|
中文資料
書籍
王泰銓(2009)，《歐洲事業法(二)-歐洲競爭規範》，五南圖書。
范建得、莊春發(1999)，《公平交易法(2)-不公平競爭》，二版，台北市:漢興書局。
范建得、莊春發(1999)，《公平交易法-獨佔、結合及聯合市場力量之管制》，版，台北市:漢興書局。
白艷(2010)，《歐盟競爭法平行論:理論與實踐》，第一版，北京:法律出版社。
賴源河編審(2005)，《公平交易法新論》，三版，台北市:元照出版有限公司。
期刊
Arndt Teichmann、吳秀明譯(1997)，〈支配市場事業及市場強勢事業之阻礙競爭與差別待遇行為〉，《公平交易季刊》，第五卷第三期，頁137-150。
王文宇(2018)，〈分析商業交易常用的經濟概念〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，No. 278，頁100-120。
石亞瑩(2015)，〈國際法視野中的軟法－從軟法與條約間關係的視角〉，《國際經濟法學刊》，第22卷第1期，頁260-286。
朱博湧、鄧美貞、黃基鴻(2005)，〈垂直整合與虛擬整合商業模式之績效比較:台灣積體電路產業實證〉，《Chiao Da Management Review》，Vol. 25 No. 1, 頁1-27。
吳秀明、沈麗玉(2014)，〈競爭法制革新之整體規劃與藍圖〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，No. 228，頁141-174。
李綱信(2012)，〈歐美競爭法之初步研析〉，《國家發展委員會經濟發產處-經濟研究》，第十二期，頁341-368。
吳佳蓁(2018)，〈Intel案與審理原則之轉變?!〉，《公平交易通訊》，No.079，頁18-20。
林亭汝、謝光偉、游雅雯(2007)，〈以品牌權益觀點探討B2B品牌經營之關鍵成功要素〉，《亞洲經濟管理評論》，第十一卷第一期，頁87-118。
陳志民(2018)，〈從2017年歐盟盟法院Intel案判決，談公平法審理折扣(讓)案件之法律經濟分析架構及政策啟示〉，《公平交易通訊》，2018年9月號No. 083，頁1-2。
陳琪(1993)，〈美國反托拉斯法之簡介〉，《公平交易季刊》，第一卷第四期，頁45-67。
黃銘傑(2004)，〈公平交易委員會搭售規範之弔詭(下)〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，No. 110，頁160-171。
楊智傑(2010)，〈智慧財產權差別取價之研究－以藥物專利與電影著作為例〉，《財產法與經濟法》，24期，頁15。
鄧峰(2013)，〈同源分化和同案異判-Intel忠誠反利案的國際比較〉，《北大法律評論》，第14卷第2輯，頁243-286。
謝國廉(2012)，〈歐盟競爭法處理濫用獨占地位爭議之新標準-以英特爾案為中心〉，《政大智慧財產評論第十卷第二期》，頁1-32。
薛強(2009)，〈反壟斷視野下的企業價格行為研究〉，《中國物價》，2009年8月，頁11-15。
劉雅甜、林平、吳緒亮(2019)，〈忠誠折扣的反壟斷經濟分析〉，《經濟與管理研究》，第40卷第2期，頁70-81。
學位論文
丁丞康(2015)。《公平交易法對於事業贈品贈獎促銷行為規範之研究》，國立政治大學法學院碩士在職專班碩士論文（未出版），台北。
黃家蔚(2004)。《促銷方式、產品涉入程度與促銷情境對消費者品牌評價與購買意願之影響》，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文（未出版），台南。
黃靖民(2015)。《論競爭法對資訊產業濫用優勢地位之判斷-以微軟及Google於美國、歐盟法之法律爭議經濟分析反思我國法制》，東吳大學法學院法律學系碩士論文（未出版），台北。
網路資料
牛曰正、吳秀明、謝竺珊、朱基一(2018)，〈公平交易法上「安全港(safe harbor)」之研究〉，《107年委託研究報告3》，公平交易委員會委託研究PG10705-0015，頁62-63，載於: https://www.ftc.gov.tw/
陳志民、陳和全、陳昭文、劉妤珊(2011)，〈單方行為之研究〉，《100 年委託研究報告3》，公平交易委員會委託研究報告FTC-100-G03，頁1-185，載於: https://www.ftc.gov.tw/
葉高芬(2010)，〈歐美忠實折扣比較研究及其對中國的啟示〉，《比較法研究》，第5期，載於: http://old.civillaw.com.cn/
經濟部技術處/財團法人工業技術研究院(2018)，〈台灣半導體產業年鑑〉，頁4-1，載於: https://www.itis.org.tw/default.aspx
半導體全球影響報告:開創超級互聯時代，全球半導體聯盟網站，載於: http://www.semismatter.com/
公平交易委員會網站，https://www.ftc.gov.tw/internet/main/index.aspx
外文資料
Books
Ariel Ezrachi (2008). EC COMPETITION LAW, Hart Publishing U.S.A.
Alison Jones & Brenda Sufrin (2008). EC COMPETITION LAW- TEXT, CASES, AND MATERIALS, Third Edition, Oxford University Press Inc. U.S.A.
Daniel J. Gifford & Robert T. Kudrle (2015). THE ATLANTIC DIVIDE IN ANTITRUST: AN EXAMINATION OF US AND EU COMPETITION POLICY, University of Chicago Press, U.S.A.
Tony Yeshin (2006), SALES PROMOTION, Thomson Learning, 116-183
Periodicals
Assaf Eilat & David Gilo & Guy Sagi, Loyalty discounts, dealing and bundling: rule of reason, quasi-per-se, price-cost test, or something in between? Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 1-36 (2016)
Alberto Heimler, Below-Cost Pricing and Loyalty-Inducing Discounts: Are They Restrictive and, If So, When? Competition Policy International, Vol. 1, No. 2, 148-172 (2009)
Ahlborn Christian & Bailey David, Discounts, Rebates and Selective Pricing by Dominant Firms: a Trans-Atlantic Comparison, European Competition Journal, July 2006, Vol. 2, 101-143 (2006)
Crane, Daniel A., Bargaining over Loyalty, Tex L. Rev. 92, no. 2, 253-301 (2013)
Daniel J. Gifford & Robert T. Kudrle, The Law and Economics of Price Discrimination in Modern Economies: Time for Reconciliation? Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-21 (2008) Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=1188722
Joshua D. Wright, An Antitrust Analysis of the Federal Trade Commission’s Complaint against Intel, ICLE Antitrust and Competition Policy White Paper Series, 10-27 (2010)
Pablo Ibáñez Colomo, Intel and Article 102 TFEU Case Law: Making Sense of a Perpetual Controversy. LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers (2014) Available at www.lse.ac.uk/collections/law/wps/wps.htm
D. D. Sokol, Troubled Waters between U.S. and European Antitrust, 115 Mich. L. Rev. 955 (2017) Available at http://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol115/iss6/10
Elhauge, Einer R., How Loyalty Discounts Can Perversely Discourage Discounting, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, Vol. 5, No. 1, (2009) Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1275529
Eilmansberger Thomas, Dominance—the Lost Child? How Effects-Based Rules could and should Change Dominance Analysis, European Competition Journal, July 2006, Vol. 2, 15-29 (2006)
Frank P. Maier-Rigaud, Article 82 Rebates: Four Common Fallacies, European Competition Journal, July 2006, Vol. 2, 85-100 (2006)
Massimiliano Kadar, The Meaning of “Anticompetitive Effects” Under Article 102 TFEU, CPI Antitrust Chronicle (2016)
Marinova, Miroslava, Should the rejection of the “as efficient competitor” test in the Intel and Post Danmark II judgements lead to dismissal of the effect-based approach? European Competition Journal; Aug-Dec2016, Vol. 12 Issue 2/3, 387-408 (2016)
Paul Nihoul, The Ruling of the General Court in Intel: Towards the End of an Effect-based Approach in European Competition Law? Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, Vol. 5, No. 8 (2014)
Venit, James S., The judgment of the European Court of Justice in Intel v Commission: a procedural answer to a substantive question? European Competition Journal; Aug-Dec2017, Vol. 13 Issue 2/3, 172-198 (2017)
Wouter P. J. Wils, The Judgment of the EU General Court in Intel and the So-Called 'More Economic Approach' to Abuse of Dominance, World Competition: Law and Economics Review, Vol. 37, No. 4, 434 (2014)
Internet Sources
Damien Geradin (2015). Loyalty Rebates after Intel: Time for the European Court of Justice to Overrule Hoffman-La Roche, available on the Social Science Research Network at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2586584
Faella, Gianluca (2007). The Antitrust Assessment of Loyalty Discounts and Rebates, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1079504
Jonathan M. Jacobson (2010). A Note on Loyalty Discount, available at https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publishing/antitrust_source/Jun10_FullSource6_24.authcheckdam.pdf
Mark Taylor & Jürgen Schindler (2017). Intel: Clarification or Contradiction? available at http://www.antitrustsource.com
Richard A. Duncan, Brian S. McCormaca (2008), Loyalty & Fidelity Discounts & Rebates in the U.S. & EU: Will Divergence Occur over Cost-based Standards of Liability? 9 Sedona Conf. J. 133, available at https://thesedonaconference.org/node/8747
Slaughter and May (2016). An Overview of the EU Competition Rules
The Unilateral Conduct Working Group (2009). Report on the Analysis of Loyalty Discounts and Rebates under Unilateral Conduct Laws, Presented at the 8th Annual Conference of the ICN Zurich, Switzerland, available at https://centrocedec.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/report-on-the-analysis-of-loyalty-discounts-and-rebates-2009.pdf
Vlatka Butorac Malnar & Ivana Kunda (2018). EU COMPETITION LAW IN THE DIGITAL ERA: WHAT TO TELL ABOUT INTEL? Available at https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/eclic/article/view/7098
Settlement Agreement between Advanced Micro Devices Inc. and Intel Corporation https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/50863/000005086309000213/exh101.htm
Cases
U.S.
Masimo Corp. v. Tyco Health Care Grp. (9th Cir. 2009);
Natchitoches Parish Hosp. Serv. Dist. v. Tyco Int’l, Ltd.(2009);
Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp.(2000)
Virgin Atl. Airways Ltd. v. British Airways(2001)
Smith Wholesale Co. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.(2007)
Se. Mo. Hosp. v. C.R. Bard, Inc.(2011)
Church & Dwight Co. v. Mayer Labs., Inc.(2012)
ZF Meritor, LLC v. Eaton Corp., 696 F.3d 254 (3d Cir. 2012)
Eisai Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC, No. 14-2017, 2016 WL 2600321 (3d Cir. May 4, 2016)
SmithKline Corp. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 575 F.2d 1056 (3rd Cir. 1978)
LePage's Inc. v. 3M , 324 F.2d 141 (3rd Cir. 2003)
E.U.
Case 85/76, Hoffmann-La Roche v. Commission, 1979 E.C.R. 00461
Case T-228/97, Irish Sugar plc v. Commission [1997] ECR II-2969, [1999] 5 CMLR
Case T-203/1, Michelin v. Commission, 2003 E.C.R. II-4071
C-95/04 P, British Airways v. Commission, ECLI:EU:C:2007
COMP/C-3/37.990—Intel, Commission Decision (Summary), 2009 O.J. (C 227) 13.
Case T-286/09, Intel Inc. v. European Commission 2014
Case C-413/14 P, Intel Corp. v. Commission, ECLI:EU:C: 2016:788 (AG Oct. 20, 2016)
Case C-413/14 P, Intel Corp. v. Commission, ECLI:EU:C:2017:632 (CJ Sept. 6, 2017)
Case C-23/14, Post Denmark A/S v. Konkurrencerådet, ECLI:EU:C:2015:651 (CJ Oct. 6, 2015)
Internet Website
Court of Justice of the European Union, available at https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/j_6/en/
Federal Trade of Commission, available at http://www.ftc.gov/
OECD, Fidelity rebates and competition JUNE 2016 SESSION DOCUMENTATION, available at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/fidelity-rebates.htm
The United States Department of Justice, available at http://www.justice.gov/
Intel Corporation Press Room Website, available at https://www.intel.com/pressroom/legal/regulatory.htm#top
American Marketing Association, available at https://www.ama.org/the-definition-of-marketing/
|