本篇論文起初為筆者觀察現代人類與科技關係後進行提問：意識是否能以科技物為載體跨越空間限制，成為自身的代理者接收或控制現實世界的訊息?為了釐清這項問題，必須要涉及哲學、心理學、生物學、未來學等垮領域知識研究，依循此脈絡做為主旨進行創作，並分析作品體驗過程來釐清，剖析作品表現結果中蘊含的意涵與邏輯。
創作者在進入研究所之前，未曾受過藝術相關訓練，所以需要先完成一段對於藝術的釐清過程。隨著學習和創作，逐漸建立筆者對於藝術性和創作的理解，並培養出探究事物的本質習慣。
筆者試著將從大學學習的電機控制方法作為創作的方法之一，開始嘗試對於原先熟悉的動力裝置作為媒材，並檢視自身經驗進行發想形成作品的主軸。本研究中會挑出兩件跟主題具相關性的作品，進行討論研究。在第一件作品《逝訊》為觀察兩具形同細胞自動機的機器彼此溝通的過程，探討機器與生物行為上的差異性，以及兩者之間是否存在取代性，延伸取代後帶來的影響。在第二件《皿》作品中，起初是開始把注意轉移到自身對存在世界的見解，其類似於虛擬理論的觀點，並把這項假設理論化成創作，試著在互動裝置創作中體驗此概念的樣貌。並無意間產生其他能夠思考的議題，其為意識與身體的關係，延伸至對於世界的本質進行反思。

In the context start with the observation of the relationship between humans and technology. Can consciousness be carried by technology to receive and control information in the real world? To clarify this issue, need to research in the fields of knowledge, such as philosophy, psychology, biology, futurology, etc. This context as the main theme to create, and analyze the experience process to clarify, analyze the meaning and logic of the results of the work.
Researcher has not received art-related training before entering the institute, so he needs to complete a process of clarifying art first. During the study and creation processed, gradually established the researcher understanding of the artistry and creation, and cultivated the habit of exploring the nature of things.
Researcher tried to use the electronic control method which learned from the university as one of the creative methods, and began to try to use the previously familiar power device as a medium, and examine my own experience to develop the main axis of the work. In this research, two works related to the theme will be selected for discussion and research. In the first work, "Lapse" observing the process of communication between two machines that are similar to cellular automata and explore the differences in behavior between machines and biological behaviors, and whether there is substitution between the two. The extension of substitution brings about Impact. In the second piece of " The PetriDish ", researcher started to shift attention to own opinion of the world, which is like a virtual theory view and theorized this hypothesis into creation. by experience this in interactive installation creation. It does not intentionally produce other issues that can be considered, which is the relationship between consciousness and the body, which extends to reflection on the nature of the world.

摘要 1
目次 3
圖次 4
壹、 緒論 5
一、 研究背景 5
二、 創作研究目的 6
三、 研究方法 6
貳、 文獻探討 7
一、 意識運作及特性 7
二、 意識上傳 10
三、 模擬理論 11
四、 相關作品探討 13
參、 創作理念與實踐 17
一、 《逝訊》 17
二、 創作理念 17
三、 執行方法與說明 18
四、 《皿》 21
五、 創作理念 22
六、 執行方法與說明 23
肆、 作品剖析 25
一、 《逝訊》 25
二、 《皿》 26
伍、 結論 27
一、 在相同創作領域中的反饋 27
二、 未來創作延伸發展的方向 28
參考文獻 29

1. Dennett, Daniel C. Consciousness explained. Penguin uk, 1993.
2. Baars, Bernard J. A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge University Press, 1993.
3. Bamford, Sim. "A framework for approaches to transfer of a mind's substrate." International Journal of Machine Consciousness 4.01 (2012): 23-34.
4. Sotala, Kaj, and Harri Valpola. "Coalescing minds: brain uploading-related group mind scenarios." International Journal of Machine Consciousness 4.01 (2012): 293-312.
5. Oto, Brandon. "Seeking normative guidelines for novel future forms of consciousness." International Journal of Machine Consciousness 4.01 (2012): 201-214.
6. Sandberg, Anders. "Monte Carlo model of brain emulation development." (2014).
7. Bostrom, Nick. "Are we living in a computer simulation?." The Philosophical Quarterly 53.211 (2003): 243-255.
8. Bostrom, Nick, and Marcin Kulczycki. "A patch for the simulation argument." Analysis 71.1 (2011): 54-61.
9. Bostrom, Nick. "The simulation argument FAQ." Retrieved on 25 (2012).
10. Radner, Daisie, and Michael Radner. Animal consciousness. Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1989.
11. Atmanspacher, Harald. "Quantum approaches to consciousness." (2004).
12. Chalmers, David J. "Facing up to the problem of consciousness." Journal of consciousness studies 2.3 (1995): 200-219.
13. Seth, Anil K., et al. "Theories and measures of consciousness: an extended framework." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103.28 (2006): 10799-10804.
14. Eccles, John C. "The evolution of consciousness." How the self controls its brain. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1994. 113-124.
15. Brook, Andrew, and Julian Wuerth. "Kant’s View of the Mind and Consciousness of Self." (2004).