本研究主要目的在於瞭解國中生知覺體育教師轉型領導行為與學生其自我決定動機之關係，以體育教師的轉型領導行為與學生的自我決定動機型態作探討。以新竹市東區某國中為施測對象，共268位為研究對象，使用測量工具為「體育教師轉型領導量表量表」與「學生自我決定動機量表」。所得資料以描述性統計、皮爾遜積差相關、單因子變異數及迴歸歸進行分析。研究結果顯示，體育教師轉型領導行為與學生的內在動機、整合調節、認同調節、內射調節有正相關存在，與學生的無動機有負相關存在。在不同性別中，內在動機、整合調節、認同調節、內射調節為有差異；在不同年級中，轉型領導、認同調節為有差異。轉型領導對學生的內在動機、整合調節、認同調節、內射調節為正向預測效果，對學生的無動機為負向預測效果。根據研究結果，發現研究假設大都獲得支持，顯示體育教師轉型領導行為能提升學生其自我決定動機。

The main purpose of this study is to understand the relationship between students’ perception of physical education teachers’ transformation leadership and students’ self-determination motivation. The object of this research was 268 students in Hsinchu East District Junior High School, and the measurement tools were the “Physical Education Teacher Transformation Leadership Scale” and “the Student Self-Determined Motivation Scale”. The obtained data were analyzed by Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s Correlation, one-way ANOVA and Multiple regression. The research results show that there is a positive correlation between the transformational leadership behaviors of physical education teachers and students 'intrinsic motivation, integrated regulation, identified regulation, and introjected regulation, and there is a negative correlation with students' unmotivation. In different gender, there are differences in intrinsic motivation, integrated regulation, identified regulation, and introjected regulation; transformational leadership and identified regulation has different effects in different grade. Transformational leadership has a positive predictive effect on students' internal motivation, integration adjustment, identification adjustment, and injective adjustment, and a student's unmotivation has a negative prediction effect. According to the results of the study, it was found that most of the research hypotheses were supported, showing the relationship between junior high school students' perceived physical education teacher's transformational leadership behavior and students' self-determination motivation, and the physical education teacher's transformational leadership behavior can improve students' self-determination motivation.

目次
中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
謝誌 III
目次 IV
表次 VI
圖次 VII
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 5
第三節 研究假設 5
第四節 名詞操作性定義 8
第五節 研究範圍與限制 10
第貳章 文獻探討 11
第一節 轉型領導理論 11
第二節 自我決定動機 15
第三節 轉型領導理論與自我決定動機之探討 23
第四節 小結 25
第參章 研究方法 26
第一節 研究架構與設計 26
第二節 研究對象 28
第三節 研究工具 28
第四節 研究程序 32
第五節 資料處理 33
第肆章 結果 34
第一節 描述性統計與相關分析 34
第二節 體育教師轉型領導與學生自我決定動機在背景變項中的差異 38
第三節 國中生知覺體育教師轉型領導對學生自我決定動機的預測 42
第伍章 討論與結論 44
第一節 討論 44
第二節 結論 47
第三節 建議 49
參考文獻 50
附錄 57

參考文獻
王俊明（2007）。大學生知覺體育教師領導行為對運動健康信念、身體活動行為與意圖的影響。大專體育學刊，9，13-22。
余宗勳（2004）。國小六年級學童成就動機、教師領導風格與學習適應關係之研究（碩士論文）。國立台南師範大學，臺南市。
汪在莒、賴文璇（2010）。教練轉型領導行為對龍舟運動員成就目標，運動參與動機與組織承諾結構模式驗證。大專體育學術專刊，452-459。
周彥辛、季力康（2011）。體育課動機與休閒運動意圖之間的關係。中華體育季刊，25， 49-59。
林季燕、季力康（2003）。運動動機量表的編製-信度與效度分析。臺灣運動心理學報，2，15-32。
林美惠、郭秋勳（2006）。教師轉型領導對大學生學習動機及學業表現影響之個案研究。 明道學術論壇，2，45-64。
高三福（2009）。教練的轉型與交易領導及運動員的團隊承諾：內在動機的調節效果。體育學報，42，45-61。
高三福（2011）。多因子領導量表修訂（未出版之工具）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
高三福、陳鈺芳（2006）。運動教練的教誨領導：高中運動團隊的個案研究。大專體育學刊，8，97-111。
張春興（1989）。張氏心理學辭典。台北市：東華書局。
張春興（2000）。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市：東華。
許建民、高俊雄（2006）。青少年休閒參與動機模式之研究。大專體育學刊，8，51-63。
陳其昌、謝文娟（2009）。國中體育教師領導風格對學生上體育課動機的影響。大專體育學刊，11，31-45。
陳素青、詹俊成、鄭志富（2013）。臺北市高中體育教師領導風格與班級氣氛對體育課學習動機之影響。體育學報，46，257-272。
陳偉瑀（1998）。專科體育教師教導行為對學生 學習滿意度及內在動機的影響。國立體育學院論叢，9，241-265。
陳嘉惠（2001）。國小教師轉化、互易領導與學生文化關係之研究（碩士論文）。國立屏東師範學院，屏東縣。
黃輝雄（1999）。國民小學教師班級領導風格與學生成就動機關係之研究（碩士論文）。國立屏東師範學院，屏東縣。
詹俊成、陳素青（2011）。臺北市高中職學生體育課班級氣氛與學習動機對學習滿意度之影響。體育學報，44，437-458。
廖啟雄（2003）。國民小學教師領導與學生疏離感關係之研究（碩士論文）。國立台北師範學院，臺北市。
蘇美如、黃英哲（2009）。國小體育教師支持和學生體育課參與動機歷程知關係-應用自我決定理論。臺灣運動心理學報，14，33-50。
Avolio, B. J. & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire. Manual and sampler set. (3rd ed.). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2002). Development potential across a full range of leadership. New Jersey, NJ: Mahwah.
Bakker, F. C., Whiting, H. T. A., & Vander, Brug , H. (1990). Sport psychology: Concept and applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons .
Bass, B. M. & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership.(2 nd ed. )，Mahwah，N.J.: L.Erlbaum Associates,Inc.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: The Free Press.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1989). Potential biases in leadership measures: How prototypes, leniency, and general satisfaction relate to ratings and rankings of transformational and transactional leadership constructs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 509-527.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership questionnaire. Paio Alto, Ca：Consulting Psychologists Press.
Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. NY: Harper & Row.
Biddle, S. J. H., Soos, I., & Chatzisarantis, N. (1999). Predicting physical education intentions using goal perspective and self-determination theory approach. European Psychologist, 4, 83-89.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Carroll, B., & Alexandris. (1997). Perception of constraints in strength of motivation: Their relationship to recreational sport participation in Greece. Journal of Leisure Research, 29, 279-299.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivation approach to self：Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Perspectives on motivation, 237-288. Lincoln, NE：University of Nebraska Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The‘what’and‘why’ofgoal pursuits:Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55 , 68-78.
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country: Across-cultural study of self-determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 930-942.
Dörnyei, Z., & Csizer, K. (1998). Ten commandments for motivating language learners: Results of an empirical study. Language Teaching Research, 2, 203-229.
Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Culverhouse, T., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2003). The processes by which perceived autonomy support in physical education promotes leisure time physical activity intentions and behavior: A trans-contextual model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 784-795.
Myers, A (1989). Sex and age linked determinants of physical activity in adulthood. Canadian Journal of PublicHealth , 80 , 256 - 261.
Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 225-242.
Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education using a self-determination theory framework. Journal of Education Psychology, 97, 444-453.
Parish, L. E., & Treasure, D. C. (2003). Physical activity and situational motivational in physical education:Influence of the motivational climate and perceived ability. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 173-182.
Pounder, J. S. (2008). Transformational leadership: Practicing what we teach in the management classroom. Journal of Education for Business, 84, 2-6.
Roberts, N. C. (1985). Transforming leadership: A process of collective action. Human Relations, 38, 1023-1046.
Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397-428.
Sallis, J. F., & Mckenzie, T. L. (1991). Physical education’s role in public health. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 124-137.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1984). Leadership and excellence in schooling, Educational Leadership, 41, 33-34.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1990). Adding Value to Leadership Gets Extraordinary Results. Educational leadership, 47, 23-27.
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 97-110.
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2006). Students’ motivational processes and their relationship to teacher ratings in school physical education: A self-determination theory approach. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77, 100-110.
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Pensgaard, A. M. (2005). The effect of competitive outcome and task-involving, ego-involving, and co-operative structures on the psychological well- being of individuals engaged in a co-ordination task. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 41-68.
Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., & Pelletier, L. G. (1989). Construction et validation de l'échelle de motivation en éducation (EME). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 21, 323.
Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161-1176.
View, J., DeMulder, E. K., & Stribling, S. M. (2009). Cultivating transformative leadership in P-12 schools and classrooms through critical teacher professional development. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 3, 39-53.
Yukl, G. A. (1989). Leadership in organization (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.