|
1. Akbari Chermahini, S., Ghanbari, A., &Ghanbari Talab, M. (2013). LEARNING STYLES AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS IN ENGLISH AS A SECOND-LANGUAGE CLASS IN IRAN. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 7(2), 322–333. 2. Alqahtani, N. D., Al-Jewair, T., Al-Moammar, K., Albarakati, S. F., &Alkofide, E. A. (2015). Live demonstration versus procedural video: A comparison of two methods for teaching an orthodontic laboratory procedure Approaches to teaching and learning. BMC Medical Education, 15(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0479-y 3. An, L., Wang, Y., &Sun, Y. (2017). Reading words or pictures: Eye movement patterns in adults and children differ by age group and receptive language ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(MAY), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00791 4. Athanasopoulos, P. (2007). Do bilinguals think differently from monolinguals ? Evidence from non-linguistic cognitive categorisation of objects in Japanese-English. Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics (17th International Symposium on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Thessaloniki 14-17 April 2005), 17(2), 338–345. 5. Atkinson, R. C., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1971). THE CONTROL PROCESSES OF SHORT-TERM MEMORY. Builder. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0871-82 6. Birulés-Muntané, J., &Soto-Faraco, S. (2016). Watching subtitled films can help learning foreign languages. PLoS ONE, 11(6), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158409 7. Boeker, M., Andel, P., Vach, W., &Frankenschmidt, A. (2013). Game-based e-learning is more effective than a conventional instructional method: A randomized controlled trial with third-year medical students. PLoS ONE, 8(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082328 8. Burt, M. (2004). Issues with outcomes in workplace ESL programs. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Adult and Vocational Education & The Institute for Work and the Economy, 1–13. 9. Casasanto, D., Boroditsky, L., Phillips, W., Greene, J., Goswami, S., Bocanegra-Thiel, S., …Gil, D. (2005). How deep are effects of language on thought? Time estimation in speakers of English, Indonesian, Greek, and Spanish. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 186–191. 10. Charles, R. L., &Nixon, J. (2019). Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: A systematic review. Applied Ergonomics, 74(September 2016), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.028 11. Eckstein, M. K., Guerra-Carrillo, B., Miller Singley, A. T., &Bunge, S. A. (2017). Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development? Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.001 12. Ekkens, K., &Winke, P. (2009). Evaluating Workplace English Language Programs. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(4), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300903063038 13. Elgart, D. B. (1975). oral reading, silent reading, and listening comprehension: a comparative study. Journal of Reading Behavior, (1), 203–207. 14. Fayaz, A., Mazahery, A., Hosseinzadeh, M., &Yazdanpanah, S. (2015). Video-based Learning Versus Traditional Method for Preclinical Course of Complete Denture Fabrication. Journal of Dentistry (Shiraz, Iran), 16(1 Suppl), 21–28. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26106631%5Cnhttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC4476117 15. Ferriol, J. L. M. (2013). Subtitle reading speeds in different languages : the case of Lethal Weapon. Quaderns, 20, 201–210. 16. Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15(4), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.001 17. Halverson, T., Estepp, J., Christensen, J., &Monnin, J. (2012). Classifying workload with eye movements in a complex task. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, (November), 168–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561012 18. Hasegawa, M., Carpenter, P. A., &Just, M. A. (2002). An fMRI study of bilingual sentence comprehension and workload. NeuroImage, 15(3), 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1001 19. Hassanabadi, H., Robatjazi, E. S., &Savoji, A. P. (2011). Cognitive consequences of segmentation and modality methods in learning from instructional animations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1481–1487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.287 20. Hercik, P., Milkova, E., &El-Hmoudova, D. (2015). Language Skills Development in E-learning Language Courses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 653–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.803 21. Hill, S. G., Iavecchia, H. P., Byers, J. C., Bittner, A. C., Zaklad, A. L., &Christ, R. E. (1992). Comparison of four subjective workload rating scales. Human Factors, 34(4), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089203400405 22. Huib, K., Rob, L., Merrienboer, V., Jeroen, J. G., Martens, R. L., &Merriënboer, J. J. G.Van. (2001). The modality effect in multimedia instructions. 23. Ipek, H. (2009). Comparing and Contrasting First and Second Language Acquisition : Implications for Language Teachers. English Language Teaching, 2(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n10p56 24. Iqbal, S. T., Zheng, X. S., &Bailey, B. P. (2004). Task-evoked pupillary response to mental workload in human-computer interaction. Extended Abstracts of the 2004 Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems - CHI ’04, 1477. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986094 25. Kim, J. Y., &Ji, Y. G. (2013). A Comparison of Subjective Mental Workload Measures in Driving Contexts. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 32(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2013.32.2.167 26. Klingner, J., Kumar, R., &Hanrahan, P. (2008). Measuring the task-evoked pupillary response with a remote eye tracker. Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications - ETRA ’08, 1(212), 69. https://doi.org/10.1145/1344471.1344489 27. Lowe, R. K. (2003). Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00018-X 28. Mapp, A. P., Ono, H., &Barbeito, R. (2003). What does the dominant eye dominate ? A brief and somewhat contentious review, 65(2), 310–317. 29. Marquart, G., Cabrall, C., &deWinter, J. (2015). Review of Eye-related Measures of Drivers’ Mental Workload. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(Ahfe), 2854–2861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.783 30. Marshall, S. (2002). The index of cognitive activity: Measuring cognitive workload. Human Factors and Power Plants, 2002. Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE 7th Conference, 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1109/HFPP.2002.1042860 31. Marshall, S. P. (2000). Method and Apparatus for Eye Tracking and Monitorng Pupl Dlation To Evaluate Cognitive Activity, (19). 32. Martí Ferriol, J. L. (2012). Velocidades de lectura de subtítulos en alemán y español de películas norteamericanas. Estudios de Traducción, 2, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_ESTR.2012.v2.38977 33. Marx, W. (2012). Assessment of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning with Dual-Task Methodology: Auditory Load and Modality Effects. European Science Editing, 38(2), 35–37. https://doi.org/10.1023/B 34. Masuda, T., Ishii, K., Miwa, K., Rashid, M., Lee, H., &Mahdi, R. (2017). One label or two? Linguistic influences on the similarity judgment of objects between English and Japanese speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(SEP), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01637 35. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning. Multi-Media Learning, 2, 318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80005-6 36. Mayer, Richard E. (2010). Unique contributions of eye-tracking research to the study of learning with graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.012 37. Miller, G. A. (1956). The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limites on out Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review, 65(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0043158 38. Miller, S. (2001). Workload measures. The University of Iowa, (August), 1–65. 39. Mitterer, H., &McQueen, J. M. (2009). Foreign subtitles help but native-language subtitles harm foreign speech perception. PLoS ONE, 4(11), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007785 40. Molina, A. I., Navarro, Ó., Ortega, M., &Lacruz, M. (2018). Evaluating multimedia learning materials in primary education using eye tracking. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 59(January), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.02.004 41. Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., &Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.2.319 42. Palinko, O., Kun, A. L., Shyrokov, A., &Heeman, P. (2010). Estimating cognitive load using remote eye tracking in a driving simulator. Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications - ETRA ’10, 141. https://doi.org/10.1145/1743666.1743701 43. Perani, D., &Abutalebi, J. (2005). The neural basis of first and second language processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15(2), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.007 44. Psacharopoulos, G., Montenegro, C. E., &Patrinos, H. A. (2017). Education Financing Priorities in Developing Countries. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration, 31(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00161.x 45. Ragab, N. (2016). Efficacy of Preferred Learning Styles and Teaching Methods of Post Graduate Nursing Students Enrolled In a Master ’ s Degree Program on Exam Achievements, 5(3), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.9790/1959-0503060820 46. Raleigh, M. F., Wilson, G. A., Moss, D. A., Reineke-Piper, K. A., Walden, J., Fisher, D. J., …Zakrajsek, T. (2018). Same content, different methods: Comparing lecture, engaged classroom, and simulation. Family Medicine, 50(2), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2018.222922 47. Reid, G. B., &Nygren, T. E. (1988). THE SUBJECTIVE YORKLOAD ASSESSUENT TECHNIQUE: A SCALING PROCEDURE FOR HEASURING MENTAL WORKLOAD. Advances in Psychology, 52, 185–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62387-0 48. Ross, N. M., &Kowler, E. (2013). Eye movements while viewing narrated, captioned, and silent videos. Journal of Vision, 13(4), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.4.1 49. Savoji, A. P., Hassanabadi, H., &Fasihipour, Z. (2011). The modality effect in learner-paced multimedia learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1488–1493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.288 50. Schwalm, M., Keinath, A., &Zimmer, H. D. (2008). Pupillometry as a method for measuring mental workload within a simulated driving task. Human Factors for Assistance and Automation, (January), 1–13. 51. Skirgård, H., Roberts, S. G., &Yencken, L. (2017). Why are some languages confused for others? Investigating data from the great language game. PLoS ONE (Vol. 12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165934 52. Sorden, S. (2012). The cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Handbook of Educational Theories. Charlotte, NC: …, (July). https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09358129 53. Stiller, K. D., Freitag, A., Zinnbauer, P., &Freitag, C. (2009). How pacing of multimedia instructions can influence modality effects: A case of superiority of visual texts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 184–203. 54. Sweller, J., Merriënboer, J. J. G.Van, &Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design.pdf. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. 55. Szarkowska, A., &Gerber-Morón, O. (2018). Viewers can keep up with fast subtitles: Evidence from eye movements. PLoS ONE, 13(6), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199331 56. Tabbers, H., Martens, R., &Merriënboer, J.Van. (2000). Multimedia instructions and Cognitive Load Theory : Education, 1–10. 57. van derWel, P., &vanSteenbergen, H. (2018). Pupil dilation as an index of effort in cognitive control tasks: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1432-y 58. vanGog, T., &Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.009 59. Vulchanova, M., Aurstad, L. M. G., Kvitnes, I. E. N., &Eshuis, H. (2015). As naturalistic as it gets: Subtitles in the English classroom in Norway. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(JAN), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01510 60. Wang, C. Y., Tsai, M. J., &Tsai, C. C. (2016). Multimedia recipe reading: Predicting learning outcomes and diagnosing cooking interest using eye-tracking measures. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.064 61. Yang, T. X., Allen, R. J., Yu, Q. J., &Chan, R. C. K. (2015). The influence of input and output modality on following instructions in working memory. Scientific Reports, 5, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17657 62. http://www.human-memory.net/types_sensory.html 63. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2018/08/28/2003699330 64. https://www.hongkongfp.com/2018/08/31/taiwan-make-english-official-language-next-year-says-official/ 65. https://www.bbcgoodfood.com/recipes/collection/easy-baking 66. https://www.keithv.com/software/nasatlx/nasatlx.html
|