魚骨板之啟發:防禦性生物複合材料之多尺度結構分析及機械性質研究
2. 烏賊骨板之結構與機械性質設計研究
3. 以化學氣相沉積法增強陶瓷支架之機械性質
4. 鮑魚珍珠層之仿生啟發: 以濺鍍與脈衝雷射蒸鍍複合技術合成氧化鋯/聚醯亞胺多層膜之微結構分析與機械性質研究
5. 兩種水棲昆蟲之吸附結構與機制研究:以石蛉幼蟲與網蚊幼蟲為啟發
6. 甲殼類外殼之仿生啟發:以濺鍍與脈衝雷射蒸鍍複合系統合成氧化鋯與氧化鈦/聚亞醯胺多層鍍膜之研究
7. 鯊魚牙齒之多尺度結構觀察與機械性質研究
8. 以扶桑及多孔植物為模板- 凝膠溶膠法合成TiO2及CaCO3 之研究
9. Inspirations from the Peristome of Nepenthes: Microstructural Characterization and Wettability Measurement of Multifunctional Surfaces Synthesized by Bio-replication and Surface Modification Techniques
10. Multi-scale Structural Characterization and Attachment Mechanisms of the Hillstream River Loach (Sinogastromyzon puliensis)
11. Multi-scale Structural Characterization and Mechanical Evaluation of Protective Bio-composites: Inspirations from Cobra Snake and Chinese Striped-neck Turtle Eggshells
12. 以冷凍鑄造法及矽藻土合成具多階層孔洞結構之仿生複合材料
13. 以冷凍鑄造及高分子聚合法合成多功能具多階層孔洞之矽藻土基複合材料
14. 以魚鱗為原料合成氫氧基磷灰石多孔材料應用於生醫領域及重金屬吸附功能之研究
15. 以冷凍鑄造法及矽藻土製備水下超疏油之多孔薄片應用於高效率油水分離
 
* *