This study examined team performance as it was influenced by artificial intelligence adoptions, knowledge sharing, emotional intelligence, and team coordination. This study also observed the mediation effect of emotional intelligence in the relationship between team coordination and team performance. Two hundred team members of 16 teams from 8 companies in Indonesia and Taiwan had completed this study questionnaire to prove this research hypothesis by using multiple regression methods. This present study predicted (I) artificial intelligence adoptions, knowledge sharing, emotional intelligence, and team coordination would have a positive relation with team performance (II) team coordination will give a positive impact on emotional intelligence and (III) emotional intelligence would mediate the relationship between team coordination and team performance. However, this study found that artificial intelligence adoptions, knowledge sharing, emotional intelligence significantly had a positive impact on team performance, whereas team coordination was not significant to influence team performance. Additionally, this study claimed that team coordination has a positive effect on emotional intelligence and emotional intelligence mediates the relationship between team coordination and team performance.

ABSTRACT i
Table of Content ii
List of Tables iv
List of Figures v
Chapter One: Introduction 1
1.1 Research background 1
1.2 Research questions 3
Chapter Two: Literature Review 5
2.1 Artificial intelligence adoptions and team performance 5
2.2 Knowledge sharing and team performance 6
2.3 Team coordination and team performance 6
2.4 Emotional intelligence and team coordination 7
2.5 Team coordination, emotional intelligence and team performance 8
Chapter Three: Research and Methodology. 10
3.1 Research Framework 10
3.2 Participant and Procedures 11
3.3 Sample Demographics 12
3.4 Measures 13
3.4.1 Artificial Intelligence Adoption (AI) 13
3.4.2 Emotional Intelligence (EI) 14
3.4.3 Knowledge Sharing (KS) 16
3.4.4 Team Coordination (TC) 16
3.4.5 Team Performance (TP) 17
Chapter Four: Data Analysis 19
4.1 Test of the Measurement Model 19
4.1.1 Validity Test 19
4.1.2 Reliability Test 21
4.2 Multiple Regression Analysis 22
4.3 Testing the Assumption of Multiple Regression Model 23
4.3.1 Autocorrelation test 23
4.3.2 Multicollinearity Test 23
4.3.3 Heteroscedasticity Test 24
4.4 Testing of Mediation effect 24
Chapter Five: Conclusion 26
5.1 Discussion 26
5.2 Theoretical implications 26
5.3 Managerial implications 27
5.4 Limitations and future research suggestion 28
References 29

List of Tables
Table 1- 1: Business function in which AI has been adopted, by industry, % of respondents 1
Table 3- 1: Distribution of demographic data (n=200) 12
Table 3- 2: Survey items for artificial intelligence adoption 14
Table 3- 3: Survey items for emotional intelligence 14
Table 3- 4: Survey items for knowledge sharing 16
Table 3- 5: Survey items for team coordination 17
Table 3- 6: Survey Items for Team Performance 17
Table 4- 1: Descriptive statistics and inter-correlation among all study variables 19
Table 4- 2: Result of factor loading and KMO 20
Table 4- 3: The result of reliability test 21
Table 4- 4: The result of hierarchical regression 22
Table 4- 5: The result of Durbin-Watson test. 23
Table 4- 6: The result of multicollinearity test. 24
Table 4- 7: The result of Glejser test 24
Table 4- 8: Analysis procedure of mediation effect 25
Table 4- 9: The result of mediation test. 25

List of Figures
Figure 3- 1: The Research Framework 11
Figure 4- 1: Mediation effect test 25

Acemoglu, D., and Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation and work. Retrieved from
Aliaga, M., and Gunderson, B. J. D. Q. R. i. E. w. S. T. O., CA: Sage Publications. (2000). Introduction to Quantitative research. 1-11.
Ansari, A. H., and Talan, A. (2017). Emotional Intelligence and Work Engagement as Mediators of Big Five Personality and Knowledge Sharing. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 9(3), 16-26. doi:10.18311/gjeis/2017/16357
Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Behery, M., Al-Nasser, A. D., Jabeen, F., Rawas, E., Said, A. J. I. J. o. B., and Society. (2018). TOXIC LEADERSHIP AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR: A MEDIATION EFFECT OF FOLLOWERS'TRUST AND COMMITMENT IN THE MIDDLE EAST. 19(3).
Bell, S. T. J. J. o. a. p. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. 92(3), 595.
Bradley, K., and Smyth, B. (2003). Personalized information ordering: a case study in online recruitment. In Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XIX (pp. 279-292): Springer.
Bryman, A., and Cramer, D. (2009). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS 14, 15 and 16: A guide for social scientists: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
Burstyn, G. (2003). The Importance of Being Empathetic. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1(1), 11-11.
Carmines, E. G., and Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment (Vol. 17): Sage publications.
Cherniss, C., Goleman, D., Emmerling, R., Cowan, K., and Adler, M. (1998). Bringing emotional intelligence to the workplace. New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations, Rutgers University.
Choi, S. Y., Lee, H., and Yoo, Y. J. M. q. (2010). The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: a field study. 855-870.
Cook, P., Ellis, C. A., Desai, B. C., Frasson, C., Mylopoulos, J., and Naffah, N. (1899). Artificial intelligence in office information systems. Paper presented at the afips.
Cui, L., Huang, S., Wei, F., Tan, C., Duan, C., and Zhou, M. J. P. o. A., System Demonstrations. (2017). Superagent: A customer service chatbot for e-commerce websites. 97-102.
Cummings, J. N. J. M. s. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. 50(3), 352-364.
d'Astous, A., Levesque, M. J. P., and Marketing. (2003). A scale for measuring store personality. 20(5), 455-469.
Dielman, T. E. (2001). Applied regression analysis for business and economics: Duxbury/Thomson Learning Pacific Grove, CA.
Faraj, S., and Sproull, L. J. M. s. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. 46(12), 1554-1568.
Field, A. J. U. S. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, Sage Publications Inc.
Figueredo, A. J., Garcia, R. A., Cabeza De Baca, T., Gable, J. C., Weise, D. J. J. o. M., and Sciences, M. i. t. S. (2013). Revisiting mediation in the social and behavioral sciences. 4(1), 1-19.
Frey, L. R., Botan, C. H., Kreps, G. L. J. C. r. m. Q., and approaches, q. (2007). Textual analysis. 561-592.
Ghauri, P. N., and Grønhaug, K. (2005). Research methods in business studies: A practical guide: Pearson Education.
Given, L. M. (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods: Sage publications.
Griffith, T. L., and Sawyer, J. E. J. J. o. O. B. (2010). Multilevel knowledge and team performance. 31(7), 1003-1031.
Guinan, P. J., Cooprider, J. G., and Faraj, S. (1998). Enabling software development team performance during requirements definition: A behavioral versus technical approach. Information systems research, 9(2), 101-125.
Gujarati, D. N. (2009). Basic econometrics: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Hinds, P. J., Roberts, T. L., and Jones, H. J. H.-C. I. (2004). Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. 19(1), 151-181.
Hoegl, M., Weinkauf, K., and Gemuenden, H. G. J. O. s. (2004). Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam RandD projects: A longitudinal study. 15(1), 38-55.
Holland, V. (2010). Information centre for Dutch cattle - Dairy Herd Administration
Management Retrieved from
Hulland, J. J. S. m. j. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. 20(2), 195-204.
Ivanov, S. H., Webster, C., and Berezina, K. (2017). Adoption of robots and service automation by tourism and hospitality companies.
Jones, L. J. E., and Technology. (2017). Driverless cars: when and where? , 12(2), 36-40.
Kaiser, H. F. J. P. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. 39(1), 31-36.
Kanawattanachai, P., and Yoo, Y. J. M. q. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. 31(4).
Kaplan, A., and Haenlein, M. J. B. H. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. 62(1), 15-25.
Killgore, W. D., Sonis, L. A., Rosso, I. M., and Rauch, S. L. J. P. r. (2016). Emotional Intelligence Partially Mediates the Association between Anxiety Sensitivity and Anxiety Symptoms1, 2. 118(1), 23-40.
Lee, P., Gillespie, N., Mann, L., and Wearing, A. J. M. l. (2010). Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance. 41(4), 473-491.
Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. Journal of applied psychology, 88(4), 587.
MacKinnon, D. P., Coxe, S., Baraldi, A. N. J. J. o. B., and Psychology. (2012). Guidelines for the investigation of mediating variables in business research. 27(1), 1-14.
Mann, P. S. J. J. o. t. R. S. S.-S. A. S. i. S. (1995). Introductory Statistics. 158(2), 339.
Mayer, J. D., and Salovey, P. (1993). The intelligence of emotional intelligence. In: JAI.
Mayers, A. (2013). Introduction to Statistics and SPSS in Psychology (Vol. 28): Pearson Harlow, England.
McKinsey. (2018). AI adoption advances, but foundational barriers remain. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/artificial-intelligence/ai-adoption-advances-but-foundational-barriers-remain
Money, R., Newman, M., and Hanson, J. (2007). On-line interview processing. In: Google Patents.
Moon Joung, K. I. M. (2018). Group Positive Affect and Group-level Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Investigating the Substituting Role of Leader Emotional Intelligence and the Mediating Role of Affective Fit Perception. Seoul Journal of Business, 24(2), 57-76. doi:10.35152/snusjb.2018.24.1.004
Naseer, Z., Chishti, S.-u.-H., Rahman, F., and Jumani, N. B. J. I. O. J. o. E. S. (2011). Impact of Emotional Intelligence on Team Performance in Higher Education Institutes. 3(1).
Nunnally, J. C., and Bernstein, I. H. J. N. Y., NY: MacGraw-Hill. (1994). Psychological theory. 131-147.
Parboteeah, K. C., J. (2008). International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies. In. Thousand Oaks
Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/organization. doi:10.4135/9781412956246
Park, R. E. J. E. (1966). Estimation with heteroscedastic error terms. 34(4), 888.
Patel, V. L., Shortliffe, E. H., Stefanelli, M., Szolovits, P., Berthold, M. R., Bellazzi, R., and Abu-Hanna, A. J. A. i. i. m. (2009). The coming of age of artificial intelligence in medicine. 46(1), 5-17.
Pathak, M. (2015). Learning to bond. Human Capital, 18(12), 34-35.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., and Podsakoff, N. P. J. J. o. a. p. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. 88(5), 879.
Polacco, A., Backes, K. J. J. o. B., and Management. (2018). The amazon go concept: Implications, applications, and sustainability. 24(1).
Popa, C. J. B. o. t. U. o. A. S., and Agriculture, V. M. C.-N. (2011). Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture. 68(1).
Rapisarda, B. A. J. T. I. J. o. O. A. (2002). The impact of emotional intelligence on work team cohesiveness and performance. 10(4), 363-379.
Rezvani, A., Barrett, R., and Khosravi, P. J. T. P. M. A. I. J. (2019). Investigating the relationships among team emotional intelligence, trust, conflict and team performance. 25(1/2), 120-137.
Rotman, D. J. T. R. (2013). How technology is destroying jobs. 16(4), 28-35.
Salim, A., Yusuf, M., and Gunarhadi, G. J. P. o. t. I. (2017). THE APPLICATION OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM TO IDENTIFY CHILDREN WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES. 1(1).
Santos, J. R. A. J. J. o. e. (1999). Cronbach’s alpha: A tool for assessing the reliability of scales. 37(2), 1-5.
Soni, N., Sharma, E. K., Singh, N., and Kapoor, A. J. a. p. a. (2019). Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Businesses: from Research, Innovation, Market Deployment to Future Shifts in Business Models.
Stone, M., and Hirsh, H. J. A. M. (2005). Artificial intelligence: The next twenty-five years. 26(4), 85-85.
Summers, J. K., Humphrey, S. E., and Ferris, G. R. J. A. o. M. J. (2012). Team member change, flux in coordination, and performance: Effects of strategic core roles, information transfer, and cognitive ability. 55(2), 314-338.
Truong, Y., McColl, R. J. J. o. R., and Services, C. (2011). Intrinsic motivations, self-esteem, and luxury goods consumption. 18(6), 555-561.
Wadhwa, A. (2017). Imperatives for Successful Collaboration in Virtual Teams. PM World Journal, 6(11), 1-9.
Wiederhold, G. (1992). The roles of artificial intelligence in information systems. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 1(1), 35-55.
William, L. T. J. J. W. M. (2000). Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. 64(4), 912-923.
Wolff, S. B., Pescosolido, A. T., and Druskat, V. U. J. T. L. Q. (2002). Emotional intelligence as the basis of leadership emergence in self-managing teams. 13(5), 505-522.