帳號:guest(18.223.196.180)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):何宛臻
作者(外文):Ho, Wan-Chen
論文名稱(中文):兩岸師培者對數學臆測教學課堂的覺察力
論文名稱(外文):Cross-Strait Mathematics Teacher Educators' Professional Noticing in the Context of Conjecturing-Based Class
指導教授(中文):林碧珍
指導教授(外文):Lin, Pi-Jen
口試委員(中文):蔡文煥
林勇吉
口試委員(外文):Tsai, Wen-Huan
Lin, Yung-Chi
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:數理教育研究所
學號:106198751
出版年(民國):109
畢業學年度:108
語文別:中文
論文頁數:148
中文關鍵詞:覺察力數學臆測師培者兩岸
外文關鍵詞:noticingmathematics conjecturingteacher educatorcross-strait
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:55
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
為了觀察並分析師培者的專業覺察力,並比較兩岸師培者在覺察什麼與如何覺察的差異,本研究採個案研究法,選擇在科技部計畫下的兩岸學術論壇活動為背景,觀察參與活動的兩岸師培者們在臆測教學課堂覺察力的比較。
研究結果發現,兩岸師培者在覺察對象的部分,會同時關注學生和老師,偶而會以師培者本身的經驗或歷程做說明;在覺察主題的部分,兩岸師培者會同時關注數學思考,其次,台灣師培者聚焦數學內容,中國師培者聚焦老師的教學法;在覺察論證的方面,兩岸的師培者都傾向聚焦覺察猜想與支持例。
而兩岸師培者在如何覺察的部分,都關注發展證明、學生觀察的層次以及猜想品質,也都相當讚賞臆測教學的成效,以及臆測教學跟一般課堂教學活動的差異性。差異的部分,臺灣的學者比較重視學生數學概念的釐清、證明的層次、如何提昇學生的數學認知發展、老師在臆測教學各個階段的教學規劃以及教學細節,也比較強調教師如何提供學生鷹架。而中國學者則會比較重視課程的效率、學生思維的發展、文化規範層次、老師如何去發展設計出臆測教學任務、教師角色、數學術語化,以及教師介入的時機與方法。此外,臺灣老師提到了反例的例子,中國的學者關注教學計畫,同時重視回應其他評述者以進行交流,並覺察到台灣包班制和中國分科制教學形態的差異。
本研究顯示,兩岸的師培者在覺察臆測教學關注的重點有差異,但都能聚焦於學生數學思考,善用各種例子解釋學生的猜想,並針對證明的層次進行舉例說明,以及提供老師教學策略的建議。
In order to observe and analyze the professional noticing of the analysts, and to compare the differences between what the cross-strait educators notice and how they notice. This study uses a case study method. The background of the cross-strait academic forum activities was sponsored by the Ministry of Science and Technology. Observing the cross-strait teachers who participated in the activities, they were comparing the perceptions of teaching classrooms.
The study found that regarding the actors, the teacher educators on both sides of the strait notice on students and teachers at the same time. The teacher educators will occasionally explain the experience or resume of themselves. When regarding the topics, cross-strait teacher educators both noticed mathematics thinking. Secondly, Taiwanese teacher educators notice mathematics content, while Chinese teacher educators notice teacher's teaching method. In terms of argumentation, the teachers of both sides of the strait are inclined to notice conjectures and supporting cases.
About how teacher educators notice, the cross-strait teacher educators who notice the development is concerned with the development of proof, the level of student observation and the quality of conjectures. They also appreciate the effectiveness of speculative teaching and the difference between speculative teaching and general classroom teaching activities. In the difference, Taiwanese scholars pay more attention to the clarification of the mathematical concept of students, the level of proof, how to improve the development of students' mathematical cognition, the teaching planning and teaching details of teachers at all stages of speculative teaching, and also emphasize how teachers provide students with scaffolding. Chinese scholars will pay more attention to the efficiency of the curriculum, the development of students' thinking, the level of cultural norms, how teachers develop and design the teaching tasks, the role of teachers, the terminology of mathematics, and the timing and methods of teacher involvement. In addition, the Taiwan teacher mentioned examples of counterexamples. Chinese scholars pay attention to teaching plans and attach importance to responding to other commenters for communication. I also noticed the difference between the Taiwanese shift system and the Chinese sub-system teaching style.
This study shows that the teacher educators on both sides of the strait are different in their noticing of the focus of conjecturing. But they all notice students' mathematical thinking and use various examples to explain students' conjecturs. And give examples of the level of proof, and provide advice on the teacher's teaching strategy.
中文摘要 I
Abstract II
致謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 V
表目錄 VI
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 3
第三節 名詞釋義 3
第四節 研究範圍與限制 4
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 教師覺察力 6
第二節 數學臆測教學課堂 20
第三節 師培者的覺察力 29
第三章 研究方法與設計 32
第一節 研究方法 32
第二節 研究情境與對象 33
第三節 資料蒐集與分析 37
第四節 研究架構 47
第五節 研究流程 49
第四章 研究結果與討論 51
第一節 台灣師培者觀察臆測教學覺察什麼 51
第二節 中國師培者在觀察臆測教學覺察什麼 60
第三節 兩岸師培者如何覺察臆測教學之比較 69
第五章 結論與建議 132
第一節 研究結論 132
第二節 研究建議 136
參考文獻 138
中文參考文獻 138
英文參考文獻 140

中文參考文獻
王惠玉(2018)。應用不同媒體調查國小師資生數學教學覺察力之研究:比較現場影片和動畫的差異。國立清華大學數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
石糧豪(2019)。學生形成論證的教師支持性行為:新竹與浙江數學課堂比較。國立清華大學數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
呂沅潤(2015)。在數學臆測教學之下國小四年級論證結構之比較。國立新竹教育大學數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
李契特曼、江吟梓與蘇文賢 (2010)。教育質性研究: 實用指南。學富文化。
余姿縈(2018)。初任教師建議數學臆測規範之行動研究:以高年級為例。國立清華大學數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
周欣怡(2015)。數學臆測教學課室中國小三年級學生論證結構發展之研究。國立新竹教育大學數理教育研究所數學教育教學碩士班碩士論文,未出版。
周姝聿(2018)。一位體制外教師實施臆測教學在造例階段的任務設計之行動研究。國立清華大學數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
吳長恩(2019)。數學臆測教學下教師提問類型之個案研究。國立清華大學數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
林勇吉(2017)真的只有教師知識和信念嗎?數學教師覺察力:從另一個觀點來看待教師的專業能力。科學教育月刊, 402, 2-15.
林碧珍(2015)。國小三年級課室以數學臆測活動引發學生論證初探。科學教育學刊,23(1),81-108.
林碧珍主編(2016)。數學臆測任務設計與實踐。台北:師大書苑。
林碧珍(2016)。在”周長與面積變化關係”中是如何發展學生的數學論證的。新世紀小學數學, 3,6-10。
林福來主編(2015)。主動思考:貼近數學的心跳。開學文化。
林福來、單維彰、李源順、鄭章華(2013)。十二年國民基本教育領域綱要內容前導研究整合型研究之子計畫三:十二年國民基本教育數學領域綱要內容之前導研究研究報告(NAER-102-06-A-1-02-03-1-12)。新北市:國家教育研究院。
林碧珍、馮博凱(2013)。國小學生反駁錯誤命題的論證結構-以速率單元為例。第 29 屆科學教育國際研討會(pp.292-294)。國立彰化師大科學教育研究所。
林碧珍、鄭章華、陳姿靜,(2016)。數學素養導向的任務設計與教學實踐── 以發展學童的數學論證為例。Journal of Textbook Research, 9(1).
林碧珍、洪神佑(2017)。臆測有助於小學課堂中的小組論證。 在「第九屆全體學生課堂教學研究」會議上發表的論文。7月12日至15日,中國大連大學。
林碧珍、鄭俊彥與蔡寶桂,(2018)。國小六年級學生 [數學論證評量工具] 之建構。測驗學刊, 65(3), 257-289.
邱憶惠(2016)。學習去教:在師資培育課堂裡的自我研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,9 卷3 期,81-104 頁(DOI 10.3966/207136492016120903004)
洪神佑(2016)。在數學臆測教學下一組國小六年級學生論證結構發展之研究 。國立新竹教育大學數理教育研究所數學教育教學碩士班碩士論文,未出版。
陳英娥、林福來(1998)。數學臆測的思維模式。科學教育學刊,6(2),191-218。
教育部(2011)。义务教育数学课程标准。北京: 北京师范大学。
教育部(2012)。小学教师专业标准(试行)。北京:北京师范大学。
教育部(2014)。中国学生发展核心素养。北京:北京师范大学。
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。
國家教育研究院(2018)十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校數學領域。
張廖珮鈺(2019)。數學臆測教學的教師角色之研究。國立清華大學數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
張俊彥、李哲迪、任宗浩、林碧珍、張美玉、曹博盛、楊文金、張瑋寧,(2015) 。國際數學與科學教育成就趨勢調查 2015 台灣精簡國家成果報告。
陳姿蒨(2018)。國小教師數學教學覺察力之研究:不同教學年資教師的表現。國立清華大學數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
陳佳明(2018)。一位國小五年級教師建立從造例到提出猜想臆測教學規範之行動研究。國立清華大學數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
游淑美(2018)。一位體制外教師三年級數學臆測任務設計及實踐之行動研究。國立清華大學數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
彭俊欽(2019)。實施臆測取向教學之高年級資優生數學臆測認知歷程之個案研究。國立清華大學數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
繆佳燕(2018)。在數學臆測教學下不同教師引發學生數學論證的介入之比較。國立清華大學數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
薛密(譯)(1998)。費馬最後定理(pp. 94-105) (原作者:Simon Singh)。新北:台灣商務印書館。
蘇奕心(2018)。國小不同數學背景與教學年資教師數學教學覺察力之比較。國立清華大學數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。

英文參考文獻
Ainley, J., & Luntley, M. (2007). The role of attention in expert classroom practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 3–22.
Amador, J. (2016). Professional noticing practices of novice mathematics teacher educators. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 217-241.
Amador, J. M., Carter, I., & Hudson, R. A. (2016). Analyzing preservice mathematics teachers’ professional noticing. Action in Teacher Education, 38(4), 371-383.
Amobi, F., & Irwin, L. (2012). Implementing on-campus microteaching to elicit preservice teachers’ reflection on teaching actions: Fresh perspective on an established practice. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 27–34.
Barnett, C. (1998). Mathematics teaching cases as a catalyst for informed strategic inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 81-93.
Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers' ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83-93.
Brown, R. A., & Renshaw, P. D. (2000). Collective argumentation: A sociocultural approach to reframing classroom teaching and learning.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Cañadas, M. C., & Castro, E. (2005). A proposal of categorization for analyzing inductive rea-soning. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the CERME 4 international conference (pp. 401-408). Catalonia, Spain: SantFeliu de Guíxols.
Chieu, V. M., Herbst, P., & Weiss, M. (2011). Effect of an animated classroom story embedded in online discussion on helping mathematics teachers learn to notice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(4), 589-624.
Cobb, P., & Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.). (1995). The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures. Psychology Press.
Coles, A. (2013). Using video for professional development: the role of the discussion facilitator. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(3), 165-184.\
Colestock, A. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2009). Teachers’ sense making strategies while watching video of mathematics instruction. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(1), 7–29.
Ding, L., & Domínguez, H. (2016). Opportunities to notice: Chinese prospective teachers noticing students’ ideas in a distance formula lesson. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(4), 325-347.
Dinkleman, T. (2003). Self-study in teacher education: A means and ends tool for promoting reflective teaching. Journal of Teacher Education,54(1), 6-18.
Dreher, A., & Kuntze, S. (2015). Teachers’ professional knowledge and noticing: The case of multiple representations in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(1), 89-114.
Ducharme, E. (1993). The Lives of Teacher Educators. New York: Teachers College Press.
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science education, 88(6), 915-933.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittroc (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
Erickson, F. (2011). On noticing teacher noticing. In Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 47-64). Routledge.
Frederiksen, J. R., Sipusic, M., Sherin, M., & Wolfe, E. W. (1998). Video portfolio assessment: Creating a framework for viewing the functions of teaching. Educational Assessment, 5(4), 225-297.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American educational research journal, 38(4), 915-945.
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633.
Golanics, J. D., & Nussbaum, E. M. (2008). Enhancing online collaborative argumentation through question elaboration and goal instructions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 167-180.
Herbst, P., Aaron, W., & Erickson, A. (2013). How preservice teachers respond to representations of practice: A comparison of animations and video. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Herbst, P., & Kosko, K. (2014). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and its specificity to high school geometry instruction.
Hiebert, J., Morris, A. K., Berk, D., & Jansen, A. (2007). Preparing teachers to learn from teaching. Journal of teacher education, 58(1), 47-61.
Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and instruction, 26(4), 430-511.
Hoth, J., Döhrmann, M., Kaiser, G., Busse, A., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2016). Diagnostic competence of primary school mathematics teachers during classroom situations. ZDM, 48(1-2), 41-53.
Hoving, W., & Van Bon, J. (2010). De ISM-Methode.
Huang, R., & Li, Y. (2012). What matters most: A comparison of expert and novice teachers' noticing of mathematics classroom events. School science and mathematics, 112(7), 420-432.
Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K. C., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for research in mathematics education, 81-116.
Hughes, J. E., Packard, B. W. L., & Pearson, P. D. (2000). The role of hypermedia cases on preservice teachers' views of reading instruction. Action in Teacher Education, 22(sup2), 24-38.
Jacobs, J. K., & Morita, E. (2002). Japanese and American teachers' evaluations of videotaped mathematics lessons. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 154-175.
Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Battey, D. (2007). Professional development focused on children's algebraic reasoning in elementary school. Journal for research in mathematics education, 258-288.
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for research in mathematics education, 169-202.
Jacobs, V. R., & Sherin, M. G. (2011). SITUATING THE STUDY OF TEACHER NOTICING. In Mathematics Teacher Noticing (pp. 33-44). Routledge.
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., Philipp, R. A., & Schappelle, B. P. (2011). Deciding how to respond on the basis of children’s understandings. Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes, 97-116.
Kazemi, E., Elliott, R., Mumme, J., Carroll, C., Lesseig, K. & Kelley-Petersen, M. (2011). Noticing leaders’ thinking about videocases of teachers engaged in mathematics tasks in professional development. In M. G. Sherin, V. Jacobs & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 188–203). New York: Routledge.
Kersting, N. (2008). Using video clips of mathematics classroom instruction as item prompts to measure teachers’ knowledge of teaching mathematics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(5), 845–861.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Koster, B., Brekelmans, M., Korthagen, F., & Wubbels, T. (2005). Quality requirements for teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 157–176. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.004
Koster, B., Dengerink, J., Korthagen, F., & Lunenberg, M. (2008). Teacher educators working on their own professional development: Goals, activities and outcomes of a project for the professional development of teacher educators. Teachers and teaching, 14(5-6), 567-587.
Krummheuer, G. (2007). Argumentation and participation in the primary mathematics classroom:Two episodes and related theoretical abduction. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(1), 60-82.
Kuhn D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. New York:Cambridge University Press.
Lee, M. Y., & Choy, B. H. (2017). Mathematical teacher noticing: the key to learning from Lesson Study. In Teacher noticing: bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks(pp. 121-140). Springer, Cham.
Leitao, S. (2003). Evaluating and selecting counterarguments. Written Communication, 20, 269–306.
Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers' attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142-154.
Lin, P. J. (2005). Using research-based video-cases to help pre-service primary teachers conceptualize a contemporary view of mathematics teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(3), 351-377.
Lin, P. J. (2016). Learning to teach students’ mathematical argumentation in classroom. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference of Classroom Teaching Research for All Students (CTRAS8).. July 21–23, Macromedia University Hamburg/Munich, Germany.
Lin, P. J. (2017). Enhancing students’ mathematical argumentation in primary classroom. Proceedings of the 41st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (vol. 1, 237). July, 18-22, National Institute of Education, Singapore.
Lin, P. J. (2018a). The Development of Students’ Mathematical Argumentation in a Primary Classroom. Educação & Realidade, Porto Alegre, v. 43, n. 3, p. 1171-1192, July/Sept.
Lin, P. J. (2018b). Improving Knowledge for Teaching Mathematical Argumentation in Primary Classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(1), 17-30.
Lin, P. J. (2019). Enhancing teachers’ knowledge of noticing students’ mathematical thinking via using conjecturing-based videos. Paper presented at the international conference of the 2019 Classroom Teaching Research for All Students Conference (CTRAS). June 28-30. Beijing Normal university, China.
Lin, P. J., & Tsai, W. H. (2016). Enhancing Students’ Mathematical Conjecturing and Justification in Third-Grade Classrooms: the sum of even/odd numbers. Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(1), 1-15.
Lin, P. J. & Miao, J. Y. (2018). Teachers' supports for students engaging in mathematical argumentation. Proceedings of the Clute International Conference (pp.327-1~327-8). August 5-9. Clute Institute. San Francisco, California, USA. (ISSN2157-9660 on line).
Liston, D., Borko, H., & Whitcomb, J. (2008). The teacher educators’ role in enhancing teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(2), 111-116.
Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2010). Prospective primary mathematics teachers’ learning from on-line discussions in a virtual video-based environment. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2), 177-196.
Lunenberg, M. L. (2010). Characteristics, scholarship and research of teacher educators. In International encyclopedia of education (pp. 676-680). Elsevier Ltd.
Lunenberg, M., Dengerink, J., & Korthagen, F. (2014). The professional teacher educator: Roles, behaviour, and professional development of teacher educators. Springer Science & Business Media.
Martinez, K. (2008). Academic induction for teacher educators. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(1), 35-51.
Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. Routledge.
Mason, J. (2011). Noticing: Roots and branches. In M. G. Sherin, V. Jacobs & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 35–50). New York: Routledge.
Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1985). Phases of work. Thinking mathematically.
McConville, S. A., & Lane, A. M. (2006). Using on-line video clips to enhance self-efficacy toward dealing with difficult situations among nursing students. Nurse Educ Today, 26(3), 200-208. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.09.024
McDuffie, A. R., Foote, M. Q., Bolson, C., Turner, E. E., Aguirre, J. M., Bartell, T. G., et al. (2014). Using video analysis to support pre-service K-8 teachers’ noticing of students’ multiple mathematical knowledge bases. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(3), 245–270.
Miller, K., & Zhou, X. (2007). Learning from classroom video: What makes it compelling and what makes it hard. Video research in the learning sciences, 321-334.
Miller, K. F. (2011). Situatin awareness in teaching: What educators can learn from video-based research in other fields. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes. New York: Routledge.
Mitchell, R. N., & Marin, K. A. (2015). Examining the use of a structured analysis framework to support prospective teacher noticing. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(6), 551-575.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(NCTM).Principles and standards for schoolmathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM, 2000.
Nussbaum, E. M. (2008). Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: Preface and literature review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 345-359.
Nussbaum, E. M., & Schraw, G. (2007). Promoting argument-counterargument integration in students' writing. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(1), 59-92.
O'Keefe, D. J. (1982). The concepts of argument and arguing. In Advances in argumentation theory and research (pp. 3-23). Southern Ilinois University Press.
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of research in science teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
Polya, G.(1954). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematicalmethod. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Russ, R. S., Sherin, B., & Sherin, M. G. (2011). Images of expertise in mathematics teaching. In Expertise in mathematics instruction (pp. 41-60). Springer, Boston, MA.
Santagata, R., & Angelici, G. (2010). Studying the impact of the lesson analysis framework on preservice teachers’ abilities to reflect on videos of classroom teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(4), 339–349.
Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. W. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 10(2), 123-140.
Schack, E. O., Fisher, M. H., & Thomas, J. N. (2015). Multiple perspectives of teacher noticing: An emerging area of research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(3), 371-375.
Schack, E. O., Fisher, M. H., & Wilhelm, J. A. (Eds.). (2017). Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks. Springer.
Scherer, P., & Steinbring, H. (2007). Noticing children’s learning processes–teachers jointly reflect on their own classroom interaction for improving mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(2), 157-185.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context.
Sherin, M. G. (2003a). Using video clubs to support conversations among teachers and researchers. Action in Teacher Education, 24(4), 33–45.
Sherin, M. G., (2003b). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In Using video in teacher education (pp. 1-27). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (2011). Situating the study of teacher noticing. Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes, 3-13.
Sherin, M. G., Russ, R. S., & Colestock, A. A. (2011). Accessing mathematics teachers’ in-the-moment noticing. Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes, 79-94.
Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2003). A new lens on teaching: Learning to notice. Mathematics teaching in the middle school, 9(2), 92. ISO 690
Sherin, M. G., & Linsenmeier, K. van Es., EA (2006, April). Selecting video clubs for teacher learning about student thinking.
Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. (2005). Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of technology and teacher education, 13(3), 475-491.
Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20-37. doi: 120 10.1177/0022487108328155
Shulman, L. S. (1996). Just in case: Reflections on learning from experience. The case for education: Contemporary approaches for using case methods, (s 197), 217.
Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. perception, 28(9), 1059-1074.
Stylianides, A. J. (2007). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for research in Mathematics Education, 289-321.
Star, J. R., Lynch, K., & Perova, N. (2011). Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers's abilities to attend to classroom features. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 117-133). New York: Routledge.
Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 11(2), 107-125.
Stockero, S. L., Rupnow, R. L., & Pascoe, A. E. (2017). Learning to notice important student mathematical thinking in complex classroom interactions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 384-395.
Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Philippou, G. N. (2007). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of proof by mathematical induction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(3), 145-166.
Sun, J., & Van Es, E. A. (2015). An exploratory study of the influence that analyzing teaching has on preservice teachers’ classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 201-214.
Superfine, A. C., Li, W., Bragelman, J., & Fisher, A. (2015). Examining the use of video to support preservice elementary teachers’ noticing of children’s thinking. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(2), 137-157.
Taylan, R. D. (2017). Characterizing a highly accomplished teacher’s noticing of third-grade students’ mathematical thinking. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(3), 259-280.
Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Doorn, J. A. A., & Lammers, C. J. (1984). Moderne sociologie. Een systematische inleiding. Utrecht-Antwerpen: Uitgeverij Het Spectrum.
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571-596.
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). How different video club designs support teachers in “learning to notice”. Journal of computing in teacher education, 22(4), 125-135.
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’“learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and teacher education, 24(2), 244-276.
van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 164-181). Routledge.
van Velzen, C., & Volman, M. (2009). The activities of a school‐based teacher educator: a theoretical and empirical exploration. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(4), 345-367.
Verloop, N. (2001). Teacher Professionalism. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 433-527.
Walkoe, J. (2015). Exploring teacher noticing of student algebraic thinking in a video club. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(6), 523-550.
Willingham, D. T. (2002). Ask the Cognitive Scientist Allocating Student Study Time" Massed" versus" Distributed" Practice. American Educator, 26(2), 37-39.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *