帳號:guest(3.17.157.165)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):蔡馨慧
作者(外文):Tsai, Hsin-Hui
論文名稱(中文):風險在內部控制中被如何衡量?高風險投資專案的調查
論文名稱(外文):How is Risk Measured in Internal Control? A Survey of High-risk Investment Project
指導教授(中文):謝佩芳
指導教授(外文):Hsieh, Pei-Fang
口試委員(中文):張焯然
王馨徽
謝佩芳
口試委員(外文):Chang, Jow-Ran
Wang, Shin-Huei
Hsieh, Pei-Fang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:國際專業管理碩士班
學號:105077505
出版年(民國):107
畢業學年度:106
語文別:英文
論文頁數:16
中文關鍵詞:風險管理風險內部控制程序正義
外文關鍵詞:risk managementriskinternal controlprocedural justice
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:42
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:16
  • 收藏收藏:0
風險是影響財務成效的關鍵因素之一,能很大程度地影響投資者的收入。本文彙整過去文獻討論高科技產業及高風險投資中,不同情況下風險的衡量指標及其重要性。本文也根據內部控制的觀點,從法律和會計角度出發、探討高風險投資評估中,適用之風險衡量和管理指標。
Risk is a critical element in financial results which have much impact on investors’ incomes. This survey paper discusses risk’s intrinsic traits, importance, and measurements under different circumstances in high-tech industries and/or high-risk investments. Internal control is proposed as an applicable risk-measuring and managing tool from legal and accounting views herein.
Catalogue:
1. Introduction P. 1
2. Literature Review P. 2
I. The Reasons of Internal Control Being Applied. P. 2
(i.) Diversified characteristics of risk. P. 2
(ii.) Risk-considering approaches for companies with higher risks to assess investments. P. 2
(iii.) Application of internal control on measuring risks. P. 4
II. The Characteristics of Internal Control—Its Importance and Monitoring P. 5
(i.) Why internal control is important. P. 5
(ii.) The monitoring power over internal control. P. 5
III. How Risks Are Affected by Internal Control. P. 8
IV. Specific Examples of Internal Control Measuring Risks. P. 9
(i.) Procedural justice reducing the risk of excessive budgetary slack. P. 9
(ii.) Budget as a tool implied in MCS to benefit creativity. P. 11

3. Conclusion P. 13
4. Reference P. 16



Reference:
Azam, M. R., 2018. Theory Application: Why People Commit Fraud. International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, 5(1), pp. 54-65.
Bancel, F. & Tierny, J., 2011. Valuing Companies with Cash-Flow@Risk. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 23(2), pp. 85-93.
Chong, V. K. & Strauss, R., 2017. Participative Budgeting: The Effects of Budget Emphasis, Information Asymmetry and Procedural Justice on Slack – Additional Evidence. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 1, pp. 181-220.
Cools, M. & Stouthuysen, K. & Van den Abbeele, A., 2017. Management Control for Stimulating Different Types of Creativity: The Role of Budgets. Journal of Management Accounting Research, Fall 2017, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 1-21.
Hördahl, P. & Vestin, D., 2005. Interpreting Implied Risk-Neutral Densities: The Role of Risk Premia. Review of Finance, 9(1), pp. 97-137.
Krishnan, J. (2005.) Audit Committee Quality and Internal Control: An Empirical Analysis. The Accounting Review, 80(2), pp. 649-675.
Lau, C. M. & Eggleton, I. R. C., 2003. The influence of information asymmetry and budget emphasis on the relationship between participation and slack. Accounting and Business Research, 33(2), pp. 91-104.
Song, N., Xie, Y., Ching, W. K., & Siu, T. K., 2016. A real option approach for investment opportunity valuation. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization. 13(3), pp. 1213-1235.
Spira, Laura F. & Page, M., 2003. Risk management: The reinvention of internal control and the changing role of internal audit, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16(4), pp.640-661.
Tédongap, R., 2015. Consumption Volatility and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns. Review of Finance, 19(1), pp. 367-405.
Tsai, C. H., 2015. The Failure of Corporate Internal Controls and Internal Information Sharing: A Conceptual Framework for Taiwan. Hong Kong Law Journal, Vo. 45, Part 2, pp. 469-497.
Unsworth, K., 2001. Unpacking Creativity. Academy of Management Review. 26(2), pp. 286-297.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *