近年來興起的創業型大學以及入世學術的討論，使得許多的大學教授們面臨繼續傳統的學術研究工作，還是轉向執行更多的產學合作計畫。本計畫的研究目的就是探討在這樣的情況底下，作為具有理性思考與反思力的教授們，要如何應付與管理這個象牙塔內的學術兩難。在理論上，我們會引用Stoke（1997）的模型，對於大學裡教授的行為做出分類，並探討其行為的動機，以及如何應付與解決來自制度上的壓力。在方法上，我們會採用質性分析的個案研究，透過對於初級與次級資料的蒐集與比較分析，分析國立清華大學的教授。

In recent years, we have seen the increasing importance of entrepreneurial university and engaged scholarship in characterizing the day-to-day activities in the world-wide ivory towers. This tendency, in turn, has given rise to institutional pressures facing by professors and researchers who need to, at worst, choose between research excellence and industrial application or, at best, search for a balanced level of engaged scholarship. The purpose of this project then is to address this dilemma of scholarship, now common to most Taiwanese university professors. On the theoretical side, we will draw on Stoke (1997) to classify the university workers into different types, based upon which will examine their motivations and behaviors. On the theoretical side, we will draw on a qualitative case study, choosing Tsing Hua University. Our research should provide important implication for research on entrepreneurial university, university-industry collaboration, academic work, as well as implications for funding policy and scholarly administration.

目錄
摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
致謝詞 III
目錄 IV
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 理論背景 3
大學的角色 3
觀念性架構 8
第三章 研究方法 10
單一個案研究 10
個案選擇 11
資料來源 13
資料分析 14
第四章 分析與討論 15
清華大學分類結果 15
清華大學教授的分類特性 18
波耳類型教授型態 21
巴斯德類型教授型態 27
愛迪生類型教授型態 31
四種類型的共通點和差異點 36
第五章 討論與建議 38
理論意涵 39
實務意涵 40
研究限制與未來研究方向 41
參考文獻 42

Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. 2002. Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48(1): 44-60.
Ambos, T. C., Mäkelä, K., Birkinshaw, J., & d'Este, P. 2008. When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8): 1424-1447.
Ankrah, S. N., Burgess, T. F., Grimshaw, P., & Shaw, N. E. 2013. Asking Both University and Industry Actors About Their Engagement in Knowledge Transfer: What Single-Group Studies of Motives Omit. Technovation, 33(2-3): 50-65.
Atkins, M. 1995. What Should We Be Assessing. Assessment for learning in higher education. London, UK: Kogan Page.
Audretsch, D. B. 2014. From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3): 313-321.
Audretsch, D., & Keilbach, M. 2004. Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies, 38(8): 949-959.
Beaudry, C., & Kananian, R. 2012. Impact of University-Industry Contracts Resulting in Patents on the Quality of Patenting in Biotechnology: 19-21. DRUID Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Behrens, T. R., & Gray, D. O. 2001. Unintended consequences of cooperative research: Impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome. Research Policy, 30(2): 179-199.
Brooks, H. 1994. The relationship between science and technology policy. Research Policy, 23(5): 477-486.
Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. 2008. University patenting and scientific productivity: a quantitative study of Italian academic inventors. European Management Review, 5(2): 91-109.
Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M., Louis, K. S., Stoto, M. A., & Wise, D. 1986. University-industry research relationships in biotechnology—Implications for the university. Science, 232(4756): 1361-1366.
Carayol, N., & Matt, M. 2004. Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory level evidence from a large European university. Research Policy, 33(8): 1081-1102.
Carayol, N., & Matt, M. 2006. Individual and collective determinants of academic scientists' productivity. Information Economics and Policy, 18(1): 55-72.
Clark, B. 1998. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Clark, B. 2001. The entrepreneurial university: new foundations for collegiality, autonomy, and achievement. Journal of the Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education. 13(2): 17-23.
Chang, Y. C., Yang, P. Y., Tsai-Lin, T. F., & Chi, H. R. 2011. How University Departments respond to the Rise of Academic Entrepreneurship? The Pasteur’s Quadrant Explanation. Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics, 11(7): 1-21.
Chang, Y. C., Yang, P. Y., Martin, B. R., Chi, H. R., & Tsai-Lin, T. F. 2016. Entrepreneurial universities and research ambidexterity. A multilevel analysis. Technovation, 54: 7-21.
Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95-120.
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. 2002. Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1): 1-23.
Cunningham, J. A., & Link, A. N. 2015. Fostering university-industry R&D collaborations in European Union countries. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4): 849-860.
Dalmarco, G., Hulsink, W., & Blois, G.V. 2018. Creating entrepreneurial universities in an emerging economy: Evidence from Brazil. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 135: 99-111.
D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. 2011. Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3): 316-339.
Degroof, J. J., & Roberts, E. B. 2004. Overcoming weak entrepreneurial infrastructures for academic spin-off ventures. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3-4): 327-352.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532-550.
Etzkowitz, H. 1998. The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8): 823-833.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2): 109-123.
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhart, C., & Terra, B. R. C. 2000. The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2): 313-330.
Etzkowitz, H. 2003. Research groups as 'quasi-firms': the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1): 109-121.
Etzkowitz, H. 2008. The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. New York, NY: Routledge.
Etzkowitz, H. 2016. The entrepreneurial university: Vision and metrics. Industry and Higher Education, 30(2): 83-97.
Fabrizio, K. R., & Di Minin, A. 2008. Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment. Research Policy, 37(5): 914-931.
Feller, I. 1990. Universities as engines of R&D-based economic growth: They think they can. Research Policy, 19(4): 335-348.
Florida, R., & Cohen, W. M. 1999. Engine or infrastructure? The university role in economic development: 589-610. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Freitas, I. M. B., Marques, R. A., & e Silva, E. M. D. P. 2013. University-industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries. Research Policy, 42(2): 443-453.
Geison, G. 1995. The Private Science of Louis Pasteur. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. 2011. 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8): 1045-1057.
Gulbrandsen, M., & Slipersæter, S. 2007. The Third Mission and The Entrepreneurial University Model. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Guenther, J., & Wagner, K. 2008. Getting out of the ivory tower – new perspectives on the entrepreneurial university. European Journal International Management, 2(4): 400-417.
Guerrero, M., Cunninghm, J., & Urbano, D. 2015. Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44(3): 748-764.
Gordon, I., Hamilton, E., & Jack, S. 2012. A study of a university-led entrepreneurship education programme for small business owner/managers. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(9-10): 767-805.
Hausman, N. 2017. University Innovation and Local Economic Growth. Discussion paper series, The Maurice Falk Institute for Economic Research in Israel.
Hughes, T. P. 1983. Networks of Power: Electrification of Western Society. 1880-1930. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Huang, K. G., & Murray, F. E. 2010. Entrepreneurial Experiments in Science Policy: Analyzing the Human Genome Project. Research Policy, 39(5): 567-582.
Hughes, A., & Kitson, M. 2012. Pathways to impact and the strategic role of universities: new evidence on the breadth and depth of university knowledge exchange in the UK and the factors constraining its development. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(3): 723-750.
Ivanova, I.A., & Leydesdorff, L. 2014. Rotational symmetry and the transformation of innovation systems in a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 86: 143-156.
Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. 2002. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Johnstone, A., & Huggins, R. 2016. Drivers of university–industry links: The case of knowledge intensive business service firms in rural locations. Regional Studies, 50(8): 1330-1345.
Kalar, B., & Antoncic, B. 2015. The entrepreneurial university, academic activities and technology and knowledge transfer in four European countries. Technovation, 36: 1-11.
Philpott, K., Dooley, L., O’Reilly, C., & Lupton, G. 2011. The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31: 161-170.
Krimsky, S. 2003. Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted the Virtue of Biomedical Research? Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Langley, A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4): 691-710.
Larsen, M., T. 2011. The implications of academic enterprise for public science: An overview of the empirical evidence. Research Policy, 40(1): 6-19.
Larty, J., Jack, S., & Lockett, N. 2016. Building regions: A resource-based view of a policy-led knowledge exchange network. Regional Studies, 51(7): 994-1007.
Lehmann, E., E. 2015. The role of universities in local and regional competitiveness. In D. B. Audretsch, A. N. Link, & M. L. Walshok (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Local Competitiveness: 211-236. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lehmann, E., E., & Menter, M. 2016. University-industry collaboration and regional wealth. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6): 1284-1307.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
Longhurst, R. 2003. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. In N. Clifford & G. Valentine (Eds.). Key Methods in Geography: 117-132. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
Lucas, R., Jr. 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1): 3-42.
Meyer, M. 2006. Are patenting scientists the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology. Research Policy, 35(10): 1646-1662.
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. 2004. The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university– industry technology transfer: A model for other OECD governments? Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1-2): 115-127.
Mowery, D. C., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. 2002. Learning to patent: Institutional experience, learning, and the characteristics of US university patents after the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992. Management Science, 48(1): 73-89.
Murray, F., & Stern, S. 2007. Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(4): 648-687.
Nelson, R. R. 2001. Observations on the post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2): 13-19.
Noble, D. F. 1977. America by Design: Science, Technology, and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism. New York, NY: Knopf.
O'Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Morse, K. P., O'Gorman, C., & Roche, F. 2007. Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Management, 37(1): 1-16.
Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Perkmann, M., King, Z., & Pavelin, S. 2011. Engaging Excellence? Effects of Faculty Quality on University Engagement with Industry. Research Policy, 40(4): 539-552.
Poyago-Theotoky, Beath, J., & Siegel, D. S. 2002. Universities and fundamental research: reflections on the growth of university-industry partnerships. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1): 10-21.
Ragin, C. C. 1987. The Comparative Methods. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Ragin, C. C., & Becker, H. S. 1992. What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Rao, C. R. 1997. Statistics and Truth: Putting Chance to Work. Singapore, World Scientific Publishing.
Rasmussen, E., Wright, M. 2015. How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(5): 782-799.
Revest, V., & Sapio, A. 2010. Financing technology-based small firms in Europe: what do we know? Small Business Economy, 39(1): 179-205.
Romer, P. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5): 1002-1037.
Rosell, C., & Agrawal, A. 2009. Have university knowledge flows narrowed? Evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 38(1): 1-13.
Rumsey, S. 2004. How to Find Information: A Guide for Researchers. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Salter, A. J., Martin, B. B., 2001. The economic benefits of publically funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy, 30: 509-532.
Sebeok, T. A., & Umiker-Sebeok, J. 1980. "You Know my Method": A Juxtaposition of Charles S. Peirce and Sherlock Holmes. Semiotica, 26(3): 203-250.
Shane, S. A. 2004. Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Shichijo, N., Sedita, S. R., & Baba, Y. 2015. How does the entrepreneurial orientation of scientists affect their scientific performance? Evidence from the Quadrant Model. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(9): 999-1013.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. & Link, A. N. 2003. Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1): 27-48.
Siegel, D. S., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. 2007. The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: Organizational and societal implications. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4): 489-504.
Siggelkow, N. 2007. Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 20-24.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. 2004. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Solow, R. 1956. A contribution to the economic growth theory. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1): 65-94.
Stephan, P. E., Gurmu, S., Sumell, A. J., & Black, G. 2007. Who's patenting in the university? Evidence from the survey of doctorate recipients. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2): 71-99.
Stokes, D. E. 1997. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, MA: Brookings Institution Press.
Tijssen, R. J. W. 2012. Co-authored research publications and strategic Analysis of public-private collaboration. Research Evaluation, 21(3): 204-215.
Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. 2013. Entrepreneurial universities: Socio-economic impacts of academic entrepreneurship in a European region. Economic Development Quarterly, 27(1): 41-56.
Van Maanen, J. 1998. Qualitative Studies of Organizations, London, UK: SAGE Publications.
Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A., 2004. Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1): 147-175.
Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Mustar, P., & Lockett, A., 2007. Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wong, P. K. 2011. Academic Entrepreneurship in Asia: The Role and Impact of Universities in National Innovation Systems. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wong, P. K., Singh, A., & Tijssen, R. 2017. Studying the Role of University in Knowledge Creation vs Commercialization Using Stokes’ Typology: Evidence from the National University of Singapore (Working Proposal). University of Singapore.
Yin, R. K. 1984. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R. 2001. Capturing technological opportunity via Japan's star scientists: Evidence from Japanese firms' biotech patents and products. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2): 37-58.
Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Armstrong, J. S. 2002. Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48(1): 138-153.